linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the risc-v tree

linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the risc-v tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1378 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h

between commit:

  b579dfe71a6a ("RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available")

from the risc-v tree and commit:

  c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")

from the kvm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
index 289621da4a2a,9c46dd3ff4a2..000000000000
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
@@@ -27,7 -27,14 +27,15 @@@ enum sbi_ext_id 
  	SBI_EXT_IPI = 0x735049,
  	SBI_EXT_RFENCE = 0x52464E43,
  	SBI_EXT_HSM = 0x48534D,
 +	SBI_EXT_SRST = 0x53525354,
+ 
+ 	/* Experimentals extensions must lie within this range */
+ 	SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_START = 0x08000000,
+ 	SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_END = 0x08FFFFFF,
+ 
+ 	/* Vendor extensions must lie within this range */
+ 	SBI_EXT_VENDOR_START = 0x09000000,
+ 	SBI_EXT_VENDOR_END = 0x09FFFFFF,
  };
  
  enum sbi_ext_base_fid {

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the risc-v tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1617 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:40:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   b579dfe71a6a ("RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available")
> 
> from the risc-v tree and commit:
> 
>   c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> index 289621da4a2a,9c46dd3ff4a2..000000000000
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> @@@ -27,7 -27,14 +27,15 @@@ enum sbi_ext_id 
>   	SBI_EXT_IPI = 0x735049,
>   	SBI_EXT_RFENCE = 0x52464E43,
>   	SBI_EXT_HSM = 0x48534D,
>  +	SBI_EXT_SRST = 0x53525354,
> + 
> + 	/* Experimentals extensions must lie within this range */
> + 	SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_START = 0x08000000,
> + 	SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_END = 0x08FFFFFF,
> + 
> + 	/* Vendor extensions must lie within this range */
> + 	SBI_EXT_VENDOR_START = 0x09000000,
> + 	SBI_EXT_VENDOR_END = 0x09FFFFFF,
>   };
>   
>   enum sbi_ext_base_fid {

This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the risc-v tree

[Anup Patel]

Hi Palmer,

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 3:24 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:40:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   b579dfe71a6a ("RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available")
> >
> > from the risc-v tree and commit:
> >
> >   c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")
> >
> > from the kvm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> >
> > diff --cc arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > index 289621da4a2a,9c46dd3ff4a2..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > @@@ -27,7 -27,14 +27,15 @@@ enum sbi_ext_id
> >       SBI_EXT_IPI = 0x735049,
> >       SBI_EXT_RFENCE = 0x52464E43,
> >       SBI_EXT_HSM = 0x48534D,
> >  +    SBI_EXT_SRST = 0x53525354,
> > +
> > +     /* Experimentals extensions must lie within this range */
> > +     SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_START = 0x08000000,
> > +     SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_END = 0x08FFFFFF,
> > +
> > +     /* Vendor extensions must lie within this range */
> > +     SBI_EXT_VENDOR_START = 0x09000000,
> > +     SBI_EXT_VENDOR_END = 0x09FFFFFF,
> >   };
> >
> >   enum sbi_ext_base_fid {
>
> This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.

The commit c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")
is already merged in Linus' tree.

Since you are yet to send PR for 5.17, we have two options:
1) Rebase your for-next branch upon latest Linus' tree master branch
2) Send "RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available" in the
next batch of changes for 5.17 after 5.17-rc1

Let me know if you want me to rebase and send v8 patch of
"RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available"

In future, we should coordinate and use a shared tag for such
conflicting changes.

Regards,
Anup



>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the risc-v tree

[Anup Patel]

Hi Palmer,

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 3:24 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:40:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   b579dfe71a6a ("RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available")
> >
> > from the risc-v tree and commit:
> >
> >   c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")
> >
> > from the kvm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> >
> > diff --cc arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > index 289621da4a2a,9c46dd3ff4a2..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > @@@ -27,7 -27,14 +27,15 @@@ enum sbi_ext_id
> >       SBI_EXT_IPI = 0x735049,
> >       SBI_EXT_RFENCE = 0x52464E43,
> >       SBI_EXT_HSM = 0x48534D,
> >  +    SBI_EXT_SRST = 0x53525354,
> > +
> > +     /* Experimentals extensions must lie within this range */
> > +     SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_START = 0x08000000,
> > +     SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_END = 0x08FFFFFF,
> > +
> > +     /* Vendor extensions must lie within this range */
> > +     SBI_EXT_VENDOR_START = 0x09000000,
> > +     SBI_EXT_VENDOR_END = 0x09FFFFFF,
> >   };
> >
> >   enum sbi_ext_base_fid {
>
> This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.

The commit c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")
is already merged in Linus' tree.

Since you are yet to send PR for 5.17, we have two options:
1) Rebase your for-next branch upon latest Linus' tree master branch
2) Send "RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available" in the
next batch of changes for 5.17 after 5.17-rc1

Let me know if you want me to rebase and send v8 patch of
"RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available"

In future, we should coordinate and use a shared tag for such
conflicting changes.

Regards,
Anup



>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the risc-v tree

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 1/17/22 05:13, Anup Patel wrote:
> The commit c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")
> is already merged in Linus' tree.
> 
> Since you are yet to send PR for 5.17, we have two options:
> 1) Rebase your for-next branch upon latest Linus' tree master branch
> 2) Send "RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available" in the
> next batch of changes for 5.17 after 5.17-rc1
> 
> Let me know if you want me to rebase and send v8 patch of
> "RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available"
> 
> In future, we should coordinate and use a shared tag for such
> conflicting changes.

Palmer should just send it to Linus and note "enum sbi_ext_id has a 
trivial conflict" in the pull request message.

We'll sort it out better in the future, but it's such a minor conflict 
that it is not even a nuisance.

Paolo

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the risc-v tree

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 1/17/22 05:13, Anup Patel wrote:
> The commit c62a76859723 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI v0.2 base extension")
> is already merged in Linus' tree.
> 
> Since you are yet to send PR for 5.17, we have two options:
> 1) Rebase your for-next branch upon latest Linus' tree master branch
> 2) Send "RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available" in the
> next batch of changes for 5.17 after 5.17-rc1
> 
> Let me know if you want me to rebase and send v8 patch of
> "RISC-V: Use SBI SRST extension when available"
> 
> In future, we should coordinate and use a shared tag for such
> conflicting changes.

Palmer should just send it to Linus and note "enum sbi_ext_id has a 
trivial conflict" in the pull request message.

We'll sort it out better in the future, but it's such a minor conflict 
that it is not even a nuisance.

Paolo


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv