* [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
@ 2014-04-10 14:23 bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-10 14:52 ` [Bug 73781] " bugzilla-daemon
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-10 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
Bug ID: 73781
Summary: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
Product: Power Management
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.14
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: cpufreq
Assignee: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Reporter: katoh@mikage.ne.jp
Regression: No
After I upgraded kernel to 3.14, acpi-cpufreq module cannot be loaded.
Accordingly my laptop's cpufreq doesn't run anymore.
Until kernel 3.13.8, acpi-cpufreq has been loaded automatically as expected.
If I try to load acpi-cpufreq manually on 3.14,
# modprobe acpi-cpufreq
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': No such device
Strangely if p4_clockmod was loaded initially, acpi-cpufreq can be
loaded sucessfully too. My laptop's cpu is PentiumM though.
# modprobe p4-clockmod
# modprobe acpi-cpufreq
In this case, available frequencies are messed up.
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
212500 425000 637500 850000 1062500 1275000 1487500 1700000
On 3.13.8 (This is correct.)
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
1700000 1400000 1200000 1000000 800000 600000
/proc/cpuinfo on Linux version 3.13.8
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 9
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1700MHz
stepping : 5
microcode : 0x7
cpu MHz : 600.000
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fdiv_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov clflush
dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 tm pbe bts est tm2
bogomips : 1199.92
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-10 14:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-10 15:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-10 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |viresh.kumar@linaro.org
--- Comment #1 from Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> ---
Try reverting these patches on top of 3.14 in the order mentioned:
commit eb8c68ef558e6cba241e7ada54f6b3427cb2bf68
Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date: Mon Jan 27 22:50:35 2014 -0500
acpi-cpufreq: De-register CPU notifier and free struct msr on error.
commit cfc9c8ed03e4d908f2388af8815f44c87b503aaf
Author: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:24:50 2013 +0100
acpi-cpufreq: Adjust the code to use the common boost attribute
commit 6f19efc0a1ca08bc61841b971d8b85ab505d95c8
Author: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:24:49 2013 +0100
cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core
And let me know if it fixes things for you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-10 14:52 ` [Bug 73781] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-10 15:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 3:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-10 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #2 from KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> ---
commit eb8c68ef558e6cba241e7ada54f6b3427cb2bf68
Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date: Mon Jan 27 22:50:35 2014 -0500
I reverted this patch and built module. And it doesn't seem to make any
difference.
commit cfc9c8ed03e4d908f2388af8815f44c87b503aaf
Author: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:24:50 2013 +0100
I can't revert this patch, because some rejects happened.
commit 6f19efc0a1ca08bc61841b971d8b85ab505d95c8
Author: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Date: Fri Dec 20 15:24:49 2013 +0100
While building modules, many errors occured. So I didn't test this.
I apologize for bothering you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-10 14:52 ` [Bug 73781] " bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-10 15:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 3:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 8:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #3 from Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> ---
I wanted you to revert all three and then test it :)
Okay, I have reverted them for you now, let me know if it works.
Otherwise you have to do a git bisect, we aren't left with much options :)
git://git.linaro.org/people/viresh.kumar/linux.git for-kato
--
viresh
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 3:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 8:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |l.majewski@samsung.com
--- Comment #4 from Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> ---
(In reply to KATO Hiroshi from comment #0)
> After I upgraded kernel to 3.14, acpi-cpufreq module cannot be loaded.
> Accordingly my laptop's cpufreq doesn't run anymore.
> Until kernel 3.13.8, acpi-cpufreq has been loaded automatically as expected.
>
> If I try to load acpi-cpufreq manually on 3.14,
>
> # modprobe acpi-cpufreq
> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': No such device
Why the "No such device" error show up? This is strange.
I suppose, that the acpi_cpufreq.ko module was built correctly.
Could you share the list of modules to be installed/inserted?
Also, I've noticed, that the p4-clockmod is also inserted. Could you
compile it in and left the acpi-cpufreq to be inserted as a standalone module?
Thanks in advance.
>
> Strangely if p4_clockmod was loaded initially, acpi-cpufreq can be
> loaded sucessfully too. My laptop's cpu is PentiumM though.
>
> # modprobe p4-clockmod
> # modprobe acpi-cpufreq
>
> In this case, available frequencies are messed up.
>
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
> 212500 425000 637500 850000 1062500 1275000 1487500 1700000
>
> On 3.13.8 (This is correct.)
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
> 1700000 1400000 1200000 1000000 800000 600000
>
>
> /proc/cpuinfo on Linux version 3.13.8
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 9
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1700MHz
> stepping : 5
> microcode : 0x7
> cpu MHz : 600.000
> cache size : 1024 KB
> physical id : 0
> siblings : 1
> core id : 0
> cpu cores : 1
> apicid : 0
> initial apicid : 0
> fdiv_bug : no
> f00f_bug : no
> coma_bug : no
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 2
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov
> clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 tm pbe bts est tm2
> bogomips : 1199.92
> clflush size : 64
> cache_alignment : 64
> address sizes : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
> power management:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 8:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #5 from KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> ---
Created attachment 131921
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=131921&action=edit
inserted modules (3.13.8)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #6 from KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> ---
Created attachment 131931
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=131931&action=edit
inserted modules (3.14)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 12:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #131931|application/octet-stream |text/plain
mime type| |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 12:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 12:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #7 from KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> ---
(In reply to Viresh Kumar from comment #3)
Thank you for your kindness. I built revert patched drivers/cpufreq,
and unfortunately the problem has not been solved yet.
I also overwrite drivers/cpufreq with 3.13.8's one, the same problem happens.
So maybe cpufreq does not relate to this.
(In reply to Lukasz Majewski from comment #4)
> Why the "No such device" error show up? This is strange.
>I suppose, that the acpi_cpufreq.ko module was built correctly.
I use an ArchLinux package kernel. And never heard a similar problem
on the bts of archlinux. So I think acpi_cpufreq.ko module was built correctly.
> Also, I've noticed, that the p4-clockmod is also inserted. Could you
> compile it in and left the acpi-cpufreq to be inserted as a standalone module?
When I was searching the solution, I found a tweet of somebody who may be
worrying the same problem.
Though unlike me he uses c2d, he wrote that only p4-clockmod could be used. So
I gave it a try.
inserted modules 3.13.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=131921
inserted modules 3.14
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=131931
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 12:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #8 from Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> ---
Do git bisect please and let us know the offending commit.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-11 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-16 8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-11 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #9 from KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> ---
(In reply to Viresh Kumar from comment #8)
> Do git bisect please and let us know the offending commit.
I'll do as possible.
By the way while glancing through dmesg, one important difference found.
3.13.8
[ 0.087346] acpiphp: Slot [1-1] registered
[ 0.090033] Found 1 acpi root devices
[ 0.140788] Switched to clocksource acpi_pm
[ 1.856854] ACPI: acpi_idle registered with cpuidle
[ 2.101747] thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.25
3.14
[ 0.083948] acpiphp: Slot [1-1] registered
[ 0.139115] Switched to clocksource acpi_pm
[ 2.266132] thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.25
3.14 kernel does not find an acpi root device.
I think this can be the point of this problem intead of cpufreq.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-11 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-16 8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-16 12:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-16 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
Stuart Foster <smf.linux@ntlworld.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |smf.linux@ntlworld.com
--- Comment #10 from Stuart Foster <smf.linux@ntlworld.com> ---
Just found the same problem with a Thinkpad R51 (3.14.1 Kernel). From my
investigations the problem was introduced prior 3.14.0-rc1. How is the bisect
going ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-16 8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-16 12:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-17 8:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-16 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #11 from KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> ---
It is making very slow progress. I haven't known how hard bitsect is.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-16 12:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-17 8:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-17 15:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-17 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #12 from Stuart Foster <smf.linux@ntlworld.com> ---
My bisect attempt reports this as the source of the issue:
root@Mars:/work/linux-git# git bisect bad
b981513f806d26b2cc971eb65ced14bede67558b is the first bad commit
commit b981513f806d26b2cc971eb65ced14bede67558b
Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu Jan 9 16:15:19 2014 +0800
ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU
Enhance ACPI CPU hotplug driver to print clear error message and
bail out early if BIOS returns wrong value in ACPI MADT table or
_MAT method. Otherwise it will add the CPU device even if failed
to get APIC ID and fails any operations against sysfs interface:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
:040000 040000 beed2874da58eff342807a9bed397a9b3f23accb
07f57bb8eb502216ae49cce21293a191b594095d M drivers
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-17 8:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-17 15:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-17 15:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-18 1:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-17 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #13 from KATO Hiroshi <katoh@mikage.ne.jp> ---
Great job!
Now should I change product category to ACPI or report the cause of the
regression to the author of this patch? As this is the first time of my
submitting a bug report, I don't have any idea what to do next.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-17 15:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-17 15:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-18 1:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-17 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
--- Comment #14 from Stuart Foster <smf.linux@ntlworld.com> ---
I would let Viresh make that call as he asked for the bisect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug 73781] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-17 15:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-04-18 1:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-04-18 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73781
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|cpufreq |Config-Processors
Assignee|cpufreq@vger.kernel.org |acpi_config-processors@kern
| |el-bugs.osdl.org
Product|Power Management |ACPI
CC| |tianyu.lan@intel.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-18 1:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-10 14:23 [Bug 73781] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-10 14:52 ` [Bug 73781] " bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-10 15:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 3:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 8:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 12:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-11 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-16 8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-16 12:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-17 8:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-17 15:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-17 15:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-04-18 1:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.