All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: Introduce prepare and unprepare for subdevices
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 14:31:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0bc8d99-2067-4ce0-fa36-3ac4d14d7b3c@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2d120c3-a875-7feb-00a9-e8e4d3e4dfbe@linaro.org>



On 05/29/2018 01:51 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 05/29/2018 04:16 AM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> . . .
> 
>>> +unroll_preparation:
>>> +	list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>>> +		if (subdev->unprepare)
>>> +			subdev->unprepare(subdev);
>>> +	}
>> Here you could call rproc_unprepare_subdevices instead of duplicating
>> the code.
> 
> I thought the same thing, but it won't work because we only want to
> unprepare those devices that were successfully prepared.  Here we are
> unwinding the work that was partially done; in rproc_unprepare_subdevices()
> *all* subdevices have their unprepare function called.

You right, i missed the "continue"... new for me as i never used it,
thank for teaching!

Arnaud

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>,
	<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: Introduce prepare and unprepare for subdevices
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 14:31:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0bc8d99-2067-4ce0-fa36-3ac4d14d7b3c@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2d120c3-a875-7feb-00a9-e8e4d3e4dfbe@linaro.org>



On 05/29/2018 01:51 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 05/29/2018 04:16 AM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> . . .
> 
>>> +unroll_preparation:
>>> +	list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
>>> +		if (subdev->unprepare)
>>> +			subdev->unprepare(subdev);
>>> +	}
>> Here you could call rproc_unprepare_subdevices instead of duplicating
>> the code.
> 
> I thought the same thing, but it won't work because we only want to
> unprepare those devices that were successfully prepared.  Here we are
> unwinding the work that was partially done; in rproc_unprepare_subdevices()
> *all* subdevices have their unprepare function called.

You right, i missed the "continue"... new for me as i never used it,
thank for teaching!

Arnaud

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-29 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-15 20:53 [PATCH 0/5] remoteproc: updates for new events Alex Elder
2018-05-15 20:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] remoteproc: Rename subdev functions to start/stop Alex Elder
2018-05-15 20:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: Make start and stop in subdev optional Alex Elder
2018-05-15 20:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] remoteproc: Make client initialize ops in rproc_subdev Alex Elder
2018-05-15 20:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: rename subdev probe and remove functions Alex Elder
2018-05-29  9:12   ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-05-29  9:12     ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-05-29 11:53     ` Alex Elder
2018-06-26  1:32       ` Alex Elder
2018-06-26  2:20         ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-05-15 20:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: Introduce prepare and unprepare for subdevices Alex Elder
2018-05-29  9:16   ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-05-29  9:16     ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-05-29 11:51     ` Alex Elder
2018-05-29 12:31       ` Arnaud Pouliquen [this message]
2018-05-29 12:31         ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-05-29 15:26   ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-05-29 15:26     ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-05-29 15:30     ` Fabien DESSENNE
2018-05-29 15:31       ` Alex Elder
2018-05-29 15:44         ` Fabien DESSENNE

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0bc8d99-2067-4ce0-fa36-3ac4d14d7b3c@st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.