All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] s390/topology: Remove the unused parent_node() macro
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:56:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8f9d2c6-2466-1dfc-b7b7-bd5961e76b3b@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170727081929.GB3744@osiris>

Hi Heiko,

At 07/27/2017 04:19 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:34:31PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> Commit a7be6e5a7f8d ("mm: drop useless local parameters of
>> __register_one_node()") removes the last user of parent_node().
>>
>> The parent_node() macro in S390 platform is unnecessary.
>>
>> Remove it for cleanup.
>>
>> Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>
> Are arch maintainers supposed to pick these patches up?
>

Yes, As Michael said, It seems these patches are merging individually.

can you merge this patch in s390 tree?

> In any case: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>
>
Thanks,
	dou.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] s390/topology: Remove the unused parent_node() macro
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:56:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8f9d2c6-2466-1dfc-b7b7-bd5961e76b3b@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170727081929.GB3744@osiris>

Hi Heiko,

At 07/27/2017 04:19 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:34:31PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> Commit a7be6e5a7f8d ("mm: drop useless local parameters of
>> __register_one_node()") removes the last user of parent_node().
>>
>> The parent_node() macro in S390 platform is unnecessary.
>>
>> Remove it for cleanup.
>>
>> Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>
> Are arch maintainers supposed to pick these patches up?
>

Yes, As Michael said, It seems these patches are merging individually.

can you merge this patch in s390 tree?

> In any case: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>
>
Thanks,
	dou.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-16 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-26 13:34 [PATCH 00/11] Remove the parent_node() for each arch Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 01/11] arm64: numa: Remove the unused parent_node() macro Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34   ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-04 13:30   ` Will Deacon
2017-08-04 13:30     ` Will Deacon
2017-08-04 15:28     ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-04 15:28       ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-15 13:38       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-15 13:38         ` Catalin Marinas
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 02/11] ia64: topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34   ` Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 03/11] metag/numa: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34   ` Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 04/11] MIPS: numa: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34   ` Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 05/11] powerpc/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-27  2:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-27  2:49     ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-16 11:13       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-18 12:50   ` [05/11] " Michael Ellerman
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 06/11] s390/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34   ` Dou Liyang
2017-07-27  8:19   ` Heiko Carstens
2017-08-16 12:56     ` Dou Liyang [this message]
2017-08-16 12:56       ` Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 07/11] sh/numa: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34   ` Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 08/11] sparc64/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34   ` Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 16:46   ` David Miller
2017-07-26 16:46     ` David Miller
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 09/11] tile/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 18:00   ` Chris Metcalf
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/topology: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-27  8:58   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 11/11] asm-generic: numa: " Dou Liyang
2017-07-26 13:34   ` Dou Liyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c8f9d2c6-2466-1dfc-b7b7-bd5961e76b3b@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.