From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> To: JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-blk: support per-device queue depth Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:47:40 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <b782bcb7-9b45-a122-0f80-8cfcd89b5f70@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <25d8430c-bf18-38ca-cf0c-c054507e1466@linux.alibaba.com> On 2021/1/20 上午9:51, JeffleXu wrote: > > On 1/19/21 12:06 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2021/1/19 上午9:33, JeffleXu wrote: >>> On 1/18/21 1:25 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2021/1/18 上午11:58, Joseph Qi wrote: >>>>> module parameter 'virtblk_queue_depth' was firstly introduced for >>>>> testing/benchmarking purposes described in commit fc4324b4597c >>>>> ("virtio-blk: base queue-depth on virtqueue ringsize or module param"). >>>>> Since we have different virtio-blk devices which have different >>>>> capabilities, it requires that we support per-device queue depth >>>>> instead >>>>> of per-module. So defaultly use vq free elements if module parameter >>>>> 'virtblk_queue_depth' is not set. >>>> I wonder if it's better to use sysfs instead (or whether it has already >>>> had something like this in the blocker layer). >>>> >>> "/sys/block/<dev>/queue/nr_requests" indeed works, but isn't better to >>> set queue_depth according to the hardware capability at the very first? >>> AFAIK, nvme just set per-device queue_depth at initializing phase. >> >> I agree, the problem is that the current code may modify module parameter. > The module parameter 'virtblk_queue_depth' is actually remained untainted. > > Actually it is the original code before this patch that changes the > module parameter. Yes, that's what I meant. > When the module parameter is not set by boot cmdline > (i.e., default to 0), it will be initialized to the queue_depth of the > vring of the first probed virtio-blk device, and will be revealed to > user space through '/sys/module/virtio_blk/parameters/queue_depth'. I'm > not sure if this behavior is reasonable or not. Right, it means the virtio-blk devices that is probed after the first one can only use the queue_depth that is set according to the capability of the first virtio-blk device. > > The only side effect of this patch is that, now > '/sys/module/virtio_blk/parameters/queue_depth' will be kept as '0' when > the module parameter is not set manually. I think it's not an issue, the nr_request should be the correct way to get per device queue depth. Thanks > > > Thanks, > Jeffle > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 12 +++++++----- >>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >>>>> index 145606d..f83a417 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >>>>> @@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device >>>>> *vdev) >>>>> u32 v, blk_size, max_size, sg_elems, opt_io_size; >>>>> u16 min_io_size; >>>>> u8 physical_block_exp, alignment_offset; >>>>> + unsigned int queue_depth; >>>>> if (!vdev->config->get) { >>>>> dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n", >>>>> @@ -755,17 +756,18 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device >>>>> *vdev) >>>>> goto out_free_vq; >>>>> } >>>>> - /* Default queue sizing is to fill the ring. */ >>>>> - if (!virtblk_queue_depth) { >>>>> - virtblk_queue_depth = vblk->vqs[0].vq->num_free; >>>>> + if (likely(!virtblk_queue_depth)) { >>>>> + queue_depth = vblk->vqs[0].vq->num_free; >>>>> /* ... but without indirect descs, we use 2 descs per req */ >>>>> if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC)) >>>>> - virtblk_queue_depth /= 2; >>>>> + queue_depth /= 2; >>>>> + } else { >>>>> + queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth; >>>>> } >>>>> memset(&vblk->tag_set, 0, sizeof(vblk->tag_set)); >>>>> vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops; >>>>> - vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth; >>>>> + vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = queue_depth; >>>>> vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE; >>>>> vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE; >>>>> vblk->tag_set.cmd_size =
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> To: JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-blk: support per-device queue depth Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:47:40 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <b782bcb7-9b45-a122-0f80-8cfcd89b5f70@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <25d8430c-bf18-38ca-cf0c-c054507e1466@linux.alibaba.com> On 2021/1/20 上午9:51, JeffleXu wrote: > > On 1/19/21 12:06 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2021/1/19 上午9:33, JeffleXu wrote: >>> On 1/18/21 1:25 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2021/1/18 上午11:58, Joseph Qi wrote: >>>>> module parameter 'virtblk_queue_depth' was firstly introduced for >>>>> testing/benchmarking purposes described in commit fc4324b4597c >>>>> ("virtio-blk: base queue-depth on virtqueue ringsize or module param"). >>>>> Since we have different virtio-blk devices which have different >>>>> capabilities, it requires that we support per-device queue depth >>>>> instead >>>>> of per-module. So defaultly use vq free elements if module parameter >>>>> 'virtblk_queue_depth' is not set. >>>> I wonder if it's better to use sysfs instead (or whether it has already >>>> had something like this in the blocker layer). >>>> >>> "/sys/block/<dev>/queue/nr_requests" indeed works, but isn't better to >>> set queue_depth according to the hardware capability at the very first? >>> AFAIK, nvme just set per-device queue_depth at initializing phase. >> >> I agree, the problem is that the current code may modify module parameter. > The module parameter 'virtblk_queue_depth' is actually remained untainted. > > Actually it is the original code before this patch that changes the > module parameter. Yes, that's what I meant. > When the module parameter is not set by boot cmdline > (i.e., default to 0), it will be initialized to the queue_depth of the > vring of the first probed virtio-blk device, and will be revealed to > user space through '/sys/module/virtio_blk/parameters/queue_depth'. I'm > not sure if this behavior is reasonable or not. Right, it means the virtio-blk devices that is probed after the first one can only use the queue_depth that is set according to the capability of the first virtio-blk device. > > The only side effect of this patch is that, now > '/sys/module/virtio_blk/parameters/queue_depth' will be kept as '0' when > the module parameter is not set manually. I think it's not an issue, the nr_request should be the correct way to get per device queue depth. Thanks > > > Thanks, > Jeffle > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 12 +++++++----- >>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >>>>> index 145606d..f83a417 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c >>>>> @@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device >>>>> *vdev) >>>>> u32 v, blk_size, max_size, sg_elems, opt_io_size; >>>>> u16 min_io_size; >>>>> u8 physical_block_exp, alignment_offset; >>>>> + unsigned int queue_depth; >>>>> if (!vdev->config->get) { >>>>> dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n", >>>>> @@ -755,17 +756,18 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device >>>>> *vdev) >>>>> goto out_free_vq; >>>>> } >>>>> - /* Default queue sizing is to fill the ring. */ >>>>> - if (!virtblk_queue_depth) { >>>>> - virtblk_queue_depth = vblk->vqs[0].vq->num_free; >>>>> + if (likely(!virtblk_queue_depth)) { >>>>> + queue_depth = vblk->vqs[0].vq->num_free; >>>>> /* ... but without indirect descs, we use 2 descs per req */ >>>>> if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC)) >>>>> - virtblk_queue_depth /= 2; >>>>> + queue_depth /= 2; >>>>> + } else { >>>>> + queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth; >>>>> } >>>>> memset(&vblk->tag_set, 0, sizeof(vblk->tag_set)); >>>>> vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops; >>>>> - vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth; >>>>> + vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = queue_depth; >>>>> vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE; >>>>> vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE; >>>>> vblk->tag_set.cmd_size = _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 2:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-18 3:58 [PATCH RFC] virtio-blk: support per-device queue depth Joseph Qi 2021-01-18 5:25 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-18 5:25 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-18 6:06 ` Joseph Qi 2021-01-19 4:04 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-19 4:04 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-19 1:33 ` JeffleXu 2021-01-19 1:33 ` JeffleXu 2021-01-19 4:06 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-19 4:06 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-20 1:51 ` JeffleXu 2021-01-20 1:51 ` JeffleXu 2021-01-20 2:47 ` Jason Wang [this message] 2021-01-20 2:47 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-19 4:14 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-19 4:14 ` Jason Wang 2021-01-22 1:43 ` Joseph Qi 2021-01-22 8:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-01-22 8:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-01-22 9:13 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=b782bcb7-9b45-a122-0f80-8cfcd89b5f70@redhat.com \ --to=jasowang@redhat.com \ --cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \ --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.