All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
	Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
	Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/swap: remember PG_anon_exclusive via a swp pte bit
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:10:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b49f1b4c-defa-ef32-1984-0273e1fad178@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220329164329.208407-2-david@redhat.com>

On 3/29/22 18:43, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Currently, we clear PG_anon_exclusive in try_to_unmap() and forget about
> it. We do this, to keep fork() logic on swap entries easy and efficient:
> for example, if we wouldn't clear it when unmapping, we'd have to lookup
> the page in the swapcache for each and every swap entry during fork() and
> clear PG_anon_exclusive if set.
> 
> Instead, we want to store that information directly in the swap pte,
> protected by the page table lock, similarly to how we handle
> SWP_MIGRATION_READ_EXCLUSIVE for migration entries. However, for actual
> swap entries, we don't want to mess with the swap type (e.g., still one
> bit) because it overcomplicates swap code.
> 
> In try_to_unmap(), we already reject to unmap in case the page might be
> pinned, because we must not lose PG_anon_exclusive on pinned pages ever.
> Checking if there are other unexpected references reliably *before*
> completely unmapping a page is unfortunately not really possible: THP
> heavily overcomplicate the situation. Once fully unmapped it's easier --
> we, for example, make sure that there are no unexpected references
> *after* unmapping a page before starting writeback on that page.
> 
> So, we currently might end up unmapping a page and clearing
> PG_anon_exclusive if that page has additional references, for example,
> due to a FOLL_GET.
> 
> do_swap_page() has to re-determine if a page is exclusive, which will
> easily fail if there are other references on a page, most prominently
> GUP references via FOLL_GET. This can currently result in memory
> corruptions when taking a FOLL_GET | FOLL_WRITE reference on a page even
> when fork() is never involved: try_to_unmap() will succeed, and when
> refaulting the page, it cannot be marked exclusive and will get replaced
> by a copy in the page tables on the next write access, resulting in writes
> via the GUP reference to the page being lost.
> 
> In an ideal world, everybody that uses GUP and wants to modify page
> content, such as O_DIRECT, would properly use FOLL_PIN. However, that
> conversion will take a while. It's easier to fix what used to work in the
> past (FOLL_GET | FOLL_WRITE) remembering PG_anon_exclusive. In addition,
> by remembering PG_anon_exclusive we can further reduce unnecessary COW
> in some cases, so it's the natural thing to do.
> 
> So let's transfer the PG_anon_exclusive information to the swap pte and
> store it via an architecture-dependant pte bit; use that information when
> restoring the swap pte in do_swap_page() and unuse_pte(). During fork(), we
> simply have to clear the pte bit and are done.
> 
> Of course, there is one corner case to handle: swap backends that don't
> support concurrent page modifications while the page is under writeback.
> Special case these, and drop the exclusive marker. Add a comment why that
> is just fine (also, reuse_swap_page() would have done the same in the
> past).
> 
> In the future, we'll hopefully have all architectures support
> __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE, such that we can get rid of the empty
> stubs and the define completely. Then, we can also convert
> SWP_MIGRATION_READ_EXCLUSIVE. For architectures it's fairly easy to
> support: either simply use a yet unused pte bit that can be used for swap
> entries, steal one from the arch type bits if they exceed 5, or steal one
> from the offset bits.
> 
> Note: R/O FOLL_GET references were never really reliable, especially
> when taking one on a shared page and then writing to the page (e.g., GUP
> after fork()). FOLL_GET, including R/W references, were never really
> reliable once fork was involved (e.g., GUP before fork(),
> GUP during fork()). KSM steps back in case it stumbles over unexpected
> references and is, therefore, fine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

With the fixup as reportedy by Miaohe Lin

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

(sent a separate mm-commits mail to inquire about the fix going missing from
mmotm)

https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/c3195d8a-2931-0749-973a-1d04e4baec94@suse.cz/T/#m4e98ccae6f747e11f45e4d0726427ba2fef740eb


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/swap: remember PG_anon_exclusive via a swp pte bit
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:10:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b49f1b4c-defa-ef32-1984-0273e1fad178@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220329164329.208407-2-david@redhat.com>

On 3/29/22 18:43, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Currently, we clear PG_anon_exclusive in try_to_unmap() and forget about
> it. We do this, to keep fork() logic on swap entries easy and efficient:
> for example, if we wouldn't clear it when unmapping, we'd have to lookup
> the page in the swapcache for each and every swap entry during fork() and
> clear PG_anon_exclusive if set.
> 
> Instead, we want to store that information directly in the swap pte,
> protected by the page table lock, similarly to how we handle
> SWP_MIGRATION_READ_EXCLUSIVE for migration entries. However, for actual
> swap entries, we don't want to mess with the swap type (e.g., still one
> bit) because it overcomplicates swap code.
> 
> In try_to_unmap(), we already reject to unmap in case the page might be
> pinned, because we must not lose PG_anon_exclusive on pinned pages ever.
> Checking if there are other unexpected references reliably *before*
> completely unmapping a page is unfortunately not really possible: THP
> heavily overcomplicate the situation. Once fully unmapped it's easier --
> we, for example, make sure that there are no unexpected references
> *after* unmapping a page before starting writeback on that page.
> 
> So, we currently might end up unmapping a page and clearing
> PG_anon_exclusive if that page has additional references, for example,
> due to a FOLL_GET.
> 
> do_swap_page() has to re-determine if a page is exclusive, which will
> easily fail if there are other references on a page, most prominently
> GUP references via FOLL_GET. This can currently result in memory
> corruptions when taking a FOLL_GET | FOLL_WRITE reference on a page even
> when fork() is never involved: try_to_unmap() will succeed, and when
> refaulting the page, it cannot be marked exclusive and will get replaced
> by a copy in the page tables on the next write access, resulting in writes
> via the GUP reference to the page being lost.
> 
> In an ideal world, everybody that uses GUP and wants to modify page
> content, such as O_DIRECT, would properly use FOLL_PIN. However, that
> conversion will take a while. It's easier to fix what used to work in the
> past (FOLL_GET | FOLL_WRITE) remembering PG_anon_exclusive. In addition,
> by remembering PG_anon_exclusive we can further reduce unnecessary COW
> in some cases, so it's the natural thing to do.
> 
> So let's transfer the PG_anon_exclusive information to the swap pte and
> store it via an architecture-dependant pte bit; use that information when
> restoring the swap pte in do_swap_page() and unuse_pte(). During fork(), we
> simply have to clear the pte bit and are done.
> 
> Of course, there is one corner case to handle: swap backends that don't
> support concurrent page modifications while the page is under writeback.
> Special case these, and drop the exclusive marker. Add a comment why that
> is just fine (also, reuse_swap_page() would have done the same in the
> past).
> 
> In the future, we'll hopefully have all architectures support
> __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE, such that we can get rid of the empty
> stubs and the define completely. Then, we can also convert
> SWP_MIGRATION_READ_EXCLUSIVE. For architectures it's fairly easy to
> support: either simply use a yet unused pte bit that can be used for swap
> entries, steal one from the arch type bits if they exceed 5, or steal one
> from the offset bits.
> 
> Note: R/O FOLL_GET references were never really reliable, especially
> when taking one on a shared page and then writing to the page (e.g., GUP
> after fork()). FOLL_GET, including R/W references, were never really
> reliable once fork was involved (e.g., GUP before fork(),
> GUP during fork()). KSM steps back in case it stumbles over unexpected
> references and is, therefore, fine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

With the fixup as reportedy by Miaohe Lin

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

(sent a separate mm-commits mail to inquire about the fix going missing from
mmotm)

https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/c3195d8a-2931-0749-973a-1d04e4baec94@suse.cz/T/#m4e98ccae6f747e11f45e4d0726427ba2fef740eb


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
	Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
	Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/swap: remember PG_anon_exclusive via a swp pte bit
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:10:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b49f1b4c-defa-ef32-1984-0273e1fad178@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220329164329.208407-2-david@redhat.com>

On 3/29/22 18:43, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Currently, we clear PG_anon_exclusive in try_to_unmap() and forget about
> it. We do this, to keep fork() logic on swap entries easy and efficient:
> for example, if we wouldn't clear it when unmapping, we'd have to lookup
> the page in the swapcache for each and every swap entry during fork() and
> clear PG_anon_exclusive if set.
> 
> Instead, we want to store that information directly in the swap pte,
> protected by the page table lock, similarly to how we handle
> SWP_MIGRATION_READ_EXCLUSIVE for migration entries. However, for actual
> swap entries, we don't want to mess with the swap type (e.g., still one
> bit) because it overcomplicates swap code.
> 
> In try_to_unmap(), we already reject to unmap in case the page might be
> pinned, because we must not lose PG_anon_exclusive on pinned pages ever.
> Checking if there are other unexpected references reliably *before*
> completely unmapping a page is unfortunately not really possible: THP
> heavily overcomplicate the situation. Once fully unmapped it's easier --
> we, for example, make sure that there are no unexpected references
> *after* unmapping a page before starting writeback on that page.
> 
> So, we currently might end up unmapping a page and clearing
> PG_anon_exclusive if that page has additional references, for example,
> due to a FOLL_GET.
> 
> do_swap_page() has to re-determine if a page is exclusive, which will
> easily fail if there are other references on a page, most prominently
> GUP references via FOLL_GET. This can currently result in memory
> corruptions when taking a FOLL_GET | FOLL_WRITE reference on a page even
> when fork() is never involved: try_to_unmap() will succeed, and when
> refaulting the page, it cannot be marked exclusive and will get replaced
> by a copy in the page tables on the next write access, resulting in writes
> via the GUP reference to the page being lost.
> 
> In an ideal world, everybody that uses GUP and wants to modify page
> content, such as O_DIRECT, would properly use FOLL_PIN. However, that
> conversion will take a while. It's easier to fix what used to work in the
> past (FOLL_GET | FOLL_WRITE) remembering PG_anon_exclusive. In addition,
> by remembering PG_anon_exclusive we can further reduce unnecessary COW
> in some cases, so it's the natural thing to do.
> 
> So let's transfer the PG_anon_exclusive information to the swap pte and
> store it via an architecture-dependant pte bit; use that information when
> restoring the swap pte in do_swap_page() and unuse_pte(). During fork(), we
> simply have to clear the pte bit and are done.
> 
> Of course, there is one corner case to handle: swap backends that don't
> support concurrent page modifications while the page is under writeback.
> Special case these, and drop the exclusive marker. Add a comment why that
> is just fine (also, reuse_swap_page() would have done the same in the
> past).
> 
> In the future, we'll hopefully have all architectures support
> __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE, such that we can get rid of the empty
> stubs and the define completely. Then, we can also convert
> SWP_MIGRATION_READ_EXCLUSIVE. For architectures it's fairly easy to
> support: either simply use a yet unused pte bit that can be used for swap
> entries, steal one from the arch type bits if they exceed 5, or steal one
> from the offset bits.
> 
> Note: R/O FOLL_GET references were never really reliable, especially
> when taking one on a shared page and then writing to the page (e.g., GUP
> after fork()). FOLL_GET, including R/W references, were never really
> reliable once fork was involved (e.g., GUP before fork(),
> GUP during fork()). KSM steps back in case it stumbles over unexpected
> references and is, therefore, fine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

With the fixup as reportedy by Miaohe Lin

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

(sent a separate mm-commits mail to inquire about the fix going missing from
mmotm)

https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/c3195d8a-2931-0749-973a-1d04e4baec94@suse.cz/T/#m4e98ccae6f747e11f45e4d0726427ba2fef740eb


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-20 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 16:43 [PATCH v2 0/8] mm: COW fixes part 3: reliable GUP R/W FOLL_GET of anonymous pages David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/swap: remember PG_anon_exclusive via a swp pte bit David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-13  8:58   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-13  9:30     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-13  9:38       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-13 10:46         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-13 12:31         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-14  2:40           ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-20 17:10   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-04-20 17:10     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-04-20 17:10     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-04-20 17:13     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-20 17:13       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-20 17:13       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: add tests for __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-20 17:14   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-04-20 17:14     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-04-20 17:14     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-03-29 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] x86/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-19 12:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-19 12:46     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-19 12:46     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] arm64/pgtable: " David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] s390/pgtable: cleanup description of swp pte layout David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-30 16:48   ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-30 16:48     ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-30 16:48     ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-29 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] s390/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-30 16:48   ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-30 16:48     ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-30 16:48     ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-29 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] powerpc/pgtable: remove _PAGE_BIT_SWAP_TYPE for book3s David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-30  6:07   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-30  6:07     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-30  6:07     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-30  6:58     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-30  6:58       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-30  6:58       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] powerpc/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE " David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-29 16:43   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b49f1b4c-defa-ef32-1984-0273e1fad178@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=oded.gabbay@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pedrodemargomes@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangliang5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.