[PATCH] libxl: avoid considering pCPUs outside of the cpupool during NUMA placement

* [PATCH] libxl: avoid considering pCPUs outside of the cpupool during NUMA placement
@ 2016-10-21  9:56 Dario Faggioli
  2016-10-21 10:29 ` Wei Liu
  2016-10-21 10:51 ` Juergen Gross
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dario Faggioli @ 2016-10-21  9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel
  Cc: Juergen Gross, Wei Liu, Anshul Makkar, Ian Jackson, George Dunlap

During NUMA automatic placement, the information
of how many vCPUs can run on what NUMA nodes is used,
in order to spread the load as evenly as possible.

Such information is derived from vCPU hard and soft
affinity, but that is not enough. In fact, affinity
can be set to be a superset of the pCPUs that belongs
to the cpupool in which a domain is but, of course,
the domain will never run on pCPUs outside of its
cpupool.

Take this into account in the placement algorithm.

Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Reported-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
---
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>
---
Wei, this is bugfix, so I think it should go in 4.8.

Ian, this is bugfix, so I think it is a backporting candidate.

Also, note that this function does not respect the libxl coding style, as far
as error handling is concerned. However, given that I'm asking for it to go in
now and to be backported, I've tried to keep the changes to the minimum.

I'm up for a follow up patch for 4.9 to make the style compliant.

Thanks, Dario
---
 tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
index 33289d5..f2a719d 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
@@ -186,9 +186,12 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_cputopology *tinfo,
 {
     libxl_dominfo *dinfo = NULL;
     libxl_bitmap dom_nodemap, nodes_counted;
+    libxl_cpupoolinfo cpupool_info;
     int nr_doms, nr_cpus;
     int i, j, k;
 
+    libxl_cpupoolinfo_init(&cpupool_info);
+
     dinfo = libxl_list_domain(CTX, &nr_doms);
     if (dinfo == NULL)
         return ERROR_FAIL;
@@ -205,12 +208,18 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_cputopology *tinfo,
     }
 
     for (i = 0; i < nr_doms; i++) {
-        libxl_vcpuinfo *vinfo;
-        int nr_dom_vcpus;
+        libxl_vcpuinfo *vinfo = NULL;
+        int cpupool, nr_dom_vcpus;
+
+        cpupool = libxl__domain_cpupool(gc, dinfo[i].domid);
+        if (cpupool < 0)
+            goto next;
+        if (libxl_cpupool_info(CTX, &cpupool_info, cpupool))
+            goto next;
 
         vinfo = libxl_list_vcpu(CTX, dinfo[i].domid, &nr_dom_vcpus, &nr_cpus);
         if (vinfo == NULL)
-            continue;
+            goto next;
 
         /* Retrieve the domain's node-affinity map */
         libxl_domain_get_nodeaffinity(CTX, dinfo[i].domid, &dom_nodemap);
@@ -220,6 +229,12 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_cputopology *tinfo,
              * For each vcpu of each domain, it must have both vcpu-affinity
              * and node-affinity to (a pcpu belonging to) a certain node to
              * cause an increment in the corresponding element of the array.
+             *
+             * Note that we also need to check whether the cpu actually
+             * belongs to the domain's cpupool (the cpupool of the domain
+             * being checked). In fact, it could be that the vcpu has affinity
+             * with cpus in suitable_cpumask, but that are not in its own
+             * cpupool, and we don't want to consider those!
              */
             libxl_bitmap_set_none(&nodes_counted);
             libxl_for_each_set_bit(k, vinfo[j].cpumap) {
@@ -228,6 +243,7 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_cputopology *tinfo,
                 int node = tinfo[k].node;
 
                 if (libxl_bitmap_test(suitable_cpumap, k) &&
+                    libxl_bitmap_test(&cpupool_info.cpumap, k) &&
                     libxl_bitmap_test(&dom_nodemap, node) &&
                     !libxl_bitmap_test(&nodes_counted, node)) {
                     libxl_bitmap_set(&nodes_counted, node);
@@ -236,7 +252,10 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_cputopology *tinfo,
             }
         }
 
+ next:
+        libxl_cpupoolinfo_dispose(&cpupool_info);
         libxl_vcpuinfo_list_free(vinfo, nr_dom_vcpus);
+        vinfo = NULL;
     }
 
     libxl_bitmap_dispose(&dom_nodemap);


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread