All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Proposal for 2 properties for Nameservers
@ 2019-09-23  1:39 Manojkiran Eda
  2019-09-23  2:36 ` William Kennington
  2019-09-23 18:30 ` Johnathan Mantey
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manojkiran Eda @ 2019-09-23  1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openbmc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 1624 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Proposal for 2 properties for Nameservers
  2019-09-23  1:39 Proposal for 2 properties for Nameservers Manojkiran Eda
@ 2019-09-23  2:36 ` William Kennington
  2019-09-23 18:30 ` Johnathan Mantey
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Kennington @ 2019-09-23  2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manojkiran Eda; +Cc: OpenBMC Development

+1

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 6:40 PM Manojkiran Eda <manojeda@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This mail is regarding , the proposal for adding an additional property `StaticNameservers` and also for changing the definition of the existing `Nameservers` property.
>
> - Currently, we have a single DBUS property under Ethernet interface named `Nameservers` that captures only StaticNameservers configured on the system. It does not populate the information regarding the DNS information that is obtained by DHCP server.
>
> It is also to be noted that the static & dynamic configuration can co-exist at the same time(means we might have the DNS set manually by user and also by the DHCP Server at the same time).
>
> As per the discussion with Ratan & Wak(https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/c/openbmc/phosphor-networkd/+/24224/),we had come to a conclusion that we need have two properties in the Backend for nameservers (similar to what we have in redfish):
>
> 1. Nameservers - A read only property which captures the current nameservers on the system (which may be static or/and dynamic)
> 2. StaticNameservers - A writeable property which captures only the static nameservers.
>
> Please let me know, if anyone have concerns with this proposal.
>
> Thanks,
> Manoj
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Proposal for 2 properties for Nameservers
  2019-09-23  1:39 Proposal for 2 properties for Nameservers Manojkiran Eda
  2019-09-23  2:36 ` William Kennington
@ 2019-09-23 18:30 ` Johnathan Mantey
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johnathan Mantey @ 2019-09-23 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manojkiran Eda, openbmc


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1576 bytes --]

I agree with adding this to DBus.

On 9/22/19 6:39 PM, Manojkiran Eda wrote:
> Hi All,
>  
> This mail is regarding , the proposal for adding an additional
> property `StaticNameservers` and also for changing the definition of
> the existing `Nameservers` property.
>  
> - Currently, we have a single DBUS property under Ethernet interface
> named `Nameservers` that captures only StaticNameservers configured on
> the system. It does not populate the information regarding the DNS
> information that is obtained by DHCP server.
>  
> It is also to be noted that the static & dynamic configuration can
> co-exist at the same time(means we might have the DNS set manually by
> user and also by the DHCP Server at the same time).
>  
> As per the discussion with Ratan &
> Wak(https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/#/c/openbmc/phosphor-networkd/+/24224/),we
> had come to a conclusion that we need have two properties in the
> Backend for nameservers (similar to what we have in redfish):
>  
> 1. Nameservers - A read only property which captures the current
> nameservers on the system (which may be static or/and dynamic)
> 2. StaticNameservers - A writeable property which captures only the
> static nameservers.
>  
> Please let me know, if anyone have concerns with this proposal.
>  
> Thanks,
> Manoj
>

-- 
Johnathan Mantey
Senior Software Engineer
*azad te**chnology partners*
Contributing to Technology Innovation since 1992
Phone: (503) 712-6764
Email: johnathanx.mantey@intel.com <mailto:johnathanx.mantey@intel.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3583 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-23 18:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-23  1:39 Proposal for 2 properties for Nameservers Manojkiran Eda
2019-09-23  2:36 ` William Kennington
2019-09-23 18:30 ` Johnathan Mantey

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.