All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>,
	Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>
Subject: [PATCHv4 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the adreno smmu specific impl
Date: Tue,  8 Jun 2021 18:00:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c42181d313fdd440011541a28cde8cd10fffb9d3.1623155117.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1623155117.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>

Adreno(GPU) SMMU and APSS(Application Processor SubSystem) SMMU
both implement "arm,mmu-500" in some QTI SoCs and to run through
adreno smmu specific implementation such as enabling split pagetables
support, we need to match the "qcom,adreno-smmu" compatible first
before apss smmu or else we will be running apps smmu implementation
for adreno smmu and the additional features for adreno smmu is never
set. For ex: we have "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500" compatible for both apps
and adreno smmu implementing "arm,mmu-500", so the adreno smmu
implementation is never reached because the current sequence checks
for apps smmu compatible(qcom,sc7280-smmu-500) first and runs that
specific impl and we never reach adreno smmu specific implementation.

Suggested-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index e93b5dbda7de..83c32566bf64 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -370,11 +370,17 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 			return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
 	}
 
-	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
-		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
-
+	/*
+	 * Do not change this order of implementation, i.e., first adreno
+	 * smmu impl and then apss smmu since we can have both implementing
+	 * arm,mmu-500 in which case we will miss setting adreno smmu specific
+	 * features if the order is changed.
+	 */
 	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
 		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl);
 
+	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
+		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
+
 	return smmu;
 }
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv4 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the adreno smmu specific impl
Date: Tue,  8 Jun 2021 18:00:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c42181d313fdd440011541a28cde8cd10fffb9d3.1623155117.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1623155117.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>

Adreno(GPU) SMMU and APSS(Application Processor SubSystem) SMMU
both implement "arm,mmu-500" in some QTI SoCs and to run through
adreno smmu specific implementation such as enabling split pagetables
support, we need to match the "qcom,adreno-smmu" compatible first
before apss smmu or else we will be running apps smmu implementation
for adreno smmu and the additional features for adreno smmu is never
set. For ex: we have "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500" compatible for both apps
and adreno smmu implementing "arm,mmu-500", so the adreno smmu
implementation is never reached because the current sequence checks
for apps smmu compatible(qcom,sc7280-smmu-500) first and runs that
specific impl and we never reach adreno smmu specific implementation.

Suggested-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index e93b5dbda7de..83c32566bf64 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -370,11 +370,17 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 			return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
 	}
 
-	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
-		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
-
+	/*
+	 * Do not change this order of implementation, i.e., first adreno
+	 * smmu impl and then apss smmu since we can have both implementing
+	 * arm,mmu-500 in which case we will miss setting adreno smmu specific
+	 * features if the order is changed.
+	 */
 	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
 		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl);
 
+	if (of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np))
+		return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_smmu_impl);
+
 	return smmu;
 }
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-08 12:30 [PATCHv4 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SC7280 support Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-06-08 12:30 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-06-08 12:30 ` [PATCHv4 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SC7280 SMMU compatible Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-06-08 12:30   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-06-08 12:30 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2021-06-08 12:30   ` [PATCHv4 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the adreno smmu specific impl Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-06-08 17:16 ` [PATCHv4 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SC7280 support Will Deacon
2021-06-08 17:16   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-08 17:16   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c42181d313fdd440011541a28cde8cd10fffb9d3.1623155117.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=akhilpo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jordan@cosmicpenguin.net \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.