FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm writecache: fix writing beyond end of underlying device" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm writecache: fix writing beyond end of underlying device" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
@ 2021-03-01 13:46 gregkh
  2021-07-19 15:20 ` Mikulas Patocka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2021-03-01 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mpatocka, snitzer; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 4134455f2aafdfeab50cabb4cccb35e916034b93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:56:20 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] dm writecache: fix writing beyond end of underlying device
 when shrinking

Do not attempt to write any data beyond the end of the underlying data
device while shrinking it.

The DM writecache device must be suspended when the underlying data
device is shrunk.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
index e8382d73c73c..baf5a9ce2b25 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ struct dm_writecache {
 	size_t metadata_sectors;
 	size_t n_blocks;
 	uint64_t seq_count;
+	sector_t data_device_sectors;
 	void *block_start;
 	struct wc_entry *entries;
 	unsigned block_size;
@@ -977,6 +978,8 @@ static void writecache_resume(struct dm_target *ti)
 
 	wc_lock(wc);
 
+	wc->data_device_sectors = i_size_read(wc->dev->bdev->bd_inode) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+
 	if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc)) {
 		persistent_memory_invalidate_cache(wc->memory_map, wc->memory_map_size);
 	} else {
@@ -1646,6 +1649,10 @@ static bool wc_add_block(struct writeback_struct *wb, struct wc_entry *e, gfp_t
 	void *address = memory_data(wc, e);
 
 	persistent_memory_flush_cache(address, block_size);
+
+	if (unlikely(bio_end_sector(&wb->bio) >= wc->data_device_sectors))
+		return true;
+
 	return bio_add_page(&wb->bio, persistent_memory_page(address),
 			    block_size, persistent_memory_page_offset(address)) != 0;
 }
@@ -1717,6 +1724,9 @@ static void __writecache_writeback_pmem(struct dm_writecache *wc, struct writeba
 		if (writecache_has_error(wc)) {
 			bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
 			bio_endio(bio);
+		} else if (unlikely(!bio_sectors(bio))) {
+			bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_OK;
+			bio_endio(bio);
 		} else {
 			submit_bio(bio);
 		}
@@ -1760,6 +1770,14 @@ static void __writecache_writeback_ssd(struct dm_writecache *wc, struct writebac
 			e = f;
 		}
 
+		if (unlikely(to.sector + to.count > wc->data_device_sectors)) {
+			if (to.sector >= wc->data_device_sectors) {
+				writecache_copy_endio(0, 0, c);
+				continue;
+			}
+			from.count = to.count = wc->data_device_sectors - to.sector;
+		}
+
 		dm_kcopyd_copy(wc->dm_kcopyd, &from, 1, &to, 0, writecache_copy_endio, c);
 
 		__writeback_throttle(wc, wbl);


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread