Re: [PATCH 1/2] kasan, mm: reset tag when access metadata

[kuan.ying lee <kuan-ying.lee@mediatek.com>]

On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 16:57 +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 9:22 PM Catalin Marinas <
> catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 04:32:02PM +0800, Kuan-Ying Lee wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 09:10 +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > +Cc Catalin
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 06:00, Kuan-Ying Lee <
> > > > Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hardware tag-based KASAN doesn't use compiler
> > > > > instrumentation, we
> > > > > can not use kasan_disable_current() to ignore tag check.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thus, we need to reset tags when accessing metadata.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
> > > > 
> > > > This looks reasonable, but the patch title is not saying this
> > > > is
> > > > kmemleak, nor does the description say what the problem is.
> > > > What
> > > > problem did you encounter? Was it a false positive?
> > > 
> > > kmemleak would scan kernel memory to check memory leak.
> > > When it scans on the invalid slab and dereference, the issue
> > > will occur like below.
> > > 
> > > So I think we should reset the tag before scanning.
> > > 
> > > # echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> > > [  151.905804]
> > > =================================================================
> > > =
> > > [  151.907120] BUG: KASAN: out-of-bounds in scan_block+0x58/0x170
> > > [  151.908773] Read at addr f7ff0000c0074eb0 by task kmemleak/138
> > > [  151.909656] Pointer tag: [f7], memory tag: [fe]
> > 
> > It would be interesting to find out why the tag doesn't match.
> > Kmemleak
> > should in principle only scan valid objects that have been
> > allocated and
> > the pointer can be safely dereferenced. 0xfe is KASAN_TAG_INVALID,
> > so it
> > either goes past the size of the object (into the red zone) or it
> > still
> > accesses the object after it was marked as freed but before being
> > released from kmemleak.
> > 
> > With slab, looking at __cache_free(), it calls kasan_slab_free()
> > before
> > ___cache_free() -> kmemleak_free_recursive(), so the second
> > scenario is
> > possible. With slub, however, slab_free_hook() first releases the
> > object
> > from kmemleak before poisoning it. Based on the stack dump, you are
> > using slub, so it may be that kmemleak goes into the object red
> > zones.
> > 
> > I'd like this clarified before blindly resetting the tag.
> 
> AFAIK, kmemleak scans the whole object including the leftover redzone
> for kmalloc-allocated objects.
> 
> Looking at the report, there are 11 0xf7 granules, which amounts to
> 176 bytes, and the object is allocated from the kmalloc-256 cache. So
> when kmemleak accesses the last 256-176 bytes, it causes faults, as
> those are marked with KASAN_KMALLOC_REDZONE == KASAN_TAG_INVALID ==
> 0xfe.
> 
> Generally, resetting tags in kasan_disable/enable_current() section
> should be fine to suppress MTE faults, provided those sections had
> been added correctly in the first place.

Thanks Andrey for explanation.
I will refine commit and upload v2.

Thanks.