All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, farman@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
	richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/pci: zPCI interpretation support
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:32:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c44a7ba3-37bf-6b25-1e89-719a1487ca20@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32c83624-eb3b-05ea-6fb6-737bd9876db3@redhat.com>

On 1/17/22 10:23 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 14/01/2022 21.38, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> For QEMU, the majority of the work in enabling instruction interpretation
>> is handled via new VFIO ioctls to SET the appropriate interpretation and
>> interrupt forwarding modes, and to GET the function handle to use for
>> interpretive execution.
>>
>> This series implements these new ioctls, as well as adding a new, 
>> optional
>> 'intercept' parameter to zpci to request interpretation support not be 
>> used
>> as well as an 'intassist' parameter to determine whether or not the
>> firmware assist will be used for interrupt delivery or whether the host
>> will be responsible for delivering all interrupts.
> 
>   Hi Matthew,
> 
> would it make sense to create a docs/system/s390x/zpci.rst doc file, 

This is a good idea and probably something that was due for zpci before 
this series even.

> too, where you could describe such new parameters like 'intassist' and 
> 'intercept' (or is it 'interp') ? ... otherwise hardly anybody except 

Oops, 'intercept' was a holdover from a previous version and effectively 
had an inverted meaning.  It is indeed 'interp' with this current series 
(and subject to change again per other thread)



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
	schnelle@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	richard.henderson@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/pci: zPCI interpretation support
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:32:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c44a7ba3-37bf-6b25-1e89-719a1487ca20@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32c83624-eb3b-05ea-6fb6-737bd9876db3@redhat.com>

On 1/17/22 10:23 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 14/01/2022 21.38, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> For QEMU, the majority of the work in enabling instruction interpretation
>> is handled via new VFIO ioctls to SET the appropriate interpretation and
>> interrupt forwarding modes, and to GET the function handle to use for
>> interpretive execution.
>>
>> This series implements these new ioctls, as well as adding a new, 
>> optional
>> 'intercept' parameter to zpci to request interpretation support not be 
>> used
>> as well as an 'intassist' parameter to determine whether or not the
>> firmware assist will be used for interrupt delivery or whether the host
>> will be responsible for delivering all interrupts.
> 
>   Hi Matthew,
> 
> would it make sense to create a docs/system/s390x/zpci.rst doc file, 

This is a good idea and probably something that was due for zpci before 
this series even.

> too, where you could describe such new parameters like 'intassist' and 
> 'intercept' (or is it 'interp') ? ... otherwise hardly anybody except 

Oops, 'intercept' was a holdover from a previous version and effectively 
had an inverted meaning.  It is indeed 'interp' with this current series 
(and subject to change again per other thread)




  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-18 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-14 20:38 [PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/pci: zPCI interpretation support Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] Update linux headers Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] target/s390x: add zpci-interp to cpu models Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] fixup: force interp off for QEMU machine 6.2 and older Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 21:04   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 21:04     ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] s390x/pci: enable for load/store intepretation Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 14:51   ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-17 14:51     ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-18 18:08     ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 18:08       ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 15:38   ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-17 15:38     ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-18 18:14     ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 18:14       ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-31  9:37   ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-31  9:37     ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-31 14:46   ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-31 17:11     ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] s390x/pci: don't fence interpreted devices without MSI-X Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] s390x/pci: enable adapter event notification for interpreted devices Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-31 15:10   ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-31 15:10     ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-31 17:08     ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-31 17:08       ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] s390x/pci: use I/O Address Translation assist when interpreting Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] s390x/pci: use dtsm provided from vfio capabilities for interpreted devices Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] s390x/pci: let intercept devices have separate PCI groups Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:38   ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] s390x/pci: zPCI interpretation support Thomas Huth
2022-01-17 15:23   ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-18 18:32   ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2022-01-18 18:32     ` Matthew Rosato
2022-02-04 12:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-04 12:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c44a7ba3-37bf-6b25-1e89-719a1487ca20@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.