From: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org (Nicolas Pitre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: proc-v7.S: Adjust stack address when XIP_KERNEL
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:16:35 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1602161504400.13632@knanqh.ubzr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160216173225.GE19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > index 0f92d57..1595fb2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> > > @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ __errata_finish:
> > >
> > > .align 2
> > > __v7_setup_stack_ptr:
> > > - .word __v7_setup_stack - .
> > > + .word __v7_setup_stack - . + PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP
>
> I keep looking at this patch, and I really find that I detest this
> PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP thing - it's really not obvious what's going on
> here. It's taken a _long_ time to work this out, which _really_
> isn't good going forward.
>
> Let's instead change things to make it much more obvious - see the
> patch below.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> index ebdaaf7dd19f..593e5613184d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -135,11 +135,18 @@
> #define PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET UL(CONFIG_PHYS_OFFSET)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
> -#define PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP \
> - ( XIP_VIRT_ADDR(CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR) - PAGE_OFFSET + \
> - PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET - CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR )
> +/*
> + * When referencing data in RAM from the XIP region in a relative manner
> + * with the MMU off, we need the relative offset between the two physical
> + * addresses. The macro below achieves this, which is:
> + * __pa(v_data) - __xip_pa(v_text)
> + */
> +#define PHYS_RELATIVE(v_data, v_text) \
> + (((v_data) - PAGE_OFFSET + PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET) - \
> + ((v_text) - XIP_VIRT_ADDR(CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR) + \
> + CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR))
Sure, this is less opaque.
> #else
> -#define PHYS_OFFSET_FIXUP 0
> +#define PHYS_RELATIVE(v_data, v_text) (v_data) - (v_text)
You should probably surround the whole thing with parents in case this
gets used in some other computations.
Nicolas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-29 22:11 [PATCH] ARM: proc-v7.S: Adjust stack address when XIP_KERNEL Chris Brandt
2016-01-31 23:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-01 14:08 ` Chris Brandt
2016-02-01 14:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Brandt
2016-02-01 21:15 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-02-16 17:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-16 18:53 ` Chris Brandt
2016-02-16 20:16 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.20.1602161504400.13632@knanqh.ubzr \
--to=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.