All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils
@ 2020-04-22  7:55 bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-22  8:05 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] " bugzilla at busybox.net
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2020-04-22  7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12801

            Bug ID: 12801
           Summary: Flag '-Wa,--noexecstack' is missing when building
                    uclibc with newer binutils
           Product: buildroot
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: major
          Priority: P5
         Component: Other
          Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
          Reporter: m.patzlaff at pilz.de
                CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 8436
  --> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=8436&action=edit
defconfig to reproduce the issue

When I upgraded buildroot from 2019.02.8 to 2020.02 and re-build my
configuration I noticed that all binaries (executables and shared libraries)
have the executable stack requested in the GNU_STACK program header. I did some
research and also tried to narrow the cause. Eventually I found this:

        \         |
binutils \ uclibc | 1.0.31    |  1.0.32 
------------------+-----------+---------------
2.30              | fine      | fine
2.31.1            | execstack | execstack
2.32              | execstack | execstack
2.33.1            | execstack | execstack

So, until binutils 2.30 everything goes fine. Regardless of what GCC version (I
tested with 4.9 and 8.3.0) I used, the uclibc libraries were marked with
non-executable stack and thus all other binaries were OK too. But starting from
binutils 2.31.1 something goes wrong. In the log for binutils 2.30 + uclibc
1.0.31 one can see, that the flag "-Wa,--noexecstack" is properly passed to the
compiler. In the log for binutils 2.32 + uclibc 1.0.32 this flag is missing.
And here is where I am lost. I can't figure out why because executing the flag
detection in Rules.mak from uclibc manually returns the correct result. And I
also double checked the security options in uclibc-menuconfig.

To reproduce the results above it's best to use the attached defconfig on
buildroot versions 2019.02.8 and 2020.02.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils
  2020-04-22  7:55 [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2020-04-22  8:05 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-22  8:05 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2020-04-22  8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12801

--- Comment #1 from Marcel Patzlaff <m.patzlaff@pilz.de> ---
Created attachment 8441
  --> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=8441&action=edit
Partial log of the OK case

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils
  2020-04-22  7:55 [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-22  8:05 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] " bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2020-04-22  8:05 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-22  8:22 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2020-04-22  8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12801

--- Comment #2 from Marcel Patzlaff <m.patzlaff@pilz.de> ---
Created attachment 8446
  --> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=8446&action=edit
Partial log of the failure case

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils
  2020-04-22  7:55 [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-22  8:05 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] " bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-22  8:05 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2020-04-22  8:22 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-22 11:15 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2020-04-22  8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12801

Marcel Patzlaff <m.patzlaff@pilz.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 OS|Linux                       |All
             Target|                            |ARM Cortex A9
              Build|                            |x86_64 laptop
           Hardware|PC                          |All

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils
  2020-04-22  7:55 [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils bugzilla at busybox.net
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-04-22  8:22 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2020-04-22 11:15 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-22 12:37 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-24 12:19 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2020-04-22 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12801

Marcel Patzlaff <m.patzlaff@pilz.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Product|buildroot                   |uClibc
          Component|Other                       |Other
           Assignee|unassigned at buildroot.uclibc |unassigned at uclibc.org
                   |.org                        |
                 CC|                            |uclibc-cvs at uclibc.org

--- Comment #3 from Marcel Patzlaff <m.patzlaff@pilz.de> ---
I finally found what the problem is. The check_as macro in uclibc/Rules.mak
does not function with newer binutils versions anymore. Executing the check
manually yield:

$ /opt/debug/buildroot_toolchain/usr/bin/arm-se-linux-uclibcgnueabihf-gcc
-Wa,--noexecstack -Wa,-Z -c -o /dev/null -xassembler /dev/null || echo "WTF"

Assembler messages:
Fatal error: The input '/dev/null' and output '/dev/null' files are the same


So basically, this seems to be uClibc bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils
  2020-04-22  7:55 [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils bugzilla at busybox.net
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-04-22 11:15 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2020-04-22 12:37 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  2020-04-24 12:19 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2020-04-22 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12801

romain.naour at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at uclibc.org       |wbx at openadk.org

--- Comment #4 from romain.naour at gmail.com ---
Hi Marcel,

I'm able to reproduce the issue.

Indeed the error message come from a new as check from binutils 2.31.x series:

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=67f846b59b32f3d704c601669409c2584383fea9

See similar report and kernel commit:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/9/233

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=e9666d10a5677a494260d60d1fa0b73cc7646eb3

I'm adding Waldemar in Cc of this bug.

Best regards,
Romain

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils
  2020-04-22  7:55 [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils bugzilla at busybox.net
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-04-22 12:37 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2020-04-24 12:19 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2020-04-24 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12801

--- Comment #5 from Marcel Patzlaff <m.patzlaff@pilz.de> ---
Created attachment 8451
  --> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=8451&action=edit
Patch to fix the check_as Makefile macro.

Please find a possible patch attached to fix this. I will also push it to the
buildroot mailinglist, as the problem should be fixed really soon.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-24 12:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-22  7:55 [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22  8:05 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] " bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22  8:05 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22  8:22 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22 11:15 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22 12:37 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-24 12:19 ` bugzilla at busybox.net

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.