* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
@ 2017-06-19 11:11 bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-19 11:17 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] " bugzilla at busybox.net
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2017-06-19 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Bug ID: 9966
Summary: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
Product: buildroot
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
Reporter: tuzakli.refik at gmail.com
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Target Milestone: ---
/home/osboxes/Desktop/boards/arm/karo/tx6u_8033/fs/buildroot/output/host/usr/lib/libncurses.so:
file not recognized: File format not recognized
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:5997: recipe for target 'dmesg' failed
make[3]: *** [dmesg] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[3]: Leaving directory
'/home/osboxes/Desktop/boards/arm/karo/tx6u_8033/fs/buildroot/output/build/util-linux-2.30'
Makefile:11718: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/osboxes/Desktop/boards/arm/karo/tx6u_8033/fs/buildroot/output/build/util-linux-2.30'
Makefile:4913: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/osboxes/Desktop/boards/arm/karo/tx6u_8033/fs/buildroot/output/build/util-linux-2.30'
package/pkg-generic.mk:227: recipe for target
'/home/osboxes/Desktop/boards/arm/karo/tx6u_8033/fs/buildroot/output/build/util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built'
failed
make: ***
[/home/osboxes/Desktop/boards/arm/karo/tx6u_8033/fs/buildroot/output/build/util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built]
Error 2
armv7 a9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2017-06-19 11:17 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-26 11:07 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2017-06-19 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at buildroot.uclibc |casantos at datacom.ind.br
|.org |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-19 11:17 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] " bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2017-06-26 11:07 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-28 6:25 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2017-06-26 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> ---
Please check if the problem persists on a recent master snapshot (as of commit
74235a6854d6e469f2dbc141fe08ce9ae94e7d3c).
Please provide a copy of your defconfig. Run
$ make savedefconfig BR2_DEFCONFIG=/tmp/bug_9966_defconfig
Then attach /tmp/bug_9966_defconfig to this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-19 11:17 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] " bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-26 11:07 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2017-06-28 6:25 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-28 11:03 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2017-06-28 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
--- Comment #2 from Refik Tuzakli <tuzakli.refik@gmail.com> ---
After I run make clean, I run make again then it works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-06-28 6:25 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2017-06-28 11:03 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 0:58 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2017-06-28 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> ---
Looks like the reporter attempted to perform a dirty build in an output
directory containing traces of a previous build, for a different architecture.
Closing as RESOLVED/WORKSFORME, since the reporter did not provide enough
information to reproduce the failure and was able to circumvent the problem by
means of a clean build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-06-28 11:03 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2019-02-25 0:58 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 1:02 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2019-02-25 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-boogs@rere.qmqm.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
--- Comment #4 from Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-boogs@rere.qmqm.pl> ---
I just stumbled on this problem on 2018.11.3 after adding a patch that modifies
configure.ac.
'make clean' does not help in this case.
It seems that this modification triggers regererating of aclocal.m4 (it has
some parts replaced with an older version) and all the paths to tools and
libraries in resulting Makefiles get mixed up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-25 0:58 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2019-02-25 1:02 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 1:04 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2019-02-25 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-boogs@rere.qmqm.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mirq-boogs at rere.qmqm.pl
--- Comment #5 from Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-boogs@rere.qmqm.pl> ---
Created attachment 7961
--> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=7961&action=edit
patch for util-linux configure.ac
For reproduction: put attached patch in package/util-linux/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-25 1:02 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2019-02-25 1:04 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 11:44 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2019-02-25 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-boogs@rere.qmqm.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|unspecified |2018.11.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-25 1:04 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2019-02-25 11:44 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 13:49 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 16:51 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2019-02-25 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.com.br> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.com.br> ---
(In reply to Micha? Miros?aw from comment #5)
Sorry, this is not a bug in Buildroot. You add a patch that knowingly breaks
the build and then complain that the build gets broken.
Also, please do not reopen an old bug just because you saw a similar behavior
in a new situation. A bug must be reopened if it's resolution was not correct.
New problems must be reported as new bugs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-25 11:44 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2019-02-25 13:49 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 16:51 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2019-02-25 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
--- Comment #7 from Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-boogs@rere.qmqm.pl> ---
(In reply to Carlos Santos from comment #6)
I don't want to point fingers. Adding 'UTIL_LINUX_AUTORECONF = YES' line to
package/util-linux/util-linux.mk fixes the problem.
I guess it has something to do with buildroot's makefile replacing
config/ltmain.sh in the package but not in autotools it provides. The file
get's replaced with unpatched version when ./configure runs autoreconf to
update itself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-25 13:49 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
@ 2019-02-25 16:51 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2019-02-25 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9966
--- Comment #8 from Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.com.br> ---
(In reply to Micha? Miros?aw from comment #7)
Let me clarify my point: I'm not against adding a patch to disable rtcwake,
even though I believe this should be submitted upstream first. My point is that
such change would be an improvement, not a bug fix, so the right way to do it
is by means of a patch on Buildroot that adds the required patch for util-linux
and also turns AUTORECONF to YES.
Also, this discussion should happen on the buildroot mailing list, not on a bug
report, so I stop here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-25 16:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-19 11:11 [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] New: util-linux-2.30/.stamp_built' failed bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-19 11:17 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 9966] " bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-26 11:07 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-28 6:25 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2017-06-28 11:03 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 0:58 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 1:02 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 1:04 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 11:44 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 13:49 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2019-02-25 16:51 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.