* [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 @ 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-26 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in CCI/MCPM support to shared APMU code [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: Add CCI nodes to r8a7790 DTS Add code to interface to the CCI driver and MCPM to mach-shmobile. The shared APMU SMP code is extended to share CPU power domain power on and off support via both regular SMP hooks and MCPM callbacks. It is worth noting that the APMU code is used for multiple SoCs including the Dual core CA15 r8a7791 where this MCPM support is not needed and the big.LITTLE r8a7790 that needs to program the CCI. Previously posted as "[PATCH] ARM: shmobile: MCPM and CCI prototype". Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> --- Written against renesas.git tag renesas-devel-v3.14-rc4-20140226 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 28 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S | 7 + arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h | 1 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 @ 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-26 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in CCI/MCPM support to shared APMU code [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: Add CCI nodes to r8a7790 DTS Add code to interface to the CCI driver and MCPM to mach-shmobile. The shared APMU SMP code is extended to share CPU power domain power on and off support via both regular SMP hooks and MCPM callbacks. It is worth noting that the APMU code is used for multiple SoCs including the Dual core CA15 r8a7791 where this MCPM support is not needed and the big.LITTLE r8a7790 that needs to program the CCI. Previously posted as "[PATCH] ARM: shmobile: MCPM and CCI prototype". Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> --- Written against renesas.git tag renesas-devel-v3.14-rc4-20140226 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 28 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S | 7 + arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h | 1 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in MCPM and CCI to APMU code 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-26 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> Add MCPM and CCI hooks to the shared APMU code to allow multicluster operation on r8a7790. Tested with SMP boot and CPU Hotplug on r8a7790 Lager. Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> --- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S | 7 + arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h | 1 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@ ENTRY(shmobile_invalidate_start) b secondary_startup ENDPROC(shmobile_invalidate_start) +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM +ENTRY(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry) + bl v7_invalidate_l1 + b mcpm_entry_point +ENDPROC(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry) +#endif + /* * Reset vector for secondary CPUs. * This will be mapped at address 0 by SBAR register. --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern void shmobile_smp_hook(unsigned i unsigned long arg); extern int shmobile_smp_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu); extern void shmobile_invalidate_start(void); +extern void shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry(void); extern void shmobile_boot_scu(void); extern void shmobile_smp_scu_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus); extern void shmobile_smp_scu_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu); --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -7,22 +7,28 @@ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as * published by the Free Software Foundation. */ +#include <linux/arm-cci.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/ioport.h> +#include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/smp.h> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/cp15.h> +#include <asm/mcpm.h> #include <asm/smp_plat.h> #include <mach/common.h> -static struct { +static struct apmu_cpu { void __iomem *iomem; int bit; } apmu_cpus[CONFIG_NR_CPUS]; +#define MAX_NR_CLUSTERS 2 +static struct apmu_cpu *apmu_clst2cpu[MAX_NR_CLUSTERS][CONFIG_NR_CPUS]; + #define WUPCR_OFFS 0x10 #define PSTR_OFFS 0x40 #define CPUNCR_OFFS(n) (0x100 + (0x10 * (n))) @@ -69,14 +75,23 @@ static int apmu_wrap(int cpu, int (*fn)( static void apmu_init_cpu(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit) { + u32 id; + int mcpm_cpu, mcpm_cluster; + if (apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem) return; apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem = ioremap_nocache(res->start, resource_size(res)); apmu_cpus[cpu].bit = bit; - pr_debug("apmu ioremap %d %d 0x%08x 0x%08x\n", cpu, bit, - res->start, resource_size(res)); + id = cpu_logical_map(cpu); + mcpm_cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(id, 0); + mcpm_cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(id, 1); + + pr_debug("apmu ioremap %d %d %pr %d %d\n", + cpu, bit, res, mcpm_cluster, mcpm_cpu); + + apmu_clst2cpu[mcpm_cluster][mcpm_cpu] = &apmu_cpus[cpu]; } static struct { @@ -93,7 +108,8 @@ static struct { } }; -static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit)) +static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit), + bool allow_multicluster) { u32 id; int k; @@ -110,7 +126,8 @@ static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(st is_allowed = true; } } - if (!is_allowed) + + if (!allow_multicluster && !is_allowed) continue; for (bit = 0; bit < ARRAY_SIZE(apmu_config[k].cpus); bit++) { @@ -124,14 +141,19 @@ static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(st } } +static int __init shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init(void); + void __init shmobile_smp_apmu_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) { /* install boot code shared by all CPUs */ shmobile_boot_fn = virt_to_phys(shmobile_smp_boot); shmobile_boot_arg = MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK; - /* perform per-cpu setup */ - apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu); + /* allow multi-cluster operation in case CCI is detected */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_CCI) && !shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init()) + apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu, true); + else + apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu, false); } int shmobile_smp_apmu_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) @@ -192,4 +214,79 @@ int shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(unsigned { return apmu_wrap(cpu, apmu_power_off_poll); } +#else +#define shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_die() shmobile_smp_sleep() +static inline int shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(void) { return -ENOTSUPP; } #endif + +#if defined(CONFIG_MCPM) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_CCI) +static void __naked apmu_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level) +{ + asm volatile ("cmp r0, #1\n" + "bxne lr\n" + "b cci_enable_port_for_self "); +} + +static int apmu_power_up(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) +{ + struct apmu_cpu *ac = apmu_clst2cpu[cluster][cpu]; + if (!ac) + return -EINVAL; + + shmobile_smp_hook(ac - &apmu_cpus[0], + virt_to_phys(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry), 0); + + return apmu_wrap(ac - &apmu_cpus[0], apmu_power_on); +} + +static void apmu_power_down(void) +{ + shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_die(smp_processor_id()); +} + +static int apmu_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) +{ + struct apmu_cpu *ac = apmu_clst2cpu[cluster][cpu]; + int ret = -EINVAL; + + if (ac) + ret = shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(ac - &apmu_cpus[0]); + + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; +} + +static const struct mcpm_platform_ops apmu_pm_power_ops = { + .power_up = apmu_power_up, + .power_down = apmu_power_down, + .power_down_finish = apmu_power_down_finish, +}; + +static int __init shmobile_smp_apmu_mcpm_hook(void) +{ + int ret; + + mcpm_smp_set_ops(); + + ret = mcpm_platform_register(&apmu_pm_power_ops); + if (!ret) { + if (cci_probed()) + mcpm_sync_init(apmu_power_up_setup); + + pr_info("APMU MCPM power management initialized\n"); + } + return ret; +} +#else +static inline int shmobile_smp_apmu_mcpm_hook(void) { return 0; } +#endif + +static int __init shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init(void) +{ + struct device_node *node; + + node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cci-400"); + if (node && of_device_is_available(node)) + return shmobile_smp_apmu_mcpm_hook(); + + return -ENODEV; +} --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ void shmobile_smp_hook(unsigned int cpu, shmobile_smp_fn[cpu] = fn; shmobile_smp_arg[cpu] = arg; flush_cache_all(); + + sync_cache_w(&shmobile_smp_mpidr[cpu]); + sync_cache_w(&shmobile_smp_fn[cpu]); + sync_cache_w(&shmobile_smp_arg[cpu]); } #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in MCPM and CCI to APMU code @ 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-26 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> Add MCPM and CCI hooks to the shared APMU code to allow multicluster operation on r8a7790. Tested with SMP boot and CPU Hotplug on r8a7790 Lager. Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> --- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S | 7 + arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h | 1 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@ ENTRY(shmobile_invalidate_start) b secondary_startup ENDPROC(shmobile_invalidate_start) +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM +ENTRY(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry) + bl v7_invalidate_l1 + b mcpm_entry_point +ENDPROC(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry) +#endif + /* * Reset vector for secondary CPUs. * This will be mapped at address 0 by SBAR register. --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern void shmobile_smp_hook(unsigned i unsigned long arg); extern int shmobile_smp_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu); extern void shmobile_invalidate_start(void); +extern void shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry(void); extern void shmobile_boot_scu(void); extern void shmobile_smp_scu_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus); extern void shmobile_smp_scu_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu); --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -7,22 +7,28 @@ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as * published by the Free Software Foundation. */ +#include <linux/arm-cci.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/ioport.h> +#include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/smp.h> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/cp15.h> +#include <asm/mcpm.h> #include <asm/smp_plat.h> #include <mach/common.h> -static struct { +static struct apmu_cpu { void __iomem *iomem; int bit; } apmu_cpus[CONFIG_NR_CPUS]; +#define MAX_NR_CLUSTERS 2 +static struct apmu_cpu *apmu_clst2cpu[MAX_NR_CLUSTERS][CONFIG_NR_CPUS]; + #define WUPCR_OFFS 0x10 #define PSTR_OFFS 0x40 #define CPUNCR_OFFS(n) (0x100 + (0x10 * (n))) @@ -69,14 +75,23 @@ static int apmu_wrap(int cpu, int (*fn)( static void apmu_init_cpu(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit) { + u32 id; + int mcpm_cpu, mcpm_cluster; + if (apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem) return; apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem = ioremap_nocache(res->start, resource_size(res)); apmu_cpus[cpu].bit = bit; - pr_debug("apmu ioremap %d %d 0x%08x 0x%08x\n", cpu, bit, - res->start, resource_size(res)); + id = cpu_logical_map(cpu); + mcpm_cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(id, 0); + mcpm_cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(id, 1); + + pr_debug("apmu ioremap %d %d %pr %d %d\n", + cpu, bit, res, mcpm_cluster, mcpm_cpu); + + apmu_clst2cpu[mcpm_cluster][mcpm_cpu] = &apmu_cpus[cpu]; } static struct { @@ -93,7 +108,8 @@ static struct { } }; -static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit)) +static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit), + bool allow_multicluster) { u32 id; int k; @@ -110,7 +126,8 @@ static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(st is_allowed = true; } } - if (!is_allowed) + + if (!allow_multicluster && !is_allowed) continue; for (bit = 0; bit < ARRAY_SIZE(apmu_config[k].cpus); bit++) { @@ -124,14 +141,19 @@ static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(st } } +static int __init shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init(void); + void __init shmobile_smp_apmu_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) { /* install boot code shared by all CPUs */ shmobile_boot_fn = virt_to_phys(shmobile_smp_boot); shmobile_boot_arg = MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK; - /* perform per-cpu setup */ - apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu); + /* allow multi-cluster operation in case CCI is detected */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_CCI) && !shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init()) + apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu, true); + else + apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu, false); } int shmobile_smp_apmu_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) @@ -192,4 +214,79 @@ int shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(unsigned { return apmu_wrap(cpu, apmu_power_off_poll); } +#else +#define shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_die() shmobile_smp_sleep() +static inline int shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(void) { return -ENOTSUPP; } #endif + +#if defined(CONFIG_MCPM) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_CCI) +static void __naked apmu_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level) +{ + asm volatile ("cmp r0, #1\n" + "bxne lr\n" + "b cci_enable_port_for_self "); +} + +static int apmu_power_up(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) +{ + struct apmu_cpu *ac = apmu_clst2cpu[cluster][cpu]; + if (!ac) + return -EINVAL; + + shmobile_smp_hook(ac - &apmu_cpus[0], + virt_to_phys(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry), 0); + + return apmu_wrap(ac - &apmu_cpus[0], apmu_power_on); +} + +static void apmu_power_down(void) +{ + shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_die(smp_processor_id()); +} + +static int apmu_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) +{ + struct apmu_cpu *ac = apmu_clst2cpu[cluster][cpu]; + int ret = -EINVAL; + + if (ac) + ret = shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(ac - &apmu_cpus[0]); + + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; +} + +static const struct mcpm_platform_ops apmu_pm_power_ops = { + .power_up = apmu_power_up, + .power_down = apmu_power_down, + .power_down_finish = apmu_power_down_finish, +}; + +static int __init shmobile_smp_apmu_mcpm_hook(void) +{ + int ret; + + mcpm_smp_set_ops(); + + ret = mcpm_platform_register(&apmu_pm_power_ops); + if (!ret) { + if (cci_probed()) + mcpm_sync_init(apmu_power_up_setup); + + pr_info("APMU MCPM power management initialized\n"); + } + return ret; +} +#else +static inline int shmobile_smp_apmu_mcpm_hook(void) { return 0; } +#endif + +static int __init shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init(void) +{ + struct device_node *node; + + node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cci-400"); + if (node && of_device_is_available(node)) + return shmobile_smp_apmu_mcpm_hook(); + + return -ENODEV; +} --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ void shmobile_smp_hook(unsigned int cpu, shmobile_smp_fn[cpu] = fn; shmobile_smp_arg[cpu] = arg; flush_cache_all(); + + sync_cache_w(&shmobile_smp_mpidr[cpu]); + sync_cache_w(&shmobile_smp_fn[cpu]); + sync_cache_w(&shmobile_smp_arg[cpu]); } #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in MCPM and CCI to APMU code 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-28 4:08 ` Nicolas Pitre -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2014-02-28 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Magnus Damm wrote: > From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> > > Add MCPM and CCI hooks to the shared APMU code to allow > multicluster operation on r8a7790. Tested with SMP boot > and CPU Hotplug on r8a7790 Lager. > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> > --- > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S | 7 + > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h | 1 > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 > 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S > +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 > @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@ ENTRY(shmobile_invalidate_start) > b secondary_startup > ENDPROC(shmobile_invalidate_start) > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM > +ENTRY(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry) > + bl v7_invalidate_l1 > + b mcpm_entry_point > +ENDPROC(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry) > +#endif You could get rid of this and shmobile_invalidate_start by simply adding a shmobile specific entry in arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S alongside the other __v7_*_setup functions. > + > /* > * Reset vector for secondary CPUs. > * This will be mapped at address 0 by SBAR register. > --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h > +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern void shmobile_smp_hook(unsigned i > unsigned long arg); > extern int shmobile_smp_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu); > extern void shmobile_invalidate_start(void); > +extern void shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry(void); > extern void shmobile_boot_scu(vonid); > extern void shmobile_smp_scu_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus); > extern void shmobile_smp_scu_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu); > --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c > +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 > @@ -7,22 +7,28 @@ > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > * published by the Free Software Foundation. > */ > +#include <linux/arm-cci.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > #include <linux/ioport.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/of_address.h> > #include <linux/smp.h> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h> > #include <asm/cp15.h> > +#include <asm/mcpm.h> > #include <asm/smp_plat.h> > #include <mach/common.h> > > -static struct { > +static struct apmu_cpu { > void __iomem *iomem; > int bit; > } apmu_cpus[CONFIG_NR_CPUS]; > > +#define MAX_NR_CLUSTERS 2 This is defined in mcpm.h already. > +static struct apmu_cpu *apmu_clst2cpu[MAX_NR_CLUSTERS][CONFIG_NR_CPUS]; > + > #define WUPCR_OFFS 0x10 > #define PSTR_OFFS 0x40 > #define CPUNCR_OFFS(n) (0x100 + (0x10 * (n))) > @@ -69,14 +75,23 @@ static int apmu_wrap(int cpu, int (*fn)( > > static void apmu_init_cpu(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit) > { > + u32 id; > + int mcpm_cpu, mcpm_cluster; > + > if (apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem) > return; > > apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem = ioremap_nocache(res->start, resource_size(res)); > apmu_cpus[cpu].bit = bit; > > - pr_debug("apmu ioremap %d %d 0x%08x 0x%08x\n", cpu, bit, > - res->start, resource_size(res)); > + id = cpu_logical_map(cpu); > + mcpm_cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(id, 0); > + mcpm_cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(id, 1); You should consider validating those values making sure they're lower than CONFIG_NR_CPUS and MAX_NR_CLUSTERS respectively. And declaring them as unsigned. > + > + pr_debug("apmu ioremap %d %d %pr %d %d\n", > + cpu, bit, res, mcpm_cluster, mcpm_cpu); > + > + apmu_clst2cpu[mcpm_cluster][mcpm_cpu] = &apmu_cpus[cpu]; > } > > static struct { > @@ -93,7 +108,8 @@ static struct { > } > }; > > -static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit)) > +static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit), > + bool allow_multicluster) > { > u32 id; > int k; > @@ -110,7 +126,8 @@ static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(st > is_allowed = true; > } > } > - if (!is_allowed) > + > + if (!allow_multicluster && !is_allowed) > continue; > > for (bit = 0; bit < ARRAY_SIZE(apmu_config[k].cpus); bit++) { > @@ -124,14 +141,19 @@ static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(st > } > } > > +static int __init shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init(void); > + > void __init shmobile_smp_apmu_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) > { > /* install boot code shared by all CPUs */ > shmobile_boot_fn = virt_to_phys(shmobile_smp_boot); > shmobile_boot_arg = MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK; > > - /* perform per-cpu setup */ > - apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu); > + /* allow multi-cluster operation in case CCI is detected */ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_CCI) && !shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init()) > + apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu, true); > + else > + apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu, false); > } > > int shmobile_smp_apmu_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) > @@ -192,4 +214,79 @@ int shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(unsigned > { > return apmu_wrap(cpu, apmu_power_off_poll); > } > +#else > +#define shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_die() shmobile_smp_sleep() > +static inline int shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(void) { return -ENOTSUPP; } > #endif > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_MCPM) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_CCI) > +static void __naked apmu_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level) > +{ > + asm volatile ("cmp r0, #1\n" > + "bxne lr\n" > + "b cci_enable_port_for_self "); > +} > + > +static int apmu_power_up(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) > +{ > + struct apmu_cpu *ac = apmu_clst2cpu[cluster][cpu]; > + if (!ac) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + shmobile_smp_hook(ac - &apmu_cpus[0], > + virt_to_phys(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry), 0); > + > + return apmu_wrap(ac - &apmu_cpus[0], apmu_power_on); > +} It is possible for the power_up and power_down methods to be unordered or called concurrently in some circumstances (please see comment inside mcpm_cpu_power_down()). You should guard against that possibility with a critical region and a count. Eventually we might move this concurrency handling into the core but it is still up to backend code to handle it for now until there is enough backend implementations to factor away common issues. I'd suggest having a look at arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb.c for an example implementation. > +static void apmu_power_down(void) > +{ > + shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_die(smp_processor_id()); > +} This completely fails to handle the MCPM cluster race avoidance protocol. You should have a look at Documentation/arm/cluster-pm-race-avoidance.txt and also arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb.c again. In particular, you need proper calls to __mcpm_cpu_going_down(), __mcpm_outbound_enter_critical(), __mcpm_outbound_leave_critical() and __mcpm_cpu_down(). The "last man" protocol must be used at least for the disabling of the CCI port for the cluster becoming completely unused, and ideally removing power to the whole cluster as well in that case. Without the above calls, there is simply no benefits calling into mcpm_entry_point as it is basically a huge passthrough. Nicolas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in MCPM and CCI to APMU code @ 2014-02-28 4:08 ` Nicolas Pitre 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2014-02-28 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Magnus Damm wrote: > From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> > > Add MCPM and CCI hooks to the shared APMU code to allow > multicluster operation on r8a7790. Tested with SMP boot > and CPU Hotplug on r8a7790 Lager. > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> > --- > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S | 7 + > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h | 1 > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 > 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S > +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 > @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@ ENTRY(shmobile_invalidate_start) > b secondary_startup > ENDPROC(shmobile_invalidate_start) > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM > +ENTRY(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry) > + bl v7_invalidate_l1 > + b mcpm_entry_point > +ENDPROC(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry) > +#endif You could get rid of this and shmobile_invalidate_start by simply adding a shmobile specific entry in arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S alongside the other __v7_*_setup functions. > + > /* > * Reset vector for secondary CPUs. > * This will be mapped at address 0 by SBAR register. > --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h > +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern void shmobile_smp_hook(unsigned i > unsigned long arg); > extern int shmobile_smp_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu); > extern void shmobile_invalidate_start(void); > +extern void shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry(void); > extern void shmobile_boot_scu(vonid); > extern void shmobile_smp_scu_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus); > extern void shmobile_smp_scu_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu); > --- 0001/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c > +++ work/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c 2014-02-27 00:57:50.000000000 +0900 > @@ -7,22 +7,28 @@ > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > * published by the Free Software Foundation. > */ > +#include <linux/arm-cci.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > #include <linux/ioport.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/of_address.h> > #include <linux/smp.h> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h> > #include <asm/cp15.h> > +#include <asm/mcpm.h> > #include <asm/smp_plat.h> > #include <mach/common.h> > > -static struct { > +static struct apmu_cpu { > void __iomem *iomem; > int bit; > } apmu_cpus[CONFIG_NR_CPUS]; > > +#define MAX_NR_CLUSTERS 2 This is defined in mcpm.h already. > +static struct apmu_cpu *apmu_clst2cpu[MAX_NR_CLUSTERS][CONFIG_NR_CPUS]; > + > #define WUPCR_OFFS 0x10 > #define PSTR_OFFS 0x40 > #define CPUNCR_OFFS(n) (0x100 + (0x10 * (n))) > @@ -69,14 +75,23 @@ static int apmu_wrap(int cpu, int (*fn)( > > static void apmu_init_cpu(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit) > { > + u32 id; > + int mcpm_cpu, mcpm_cluster; > + > if (apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem) > return; > > apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem = ioremap_nocache(res->start, resource_size(res)); > apmu_cpus[cpu].bit = bit; > > - pr_debug("apmu ioremap %d %d 0x%08x 0x%08x\n", cpu, bit, > - res->start, resource_size(res)); > + id = cpu_logical_map(cpu); > + mcpm_cpu = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(id, 0); > + mcpm_cluster = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(id, 1); You should consider validating those values making sure they're lower than CONFIG_NR_CPUS and MAX_NR_CLUSTERS respectively. And declaring them as unsigned. > + > + pr_debug("apmu ioremap %d %d %pr %d %d\n", > + cpu, bit, res, mcpm_cluster, mcpm_cpu); > + > + apmu_clst2cpu[mcpm_cluster][mcpm_cpu] = &apmu_cpus[cpu]; > } > > static struct { > @@ -93,7 +108,8 @@ static struct { > } > }; > > -static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit)) > +static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit), > + bool allow_multicluster) > { > u32 id; > int k; > @@ -110,7 +126,8 @@ static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(st > is_allowed = true; > } > } > - if (!is_allowed) > + > + if (!allow_multicluster && !is_allowed) > continue; > > for (bit = 0; bit < ARRAY_SIZE(apmu_config[k].cpus); bit++) { > @@ -124,14 +141,19 @@ static void apmu_parse_cfg(void (*fn)(st > } > } > > +static int __init shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init(void); > + > void __init shmobile_smp_apmu_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) > { > /* install boot code shared by all CPUs */ > shmobile_boot_fn = virt_to_phys(shmobile_smp_boot); > shmobile_boot_arg = MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK; > > - /* perform per-cpu setup */ > - apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu); > + /* allow multi-cluster operation in case CCI is detected */ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_CCI) && !shmobile_smp_apmu_cci_init()) > + apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu, true); > + else > + apmu_parse_cfg(apmu_init_cpu, false); > } > > int shmobile_smp_apmu_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) > @@ -192,4 +214,79 @@ int shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(unsigned > { > return apmu_wrap(cpu, apmu_power_off_poll); > } > +#else > +#define shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_die() shmobile_smp_sleep() > +static inline int shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_kill(void) { return -ENOTSUPP; } > #endif > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_MCPM) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_CCI) > +static void __naked apmu_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level) > +{ > + asm volatile ("cmp r0, #1\n" > + "bxne lr\n" > + "b cci_enable_port_for_self "); > +} > + > +static int apmu_power_up(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) > +{ > + struct apmu_cpu *ac = apmu_clst2cpu[cluster][cpu]; > + if (!ac) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + shmobile_smp_hook(ac - &apmu_cpus[0], > + virt_to_phys(shmobile_invalidate_mcpm_entry), 0); > + > + return apmu_wrap(ac - &apmu_cpus[0], apmu_power_on); > +} It is possible for the power_up and power_down methods to be unordered or called concurrently in some circumstances (please see comment inside mcpm_cpu_power_down()). You should guard against that possibility with a critical region and a count. Eventually we might move this concurrency handling into the core but it is still up to backend code to handle it for now until there is enough backend implementations to factor away common issues. I'd suggest having a look at arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb.c for an example implementation. > +static void apmu_power_down(void) > +{ > + shmobile_smp_apmu_cpu_die(smp_processor_id()); > +} This completely fails to handle the MCPM cluster race avoidance protocol. You should have a look at Documentation/arm/cluster-pm-race-avoidance.txt and also arch/arm/mach-vexpress/dcscb.c again. In particular, you need proper calls to __mcpm_cpu_going_down(), __mcpm_outbound_enter_critical(), __mcpm_outbound_leave_critical() and __mcpm_cpu_down(). The "last man" protocol must be used at least for the disabling of the CCI port for the cluster becoming completely unused, and ideally removing power to the whole cluster as well in that case. Without the above calls, there is simply no benefits calling into mcpm_entry_point as it is basically a huge passthrough. Nicolas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: Add CCI nodes to r8a7790 DTS 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-26 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> Add CCI nodes to the r8a7790 SoC DTSI file. Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) --- 0001/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi +++ work/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi 2014-02-27 07:59:13.000000000 +0900 @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a15"; reg = <0>; clock-frequency = <1300000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; }; cpu1: cpu@1 { @@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a15"; reg = <1>; clock-frequency = <1300000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; }; cpu2: cpu@2 { @@ -49,6 +51,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a15"; reg = <2>; clock-frequency = <1300000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; }; cpu3: cpu@3 { @@ -56,6 +59,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a15"; reg = <3>; clock-frequency = <1300000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; }; cpu4: cpu@4 { @@ -63,6 +67,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a7"; reg = <0x100>; clock-frequency = <780000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; }; cpu5: cpu@5 { @@ -70,6 +75,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a7"; reg = <0x101>; clock-frequency = <780000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; }; cpu6: cpu@6 { @@ -77,6 +83,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a7"; reg = <0x102>; clock-frequency = <780000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; }; cpu7: cpu@7 { @@ -84,6 +91,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a7"; reg = <0x103>; clock-frequency = <780000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; }; }; @@ -99,6 +107,26 @@ interrupts = <1 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>; }; + cci@f0090000 { + compatible = "arm,cci-400"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + reg = <0 0xf0090000 0 0x1000>; + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xf0090000 0x10000>; + + cci_control1: slave-if@4000 { + compatible = "arm,cci-400-ctrl-if"; + interface-type = "ace"; + reg = <0x4000 0x1000>; + }; + + cci_control2: slave-if@5000 { + compatible = "arm,cci-400-ctrl-if"; + interface-type = "ace"; + reg = <0x5000 0x1000>; + }; + }; + gpio0: gpio@e6050000 { compatible = "renesas,gpio-r8a7790", "renesas,gpio-rcar"; reg = <0 0xe6050000 0 0x50>; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: Add CCI nodes to r8a7790 DTS @ 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-26 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> Add CCI nodes to the r8a7790 SoC DTSI file. Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) --- 0001/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi +++ work/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi 2014-02-27 07:59:13.000000000 +0900 @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a15"; reg = <0>; clock-frequency = <1300000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; }; cpu1: cpu at 1 { @@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a15"; reg = <1>; clock-frequency = <1300000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; }; cpu2: cpu at 2 { @@ -49,6 +51,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a15"; reg = <2>; clock-frequency = <1300000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; }; cpu3: cpu at 3 { @@ -56,6 +59,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a15"; reg = <3>; clock-frequency = <1300000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>; }; cpu4: cpu at 4 { @@ -63,6 +67,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a7"; reg = <0x100>; clock-frequency = <780000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; }; cpu5: cpu at 5 { @@ -70,6 +75,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a7"; reg = <0x101>; clock-frequency = <780000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; }; cpu6: cpu at 6 { @@ -77,6 +83,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a7"; reg = <0x102>; clock-frequency = <780000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; }; cpu7: cpu at 7 { @@ -84,6 +91,7 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a7"; reg = <0x103>; clock-frequency = <780000000>; + cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>; }; }; @@ -99,6 +107,26 @@ interrupts = <1 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>; }; + cci at f0090000 { + compatible = "arm,cci-400"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + reg = <0 0xf0090000 0 0x1000>; + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xf0090000 0x10000>; + + cci_control1: slave-if at 4000 { + compatible = "arm,cci-400-ctrl-if"; + interface-type = "ace"; + reg = <0x4000 0x1000>; + }; + + cci_control2: slave-if at 5000 { + compatible = "arm,cci-400-ctrl-if"; + interface-type = "ace"; + reg = <0x5000 0x1000>; + }; + }; + gpio0: gpio at e6050000 { compatible = "renesas,gpio-r8a7790", "renesas,gpio-rcar"; reg = <0 0xe6050000 0 0x50>; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm @ 2014-02-28 2:40 ` Laurent Pinchart -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2014-02-28 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Magnus, On Thursday 27 February 2014 08:13:26 Magnus Damm wrote: > ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 > > [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in CCI/MCPM support to shared APMU code > [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: Add CCI nodes to r8a7790 DTS > > Add code to interface to the CCI driver and MCPM to mach-shmobile. The > shared APMU SMP code is extended to share CPU power domain power on > and off support via both regular SMP hooks and MCPM callbacks. > > It is worth noting that the APMU code is used for multiple SoCs including > the Dual core CA15 r8a7791 where this MCPM support is not needed and the > big.LITTLE r8a7790 that needs to program the CCI. > > Previously posted as "[PATCH] ARM: shmobile: MCPM and CCI prototype". I won't review these patches as I have no idea how CCI and MCPM work (I don't even know what the latter stands for), but is there a chance this could be useful for the IPMMU that can use CCI (and DVM) to remove the need for explicit cache management in page tables management ? > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> > --- > > Written against renesas.git tag renesas-devel-v3.14-rc4-20140226 > > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 28 ++++++ > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S | 7 + > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h | 1 > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 > 5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 @ 2014-02-28 2:40 ` Laurent Pinchart 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2014-02-28 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Magnus, On Thursday 27 February 2014 08:13:26 Magnus Damm wrote: > ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 > > [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in CCI/MCPM support to shared APMU code > [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: Add CCI nodes to r8a7790 DTS > > Add code to interface to the CCI driver and MCPM to mach-shmobile. The > shared APMU SMP code is extended to share CPU power domain power on > and off support via both regular SMP hooks and MCPM callbacks. > > It is worth noting that the APMU code is used for multiple SoCs including > the Dual core CA15 r8a7791 where this MCPM support is not needed and the > big.LITTLE r8a7790 that needs to program the CCI. > > Previously posted as "[PATCH] ARM: shmobile: MCPM and CCI prototype". I won't review these patches as I have no idea how CCI and MCPM work (I don't even know what the latter stands for), but is there a chance this could be useful for the IPMMU that can use CCI (and DVM) to remove the need for explicit cache management in page tables management ? > Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se> > --- > > Written against renesas.git tag renesas-devel-v3.14-rc4-20140226 > > arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 28 ++++++ > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp.S | 7 + > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h | 1 > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 > 5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-28 4:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-02-26 23:13 [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 Magnus Damm 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm 2014-02-26 23:13 ` [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: Hook in MCPM and CCI to APMU code Magnus Damm 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm 2014-02-28 4:08 ` Nicolas Pitre 2014-02-28 4:08 ` Nicolas Pitre 2014-02-26 23:13 ` [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: Add CCI nodes to r8a7790 DTS Magnus Damm 2014-02-26 23:13 ` Magnus Damm 2014-02-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: CCI and MCPM support for r8a7790 Laurent Pinchart 2014-02-28 2:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.