All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Hawking Zhang" <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>,
	"Guchun Chen" <guchun.chen@amd.com>,
	"John Clements" <john.clements@amd.com>,
	"Dennis Li" <Dennis.Li@amd.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/amdgpu: fix a signedness bug in __verify_ras_table_checksum()
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 11:18:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb78075f-2249-8311-2f75-c0dfaa333ec4@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOAsdyWeZAHF0oll@mwanda>

Series is,
Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>

Regards,
Luben

On 2021-07-03 5:44 a.m., Dan Carpenter wrote:
> If amdgpu_eeprom_read() returns a negative error code then the error
> handling checks:
>
> 	if (res < buf_size) {
>
> The problem is that "buf_size" is a u32 so negative values are type
> promoted to a high positive values and the condition is false.  Fix
> this by changing the type of "buf_size" to int.
>
> Fixes: 79beb6114014 ("drm/amdgpu: Optimize EEPROM RAS table I/O")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> It's hard for me to tell the exact upper bound that "buf_size" can be,
> but if it's over USHRT_MAX then we are well toasted.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> index fc70620369e4..f07a456506ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> @@ -978,9 +978,8 @@ const struct file_operations amdgpu_ras_debugfs_eeprom_table_ops = {
>  static int __verify_ras_table_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
>  {
>  	struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
> -	int res;
> +	int buf_size, res;
>  	u8  csum, *buf, *pp;
> -	u32 buf_size;
>  
>  	buf_size = RAS_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE +
>  		control->ras_num_recs * RAS_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE;


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Guchun Chen" <guchun.chen@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"John Clements" <john.clements@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Dennis Li" <Dennis.Li@amd.com>,
	"Hawking Zhang" <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/amdgpu: fix a signedness bug in __verify_ras_table_checksum()
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 11:18:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb78075f-2249-8311-2f75-c0dfaa333ec4@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOAsdyWeZAHF0oll@mwanda>

Series is,
Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>

Regards,
Luben

On 2021-07-03 5:44 a.m., Dan Carpenter wrote:
> If amdgpu_eeprom_read() returns a negative error code then the error
> handling checks:
>
> 	if (res < buf_size) {
>
> The problem is that "buf_size" is a u32 so negative values are type
> promoted to a high positive values and the condition is false.  Fix
> this by changing the type of "buf_size" to int.
>
> Fixes: 79beb6114014 ("drm/amdgpu: Optimize EEPROM RAS table I/O")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> It's hard for me to tell the exact upper bound that "buf_size" can be,
> but if it's over USHRT_MAX then we are well toasted.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> index fc70620369e4..f07a456506ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> @@ -978,9 +978,8 @@ const struct file_operations amdgpu_ras_debugfs_eeprom_table_ops = {
>  static int __verify_ras_table_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
>  {
>  	struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
> -	int res;
> +	int buf_size, res;
>  	u8  csum, *buf, *pp;
> -	u32 buf_size;
>  
>  	buf_size = RAS_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE +
>  		control->ras_num_recs * RAS_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE;


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Guchun Chen" <guchun.chen@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"John Clements" <john.clements@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Dennis Li" <Dennis.Li@amd.com>,
	"Hawking Zhang" <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/amdgpu: fix a signedness bug in __verify_ras_table_checksum()
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 11:18:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb78075f-2249-8311-2f75-c0dfaa333ec4@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOAsdyWeZAHF0oll@mwanda>

Series is,
Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>

Regards,
Luben

On 2021-07-03 5:44 a.m., Dan Carpenter wrote:
> If amdgpu_eeprom_read() returns a negative error code then the error
> handling checks:
>
> 	if (res < buf_size) {
>
> The problem is that "buf_size" is a u32 so negative values are type
> promoted to a high positive values and the condition is false.  Fix
> this by changing the type of "buf_size" to int.
>
> Fixes: 79beb6114014 ("drm/amdgpu: Optimize EEPROM RAS table I/O")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> It's hard for me to tell the exact upper bound that "buf_size" can be,
> but if it's over USHRT_MAX then we are well toasted.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> index fc70620369e4..f07a456506ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> @@ -978,9 +978,8 @@ const struct file_operations amdgpu_ras_debugfs_eeprom_table_ops = {
>  static int __verify_ras_table_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
>  {
>  	struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
> -	int res;
> +	int buf_size, res;
>  	u8  csum, *buf, *pp;
> -	u32 buf_size;
>  
>  	buf_size = RAS_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE +
>  		control->ras_num_recs * RAS_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE;

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-04 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-03  9:44 [PATCH 1/4] drm/amdgpu: fix a signedness bug in __verify_ras_table_checksum() Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:44 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:44 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Fix signedness bug in __amdgpu_eeprom_xfer() Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:44   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:44   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/amdgpu: unlock on error in amdgpu_ras_debugfs_table_read() Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:45   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:45   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/amdgpu: return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:46   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-03  9:46   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-04 15:18 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2021-07-04 15:18   ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/amdgpu: fix a signedness bug in __verify_ras_table_checksum() Luben Tuikov
2021-07-04 15:18   ` Luben Tuikov
2021-07-06  0:52   ` Luben Tuikov
2021-07-06  0:52     ` Luben Tuikov
2021-07-06  0:52     ` Luben Tuikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb78075f-2249-8311-2f75-c0dfaa333ec4@amd.com \
    --to=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
    --cc=Dennis.Li@amd.com \
    --cc=Hawking.Zhang@amd.com \
    --cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=guchun.chen@amd.com \
    --cc=john.clements@amd.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.