* Stacking patches for 5.3
@ 2019-05-24 19:26 Casey Schaufler
2019-05-24 19:36 ` James Morris
2019-05-24 19:37 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2019-05-24 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Security Module list
Cc: Kees Cook, James Morris, John Johansen, Paul Moore, casey
I have a set of 59 patches for the nest round of LSM stacking.
They are all really small. Kees has expressed a preference for
small patches. I think that the collapsed set of about 10 would
make more sense. Which would the community as a whole prefer?
The patches are not much different from what has been presented
already.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Stacking patches for 5.3
2019-05-24 19:26 Stacking patches for 5.3 Casey Schaufler
@ 2019-05-24 19:36 ` James Morris
2019-05-24 19:37 ` Paul Moore
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2019-05-24 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Schaufler
Cc: Linux Security Module list, Kees Cook, John Johansen, Paul Moore
On Fri, 24 May 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> I have a set of 59 patches for the nest round of LSM stacking.
> They are all really small. Kees has expressed a preference for
> small patches. I think that the collapsed set of about 10 would
> make more sense. Which would the community as a whole prefer?
> The patches are not much different from what has been presented
> already.
I agree with Kees, smaller patches are easier to review.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Stacking patches for 5.3
2019-05-24 19:26 Stacking patches for 5.3 Casey Schaufler
2019-05-24 19:36 ` James Morris
@ 2019-05-24 19:37 ` Paul Moore
2019-05-24 19:55 ` Casey Schaufler
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2019-05-24 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Schaufler
Cc: Linux Security Module list, Kees Cook, James Morris, John Johansen
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:26 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> I have a set of 59 patches for the nest round of LSM stacking.
> They are all really small. Kees has expressed a preference for
> small patches. I think that the collapsed set of about 10 would
> make more sense. Which would the community as a whole prefer?
> The patches are not much different from what has been presented
> already.
Is there an option for "not posted on the Friday before a holiday weekend"? ;)
I honestly don't care too much about patch size, regardless of how it
is packaged it's a lot of pretty critical stuff to review.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Stacking patches for 5.3
2019-05-24 19:37 ` Paul Moore
@ 2019-05-24 19:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-25 3:55 ` James Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Casey Schaufler @ 2019-05-24 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore
Cc: Linux Security Module list, Kees Cook, James Morris, John Johansen
On 5/24/2019 12:37 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:26 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>> I have a set of 59 patches for the nest round of LSM stacking.
>> They are all really small. Kees has expressed a preference for
>> small patches. I think that the collapsed set of about 10 would
>> make more sense. Which would the community as a whole prefer?
>> The patches are not much different from what has been presented
>> already.
> Is there an option for "not posted on the Friday before a holiday weekend"? ;)
I'm waiting for James' next-general to base it on, so you needn't worry.
> I honestly don't care too much about patch size, regardless of how it
> is packaged it's a lot of pretty critical stuff to review.
Consensus looks like small patches are the way to go. So be it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Stacking patches for 5.3
2019-05-24 19:55 ` Casey Schaufler
@ 2019-05-25 3:55 ` James Morris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: James Morris @ 2019-05-25 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Casey Schaufler
Cc: Paul Moore, Linux Security Module list, Kees Cook, John Johansen
On Fri, 24 May 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 5/24/2019 12:37 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:26 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> >> I have a set of 59 patches for the nest round of LSM stacking.
> >> They are all really small. Kees has expressed a preference for
> >> small patches. I think that the collapsed set of about 10 would
> >> make more sense. Which would the community as a whole prefer?
> >> The patches are not much different from what has been presented
> >> already.
> > Is there an option for "not posted on the Friday before a holiday weekend"? ;)
>
> I'm waiting for James' next-general to base it on, so you needn't worry.
I won't be merging with Linus' tree unless there's a specific reason to,
so go ahead with the current branch.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-25 3:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-24 19:26 Stacking patches for 5.3 Casey Schaufler
2019-05-24 19:36 ` James Morris
2019-05-24 19:37 ` Paul Moore
2019-05-24 19:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-05-25 3:55 ` James Morris
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.