All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Question regarding swiotlb-xen in Linux kernel
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:36:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba241f11-7681-77c9-3f9a-340d7f656d6b@suse.com> (raw)

I'm currently investigating a problem related to swiotlb-xen. With a
specific driver a customer is capable to trigger a situation where a
MFN is mapped to multiple dom0 PFNs at the same time. There is no
guest involved, so this is not related to grants.

Wit a debug kernel I have managed to track the inconsistency to a
call of xen_destroy_contiguous_region() from xen_swiotlb_free_coherent()
where the region was obviously not contiguous.

xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() contains:

        if (((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask)) ||
            range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size))
                xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys, order);

Shouldn't it be either:

        if (((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask)) &&
            !range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size))
                xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys, order);


or:

        if (dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask) {
            BUG_ON(range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size));
            xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys, order);
        }

as calling xen_destroy_contiguous_region() with a non-contiguous memory
region is a perfect receipt for a latent crash?

The remaining question is why the driver is calling
xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() for a non-contiguous region, of course.


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Question regarding swiotlb-xen in Linux kernel
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 09:36:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba241f11-7681-77c9-3f9a-340d7f656d6b@suse.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190418073625.KhB18rldYd_ACCzi4hGB89gWrKtmK2noMPdp_Iuf-IU@z> (raw)

I'm currently investigating a problem related to swiotlb-xen. With a
specific driver a customer is capable to trigger a situation where a
MFN is mapped to multiple dom0 PFNs at the same time. There is no
guest involved, so this is not related to grants.

Wit a debug kernel I have managed to track the inconsistency to a
call of xen_destroy_contiguous_region() from xen_swiotlb_free_coherent()
where the region was obviously not contiguous.

xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() contains:

        if (((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask)) ||
            range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size))
                xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys, order);

Shouldn't it be either:

        if (((dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask)) &&
            !range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size))
                xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys, order);


or:

        if (dev_addr + size - 1 <= dma_mask) {
            BUG_ON(range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size));
            xen_destroy_contiguous_region(phys, order);
        }

as calling xen_destroy_contiguous_region() with a non-contiguous memory
region is a perfect receipt for a latent crash?

The remaining question is why the driver is calling
xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() for a non-contiguous region, of course.


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-18  7:36 Juergen Gross [this message]
2019-04-18  7:36 ` [Xen-devel] Question regarding swiotlb-xen in Linux kernel Juergen Gross
2019-04-18 21:09 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-04-18 21:09   ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2019-04-18 22:31   ` Joe Jin
2019-04-18 22:31     ` [Xen-devel] " Joe Jin
2019-04-19  5:47     ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-19  5:47       ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2019-04-19 14:40       ` Joe Jin
2019-04-19 14:40         ` [Xen-devel] " Joe Jin
2019-04-19 15:28       ` Dongli Zhang
2019-04-19 15:28         ` [Xen-devel] " Dongli Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba241f11-7681-77c9-3f9a-340d7f656d6b@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.