All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	chenzhongjin@huawei.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
	sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:16:53 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2207011609360.23331@pobox.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524001637.1707472-20-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Hi,

sorry for the late reply...

On Mon, 23 May 2022, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:

> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> 	- Create arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h and define
> 	  klp_arch_set_pc() and klp_get_ftrace_location() which
> 	  are required for livepatch.
> 
> 	- Define TIF_PATCH_PENDING in arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> 	  for livepatch.
> 
> 	- Check TIF_PATCH_PENDING in do_notify_resume() to patch the
> 	  current task for livepatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h   | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h |  4 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c           |  4 +++
>  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..72d7cd86f158
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + *
> + * livepatch.h - arm64-specific Kernel Live Patching Core
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_LIVEPATCH_H
> +#define _ASM_ARM64_LIVEPATCH_H
> +
> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +
> +static inline void klp_arch_set_pc(struct ftrace_regs *fregs, unsigned long ip)
> +{
> +	struct pt_regs *regs = ftrace_get_regs(fregs);
> +
> +	regs->pc = ip;
> +}

kernel/livepatch/ does not use klp_arch_set_pc() anymore. It was replaced 
by ftrace_instruction_pointer_set() and 
CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS.

> +/*
> + * klp_get_ftrace_location is expected to return the address of the BL to the
> + * relevant ftrace handler in the callsite. The location of this can vary based
> + * on several compilation options.
> + * CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> + *	- Inserts 2 nops on function entry the second of which is the BL
> + *	  referenced above. (See ftrace_init_nop() for the callsite sequence)
> + *	  (this is required by livepatch and must be selected)
> + * CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL:
> + *	- Inserts a hint #0x22 on function entry if the function is called
> + *	  indirectly (to satisfy BTI requirements), which is inserted before
> + *	  the two nops from above.
> + */
> +#define klp_get_ftrace_location klp_get_ftrace_location
> +static inline unsigned long klp_get_ftrace_location(unsigned long faddr)
> +{
> +	unsigned long addr = faddr + AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL)
> +	addr = ftrace_location_range(addr, addr + AARCH64_INSN_SIZE);
> +#endif
> +
> +	return addr;
> +}

This is not needed either. peterz improved the ftrace code and livepatch 
now uses ftrace_location() which gives the proper location directly.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index e1317b7c4525..a1d8999dbdcc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
>  #define TIF_UPROBE		4	/* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */
>  #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT	5	/* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */
>  #define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL	6	/* signal notifications exist */
> +#define TIF_PATCH_PENDING	7	/* pending live patching update */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	8	/* syscall trace active */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT	9	/* syscall auditing */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT	10	/* syscall tracepoint for ftrace */
> @@ -98,11 +99,12 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
>  #define _TIF_SVE		(1 << TIF_SVE)
>  #define _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT	(1 << TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT)
>  #define _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL	(1 << TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
> +#define _TIF_PATCH_PENDING	(1 << TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>  
>  #define _TIF_WORK_MASK		(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
>  				 _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \
>  				 _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \
> -				 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
> +				 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>  
>  #define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK	(_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \
>  				 _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> index 4a4122ef6f39..cbec9597349f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
> +#include <linux/livepatch.h>
>  #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>  
> @@ -938,6 +939,9 @@ void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long thread_flags)
>  					       (void __user *)NULL, current);
>  			}
>  
> +			if (thread_flags & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
> +				klp_update_patch_state(current);
> +
>  			if (thread_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
>  				do_signal(regs);

The rest should be fine.

Regards

Miroslav

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	chenzhongjin@huawei.com,  mark.rutland@arm.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
	 sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org,  jamorris@linux.microsoft.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:16:53 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2207011609360.23331@pobox.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524001637.1707472-20-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Hi,

sorry for the late reply...

On Mon, 23 May 2022, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:

> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> 	- Create arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h and define
> 	  klp_arch_set_pc() and klp_get_ftrace_location() which
> 	  are required for livepatch.
> 
> 	- Define TIF_PATCH_PENDING in arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> 	  for livepatch.
> 
> 	- Check TIF_PATCH_PENDING in do_notify_resume() to patch the
> 	  current task for livepatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h   | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h |  4 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c           |  4 +++
>  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..72d7cd86f158
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + *
> + * livepatch.h - arm64-specific Kernel Live Patching Core
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_LIVEPATCH_H
> +#define _ASM_ARM64_LIVEPATCH_H
> +
> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +
> +static inline void klp_arch_set_pc(struct ftrace_regs *fregs, unsigned long ip)
> +{
> +	struct pt_regs *regs = ftrace_get_regs(fregs);
> +
> +	regs->pc = ip;
> +}

kernel/livepatch/ does not use klp_arch_set_pc() anymore. It was replaced 
by ftrace_instruction_pointer_set() and 
CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS.

> +/*
> + * klp_get_ftrace_location is expected to return the address of the BL to the
> + * relevant ftrace handler in the callsite. The location of this can vary based
> + * on several compilation options.
> + * CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> + *	- Inserts 2 nops on function entry the second of which is the BL
> + *	  referenced above. (See ftrace_init_nop() for the callsite sequence)
> + *	  (this is required by livepatch and must be selected)
> + * CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL:
> + *	- Inserts a hint #0x22 on function entry if the function is called
> + *	  indirectly (to satisfy BTI requirements), which is inserted before
> + *	  the two nops from above.
> + */
> +#define klp_get_ftrace_location klp_get_ftrace_location
> +static inline unsigned long klp_get_ftrace_location(unsigned long faddr)
> +{
> +	unsigned long addr = faddr + AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL)
> +	addr = ftrace_location_range(addr, addr + AARCH64_INSN_SIZE);
> +#endif
> +
> +	return addr;
> +}

This is not needed either. peterz improved the ftrace code and livepatch 
now uses ftrace_location() which gives the proper location directly.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index e1317b7c4525..a1d8999dbdcc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
>  #define TIF_UPROBE		4	/* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */
>  #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT	5	/* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */
>  #define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL	6	/* signal notifications exist */
> +#define TIF_PATCH_PENDING	7	/* pending live patching update */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	8	/* syscall trace active */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT	9	/* syscall auditing */
>  #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT	10	/* syscall tracepoint for ftrace */
> @@ -98,11 +99,12 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
>  #define _TIF_SVE		(1 << TIF_SVE)
>  #define _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT	(1 << TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT)
>  #define _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL	(1 << TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
> +#define _TIF_PATCH_PENDING	(1 << TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>  
>  #define _TIF_WORK_MASK		(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
>  				 _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \
>  				 _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \
> -				 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
> +				 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>  
>  #define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK	(_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \
>  				 _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> index 4a4122ef6f39..cbec9597349f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
> +#include <linux/livepatch.h>
>  #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>  
> @@ -938,6 +939,9 @@ void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long thread_flags)
>  					       (void __user *)NULL, current);
>  			}
>  
> +			if (thread_flags & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
> +				klp_update_patch_state(current);
> +
>  			if (thread_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
>  				do_signal(regs);

The rest should be fine.

Regards

Miroslav

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-01 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <e81e773678f88f7c2ff7480e2eb096973ec198db>
2022-05-24  0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] objtool: Reorganize CFI code madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] objtool: Reorganize instruction-related code madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] objtool: Move decode_instructions() to a separate file madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] objtool: Reorganize Unwind hint code madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC types madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24 14:27     ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-24 14:27       ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-29 15:36       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-29 15:36         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC code madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC kernel code madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] objtool: arm64: Implement decoder for FP validation madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24 14:09     ` Mark Brown
2022-05-24 14:09       ` Mark Brown
2022-05-29 14:49       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-29 14:49         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-30  7:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-30  7:51           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-01 22:45           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-01 22:45             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-07 18:13             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-07 18:13               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] objtool: arm64: Compute destinations for call and jump instructions madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] objtool: arm64: Walk instructions and compute CFI for each instruction madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24 13:45     ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-24 13:45       ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-29 15:18       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-29 15:18         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-30  1:44         ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-30  1:44           ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] objtool: arm64: Generate ORC data from CFI for object files madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] objtool: arm64: Dump ORC data present in " madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] objtool: arm64: Add unwind hint support madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: Add unwind hints to specific points in code madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: Add kernel and module support for ORC madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: Build the kernel with ORC information madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on ORC madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-07-01 14:16     ` Miroslav Benes [this message]
2022-07-01 14:16       ` Miroslav Benes
2022-07-01 19:53       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-07-01 19:53         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: Enable livepatch for ARM64 madvenka
2022-05-24  0:16     ` madvenka
2022-05-24 14:24   ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-24 14:24     ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-29 15:30     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-29 15:30       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-15 12:18   ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-15 12:18     ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-15 13:37     ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-15 13:37       ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-15 14:18       ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-15 14:18         ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-15 20:50       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-15 20:50         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-15 20:47     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-15 20:47       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.21.2207011609360.23331@pobox.suse.cz \
    --to=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
    --cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.