All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	robh@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com,
	matt.sealey@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com,
	john.horley@arm.com, mike.leach@linaro.org,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] dts: coresight: Define new bindings for direction of data flow
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:20:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c38e4b05-622e-8747-dee4-990cfbe7633d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180601203928.GD9838@xps15>

On 06/01/2018 09:39 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:16:06PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> So far we have relied on an undocumented property "slave-mode",
>> to indicate if the given port is input or not. Since we are
>> redefining the coresight bindings, define new property for the
>> "direction" of data flow for a given connection endpoint in the
>> device.
>>
>> Each endpoint must define the following property.
>>
>>   - "direction" : 0 => Port is input
>> 		 1 => Port is output
>>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 
> You haven't documented the binding in bindings/arm/coresight.txt the same way
> you did with "coresight,hwid".  I'm guessing you simply forgot to do a "git add"
> on the file when preparing the patchset.
> 
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> index 99d7a9c..63c1668 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> @@ -52,7 +52,19 @@ of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(struct device_node *endpoint)
>>   			       endpoint, of_dev_node_match);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void of_coresight_get_ports(const struct device_node *node,
>> +static bool of_coresight_ep_is_input(struct device *dev, struct device_node *ep_node)
> 
> I suggested of_coresight_endpoint_get_port_id() in my review of 6/8.  I'm good
> with either "ep" or "endpoint", as long as the names are consistent.

Yep, that's right. This is what I have for the documentation :

--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
@@ -103,9 +103,11 @@ with a specific direction of data flow, each 
connection must define the
  following properties to uniquely identify the connection details.

   * Direction of the data flow w.r.t the component :
-   Each input port must have the following property defined at the 
"endpoint"
+   Each hardware port must have the following property defined at the 
"endpoint"
     for the port.
-       "slave-mode"
+       "direction" - 32bit integer, whose values are defined as follows :
+               0 => the endpoint is an Input port
+               1 => the endpoint is an Output port.


and changes to the examples as well..


Cheers
Suzuki

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: suzuki.poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 7/8] dts: coresight: Define new bindings for direction of data flow
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:20:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c38e4b05-622e-8747-dee4-990cfbe7633d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180601203928.GD9838@xps15>

On 06/01/2018 09:39 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:16:06PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> So far we have relied on an undocumented property "slave-mode",
>> to indicate if the given port is input or not. Since we are
>> redefining the coresight bindings, define new property for the
>> "direction" of data flow for a given connection endpoint in the
>> device.
>>
>> Each endpoint must define the following property.
>>
>>   - "direction" : 0 => Port is input
>> 		 1 => Port is output
>>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 
> You haven't documented the binding in bindings/arm/coresight.txt the same way
> you did with "coresight,hwid".  I'm guessing you simply forgot to do a "git add"
> on the file when preparing the patchset.
> 
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> index 99d7a9c..63c1668 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
>> @@ -52,7 +52,19 @@ of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(struct device_node *endpoint)
>>   			       endpoint, of_dev_node_match);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void of_coresight_get_ports(const struct device_node *node,
>> +static bool of_coresight_ep_is_input(struct device *dev, struct device_node *ep_node)
> 
> I suggested of_coresight_endpoint_get_port_id() in my review of 6/8.  I'm good
> with either "ep" or "endpoint", as long as the names are consistent.

Yep, that's right. This is what I have for the documentation :

--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
@@ -103,9 +103,11 @@ with a specific direction of data flow, each 
connection must define the
  following properties to uniquely identify the connection details.

   * Direction of the data flow w.r.t the component :
-   Each input port must have the following property defined at the 
"endpoint"
+   Each hardware port must have the following property defined at the 
"endpoint"
     for the port.
-       "slave-mode"
+       "direction" - 32bit integer, whose values are defined as follows :
+               0 => the endpoint is an Input port
+               1 => the endpoint is an Output port.


and changes to the examples as well..


Cheers
Suzuki

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-04 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-01 13:15 [RFC PATCH 0/8] coresight: Update device tree bindings Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] dts: binding: coresight: Document graph bindings Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 16:14   ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 16:14     ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] coresight: Fix remote endpoint parsing Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 19:38   ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 19:38     ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 19:46     ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 19:46       ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-04 10:34       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-04 10:34         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] coresight: Cleanup platform description data Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] coresight: platform: Cleanup coresight connection handling Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] coresight: Handle errors in finding input/output ports Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] dts: coresight: Clean up the device tree graph bindings Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 20:26   ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 20:26     ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-12 20:48   ` Rob Herring
2018-06-12 20:48     ` Rob Herring
2018-06-13  9:45     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-13  9:45       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-13 12:49       ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-13 12:49         ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-13 12:49         ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-13 13:35         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-13 13:35           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-13 13:35           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-13 13:57           ` Rob Herring
2018-06-13 13:57             ` Rob Herring
2018-06-13 13:57             ` Rob Herring
2018-06-13 15:47           ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-13 15:47             ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-13 15:47             ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-13 17:07             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-13 17:07               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-13 17:07               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-13 19:40               ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-13 19:40                 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-13 19:40                 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-13 21:07                 ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-13 21:07                   ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-13 21:07                   ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-14  8:53                   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-14  8:53                     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-14  8:53                     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-14 13:59                     ` Rob Herring
2018-06-14 13:59                       ` Rob Herring
2018-06-14 13:59                       ` Rob Herring
2018-06-14 15:04                       ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-14 15:04                         ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-14 15:04                         ` Matt Sealey
2018-06-15  9:58                       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-15  9:58                         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-15  9:58                         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-03  9:44                       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-03  9:44                         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-03  9:44                         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-03 16:15                         ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] dts: coresight: Define new bindings for direction of data flow Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 20:39   ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 20:39     ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-04 14:20     ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2018-06-04 14:20       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] dts: juno: Update coresight bindings for hw port Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 13:16   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-06-01 20:59   ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 20:59     ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 21:04 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] coresight: Update device tree bindings Mathieu Poirier
2018-06-01 21:04   ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c38e4b05-622e-8747-dee4-990cfbe7633d@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.horley@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=matt.sealey@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.