From: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, aik@ozlabs.ru,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, sbobroff@linux.ibm.com,
oohall@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix IOMMU setup for hotplugged devices on pseries
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:42:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b43dada8-7fc8-2ee1-46da-273c522426a4@anastas.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190905093841.mkpvzkcrafwpo5lj@wunner.de>
On 9/5/19 4:38 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:22:13PM -0500, Shawn Anastasio wrote:
>> If anybody has more insight or a better way to fix this, please let me know.
>
> Have you considered moving the invocation of pcibios_setup_device()
> to pcibios_bus_add_device()?
>
> The latter is called from pci_bus_add_device() in drivers/pci/bus.c.
> At this point device_add() has been called, so the device exists in
> sysfs.
>
> Basically when adding a PCI device, the order is:
>
> * pci_device_add() populates struct pci_dev, calls device_add(),
> binding the device to a driver is prevented
> * after pci_device_add() has been called for all discovered devices,
> resources are allocated
> * pci_bus_add_device() is called for each device,
> calls pcibios_bus_add_device() and binds the device to a driver
Thank you, this is exactly what I was looking for! Just tested and
this seems to work perfectly. I'll go ahead and submit a v2 that
does this instead.
Thanks again,
Shawn
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, sbobroff@linux.ibm.com,
oohall@gmail.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix IOMMU setup for hotplugged devices on pseries
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:42:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b43dada8-7fc8-2ee1-46da-273c522426a4@anastas.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190905093841.mkpvzkcrafwpo5lj@wunner.de>
On 9/5/19 4:38 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:22:13PM -0500, Shawn Anastasio wrote:
>> If anybody has more insight or a better way to fix this, please let me know.
>
> Have you considered moving the invocation of pcibios_setup_device()
> to pcibios_bus_add_device()?
>
> The latter is called from pci_bus_add_device() in drivers/pci/bus.c.
> At this point device_add() has been called, so the device exists in
> sysfs.
>
> Basically when adding a PCI device, the order is:
>
> * pci_device_add() populates struct pci_dev, calls device_add(),
> binding the device to a driver is prevented
> * after pci_device_add() has been called for all discovered devices,
> resources are allocated
> * pci_bus_add_device() is called for each device,
> calls pcibios_bus_add_device() and binds the device to a driver
Thank you, this is exactly what I was looking for! Just tested and
this seems to work perfectly. I'll go ahead and submit a v2 that
does this instead.
Thanks again,
Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-05 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-05 4:22 [PATCH 0/2] Fix IOMMU setup for hotplugged devices on pseries Shawn Anastasio
2019-09-05 4:22 ` Shawn Anastasio
2019-09-05 4:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Introduce pcibios_fixup_dev() Shawn Anastasio
2019-09-05 4:22 ` Shawn Anastasio
2019-09-05 4:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/pci: Fix IOMMU setup for hotplugged devices on pseries Shawn Anastasio
2019-09-05 4:22 ` Shawn Anastasio
2019-09-05 9:08 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-09-05 9:08 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-09-05 17:59 ` Shawn Anastasio
2019-09-05 17:59 ` Shawn Anastasio
2019-09-05 9:38 ` Lukas Wunner
2019-09-05 18:42 ` Shawn Anastasio [this message]
2019-09-05 18:42 ` Shawn Anastasio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b43dada8-7fc8-2ee1-46da-273c522426a4@anastas.io \
--to=shawn@anastas.io \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.