2.6.0-test1-wli-1 compile fail

2.6.0-test1-wli-1 compile fail

[root]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 517 bytes --]

Error:

fs/namei.c: In function `path_lookup':
fs/namei.c:868: parse error before `*'
fs/namei.c:873: `dirs' undeclared (first use in this function)
fs/namei.c:873: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fs/namei.c:873: for each function it appears in.)
fs/namei.c:873: `fs' undeclared (first use in this function)
fs/namei.c:890: `task' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[1]: *** [fs/namei.o] Error 1
make: *** [fs] Error 2

gzipped and comment-stripped config attached. And I had such hopes...

[-- Attachment #2: Type: APPLICATION/x-gzip, Size: 1696 bytes --]

Re: 2.6.0-test1-wli-1 compile fail

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 05:19:30PM -0400, root wrote:
> Error:
> fs/namei.c: In function `path_lookup':
> fs/namei.c:868: parse error before `*'
> fs/namei.c:873: `dirs' undeclared (first use in this function)
> fs/namei.c:873: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> fs/namei.c:873: for each function it appears in.)
> fs/namei.c:873: `fs' undeclared (first use in this function)
> fs/namei.c:890: `task' undeclared (first use in this function)
> make[1]: *** [fs/namei.o] Error 1
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
> gzipped and comment-stripped config attached. And I had such hopes...

That's moderately unusual. I didn't announce this; it was intended to
be a drop for various odd testers, not generally released.

Try 1A, ISTR having compiled that.


-- wli

Re: 2.6.0-test1-wli-1 compile fail

[Bill Davidsen]

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 05:19:30PM -0400, root wrote:
> > Error:
> > fs/namei.c: In function `path_lookup':
> > fs/namei.c:868: parse error before `*'
> > fs/namei.c:873: `dirs' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > fs/namei.c:873: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > fs/namei.c:873: for each function it appears in.)
> > fs/namei.c:873: `fs' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > fs/namei.c:890: `task' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > make[1]: *** [fs/namei.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [fs] Error 2
> > gzipped and comment-stripped config attached. And I had such hopes...
> 
> That's moderately unusual. I didn't announce this; it was intended to
> be a drop for various odd testers, not generally released.
> 
> Try 1A, ISTR having compiled that.

Actually it was 1A, I was just looking to see if there was a wli release
there, since the responsiveness has been so good. Far better than mine
taking two days to check the version and get back to you.

Since it's not released, don't worry too much, test1-ac2 has been stable
enough for some testing, and it's not overly slow even on the tiny machine
I'm using for test. I'll try again when/if you release, or you can try
with the config I attached to the original.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

Re: 2.6.0-test1-wli-1 compile fail

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:29:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Actually it was 1A, I was just looking to see if there was a wli release
> there, since the responsiveness has been so good. Far better than mine
> taking two days to check the version and get back to you.
> Since it's not released, don't worry too much, test1-ac2 has been stable
> enough for some testing, and it's not overly slow even on the tiny machine
> I'm using for test. I'll try again when/if you release, or you can try
> with the config I attached to the original.

I'm tied up with OLS stuff atm but I should be able to pound down something
by tonight or so.


-- wli

Re: 2.6.0-test1-wli-1 compile fail

[bill davidsen]

In article <20030723185416.GX15452@holomorphy.com>,
William Lee Irwin III  <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:29:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
| > Actually it was 1A, I was just looking to see if there was a wli release
| > there, since the responsiveness has been so good. Far better than mine
| > taking two days to check the version and get back to you.
| > Since it's not released, don't worry too much, test1-ac2 has been stable
| > enough for some testing, and it's not overly slow even on the tiny machine
| > I'm using for test. I'll try again when/if you release, or you can try
| > with the config I attached to the original.
| 
| I'm tied up with OLS stuff atm but I should be able to pound down something
| by tonight or so.

Get your priorities right, man. Do some nightlife! It's not as if I'm
holding *my* breath for this, responsiveness is not going to kill me if
I wait for a week.


-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.