From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com> To: Sudhakar Panneerselvam <sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com>, martin.petersen@oracle.com, michael.christie@oracle.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: shirley.ma@oracle.com, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@suse.com>, Arun Easi <aeasi@marvell.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] target: initialize LUN in transport_init_se_cmd(). Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:49:43 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <cbbd368e6e33af6e22c850192e69b27edd043efd.camel@suse.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1591559913-8388-3-git-send-email-sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com> Hello Sudhakar, On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 19:58 +0000, Sudhakar Panneerselvam wrote: > Initialization of orig_fe_lun is moved to transport_init_se_cmd() > from > transport_lookup_cmd_lun(). This helps for the cases where the scsi > request > fails before the call to transport_lookup_cmd_lun() so that > trace_target_cmd_complete() can print the LUN information to the > trace > buffer. Due to this change, the lun parameter is removed from > transport_lookup_cmd_lun() and transport_lookup_tmr_lun(). > > Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Panneerselvam < > sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com> > --- > drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c | 11 +++++------ > drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 19 ++++++++----------- > drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 12 +++++++----- > drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c | 6 ++++-- > include/target/target_core_fabric.h | 6 +++--- > 7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > [...] > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c > b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c > index f2f7c5b818cc..7ea77933e64d 100644 > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c > [...] > @@ -1790,7 +1792,7 @@ int target_submit_tmr(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, > struct se_session *se_sess, > BUG_ON(!se_tpg); > > transport_init_se_cmd(se_cmd, se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo, se_sess, > - 0, DMA_NONE, TCM_SIMPLE_TAG, sense); > + 0, DMA_NONE, TCM_SIMPLE_TAG, sense, > unpacked_lun); > /* > * FIXME: Currently expect caller to handle se_cmd->se_tmr_req > * allocation failure. Between this hunk and the next one in target_submit_tmr(), there is this code: /* * If this is ABORT_TASK with no explicit fabric provided LUN, * go ahead and search active session tags for a match to figure * out unpacked_lun for the original se_cmd. */ if (tm_type = TMR_ABORT_TASK && (flags & TARGET_SCF_LOOKUP_LUN_FROM_TAG)) { if (!target_lookup_lun_from_tag(se_sess, tag, &unpacked_lun)) goto failure; } > @@ -1818,7 +1820,7 @@ int target_submit_tmr(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, > struct se_session *se_sess, > goto failure; > } > > - ret = transport_lookup_tmr_lun(se_cmd, unpacked_lun); > + ret = transport_lookup_tmr_lun(se_cmd); > if (ret) > goto failure; > AFAICS, your patch breaks the case where the above code is executed to derive unpacked_lun from the tag. The updated value of unpacked_lun is never used. That would break aborts for the qla2xxx target. Am I overlooking something? Can you please explain? Regards Martin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com> To: Sudhakar Panneerselvam <sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com>, martin.petersen@oracle.com, michael.christie@oracle.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: shirley.ma@oracle.com, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@suse.com>, Arun Easi <aeasi@marvell.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] target: initialize LUN in transport_init_se_cmd(). Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:49:43 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <cbbd368e6e33af6e22c850192e69b27edd043efd.camel@suse.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1591559913-8388-3-git-send-email-sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com> Hello Sudhakar, On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 19:58 +0000, Sudhakar Panneerselvam wrote: > Initialization of orig_fe_lun is moved to transport_init_se_cmd() > from > transport_lookup_cmd_lun(). This helps for the cases where the scsi > request > fails before the call to transport_lookup_cmd_lun() so that > trace_target_cmd_complete() can print the LUN information to the > trace > buffer. Due to this change, the lun parameter is removed from > transport_lookup_cmd_lun() and transport_lookup_tmr_lun(). > > Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Panneerselvam < > sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com> > --- > drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c | 11 +++++------ > drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 19 ++++++++----------- > drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 12 +++++++----- > drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_tcm.c | 6 ++++-- > include/target/target_core_fabric.h | 6 +++--- > 7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > [...] > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c > b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c > index f2f7c5b818cc..7ea77933e64d 100644 > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c > [...] > @@ -1790,7 +1792,7 @@ int target_submit_tmr(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, > struct se_session *se_sess, > BUG_ON(!se_tpg); > > transport_init_se_cmd(se_cmd, se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo, se_sess, > - 0, DMA_NONE, TCM_SIMPLE_TAG, sense); > + 0, DMA_NONE, TCM_SIMPLE_TAG, sense, > unpacked_lun); > /* > * FIXME: Currently expect caller to handle se_cmd->se_tmr_req > * allocation failure. Between this hunk and the next one in target_submit_tmr(), there is this code: /* * If this is ABORT_TASK with no explicit fabric provided LUN, * go ahead and search active session tags for a match to figure * out unpacked_lun for the original se_cmd. */ if (tm_type == TMR_ABORT_TASK && (flags & TARGET_SCF_LOOKUP_LUN_FROM_TAG)) { if (!target_lookup_lun_from_tag(se_sess, tag, &unpacked_lun)) goto failure; } > @@ -1818,7 +1820,7 @@ int target_submit_tmr(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, > struct se_session *se_sess, > goto failure; > } > > - ret = transport_lookup_tmr_lun(se_cmd, unpacked_lun); > + ret = transport_lookup_tmr_lun(se_cmd); > if (ret) > goto failure; > AFAICS, your patch breaks the case where the above code is executed to derive unpacked_lun from the tag. The updated value of unpacked_lun is never used. That would break aborts for the qla2xxx target. Am I overlooking something? Can you please explain? Regards Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 13:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-06-07 19:58 [PATCH v4 0/4] target: fix NULL pointer dereference Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 19:58 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] target: factor out a new helper, target_cmd_init_cdb() Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 19:58 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] target: initialize LUN in transport_init_se_cmd() Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 19:58 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-09-02 13:49 ` Martin Wilck [this message] 2020-09-02 13:49 ` Martin Wilck 2020-09-02 15:14 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-09-02 15:14 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-09-03 13:00 ` Martin Wilck 2020-09-03 13:00 ` Martin Wilck 2020-09-03 13:13 ` Martin Wilck 2020-09-03 13:13 ` Martin Wilck 2020-06-07 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] target: fix NULL pointer dereference Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 19:58 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 19:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] target: rename target_setup_cmd_from_cdb() to target_cmd_parse_cdb() Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 19:58 ` Sudhakar Panneerselvam 2020-06-07 20:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] target: fix NULL pointer dereference Mike Christie 2020-06-07 20:37 ` Mike Christie 2020-06-10 2:02 ` Martin K. Petersen 2020-06-10 2:02 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=cbbd368e6e33af6e22c850192e69b27edd043efd.camel@suse.com \ --to=mwilck@suse.com \ --cc=aeasi@marvell.com \ --cc=daniel.wagner@suse.com \ --cc=hare@suse.com \ --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \ --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \ --cc=shirley.ma@oracle.com \ --cc=sudhakar.panneerselvam@oracle.com \ --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.