All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
	"James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com" 
	<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"tom.leiming@gmail.com" <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	"sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 06:00:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1616769-b1d7-97c7-b197-9dc3d0f74a7b@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180802125141.jyb2zz75jgrzibaq@linux-x5ow.site>

On 08/02/2018 05:51 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 05:46:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> This is consistent across multiple test runs. In summary,
>>
>> - Boot from initrd fails
>> - Boot from SATA drive fails (this is with CONFIG_ATA)
>> - Boot from NVME fails
>> - Boot from USB drive fails
>> - Boot from MMC (SD) fails
>> - Boot from USB UAS drive passes
>> - Boot from various real SCSI drives passes
>>
>> Platform (pc,q35), CPU type, or SMP/NOSMP does not seem to make a difference.
> 
> OK. I try to bisect between next-20180727 (known good) and
> next-20180731 (known bad) with forced scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1, but so
> far the only bad I've seen is next-20180731.
> 

Per my logs, next-20180730 is the first bad, next-20180727 is the last good.

Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-02 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-01  7:58 linux-next: Tree for Aug 1 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-01 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-01 22:52   ` James Bottomley
2018-08-01 23:00     ` James Bottomley
2018-08-02  0:05       ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-02  1:19         ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-01 23:47     ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-01 23:57       ` Ming Lei
2018-08-02  0:03         ` James Bottomley
2018-08-02  0:20           ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-02  4:58           ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-02  5:04             ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-02  5:04               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-02 12:46               ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-02 12:46                 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-02 12:51                 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-08-02 12:51                   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-08-02 13:00                   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-08-02 13:00                     ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-02 13:06                     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-08-02 13:06                       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-08-02 11:35             ` Ming Lei
2018-08-02 13:05               ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-02 16:27                 ` Ming Lei
2018-08-02 16:40                   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-02 16:40                     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-02 16:50                     ` Ming Lei
2018-08-02 16:50                       ` Ming Lei
2018-08-02 16:57                       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-02 16:57                         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-02  0:12         ` Guenter Roeck
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-01  5:19 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-01  6:14 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-01  7:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-01 12:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-01 13:20   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-01 13:28     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-01 23:55       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-02 11:13         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-01  4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-01  9:14 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-01  7:25 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-01  7:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-01  7:50 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-08-01  4:47 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-01  7:01 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-08-01 21:54   ` Randy Dunlap
2011-08-02  1:29     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-02 10:38       ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b1616769-b1d7-97c7-b197-9dc3d0f74a7b@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.