All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646
@ 2019-07-18 19:03 bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-18 19:08 ` [Bug 204223] [xfstests generic/388]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc XFS: null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21 bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (8 more replies)
  0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-18 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

            Bug ID: 204223
           Summary: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed:
                    ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE ||
                    ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip,
                    XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646
           Product: File System
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 4.19.58
          Hardware: x86-64
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: XFS
          Assignee: filesystem_xfs@kernel-bugs.kernel.org
          Reporter: mcgrof@kernel.org
                CC: filesystem_xfs@kernel-bugs.kernel.org,
                    mcgrof@kernel.org, zlang@redhat.com
        Depends on: 204049
        Regression: No

Running generic/388 in a loop with an "xfs_nocrc" configuration as per oscheck
[0], which I'm using for XFS stable maintenace, I can now easily reproduce a
crash. The crash actually triggers *right away* so a loop is often not needed.

[0] https://gitlab.com/mcgrof/oscheck

# xfs_info /dev/loop5
meta-data=/dev/loop5             isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=1310720 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
         =                       crc=0        finobt=0, sparse=0, rmapbt=0
         =                       reflink=0
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=5242880, imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

Note that the crash on this report is different than that reported and observed
currently on upstream [1].

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204049

The crash from the log:

[129134.433052] XFS (loop5): Mounting V4 Filesystem
[129134.448216] XFS (loop5): Starting recovery (logdev: internal)
[129134.490377] XFS (loop5): Ending recovery (logdev: internal)
[129135.496378] XFS (loop5): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x8) called from line 463 of
file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c.  Return address = 00000000aec438ec
[129135.499383] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
00000000000000a4
[129135.501291] PGD 0 P4D 0
[129135.502040] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[129135.502974] CPU: 6 PID: 12203 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G            E    
4.19.58 #3
[129135.504855] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[129135.507540] RIP: 0010:xfs_trans_brelse+0x21/0xd0 [xfs]
[129135.508817] Code: e5 eb 8d 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 49 89 f4
55 53 48 85 ff 0f 84 a1 00 00 00 48 8b ae e8 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 <8b> 85 a4
00 00 00
 85 c0 75 5a 48 8b 45 40 a8 08 75 09 f6 85 a0 00
[129135.513156] RSP: 0018:ffff98ee01533ba0 EFLAGS: 00010286
[129135.514453] RAX: 00000000fffffffb RBX: ffff8c50a85c0000 RCX:
0000000000000000
[129135.516216] RDX: 00000000ffffffc0 RSI: ffff8c50af5ed800 RDI:
ffff8c50b557dde8
[129135.517985] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[129135.519749] R10: 000000000000000a R11: f000000000000000 R12:
ffff8c50af5ed800
[129135.521515] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8c4fd8d87bc0 R15:
00000000fffffffb
[129135.523284] FS:  00007f38aacefb80(0000) GS:ffff8c50b7b80000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[129135.525237] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[129135.526645] CR2: 00000000000000a4 CR3: 00000002337f8004 CR4:
00000000007606e0
[129135.528416] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[129135.530185] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
[129135.531953] PKRU: 55555554
[129135.532725] Call Trace:
[129135.533472]  xfs_attr_set+0x3b9/0x420 [xfs]
[129135.534568]  xfs_xattr_set+0x4e/0x90 [xfs]
[129135.535638]  ? lookup_fast+0xc8/0x2e0
[129135.536616]  __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
[129135.537607]  __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x67/0x1a0
[129135.538722]  ? inode_permission+0x31/0x180
[129135.539843]  vfs_setxattr+0x81/0xa0
[129135.540914]  ? setxattr+0xa1/0x1c0
[129135.541833]  setxattr+0x13b/0x1c0
[129135.542734]  ? filename_lookup.part.62+0xe0/0x170
[129135.543925]  ? __check_object_size+0x15d/0x189
[129135.545074]  ? strncpy_from_user+0x4a/0x160
[129135.546157]  path_setxattr+0xbe/0xe0
[129135.547110]  __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30
[129135.548159]  do_syscall_64+0x55/0xf0
[129135.549120]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[129135.550375] RIP: 0033:0x7f38aade843a
[129135.551329] Code: 48 8b 0d 59 3a 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e
0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 bc 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 26 3a 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[129135.555577] RSP: 002b:00007ffe4eb6a6c8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX:
00000000000000bc
[129135.557436] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000064 RCX:
00007f38aade843a
[129135.559207] RDX: 000055a62efd2810 RSI: 00007ffe4eb6a700 RDI:
000055a62efd27e0
[129135.560971] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
00007ffe4eb6a437
[129135.562745] R10: 0000000000000064 R11: 0000000000000202 R12:
0000000000000001
[129135.564501] R13: 000000000000096f R14: 00007ffe4eb6a700 R15:
000055a62efd2810
[129135.566269] Modules linked in: loop(E) xfs(E) libcrc32c(E)
crct10dif_pclmul(E) crc32_pclmul(E) ghash_clmulni_intel(E) aesni_intel(E)
aes_x86_64(E) crypto_simd(E) cryptd(E) glue_helper(E) virtio_balloon(E)
evdev(E) joydev(E) pcspkr(E) serio_raw(E) i6300esb(E) button(E) ip_tables(E)
x_tables(E) autofs4(E) ext4(E) crc32c_generic(E) crc16(E) mbcache(E) jbd2(E)
fscrypto(E) ata_generic(E) virtio_net(E) net_failover(E) failover(E)
virtio_blk(E) ata_piix(E) libata(E) nvme(E) uhci_hcd(E) scsi_mod(E) ehci_hcd(E)
psmouse(E) virtio_pci(E) nvme_core(E) virtio_ring(E) crc32c_intel(E) usbcore(E)
virtio(E) i2c_piix4(E) floppy(E)
[129135.572747] XFS (loop5): writeback error on sector 2434464
[129135.578585] CR2: 00000000000000a4
[129135.578587] ---[ end trace 4929621d71ca58c2 ]---
[129135.578622] RIP: 0010:xfs_trans_brelse+0x21/0xd0 [xfs]
[129135.578624] Code: e5 eb 8d 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 49 89 f4
55 53 48 85 ff 0f 84 a1 00 00 00 48 8b ae e8 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 <8b> 85 a4
00 00 00 85 c0 75 5a 48 8b 45 40 a8 08 75 09 f6 85 a0 00
[129135.587555] RSP: 0018:ffff98ee01533ba0 EFLAGS: 00010286
[129135.588849] RAX: 00000000fffffffb RBX: ffff8c50a85c0000 RCX:
0000000000000000
[129135.590610] RDX: 00000000ffffffc0 RSI: ffff8c50af5ed800 RDI:
ffff8c50b557dde8
[129135.592381] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[129135.594146] R10: 000000000000000a R11: f000000000000000 R12:
ffff8c50af5ed800
[129135.595912] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8c4fd8d87bc0 R15:
00000000fffffffb
[129135.597680] FS:  00007f38aacefb80(0000) GS:ffff8c50b7b80000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[129135.599659] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[129135.601066] CR2: 00000000000000a4 CR3: 00000002337f8004 CR4:
00000000007606e0
[129135.602840] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[129135.604606] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
[129135.606376] PKRU: 55555554


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204049
[Bug 204049] [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format
!= XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip,
XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [xfstests generic/388]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc XFS: null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-18 19:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-18 19:32 ` [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink " bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-18 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

--- Comment #1 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
I'll note that I cannot reproduce the issue on the default configuration, as
per oscheck the fstests "xfs" configuration, without crc disabled.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-18 19:08 ` [Bug 204223] [xfstests generic/388]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc XFS: null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21 bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-18 19:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-18 20:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-18 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

--- Comment #2 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
I'm able to now trigger the same crash on an "xfs_reflink" configuration:

# xfs_info /dev/loop5
meta-data=/dev/loop5             isize=512    agcount=4, agsize=1310720 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
         =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=1
         =                       reflink=1
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=5242880, imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=3693, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

With the default configuration it is not crashing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-18 19:08 ` [Bug 204223] [xfstests generic/388]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc XFS: null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21 bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-18 19:32 ` [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-18 20:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-18 20:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-18 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

--- Comment #3 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
After about ~30 runs I managed to crash a system with the same type of output
on this big with reflink enabled but rmapbt disabled, ie, the
"xfs_reflink_normapbt" configuration Zorro used on kz#204049:

# xfs_info /dev/loop5
meta-data=/dev/loop5             isize=512    agcount=4, agsize=1310720 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
         =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
         =                       reflink=1
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=5242880, imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

[0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204049

kz#204049 reveals upstream is also affected by this bug then.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-07-18 20:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-18 20:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-19  3:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-18 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

--- Comment #4 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
(In reply to Luis Chamberlain from comment #3)

> kz#204049 reveals upstream is also affected by this bug then.

To be clear, but with a different output, so different issue, and Zorro would
have to test other configurations to see if the same issue creeps up on
upstream with them as well.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-07-18 20:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-19  3:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-19 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-19  3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

--- Comment #5 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
(In reply to Luis Chamberlain from comment #0)
> [129135.499383] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

<-- snip -->

> [129135.507540] RIP: 0010:xfs_trans_brelse+0x21/0xd0 [xfs]

Reproduced with the "xfs_reflink_normapbt" configuration and can confirm an
immediate panic on vanilla 4.19.20 with the same trace as above.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-07-19  3:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-19 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-19 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-19 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

--- Comment #6 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
Fixed by commit 6958d11f77d45d ("xfs: don't trip over uninitialized buffer on
extent read of corrupted inode"). Sent as part of the set of stable fixes for
v4.19.y series.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-07-19 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-19 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-19 21:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-20 22:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-19 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |CODE_FIX

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-07-19 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-19 21:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
  2019-07-20 22:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-19 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|CODE_FIX                    |---

--- Comment #7 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
Not fixed yet, it just takes longer with this commit to trigger.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21
  2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-07-19 21:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2019-07-20 22:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-07-20 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204223

--- Comment #8 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
These commits fix this crash:

xfs: Move fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h to fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.h
xfs: Add helper function xfs_attr_try_sf_addname
xfs: Add attibute set and helper functions
xfs: Add attibute remove and helper functions
xfs: always rejoin held resources during defer roll

I've left generic/388 running over time and it ran up to 247 times
successfully, and failed but at least without a crash in the end.

In particular the last commit has has some fixes to correct bhold callers to
release held buffers correctly merged into the patch, which IMHO should have
been split up into a separate patch.

Trying to extract the exact minor fix is difficult due to the amount of churn
from the prior patches. We'll have to try to do that work somehow or just
consider merging all of these.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-20 22:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-18 19:03 [Bug 204223] New: [xfstests generic/388]: XFS: Assertion failed: ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE || ip->i_d.di_nextents > XFS_IFORK_MAXEXT(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c, line: 3646 bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-18 19:08 ` [Bug 204223] [xfstests generic/388]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc XFS: null pointer dereference at xfs_trans_brelse+0x21 bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-18 19:32 ` [Bug 204223] [fstests generic/388 on xfs]: 4.19.58 xfs_nocrc / xfs_reflink " bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-18 20:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-18 20:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-19  3:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-19 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-19 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-19 21:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2019-07-20 22:49 ` bugzilla-daemon

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.