All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: Set the page table freeing ceiling to TASK_SIZE
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:20:50 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1302191008290.2139@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361204311-14127-3-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> ARM processors with LPAE enabled use 3 levels of page tables, with an
> entry in the top level (pgd) covering 1GB of virtual space. Because of
> the branch relocation limitations on ARM, the loadable modules are
> mapped 16MB below PAGE_OFFSET, making the corresponding 1GB pgd shared
> between kernel modules and user space.
> 
> If free_pgtables() is called with the default ceiling 0,
> free_pgd_range() (and subsequently called functions) also frees the page
> table shared between user space and kernel modules (which is normally
> handled by the ARM-specific pgd_free() function). This patch changes
> defines the ARM USER_PGTABLES_CEILING to TASK_SIZE.

I don't have an ARM to test on, so I won't ack or nack this,
but I am a little worried or puzzled.

I thought CONFIG_ARM_LPAE came in v3.3: so I would expect these
patches to need "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" for porting back there.

But then, did v3.3..v3.8 have the appropriate arch/arm code to handle
the freeing of the user+kernel pgd?  I'm not asserting that it could
not, but when doing the similar arch/x86 thing, I had to make changes
down there, so it's not necessarily something that works automatically.

And does the ARM !LPAE case work correctly (not leaking page tables
at any level) with this change from 0 to TASK_SIZE?  Again, I'm not
asserting that it does not, but your commit description doesn't give
enough confidence that you've tried that.

Perhaps you have some other patches to arch/arm, that of course I
wouldn't have noticed, which make this all work together; and it's
accepted that CONFIG_ARM_LPAE is broken on v3.3..v3.8, and too
much risk to backport it all for -stable.

Maybe all I'm asking for is a more reassuring commit description.

Hugh

> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index c094749..8f06ee5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,13 @@ extern void __pgd_error(const char *file, int line, pgd_t);
>  #define FIRST_USER_ADDRESS	PAGE_SIZE
>  
>  /*
> + * Use TASK_SIZE as the ceiling argument for free_pgtables() and
> + * free_pgd_range() to avoid freeing the modules pmd when LPAE is enabled (pmd
> + * page shared between user and kernel).
> + */
> +#define USER_PGTABLES_CEILING	TASK_SIZE
> +
> +/*
>   * The pgprot_* and protection_map entries will be fixed up in runtime
>   * to include the cachable and bufferable bits based on memory policy,
>   * as well as any architecture dependent bits like global/ASID and SMP

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: Set the page table freeing ceiling to TASK_SIZE
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:20:50 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1302191008290.2139@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361204311-14127-3-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> ARM processors with LPAE enabled use 3 levels of page tables, with an
> entry in the top level (pgd) covering 1GB of virtual space. Because of
> the branch relocation limitations on ARM, the loadable modules are
> mapped 16MB below PAGE_OFFSET, making the corresponding 1GB pgd shared
> between kernel modules and user space.
> 
> If free_pgtables() is called with the default ceiling 0,
> free_pgd_range() (and subsequently called functions) also frees the page
> table shared between user space and kernel modules (which is normally
> handled by the ARM-specific pgd_free() function). This patch changes
> defines the ARM USER_PGTABLES_CEILING to TASK_SIZE.

I don't have an ARM to test on, so I won't ack or nack this,
but I am a little worried or puzzled.

I thought CONFIG_ARM_LPAE came in v3.3: so I would expect these
patches to need "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" for porting back there.

But then, did v3.3..v3.8 have the appropriate arch/arm code to handle
the freeing of the user+kernel pgd?  I'm not asserting that it could
not, but when doing the similar arch/x86 thing, I had to make changes
down there, so it's not necessarily something that works automatically.

And does the ARM !LPAE case work correctly (not leaking page tables
at any level) with this change from 0 to TASK_SIZE?  Again, I'm not
asserting that it does not, but your commit description doesn't give
enough confidence that you've tried that.

Perhaps you have some other patches to arch/arm, that of course I
wouldn't have noticed, which make this all work together; and it's
accepted that CONFIG_ARM_LPAE is broken on v3.3..v3.8, and too
much risk to backport it all for -stable.

Maybe all I'm asking for is a more reassuring commit description.

Hugh

> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index c094749..8f06ee5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,13 @@ extern void __pgd_error(const char *file, int line, pgd_t);
>  #define FIRST_USER_ADDRESS	PAGE_SIZE
>  
>  /*
> + * Use TASK_SIZE as the ceiling argument for free_pgtables() and
> + * free_pgd_range() to avoid freeing the modules pmd when LPAE is enabled (pmd
> + * page shared between user and kernel).
> + */
> +#define USER_PGTABLES_CEILING	TASK_SIZE
> +
> +/*
>   * The pgprot_* and protection_map entries will be fixed up in runtime
>   * to include the cachable and bufferable bits based on memory policy,
>   * as well as any architecture dependent bits like global/ASID and SMP

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-18 16:18 [PATCH 0/2] Arch-specific user pgtables ceiling Catalin Marinas
2013-02-18 16:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-18 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Allow arch code to control the user page table ceiling Catalin Marinas
2013-02-18 16:18   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-19 18:08   ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-19 18:08     ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-19 22:33     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-19 22:33       ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-18 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: Set the page table freeing ceiling to TASK_SIZE Catalin Marinas
2013-02-18 16:18   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-19 18:20   ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2013-02-19 18:20     ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-19 22:55     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-19 22:55       ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1302191008290.2139@eggly.anvils \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.