All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
@ 2019-03-20 19:52 Alex Kiernan
  2019-03-21  0:45 ` Marek Vasut
  2019-04-22 16:12 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Kiernan @ 2019-03-20 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

If CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE is enabled and U-Boot is being loaded from UART
over Ymodem then we can't emit messages using printf() without causing
errors like:

  Sending: u-boot-dtb.img
  Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3009/376kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
  Retry 0: NAK on sector
  Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
  Retry 0: NAK on sector
  Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3273/409kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
  Retry 0: NAK on sector
  Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
  Retry 0: NAK on sector

Use debug() rather than printf() to avoid sending messages on the serial
port.

Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@gmail.com>
---

 common/spl/spl_fit.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/spl/spl_fit.c b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
index db436268cbcd..08faf2c1b058 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl_fit.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
@@ -240,12 +240,12 @@ static int spl_load_fit_image(struct spl_load_info *info, ulong sector,
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
-	printf("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
-	       fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
+	debug("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
+	      fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
 	if (!fit_image_verify_with_data(fit, node,
 					 src, length))
 		return -EPERM;
-	puts("OK\n");
+	debug("OK\n");
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS
-- 
2.17.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
  2019-03-20 19:52 [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE Alex Kiernan
@ 2019-03-21  0:45 ` Marek Vasut
  2019-03-21  8:57   ` Alex Kiernan
  2019-04-22 16:12 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2019-03-21  0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 3/20/19 8:52 PM, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> If CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE is enabled and U-Boot is being loaded from UART
> over Ymodem then we can't emit messages using printf() without causing
> errors like:
> 
>   Sending: u-boot-dtb.img
>   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3009/376kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3273/409kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> 
> Use debug() rather than printf() to avoid sending messages on the serial
> port.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
>  common/spl/spl_fit.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_fit.c b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> index db436268cbcd..08faf2c1b058 100644
> --- a/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> +++ b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> @@ -240,12 +240,12 @@ static int spl_load_fit_image(struct spl_load_info *info, ulong sector,
>  	}
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
> -	printf("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
> -	       fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
> +	debug("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
> +	      fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
>  	if (!fit_image_verify_with_data(fit, node,
>  					 src, length))
>  		return -EPERM;
> -	puts("OK\n");
> +	debug("OK\n");
>  #endif

Checking printf("Signature failed") to debug() is probably not what you
want to do. It'd be hiding some pretty important output.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
  2019-03-21  0:45 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2019-03-21  8:57   ` Alex Kiernan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Kiernan @ 2019-03-21  8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 2:58 AM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 3/20/19 8:52 PM, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> > If CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE is enabled and U-Boot is being loaded from UART
> > over Ymodem then we can't emit messages using printf() without causing
> > errors like:
> >
> >   Sending: u-boot-dtb.img
> >   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3009/376kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
> >   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> >   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
> >   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> >   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3273/409kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
> >   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> >   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
> >   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> >
> > Use debug() rather than printf() to avoid sending messages on the serial
> > port.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  common/spl/spl_fit.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/spl/spl_fit.c b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> > index db436268cbcd..08faf2c1b058 100644
> > --- a/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> > +++ b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> > @@ -240,12 +240,12 @@ static int spl_load_fit_image(struct spl_load_info *info, ulong sector,
> >       }
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
> > -     printf("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
> > -            fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
> > +     debug("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
> > +           fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
> >       if (!fit_image_verify_with_data(fit, node,
> >                                        src, length))
> >               return -EPERM;
> > -     puts("OK\n");
> > +     debug("OK\n");
> >  #endif
>
> Checking printf("Signature failed") to debug() is probably not what you
> want to do. It'd be hiding some pretty important output.
>

I'm not sure what message you do get in that case (since so far I've
failed to get keys into the SPL DTB in a way that seem to actually get
checked), but I take your point.

I can't see any mechanism for either buffering or discarding console
message when Ymodem is active, or am I just missing it, or anything
else that would address this problem?

-- 
Alex Kiernan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
  2019-03-20 19:52 [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE Alex Kiernan
  2019-03-21  0:45 ` Marek Vasut
@ 2019-04-22 16:12 ` Tom Rini
  2019-04-22 16:40   ` Marek Vasut
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2019-04-22 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 07:52:20PM +0000, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> If CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE is enabled and U-Boot is being loaded from UART
> over Ymodem then we can't emit messages using printf() without causing
> errors like:
> 
>   Sending: u-boot-dtb.img
>   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3009/376kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3273/409kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> 
> Use debug() rather than printf() to avoid sending messages on the serial
> port.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
>  common/spl/spl_fit.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_fit.c b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> index db436268cbcd..08faf2c1b058 100644
> --- a/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> +++ b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> @@ -240,12 +240,12 @@ static int spl_load_fit_image(struct spl_load_info *info, ulong sector,
>  	}
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
> -	printf("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
> -	       fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
> +	debug("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
> +	      fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
>  	if (!fit_image_verify_with_data(fit, node,
>  					 src, length))
>  		return -EPERM;
> -	puts("OK\n");
> +	debug("OK\n");
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS

I think in this case we want to have that bit of "garbage" happen as the
protocol handles them correctly and if there is a problem it's visible
"on the line" to be seen at least and can be dug at.  The other
alternative here would be to re-work the code to only printf anything on
the error case and debug that we're checking at all.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190422/3796151a/attachment.sig>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
  2019-04-22 16:12 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
@ 2019-04-22 16:40   ` Marek Vasut
  2019-04-22 17:02     ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marek Vasut @ 2019-04-22 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 4/22/19 6:12 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 07:52:20PM +0000, Alex Kiernan wrote:
>> If CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE is enabled and U-Boot is being loaded from UART
>> over Ymodem then we can't emit messages using printf() without causing
>> errors like:
>>
>>   Sending: u-boot-dtb.img
>>   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3009/376kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
>>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>>   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
>>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>>   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3273/409kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
>>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>>   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
>>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
>>
>> Use debug() rather than printf() to avoid sending messages on the serial
>> port.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  common/spl/spl_fit.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_fit.c b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
>> index db436268cbcd..08faf2c1b058 100644
>> --- a/common/spl/spl_fit.c
>> +++ b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
>> @@ -240,12 +240,12 @@ static int spl_load_fit_image(struct spl_load_info *info, ulong sector,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
>> -	printf("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
>> -	       fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
>> +	debug("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
>> +	      fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
>>  	if (!fit_image_verify_with_data(fit, node,
>>  					 src, length))
>>  		return -EPERM;
>> -	puts("OK\n");
>> +	debug("OK\n");
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS
> 
> I think in this case we want to have that bit of "garbage" happen as the
> protocol handles them correctly and if there is a problem it's visible
> "on the line" to be seen at least and can be dug at.  The other
> alternative here would be to re-work the code to only printf anything on
> the error case and debug that we're checking at all.

Can we do something similar to this ?
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1055047/

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
  2019-04-22 16:40   ` Marek Vasut
@ 2019-04-22 17:02     ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2019-04-22 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 06:40:33PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 4/22/19 6:12 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 07:52:20PM +0000, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> >> If CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE is enabled and U-Boot is being loaded from UART
> >> over Ymodem then we can't emit messages using printf() without causing
> >> errors like:
> >>
> >>   Sending: u-boot-dtb.img
> >>   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3009/376kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
> >>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> >>   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
> >>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> >>   Ymodem sectors/kbytes sent: 3273/409kRetry 0: Got 23 for sector ACK
> >>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> >>   Retry 0: Got 68 for sector ACK
> >>   Retry 0: NAK on sector
> >>
> >> Use debug() rather than printf() to avoid sending messages on the serial
> >> port.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >>  common/spl/spl_fit.c | 6 +++---
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_fit.c b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> >> index db436268cbcd..08faf2c1b058 100644
> >> --- a/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> >> +++ b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
> >> @@ -240,12 +240,12 @@ static int spl_load_fit_image(struct spl_load_info *info, ulong sector,
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE
> >> -	printf("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
> >> -	       fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
> >> +	debug("## Checking hash(es) for Image %s ... ",
> >> +	      fit_get_name(fit, node, NULL));
> >>  	if (!fit_image_verify_with_data(fit, node,
> >>  					 src, length))
> >>  		return -EPERM;
> >> -	puts("OK\n");
> >> +	debug("OK\n");
> >>  #endif
> >>  
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS
> > 
> > I think in this case we want to have that bit of "garbage" happen as the
> > protocol handles them correctly and if there is a problem it's visible
> > "on the line" to be seen at least and can be dug at.  The other
> > alternative here would be to re-work the code to only printf anything on
> > the error case and debug that we're checking at all.
> 
> Can we do something similar to this ?
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1055047/

Another valid approach, yes.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190422/4dd81c73/attachment.sig>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-22 17:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-20 19:52 [U-Boot] [PATCH] spl: avoid printf when we might be doing Ymodem with CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE Alex Kiernan
2019-03-21  0:45 ` Marek Vasut
2019-03-21  8:57   ` Alex Kiernan
2019-04-22 16:12 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini
2019-04-22 16:40   ` Marek Vasut
2019-04-22 17:02     ` Tom Rini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.