All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marc Aurèle La France" <tsi@tuyoix.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter REJECT: Fix destination MAC in RST packets
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:39:44 -0700 (Mountain Standard Time)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.20.2103102037030.2800@CLUIJ> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311000212.GA21480@salvia>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3571 bytes --]

On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:51:26PM -0700, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:25:28PM -0700, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:21:20AM -0700, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 06:16:34PM -0700, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
>>>>>>>> In the non-bridge case, the REJECT target code assumes the REJECTed
>>>>>>>> packets were originally emitted by the local host, but that's not
>>>>>>>> necessarily true when the local host is the default route of a subnet
>>>>>>>> it is on, resulting in RST packets being sent out with an incorrect
>>>>>>>> destination MAC.  Address this by refactoring the handling of bridged
>>>>>>>> packets which deals with a similar issue.  Modulo patch fuzz, the
>>>>>>>> following applies to v5 and later kernels.

>>>>>>> The code this patch updates is related to BRIDGE_NETFILTER. Your patch
>>>>>>> description refers to the non-bridge case. What are you trying to
>>>>>>> achieve?

>>>>>> Via DHCP, my subnet's default route is a Linux system so that it can monitor
>>>>>> all outbound traffic.  By doing so, for example, I have determined that my
>>>>>> Android phone connects to Facebook despite the fact that I have no such app
>>>>>> installed.  I want to know, and control, what other behind-the-scenes
>>>>>> (under-handed) traffic devices on my subnet generate.

>>>>>>> dev_queue_xmit() path should not be exercised from the prerouting
>>>>>>> chain, packets generated from the IP later must follow the
>>>>>>> ip_local_out() path.

>>>>>> Well, I can tell you dev_queue_xmit() does in fact work in prerouting
>>>>>> chains, as it must for the bridging case.  The only potential problem I've
>>>>>> found so far is that the RST packet doesn't go through any netfilter hooks.

>>>>> That's the issue, Netfilter rejects code from the IP layer, so the
>>>>> packets follows the ip_local_out() path.

>>>> ... which sets an incorrect destination MAC.  Also, in this case, netfilter
>>>> doesn't reject any such thing.  It doesn't even "see" the RST packet
>>>> dev_queue_xmit() sends out.  That's OK as there is no further need to
>>>> process such a packet.

>>> dev_queue_xmit() skips the policy in the local out path for the
>>> generated RST packet. If you want to plain reject using
>>> dev_queue_xmit() then you have to use the ingress hook.

>>>> At least, the device whose connection request is being denied
>>>> doesn't hang anymore...

>>> The neighbour cache selects the destination MAC from the destination
>>> IP address of the RST packet.

>>> Your patch also refers to non-bridge scenario (no br_netfilter in
>>> place).

>>> Could you describe what you're trying to achieve in plain layman terms?

>> I will (re-)do no such thing because you are refusing to make sense.

>> It's OK that the bridge code uses dev_queue_xmit() to send out an RST packet
>> that has correct MACs, but that doesn't make another trip through netfilter.

> It's not OK that the bridge uses dev_queue_xmit().

> That was an ugly solution to make the REJECT target work from
> br_netfilter, because there was absolutely no other better way at that
> time to make it work.

> There has been now native support to reject traffic from the bridge
> from many years on through br_forward(), which is the way to go.

Ah, the cart before the horse.  I'll wait.

Later.

Marc.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11  3:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-08  1:16 [PATCH nf] netfilter REJECT: Fix destination MAC in RST packets Marc Aurèle La France
2021-03-08 10:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-03-08 16:21   ` Marc Aurèle La France
2021-03-09  1:36     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-03-09  4:25       ` Marc Aurèle La France
2021-03-09 10:27         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-03-10 23:51           ` Marc Aurèle La France
2021-03-11  0:02             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-03-11  3:39               ` Marc Aurèle La France [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.WNT.2.20.2103102037030.2800@CLUIJ \
    --to=tsi@tuyoix.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.