All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jing-Ting Wu <jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com>,
	"chris.redpath@arm.com" <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@gmail.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [SPAM]Re: [Bug] Race condition between CPU hotplug off flow and __sched_setscheduler()
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 13:57:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba7ddde1829ee9eedcd6673f923d731d60719dc5.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52eea711b8ce3151ff73bfb0289cc9da0e8c4a10.camel@mediatek.com>

Hi Peter


> > How easy can you reproduce; does the below hack make it better?
> 
> 
> The issue can be reproduced in about 48 hours when hotplug up/down
> frequently.
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> I think the hack patch could stay the rq->balance_callback when rq-
> > callback = &balance_push_callback.
> 
> We can add hack patch to the stability test.

Use the patch of previous mail, we pass the stability test at previous
48 hours and still testing.

I think the patch could make the issue better.
Do you suggest to upstream this patch to mainline?

Thank you.

> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 95bac3b094b3..f18ee22b29bc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -4763,20 +4763,30 @@ struct callback_head balance_push_callback
> > =
> > {
> >  	.func = (void (*)(struct callback_head *))balance_push,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static inline struct callback_head
> > *splice_balance_callbacks(struct
> > rq *rq)
> > +static inline struct callback_head *
> > +__splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, bool foo)
> >  {
> >  	struct callback_head *head = rq->balance_callback;
> >  
> >  	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> > -	if (head)
> > -		rq->balance_callback = NULL;
> > +	if (head) {
> > +		if (foo && head == &balance_push_callback)
> > +			head = NULL;
> > +		else
> > +			rq->balance_callback = NULL;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	return head;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline struct callback_head
> > *splice_balance_callbacks(struct
> > rq *rq)
> > +{
> > +	return __splice_balance_callbacks(rq, true);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void __balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq)
> >  {
> > -	do_balance_callbacks(rq, splice_balance_callbacks(rq));
> > +	do_balance_callbacks(rq, __splice_balance_callbacks(rq,
> > false));
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct
> > callback_head *head)
> > 
> 

Best Regards,
Jing-Ting Wu




_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jing-Ting Wu <jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com>,
	"chris.redpath@arm.com" <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@gmail.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [SPAM]Re: [Bug] Race condition between CPU hotplug off flow and __sched_setscheduler()
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 13:57:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba7ddde1829ee9eedcd6673f923d731d60719dc5.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52eea711b8ce3151ff73bfb0289cc9da0e8c4a10.camel@mediatek.com>

Hi Peter


> > How easy can you reproduce; does the below hack make it better?
> 
> 
> The issue can be reproduced in about 48 hours when hotplug up/down
> frequently.
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> I think the hack patch could stay the rq->balance_callback when rq-
> > callback = &balance_push_callback.
> 
> We can add hack patch to the stability test.

Use the patch of previous mail, we pass the stability test at previous
48 hours and still testing.

I think the patch could make the issue better.
Do you suggest to upstream this patch to mainline?

Thank you.

> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 95bac3b094b3..f18ee22b29bc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -4763,20 +4763,30 @@ struct callback_head balance_push_callback
> > =
> > {
> >  	.func = (void (*)(struct callback_head *))balance_push,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static inline struct callback_head
> > *splice_balance_callbacks(struct
> > rq *rq)
> > +static inline struct callback_head *
> > +__splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, bool foo)
> >  {
> >  	struct callback_head *head = rq->balance_callback;
> >  
> >  	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> > -	if (head)
> > -		rq->balance_callback = NULL;
> > +	if (head) {
> > +		if (foo && head == &balance_push_callback)
> > +			head = NULL;
> > +		else
> > +			rq->balance_callback = NULL;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	return head;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline struct callback_head
> > *splice_balance_callbacks(struct
> > rq *rq)
> > +{
> > +	return __splice_balance_callbacks(rq, true);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void __balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq)
> >  {
> > -	do_balance_callbacks(rq, splice_balance_callbacks(rq));
> > +	do_balance_callbacks(rq, __splice_balance_callbacks(rq,
> > false));
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct
> > callback_head *head)
> > 
> 

Best Regards,
Jing-Ting Wu




_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-19 12:53 [Bug] Race condition between CPU hotplug off flow and __sched_setscheduler() Jing-Ting Wu
2022-05-19 12:53 ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-05-19 12:53 ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-05-19 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-23  7:12   ` [SPAM]Re: " Jing-Ting Wu
2022-05-23  7:12     ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-05-26  5:57     ` Jing-Ting Wu [this message]
2022-05-26  5:57       ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-06-02 16:15       ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-06-02 16:15         ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-06-07 20:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-07 20:40           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-07 21:39           ` [PATCH] sched: Fix balance_push() vs __sched_setscheduler() Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-07 21:39             ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-07 21:39             ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-08 14:16             ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-06-08 14:16               ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-06-08 14:16               ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-06-08 14:48               ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-08 14:48                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-08 14:48                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-13  8:29   ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba7ddde1829ee9eedcd6673f923d731d60719dc5.camel@mediatek.com \
    --to=jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vdonnefort@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.