* [Bug 215613] New: uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: No description of the 'unix' URI scheme
@ 2022-02-16 15:31 bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-17 20:55 ` [Bug 215613] " bugzilla-daemon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2022-02-16 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-man
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215613
Bug ID: 215613
Summary: uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: No description of the
'unix' URI scheme
Product: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: man-pages
Assignee: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: alx.manpages@gmail.com
Regression: No
The subsection DESCRIPTION/Usage provides a description of common schemes in
use on UNIX-like systems, but there's no mention of the 'unix:' scheme for Unix
domain sockets.
AFAIK, it uses the same format as 'file:' (which is documented), but I don't
know if there are any differences.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug 215613] uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: No description of the 'unix' URI scheme
2022-02-16 15:31 [Bug 215613] New: uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: No description of the 'unix' URI scheme bugzilla-daemon
@ 2022-02-17 20:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2022-02-17 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-man
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215613
Thomas Piekarski (t.piekarski@deloquencia.de) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |t.piekarski@deloquencia.de
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Piekarski (t.piekarski@deloquencia.de) ---
I took a look into it and I have been unable to find any RFC for Unix domain
socket URI schema for comparing if it is the same like file URI schema.
The IANA is not listing it [1].
The W3C is not listing it [2].
The RFC for Uniform Resource Locators [3] is not mentioning it nor does the RFC
for file [4]. Well later was just a shot :-)
Maybe it is due to its nature for being used for inter-process communication,
but from where such schema similar to internet schemas derive from?
The form is the same, but do unix://localhost/var/some-socket.sock accept such
a form with localhost inside like file does? And do they behave the same in
regards of file permissions?
---
[1]: https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml
[2]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/UriSchemes
[3]: https://www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc1738.txt
[4]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8089.html
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-17 20:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-16 15:31 [Bug 215613] New: uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: No description of the 'unix' URI scheme bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-17 20:55 ` [Bug 215613] " bugzilla-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.