All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] boot-order-test: fix memleaks in boot-order-test
@ 2020-02-03  2:59 pannengyuan
  2020-02-03  6:37 ` Thomas Huth
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: pannengyuan @ 2020-02-03  2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: thuth, lvivier, pbonzini
  Cc: Euler Robot, Pan Nengyuan, zhang.zhanghailiang, qemu-devel

From: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>

It's not a big deal, but 'check qtest-ppc/ppc64' runs fail if sanitizers is enabled.
The memory leak stack is as follow:

Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f11756f5970 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)
    #1 0x7f1174f2549d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)
    #2 0x556af05aa7da in mm_fw_cfg_init /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.c:119
    #3 0x556af059f4f5 in read_boot_order_pmac /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/boot-order-test.c:137
    #4 0x556af059efe2 in test_a_boot_order /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/boot-order-test.c:47
    #5 0x556af059f2c0 in test_boot_orders /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/boot-order-test.c:59
    #6 0x556af059f52d in test_pmac_oldworld_boot_order /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/boot-order-test.c:152
    #7 0x7f1174f46cb9  (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73cb9)
    #8 0x7f1174f46b73  (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73b73)
    #9 0x7f1174f46b73  (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73b73)
    #10 0x7f1174f46f71 in g_test_run_suite (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73f71)
    #11 0x7f1174f46f94 in g_test_run (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73f94)

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
---
 tests/qtest/boot-order-test.c | 6 +++---
 tests/qtest/libqos/fw_cfg.h   | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/boot-order-test.c b/tests/qtest/boot-order-test.c
index a725bce729..4241304ff5 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/boot-order-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/boot-order-test.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static void test_prep_boot_order(void)
 
 static uint64_t read_boot_order_pmac(QTestState *qts)
 {
-    QFWCFG *fw_cfg = mm_fw_cfg_init(qts, 0xf0000510);
+    g_autoptr(QFWCFG) fw_cfg = mm_fw_cfg_init(qts, 0xf0000510);
 
     return qfw_cfg_get_u16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_BOOT_DEVICE);
 }
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static void test_pmac_newworld_boot_order(void)
 
 static uint64_t read_boot_order_sun4m(QTestState *qts)
 {
-    QFWCFG *fw_cfg = mm_fw_cfg_init(qts, 0xd00000510ULL);
+    g_autoptr(QFWCFG) fw_cfg = mm_fw_cfg_init(qts, 0xd00000510ULL);
 
     return qfw_cfg_get_u16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_BOOT_DEVICE);
 }
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static void test_sun4m_boot_order(void)
 
 static uint64_t read_boot_order_sun4u(QTestState *qts)
 {
-    QFWCFG *fw_cfg = io_fw_cfg_init(qts, 0x510);
+    g_autoptr(QFWCFG) fw_cfg = io_fw_cfg_init(qts, 0x510);
 
     return qfw_cfg_get_u16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_BOOT_DEVICE);
 }
diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqos/fw_cfg.h b/tests/qtest/libqos/fw_cfg.h
index 13325cc4ff..c6a7cf8cf0 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/libqos/fw_cfg.h
+++ b/tests/qtest/libqos/fw_cfg.h
@@ -49,4 +49,6 @@ static inline void pc_fw_cfg_uninit(QFWCFG *fw_cfg)
     io_fw_cfg_uninit(fw_cfg);
 }
 
+G_DEFINE_AUTOPTR_CLEANUP_FUNC(QFWCFG, mm_fw_cfg_uninit)
+
 #endif
-- 
2.21.0.windows.1




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] boot-order-test: fix memleaks in boot-order-test
  2020-02-03  2:59 [PATCH] boot-order-test: fix memleaks in boot-order-test pannengyuan
@ 2020-02-03  6:37 ` Thomas Huth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2020-02-03  6:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pannengyuan, lvivier, pbonzini
  Cc: Euler Robot, zhang.zhanghailiang, qemu-devel

On 03/02/2020 03.59, pannengyuan@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
> 
> It's not a big deal, but 'check qtest-ppc/ppc64' runs fail if sanitizers is enabled.
> The memory leak stack is as follow:
> 
> Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x7f11756f5970 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)
>     #1 0x7f1174f2549d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)
>     #2 0x556af05aa7da in mm_fw_cfg_init /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/libqos/fw_cfg.c:119
>     #3 0x556af059f4f5 in read_boot_order_pmac /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/boot-order-test.c:137
>     #4 0x556af059efe2 in test_a_boot_order /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/boot-order-test.c:47
>     #5 0x556af059f2c0 in test_boot_orders /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/boot-order-test.c:59
>     #6 0x556af059f52d in test_pmac_oldworld_boot_order /mnt/sdb/qemu/tests/boot-order-test.c:152
>     #7 0x7f1174f46cb9  (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73cb9)
>     #8 0x7f1174f46b73  (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73b73)
>     #9 0x7f1174f46b73  (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73b73)
>     #10 0x7f1174f46f71 in g_test_run_suite (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73f71)
>     #11 0x7f1174f46f94 in g_test_run (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x73f94)
> 
> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
> ---
>  tests/qtest/boot-order-test.c | 6 +++---
>  tests/qtest/libqos/fw_cfg.h   | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Thanks, queued to my qtest-next branch:

 https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/commits/qtest-next

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-03  6:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-03  2:59 [PATCH] boot-order-test: fix memleaks in boot-order-test pannengyuan
2020-02-03  6:37 ` Thomas Huth

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.