From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@fb.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-multipath: Early exit if no path is available Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:36:14 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ca8be10a-11fb-dd4d-3606-f9e75a42c99d@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210127103033.15318-1-dwagner@suse.de> On 2021/1/27 18:30, Daniel Wagner wrote: > nvme_round_robin_path() should test if the return ns pointer is > valid. nvme_next_ns() will return a NULL pointer if there is no path > left. > > Fixes: 75c10e732724 ("nvme-multipath: round-robin I/O policy") > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> > --- > v2: > - moved NULL test into the if conditional statement > - added Fixes tag > > drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c > index 9ac762b28811..282b7a4ea9a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c > @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static struct nvme_ns *nvme_round_robin_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head, > } > > for (ns = nvme_next_ns(head, old); > - ns != old; > + ns && ns != old; nvme_round_robin_path just be called when !"old". nvme_next_ns should not return NULL when !"old". It seems unnecessary to add checking "ns". Is there a bug that "old" is not in "head" list? If yes, we should fix it. > ns = nvme_next_ns(head, ns)) { > if (nvme_path_is_disabled(ns)) > continue; >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com> To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-multipath: Early exit if no path is available Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:36:14 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ca8be10a-11fb-dd4d-3606-f9e75a42c99d@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210127103033.15318-1-dwagner@suse.de> On 2021/1/27 18:30, Daniel Wagner wrote: > nvme_round_robin_path() should test if the return ns pointer is > valid. nvme_next_ns() will return a NULL pointer if there is no path > left. > > Fixes: 75c10e732724 ("nvme-multipath: round-robin I/O policy") > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> > --- > v2: > - moved NULL test into the if conditional statement > - added Fixes tag > > drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c > index 9ac762b28811..282b7a4ea9a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c > @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static struct nvme_ns *nvme_round_robin_path(struct nvme_ns_head *head, > } > > for (ns = nvme_next_ns(head, old); > - ns != old; > + ns && ns != old; nvme_round_robin_path just be called when !"old". nvme_next_ns should not return NULL when !"old". It seems unnecessary to add checking "ns". Is there a bug that "old" is not in "head" list? If yes, we should fix it. > ns = nvme_next_ns(head, ns)) { > if (nvme_path_is_disabled(ns)) > continue; > _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 1:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-27 10:30 [PATCH v2] nvme-multipath: Early exit if no path is available Daniel Wagner 2021-01-27 10:30 ` Daniel Wagner 2021-01-27 10:34 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-27 10:34 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-27 16:49 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-01-27 16:49 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-01-28 1:31 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-28 1:31 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-28 7:58 ` Daniel Wagner 2021-01-28 7:58 ` Daniel Wagner 2021-01-28 9:18 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-28 9:18 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-28 9:23 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-28 9:23 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-29 1:18 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 1:18 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-28 9:40 ` Daniel Wagner 2021-01-28 9:40 ` Daniel Wagner 2021-01-29 1:23 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 1:23 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 1:42 ` Sagi Grimberg 2021-01-29 1:42 ` Sagi Grimberg 2021-01-29 3:07 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 3:07 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 3:30 ` Sagi Grimberg 2021-01-29 3:30 ` Sagi Grimberg 2021-01-29 3:36 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 3:36 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-29 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-29 7:45 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 8:33 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-01-29 8:46 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-29 9:20 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-02-01 2:16 ` Chao Leng 2021-02-01 2:16 ` Chao Leng 2021-02-01 7:29 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-02-01 7:29 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-02-01 8:47 ` Chao Leng 2021-02-01 8:47 ` Chao Leng 2021-02-01 8:57 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-02-01 8:57 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-02-01 9:40 ` Chao Leng 2021-02-01 9:40 ` Chao Leng 2021-02-01 10:45 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-02-01 10:45 ` Hannes Reinecke 2021-02-02 1:12 ` Chao Leng 2021-02-02 1:12 ` Chao Leng 2021-01-28 1:36 ` Chao Leng [this message] 2021-01-28 1:36 ` Chao Leng
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ca8be10a-11fb-dd4d-3606-f9e75a42c99d@huawei.com \ --to=lengchao@huawei.com \ --cc=axboe@fb.com \ --cc=dwagner@suse.de \ --cc=hare@suse.de \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.