[RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Hannes Reinecke]

Hi all,

as discussed recently most existing HBAs have a host-wide tagset which
does not map easily onto the per-queue tagset model of block mq.
This patchset implements a flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS for block-mq, which
enables the use of a shared tagset for all hardware queues.
The second patch adds a flag 'host_tagset' to the SCSI host template,
which allows drivers to enable the use of the global tagset.

This patchset probably has some performance implications as
there is a quite high probability of cache-bouncing when allocating
tags. Also I'm not quite sure if the implemented tagset sharing
is the correct way to handle things.
So this can be considered an RFC.

As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.

Hannes Reinecke (2):
  block: Implement global tagset
  scsi: Add template flag 'host_tagset'

 block/blk-mq-tag.c       | 12 ++++++++----
 block/blk-mq.c           | 10 ++++++++--
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c  |  2 ++
 include/linux/blk-mq.h   |  1 +
 include/scsi/scsi_host.h |  5 +++++
 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.5.6

[PATCH 1/2] block: Implement global tagset

[Hannes Reinecke]

Most legacy HBAs have a tagset per HBA, not per queue. To map
these devices onto block-mq this patch implements a new tagset
flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS, which will cause the tag allocator
to use just one tagset for all hardware queues.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 12 ++++++++----
 block/blk-mq.c         | 10 ++++++++--
 include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index e48bc2c..a14e76c 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -276,9 +276,11 @@ static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
 void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
 		busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
 {
-	int i;
+	int i, lim = tagset->nr_hw_queues;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < tagset->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
+	if (tagset->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
+		lim = 1;
+	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
 		if (tagset->tags && tagset->tags[i])
 			blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tagset->tags[i], fn, priv);
 	}
@@ -287,12 +289,14 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
 
 int blk_mq_reinit_tagset(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
 {
-	int i, j, ret = 0;
+	int i, j, ret = 0, lim = set->nr_hw_queues;
 
 	if (!set->ops->reinit_request)
 		goto out;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < set->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
+	if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
+		lim = 1;
+	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
 		struct blk_mq_tags *tags = set->tags[i];
 
 		for (j = 0; j < tags->nr_tags; j++) {
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 159187a..db96ed0 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2061,6 +2061,10 @@ static bool __blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int hctx_idx)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if ((set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS) && hctx_idx != 0) {
+		set->tags[hctx_idx] = set->tags[0];
+		return true;
+	}
 	set->tags[hctx_idx] = blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(set, hctx_idx,
 					set->queue_depth, set->reserved_tags);
 	if (!set->tags[hctx_idx])
@@ -2080,8 +2084,10 @@ static void blk_mq_free_map_and_requests(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
 					 unsigned int hctx_idx)
 {
 	if (set->tags[hctx_idx]) {
-		blk_mq_free_rqs(set, set->tags[hctx_idx], hctx_idx);
-		blk_mq_free_rq_map(set->tags[hctx_idx]);
+		if (!(set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS) || hctx_idx == 0) {
+			blk_mq_free_rqs(set, set->tags[hctx_idx], hctx_idx);
+			blk_mq_free_rq_map(set->tags[hctx_idx]);
+		}
 		set->tags[hctx_idx] = NULL;
 	}
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index b296a90..eee27b016 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ enum {
 	BLK_MQ_F_DEFER_ISSUE	= 1 << 4,
 	BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING	= 1 << 5,
 	BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED	= 1 << 6,
+	BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS	= 1 << 7,
 	BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_START_BIT = 8,
 	BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_BITS = 1,
 
-- 
1.8.5.6

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Implement global tagset

[Arun Easi]

Hi Hannes,

Thanks for taking a crack at the issue. My comments below..

On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, 5:07am, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

> Most legacy HBAs have a tagset per HBA, not per queue. To map
> these devices onto block-mq this patch implements a new tagset
> flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS, which will cause the tag allocator
> to use just one tagset for all hardware queues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 12 ++++++++----
>  block/blk-mq.c         | 10 ++++++++--
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index e48bc2c..a14e76c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -276,9 +276,11 @@ static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>  void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
>  		busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
>  {
> -	int i;
> +	int i, lim = tagset->nr_hw_queues;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < tagset->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
> +	if (tagset->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
> +		lim = 1;
> +	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
>  		if (tagset->tags && tagset->tags[i])
>  			blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tagset->tags[i], fn, priv);
>  	}
> @@ -287,12 +289,14 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
>  
>  int blk_mq_reinit_tagset(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>  {
> -	int i, j, ret = 0;
> +	int i, j, ret = 0, lim = set->nr_hw_queues;
>  
>  	if (!set->ops->reinit_request)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < set->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
> +	if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
> +		lim = 1;
> +	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
>  		struct blk_mq_tags *tags = set->tags[i];
>  
>  		for (j = 0; j < tags->nr_tags; j++) {
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 159187a..db96ed0 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2061,6 +2061,10 @@ static bool __blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int hctx_idx)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> +	if ((set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS) && hctx_idx != 0) {
> +		set->tags[hctx_idx] = set->tags[0];
> +		return true;
> +	}

So, this effectively make all request allocations to the same NUMA node 
locality of the hctx_idx 0, correct? Is the performance hit you were 
talking about in the cover letter?

Do you have any other alternatives in mind? Dynamic growing/shrinking 
tags/request-pool in hctx with a fixed base as start?

One alternative that comes to my mind is to move the divvy up logic to 
SCSI (instead of LLD doing it), IOW:

1. Have SCSI set tag_set.queue_depth to can_queue/nr_hw_queues
2. Have blk_mq_unique_tag() (or a new i/f) returning "hwq * nr_hw_queue + 
   rq->tag"

That would make the tags linear in the can_queue space, but could result 
in poor use of LLD resource if a given hctx has used up all it's tags.

On a related note, would not the current use of can_queue in SCSI lead to 
poor resource utilization in MQ cases? Like, block layer allocating 
nr_hw_queues * tags+request+driver_data.etc * can_queue, but SCSI limiting 
the number of requests to can_queue.

BTW, if you would like me to try out this patch on my setup, please let me 
know.

Regards,
-Arun

>  	set->tags[hctx_idx] = blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(set, hctx_idx,
>  					set->queue_depth, set->reserved_tags);
>  	if (!set->tags[hctx_idx])
> @@ -2080,8 +2084,10 @@ static void blk_mq_free_map_and_requests(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>  					 unsigned int hctx_idx)
>  {
>  	if (set->tags[hctx_idx]) {
> -		blk_mq_free_rqs(set, set->tags[hctx_idx], hctx_idx);
> -		blk_mq_free_rq_map(set->tags[hctx_idx]);
> +		if (!(set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS) || hctx_idx == 0) {
> +			blk_mq_free_rqs(set, set->tags[hctx_idx], hctx_idx);
> +			blk_mq_free_rq_map(set->tags[hctx_idx]);
> +		}
>  		set->tags[hctx_idx] = NULL;
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index b296a90..eee27b016 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ enum {
>  	BLK_MQ_F_DEFER_ISSUE	= 1 << 4,
>  	BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING	= 1 << 5,
>  	BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED	= 1 << 6,
> +	BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS	= 1 << 7,
>  	BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_START_BIT = 8,
>  	BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_BITS = 1,
>  
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Implement global tagset

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 04/06/2017 08:27 AM, Arun Easi wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
> 
> Thanks for taking a crack at the issue. My comments below..
> 
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, 5:07am, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> 
>> Most legacy HBAs have a tagset per HBA, not per queue. To map
>> these devices onto block-mq this patch implements a new tagset
>> flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS, which will cause the tag allocator
>> to use just one tagset for all hardware queues.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 12 ++++++++----
>>  block/blk-mq.c         | 10 ++++++++--
>>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
>>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> index e48bc2c..a14e76c 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> @@ -276,9 +276,11 @@ static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>>  void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
>>  		busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
>>  {
>> -	int i;
>> +	int i, lim = tagset->nr_hw_queues;
>>  
>> -	for (i = 0; i < tagset->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
>> +	if (tagset->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
>> +		lim = 1;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
>>  		if (tagset->tags && tagset->tags[i])
>>  			blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tagset->tags[i], fn, priv);
>>  	}
>> @@ -287,12 +289,14 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
>>  
>>  int blk_mq_reinit_tagset(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>>  {
>> -	int i, j, ret = 0;
>> +	int i, j, ret = 0, lim = set->nr_hw_queues;
>>  
>>  	if (!set->ops->reinit_request)
>>  		goto out;
>>  
>> -	for (i = 0; i < set->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
>> +	if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
>> +		lim = 1;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
>>  		struct blk_mq_tags *tags = set->tags[i];
>>  
>>  		for (j = 0; j < tags->nr_tags; j++) {
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index 159187a..db96ed0 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -2061,6 +2061,10 @@ static bool __blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int hctx_idx)
>>  {
>>  	int ret = 0;
>>  
>> +	if ((set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS) && hctx_idx != 0) {
>> +		set->tags[hctx_idx] = set->tags[0];
>> +		return true;
>> +	}
> 
> So, this effectively make all request allocations to the same NUMA node 
> locality of the hctx_idx 0, correct? Is the performance hit you were 
> talking about in the cover letter?
> 
Yes. It does make the request allocations local to NUMA node 0, but then
this will only affect LLDDs which are actually _using_ NUMA locality
when allocating the request nodes.
However, SCSI doesn't set a NUMA node locality to begin with, so this
doesn't affect us.

No, what I meant is this:
the 'sbitmap' allocator already splits up the bitmap into several words,
which then should provide a better NUMA locality per map.
When we're using a shared global map it's unclear whether the individual
words of the sbitmap can and will be moved to the various NUMA nodes, or
whether we suffer from non-locality.

My tests so far have been inconclusive; but then I'm not happy with the
testcase anyway (using null_blk I only get 250k/250k r/w IOPs, which I
found rather disappointing).

> Do you have any other alternatives in mind? Dynamic growing/shrinking 
> tags/request-pool in hctx with a fixed base as start?
> 
> One alternative that comes to my mind is to move the divvy up logic to 
> SCSI (instead of LLD doing it), IOW:
> 
> 1. Have SCSI set tag_set.queue_depth to can_queue/nr_hw_queues
> 2. Have blk_mq_unique_tag() (or a new i/f) returning "hwq * nr_hw_queue + 
>    rq->tag"
> 
> That would make the tags linear in the can_queue space, but could result 
> in poor use of LLD resource if a given hctx has used up all it's tags.
> 
Exactly. This is the method I used for implementing mq support for lpfc
and mpt3sas; however the complaint there indeed was that we might be
running into a tag starvation scenario with a large number of LUNs and
single-threaded I/O submission.

> On a related note, would not the current use of can_queue in SCSI lead to 
> poor resource utilization in MQ cases? Like, block layer allocating 
> nr_hw_queues * tags+request+driver_data.etc * can_queue, but SCSI limiting 
> the number of requests to can_queue.
> 
Yes, indeed. That's another problem which we should be looking at.
However, it's only ever relevant if we indeed implement some divvying
logic; if we move to the shared tags approach it should work as designed.

> BTW, if you would like me to try out this patch on my setup, please let me 
> know.
> 
Oh, yes. Please do.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		               zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.com			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�rnberg
GF: F. Imend�rffer, J. Smithard, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N�rnberg)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Implement global tagset

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 04/06/2017 08:27 AM, Arun Easi wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
> 
> Thanks for taking a crack at the issue. My comments below..
> 
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, 5:07am, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> 
>> Most legacy HBAs have a tagset per HBA, not per queue. To map
>> these devices onto block-mq this patch implements a new tagset
>> flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS, which will cause the tag allocator
>> to use just one tagset for all hardware queues.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 12 ++++++++----
>>  block/blk-mq.c         | 10 ++++++++--
>>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
>>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> index e48bc2c..a14e76c 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> @@ -276,9 +276,11 @@ static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>>  void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
>>  		busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
>>  {
>> -	int i;
>> +	int i, lim = tagset->nr_hw_queues;
>>  
>> -	for (i = 0; i < tagset->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
>> +	if (tagset->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
>> +		lim = 1;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
>>  		if (tagset->tags && tagset->tags[i])
>>  			blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tagset->tags[i], fn, priv);
>>  	}
>> @@ -287,12 +289,14 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
>>  
>>  int blk_mq_reinit_tagset(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>>  {
>> -	int i, j, ret = 0;
>> +	int i, j, ret = 0, lim = set->nr_hw_queues;
>>  
>>  	if (!set->ops->reinit_request)
>>  		goto out;
>>  
>> -	for (i = 0; i < set->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
>> +	if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
>> +		lim = 1;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
>>  		struct blk_mq_tags *tags = set->tags[i];
>>  
>>  		for (j = 0; j < tags->nr_tags; j++) {
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index 159187a..db96ed0 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -2061,6 +2061,10 @@ static bool __blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int hctx_idx)
>>  {
>>  	int ret = 0;
>>  
>> +	if ((set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS) && hctx_idx != 0) {
>> +		set->tags[hctx_idx] = set->tags[0];
>> +		return true;
>> +	}
> 
> So, this effectively make all request allocations to the same NUMA node 
> locality of the hctx_idx 0, correct? Is the performance hit you were 
> talking about in the cover letter?
> 
Yes. It does make the request allocations local to NUMA node 0, but then
this will only affect LLDDs which are actually _using_ NUMA locality
when allocating the request nodes.
However, SCSI doesn't set a NUMA node locality to begin with, so this
doesn't affect us.

No, what I meant is this:
the 'sbitmap' allocator already splits up the bitmap into several words,
which then should provide a better NUMA locality per map.
When we're using a shared global map it's unclear whether the individual
words of the sbitmap can and will be moved to the various NUMA nodes, or
whether we suffer from non-locality.

My tests so far have been inconclusive; but then I'm not happy with the
testcase anyway (using null_blk I only get 250k/250k r/w IOPs, which I
found rather disappointing).

> Do you have any other alternatives in mind? Dynamic growing/shrinking 
> tags/request-pool in hctx with a fixed base as start?
> 
> One alternative that comes to my mind is to move the divvy up logic to 
> SCSI (instead of LLD doing it), IOW:
> 
> 1. Have SCSI set tag_set.queue_depth to can_queue/nr_hw_queues
> 2. Have blk_mq_unique_tag() (or a new i/f) returning "hwq * nr_hw_queue + 
>    rq->tag"
> 
> That would make the tags linear in the can_queue space, but could result 
> in poor use of LLD resource if a given hctx has used up all it's tags.
> 
Exactly. This is the method I used for implementing mq support for lpfc
and mpt3sas; however the complaint there indeed was that we might be
running into a tag starvation scenario with a large number of LUNs and
single-threaded I/O submission.

> On a related note, would not the current use of can_queue in SCSI lead to 
> poor resource utilization in MQ cases? Like, block layer allocating 
> nr_hw_queues * tags+request+driver_data.etc * can_queue, but SCSI limiting 
> the number of requests to can_queue.
> 
Yes, indeed. That's another problem which we should be looking at.
However, it's only ever relevant if we indeed implement some divvying
logic; if we move to the shared tags approach it should work as designed.

> BTW, if you would like me to try out this patch on my setup, please let me 
> know.
> 
Oh, yes. Please do.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		               zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.com			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Implement global tagset

[Arun Easi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 3105 bytes --]

On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, 1:49am, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

> On 04/06/2017 08:27 AM, Arun Easi wrote:
> > Hi Hannes,
> > 
> > Thanks for taking a crack at the issue. My comments below..
> > 
> > On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, 5:07am, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > 
> >> Most legacy HBAs have a tagset per HBA, not per queue. To map
> >> these devices onto block-mq this patch implements a new tagset
> >> flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS, which will cause the tag allocator
> >> to use just one tagset for all hardware queues.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> >> ---
> >>  block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 12 ++++++++----
> >>  block/blk-mq.c         | 10 ++++++++--
> >>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
> >>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> >> index e48bc2c..a14e76c 100644
> >> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> >> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> >> @@ -276,9 +276,11 @@ static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> >>  void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
> >>  		busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
> >>  {
> >> -	int i;
> >> +	int i, lim = tagset->nr_hw_queues;
> >>  
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < tagset->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
> >> +	if (tagset->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
> >> +		lim = 1;
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
> >>  		if (tagset->tags && tagset->tags[i])
> >>  			blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tagset->tags[i], fn, priv);
> >>  	}
> >> @@ -287,12 +289,14 @@ void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
> >>  
> >>  int blk_mq_reinit_tagset(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
> >>  {
> >> -	int i, j, ret = 0;
> >> +	int i, j, ret = 0, lim = set->nr_hw_queues;
> >>  
> >>  	if (!set->ops->reinit_request)
> >>  		goto out;
> >>  
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < set->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
> >> +	if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS)
> >> +		lim = 1;
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
> >>  		struct blk_mq_tags *tags = set->tags[i];
> >>  
> >>  		for (j = 0; j < tags->nr_tags; j++) {
> >> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> >> index 159187a..db96ed0 100644
> >> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> >> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> >> @@ -2061,6 +2061,10 @@ static bool __blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int hctx_idx)
> >>  {
> >>  	int ret = 0;
> >>  
> >> +	if ((set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS) && hctx_idx != 0) {
> >> +		set->tags[hctx_idx] = set->tags[0];
> >> +		return true;
> >> +	}
> > 
:
> 
> > BTW, if you would like me to try out this patch on my setup, please let me 
> > know.
> > 
> Oh, yes. Please do.
> 

Ran the tests on my setup (Dell R730, 2 Node). This change did not drop 
any IOPs (got ~2M 512b). The cache miss percentage was varying based on if 
the tests were running on one node or both (latter yperformed worse). All 
interrupts were directed to only 1 node. Interestingly, the cache miss 
percentage was lowest when MQ was off.

I hit a fdisk hang (open path), btw, not sure if it has anything todo with 
this change, though.

Notes and hang stack attached.

Let me know if you are interested in any specific perf event/command-line.

Regards,
-Arun

[-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/plain, Size: 3423 bytes --]

perf stat, ran on a short 10 second load.

---1port-1node-new-mq----
 Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2':

 188,642,696      LLC-loads                                            (66.66%)
   3,615,142      LLC-load-misses  #    1.92% of all LL-cache hits     (66.67%)
  86,488,341      LLC-stores                                           (33.34%)
  10,820,977      LLC-store-misses                                     (33.33%)
 391,370,104      cache-references                                     (49.99%)
  14,498,491      cache-misses     #    3.705 % of all cache refs      (66.66%)

---1port-1node-mq---
 Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2':

 145,025,999      LLC-loads                                            (66.67%)
   3,793,427      LLC-load-misses  #    2.62% of all LL-cache hits     (66.67%)
  60,878,939      LLC-stores                                           (33.33%)
   8,044,714      LLC-store-misses                                     (33.33%)
 294,713,070      cache-references                                     (50.00%)
  11,923,354      cache-misses     #    4.046 % of all cache refs      (66.66%)

---1port-1node-nomq---
 Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2':

 157,375,709      LLC-loads                                            (66.66%)
     476,117      LLC-load-misses  #    0.30% of all LL-cache hits     (66.66%)
  76,046,098      LLC-stores                                           (33.34%)
     840,756      LLC-store-misses                                     (33.34%)
 326,230,969      cache-references                                     (50.00%)
   1,332,398      cache-misses     #    0.408 % of all cache refs      (66.67%)

======================

--2port-allnodes-new-mq--
 Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2':

  55,455,533      LLC-loads                                            (66.67%)
  37,996,545      LLC-load-misses  #   68.52% of all LL-cache hits     (66.67%)
  14,030,291      LLC-stores                                           (33.33%)
   7,096,931      LLC-store-misses                                     (33.33%)
  76,711,197      cache-references                                     (49.99%)
  45,170,719      cache-misses     #   58.884 % of all cache refs      (66.66%)

--2port-allnodes-mq--
 Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2':

  59,303,410      LLC-loads                                            (66.66%)
  31,115,601      LLC-load-misses  #   52.47% of all LL-cache hits     (66.66%)
  17,496,477      LLC-stores                                           (33.34%)
   6,201,373      LLC-store-misses                                     (33.34%)
  89,035,272      cache-references                                     (50.00%)
  37,372,777      cache-misses     #   41.975 % of all cache refs      (66.66%)

--2port-allnodes-nomq--
 Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2':

  86,724,905      LLC-loads                                            (66.67%)
  27,154,245      LLC-load-misses  #   31.31% of all LL-cache hits     (66.67%)
  33,710,265      LLC-stores                                           (33.34%)
   6,521,394      LLC-store-misses                                     (33.33%)
 139,089,528      cache-references                                     (50.00%)
  33,682,000      cache-misses     #   24.216 % of all cache refs      (66.66%)


[-- Attachment #3: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2937 bytes --]


Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: INFO: task fdisk:27745 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel:      Tainted: G    B      OE   4.11.0-rc4-newblk-ae+ #4
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: fdisk           D    0 27745  27743 0x00000080
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: Call Trace:
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: __schedule+0x289/0x8f0
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: schedule+0x36/0x80
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: schedule_timeout+0x249/0x300
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? sched_clock_cpu+0x11/0xb0
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? try_to_wake_up+0x59/0x450
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: wait_for_completion+0x121/0x180
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: flush_work+0x11d/0x1c0
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? wake_up_worker+0x30/0x30
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: __cancel_work_timer+0x10e/0x1d0
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? kobj_lookup+0x10d/0x160
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: disk_block_events+0x77/0x80
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: __blkdev_get+0x11b/0x4b0
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: blkdev_get+0x1c3/0x320
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: blkdev_open+0x5b/0x70
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: do_dentry_open+0x213/0x330
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? bd_acquire+0xd0/0xd0
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: vfs_open+0x4f/0x70
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? may_open+0x9b/0x100
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: path_openat+0x557/0x13c0
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? generic_file_read_iter+0x746/0x8c0
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? scsi_bios_ptable+0x54/0x130
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: do_filp_open+0x91/0x100
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? __alloc_fd+0x46/0x170
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: do_sys_open+0x124/0x210
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x209/0x290
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7faef86b0a10
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: RSP: 002b:00007fffa7159438 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000b34310 RCX: 00007faef86b0a10
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: RDX: 00007fffa7159598 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: 00007fffa7159590
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: RBP: 00007fffa7159590 R08: 00007faef8610938 R09: 0000000000000008
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
Apr  6 17:34:05 avlnxperf kernel: R13: 0000000000b34550 R14: 0000000000000005 R15: 0000000000000000

[PATCH 2/2] scsi: Add template flag 'host_tagset'

[Hannes Reinecke]

Add a host template flag 'host_tagset' to enable the use of a
global tagmap for block-mq.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c  | 2 ++
 include/scsi/scsi_host.h | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index ba22866..00036cb 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -2193,6 +2193,8 @@ int scsi_mq_setup_tags(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
 	shost->tag_set.cmd_size = cmd_size;
 	shost->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 	shost->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE | BLK_MQ_F_SG_MERGE;
+	if (shost->hostt->host_tagset)
+		shost->tag_set.flags |= BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS;
 	shost->tag_set.flags |=
 		BLK_ALLOC_POLICY_TO_MQ_FLAG(shost->hostt->tag_alloc_policy);
 	shost->tag_set.driver_data = shost;
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
index 3cd8c3b..dff3ec1 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
@@ -457,6 +457,11 @@ struct scsi_host_template {
 	unsigned no_async_abort:1;
 
 	/*
+	 * True if the host supports a host-wide tagspace
+	 */
+	unsigned host_tagset:1;
+
+	/*
 	 * Countdown for host blocking with no commands outstanding.
 	 */
 	unsigned int max_host_blocked;
-- 
1.8.5.6

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Omar Sandoval]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:07:43PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> as discussed recently most existing HBAs have a host-wide tagset which
> does not map easily onto the per-queue tagset model of block mq.
> This patchset implements a flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS for block-mq, which
> enables the use of a shared tagset for all hardware queues.
> The second patch adds a flag 'host_tagset' to the SCSI host template,
> which allows drivers to enable the use of the global tagset.
> 
> This patchset probably has some performance implications as
> there is a quite high probability of cache-bouncing when allocating
> tags. Also I'm not quite sure if the implemented tagset sharing
> is the correct way to handle things.
> So this can be considered an RFC.
> 
> As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.

Hi, Hannes,

blk-mq already supports a shared tagset, and scsi-mq already uses that.
When we initialize a request queue, we add it to a tagset with
blk_mq_add_queue_set(), where we automatically mark the tagset as shared
if there is more than one queue using it. What does this do that
BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED doesn't cover?

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Bart Van Assche]

On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 08:32 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> blk-mq already supports a shared tagset, and scsi-mq already uses that.
> When we initialize a request queue, we add it to a tagset with
> blk_mq_add_queue_set(), where we automatically mark the tagset as shared
> if there is more than one queue using it. What does this do that
> BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED doesn't cover?

Hello Omar,

Today blk-mq creates one tag set per hardware queue. The sharing by
scsi-mq is between request queues for hardware queues that have the same
index but not between hardware queues of a single request queue. My
understanding is that the goal of this patch series is to make it possible
to use a single tag set for all hardware queues and all request queues that
share the same SCSI host.

Bart.=

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Bart Van Assche]

On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 08:32 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> blk-mq already supports a shared tagset, and scsi-mq already uses that.
> When we initialize a request queue, we add it to a tagset with
> blk_mq_add_queue_set(), where we automatically mark the tagset as shared
> if there is more than one queue using it. What does this do that
> BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED doesn't cover?

Hello Omar,

Today blk-mq creates one tag set per hardware queue. The sharing by
scsi-mq is between request queues for hardware queues that have the same
index but not between hardware queues of a single request queue. My
understanding is that the goal of this patch series is to make it possible
to use a single tag set for all hardware queues and all request queues that
share the same SCSI host.

Bart.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 04/04/2017 05:32 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:07:43PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as discussed recently most existing HBAs have a host-wide tagset which
>> does not map easily onto the per-queue tagset model of block mq.
>> This patchset implements a flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS for block-mq, which
>> enables the use of a shared tagset for all hardware queues.
>> The second patch adds a flag 'host_tagset' to the SCSI host template,
>> which allows drivers to enable the use of the global tagset.
>>
>> This patchset probably has some performance implications as
>> there is a quite high probability of cache-bouncing when allocating
>> tags. Also I'm not quite sure if the implemented tagset sharing
>> is the correct way to handle things.
>> So this can be considered an RFC.
>>
>> As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.
>
> Hi, Hannes,
>
> blk-mq already supports a shared tagset, and scsi-mq already uses that.
> When we initialize a request queue, we add it to a tagset with
> blk_mq_add_queue_set(), where we automatically mark the tagset as shared
> if there is more than one queue using it. What does this do that
> BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED doesn't cover?
>
This is orthogonal to the BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED flag.
That flag is covering the case for several block devices sharing the 
same tagset.
My new flag is covering the case where several _hardware_ queues are 
sharing the same tagset.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�rnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend�rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N�rnberg)

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 04/04/2017 05:32 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:07:43PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as discussed recently most existing HBAs have a host-wide tagset which
>> does not map easily onto the per-queue tagset model of block mq.
>> This patchset implements a flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS for block-mq, which
>> enables the use of a shared tagset for all hardware queues.
>> The second patch adds a flag 'host_tagset' to the SCSI host template,
>> which allows drivers to enable the use of the global tagset.
>>
>> This patchset probably has some performance implications as
>> there is a quite high probability of cache-bouncing when allocating
>> tags. Also I'm not quite sure if the implemented tagset sharing
>> is the correct way to handle things.
>> So this can be considered an RFC.
>>
>> As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.
>
> Hi, Hannes,
>
> blk-mq already supports a shared tagset, and scsi-mq already uses that.
> When we initialize a request queue, we add it to a tagset with
> blk_mq_add_queue_set(), where we automatically mark the tagset as shared
> if there is more than one queue using it. What does this do that
> BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED doesn't cover?
>
This is orthogonal to the BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED flag.
That flag is covering the case for several block devices sharing the 
same tagset.
My new flag is covering the case where several _hardware_ queues are 
sharing the same tagset.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Ming Lei]

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as discussed recently most existing HBAs have a host-wide tagset which
> does not map easily onto the per-queue tagset model of block mq.
> This patchset implements a flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS for block-mq, which
> enables the use of a shared tagset for all hardware queues.
> The second patch adds a flag 'host_tagset' to the SCSI host template,
> which allows drivers to enable the use of the global tagset.
>
> This patchset probably has some performance implications as
> there is a quite high probability of cache-bouncing when allocating
> tags. Also I'm not quite sure if the implemented tagset sharing
> is the correct way to handle things.
> So this can be considered an RFC.
>
> As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.

Just be curious, why is multi hard queue used for this case? Are there
some real cases in SCSI?


Thanks,
Ming Lei

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Bart Van Assche]

On 04/04/2017 09:00 AM, Ming Lei wrote:=0A=
> Just be curious, why is multi hard queue used for this case? Are there=0A=
> some real cases in SCSI?=0A=
=0A=
Hello Ming,=0A=
=0A=
Yes, there is a real need for this. Background information is available=0A=
in the following e-mail thread: Arun Easi, "scsi-mq - tag# and=0A=
can_queue, performance", April 2, 2017, linux-scsi=0A=
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg106853.html).=0A=
=0A=
Bart.=0A=

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Bart Van Assche]

On 04/04/2017 09:00 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Just be curious, why is multi hard queue used for this case? Are there
> some real cases in SCSI?

Hello Ming,

Yes, there is a real need for this. Background information is available
in the following e-mail thread: Arun Easi, "scsi-mq - tag# and
can_queue, performance", April 2, 2017, linux-scsi
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg106853.html).

Bart.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] block,scsi: support host-wide tagset

[Hannes Reinecke]

On 04/04/2017 05:59 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as discussed recently most existing HBAs have a host-wide tagset which
>> does not map easily onto the per-queue tagset model of block mq.
>> This patchset implements a flag BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS for block-mq, which
>> enables the use of a shared tagset for all hardware queues.
>> The second patch adds a flag 'host_tagset' to the SCSI host template,
>> which allows drivers to enable the use of the global tagset.
>>
>> This patchset probably has some performance implications as
>> there is a quite high probability of cache-bouncing when allocating
>> tags. Also I'm not quite sure if the implemented tagset sharing
>> is the correct way to handle things.
>> So this can be considered an RFC.
>>
>> As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.
>
> Just be curious, why is multi hard queue used for this case? Are there
> some real cases in SCSI?
>
Yes.
This is required by basically every driver in drivers/scsi which would 
in theory be able to support scsi-mq (ie lpfc, qla2xxx, mpt3sas, and 
possibly fnic). Each of them support several submission/completion 
queues, but every one of them has a host-wide tag map, too.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)