* [PATCH 2/2] security/smack: Use AF_INET for sin_family field
@ 2009-08-05 12:34 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2009-08-05 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of
PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
struct sockaddr_in sip;
@@
(
sip.sin_family ==
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family !=
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family =
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u -p a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static int smack_socket_sendmsg(struct s
/*
* Perfectly reasonable for this to be NULL
*/
- if (sip == NULL || sip->sin_family != PF_INET)
+ if (sip == NULL || sip->sin_family != AF_INET)
return 0;
return smack_netlabel_send(sock->sk, sip);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] security/smack: Use AF_INET for sin_family field
@ 2009-08-05 12:34 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2009-08-05 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Morris, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of
PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
struct sockaddr_in sip;
@@
(
sip.sin_family =
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family !- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family - PF_INET
+ AF_INET
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u -p a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static int smack_socket_sendmsg(struct s
/*
* Perfectly reasonable for this to be NULL
*/
- if (sip = NULL || sip->sin_family != PF_INET)
+ if (sip = NULL || sip->sin_family != AF_INET)
return 0;
return smack_netlabel_send(sock->sk, sip);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] security/smack: Use AF_INET for sin_family field
2009-08-05 12:34 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2009-08-05 19:38 ` Casey Schaufler
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2009-08-05 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: James Morris, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
> AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of
> PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> struct sockaddr_in sip;
> @@
>
> (
> sip.sin_family ==
> - PF_INET
> + AF_INET
> |
> sip.sin_family !=
> - PF_INET
> + AF_INET
> |
> sip.sin_family =
> - PF_INET
> + AF_INET
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Yes, this is a correction. Thank you.
> ---
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -u -p a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static int smack_socket_sendmsg(struct s
> /*
> * Perfectly reasonable for this to be NULL
> */
> - if (sip == NULL || sip->sin_family != PF_INET)
> + if (sip == NULL || sip->sin_family != AF_INET)
> return 0;
>
> return smack_netlabel_send(sock->sk, sip);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] security/smack: Use AF_INET for sin_family field
@ 2009-08-05 19:38 ` Casey Schaufler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2009-08-05 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: James Morris, linux-security-module, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
> AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of
> PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> struct sockaddr_in sip;
> @@
>
> (
> sip.sin_family =
> - PF_INET
> + AF_INET
> |
> sip.sin_family !> - PF_INET
> + AF_INET
> |
> sip.sin_family > - PF_INET
> + AF_INET
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Yes, this is a correction. Thank you.
> ---
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -u -p a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static int smack_socket_sendmsg(struct s
> /*
> * Perfectly reasonable for this to be NULL
> */
> - if (sip = NULL || sip->sin_family != PF_INET)
> + if (sip = NULL || sip->sin_family != AF_INET)
> return 0;
>
> return smack_netlabel_send(sock->sk, sip);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] security/smack: Use AF_INET for sin_family field
2009-08-05 12:34 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2009-08-05 22:47 ` James Morris
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2009-08-05 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: linux-security-module, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Casey Schaufler
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
> AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of
> PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] security/smack: Use AF_INET for sin_family field
@ 2009-08-05 22:47 ` James Morris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2009-08-05 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: linux-security-module, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Casey Schaufler
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
> AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of
> PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-05 22:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-05 12:34 [PATCH 2/2] security/smack: Use AF_INET for sin_family field Julia Lawall
2009-08-05 12:34 ` Julia Lawall
2009-08-05 19:38 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-08-05 19:38 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-08-05 22:47 ` James Morris
2009-08-05 22:47 ` James Morris
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.