All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"CQ Tang" <cq.tang@intel.com>,
	"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/gem_lmem_swapping: limit lmem to 4G
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 09:56:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbef4460-580a-ab84-296c-6aa1715e8381@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkGZcTZHHcF781Zz@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>


On 28/03/2022 12:18, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:08:59AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> From: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
>>
>> On some systems lmem can be as large as 16G, which seems to trigger
>> various CI timeouts, and in the best case just takes a long time. For
>> the purposes of the test we should be able to limit to 4G, without any
>> big loss in coverage.
>>
>> v2:
>>   - No need to try again without the modparam; if it's not supported it
>>     will still load the driver just fine.
>> v3(Petri):
>>   - Add a helpful debug print in case the kernel is missing support for
>>     the lmem_size modparam.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> index 31644bcd..6cf1acec 100644
>> --- a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> @@ -526,11 +526,20 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>>   
>>   	igt_fixture {
>>   		struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
>> +		char *tmp;
>>   
>> -		i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> +		igt_i915_driver_unload();
>> +		igt_assert_eq(igt_i915_driver_load("lmem_size=4096"), 0);
>> +
>> +		i915 = __drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>>   		igt_require_gem(i915);
>>   		igt_require(gem_has_lmem(i915));
>>   
>> +		tmp = __igt_params_get(i915, "lmem_size");
>> +		if (!tmp)
>> +			igt_info("lmem_size modparam not supported on this kernel. Continuing with full lmem size. This may result in CI timeouts.");
>> +		free(tmp);
> 
> Newline at the end missing. With that added,
> Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> 
>> +
>>   		regions = gem_get_query_memory_regions(i915);
>>   		igt_require(regions);
>>   
>> @@ -556,6 +565,7 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>>   		intel_ctx_destroy(i915, ctx);
>>   		free(regions);
>>   		close(i915);
>> +		igt_i915_driver_unload();

If this causes an extra module unload on legacy platforms just after 
tests skips due not having local memory, is it a good idea? Would it 
make sense to move the skip to before unload and reload with lmem_size 
param and only unload if that condition was passed?

Regards,

Tvrtko

>>   	}
>>   
>>   	igt_exit();
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"CQ Tang" <cq.tang@intel.com>,
	"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/gem_lmem_swapping: limit lmem to 4G
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 09:56:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbef4460-580a-ab84-296c-6aa1715e8381@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkGZcTZHHcF781Zz@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>


On 28/03/2022 12:18, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:08:59AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> From: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
>>
>> On some systems lmem can be as large as 16G, which seems to trigger
>> various CI timeouts, and in the best case just takes a long time. For
>> the purposes of the test we should be able to limit to 4G, without any
>> big loss in coverage.
>>
>> v2:
>>   - No need to try again without the modparam; if it's not supported it
>>     will still load the driver just fine.
>> v3(Petri):
>>   - Add a helpful debug print in case the kernel is missing support for
>>     the lmem_size modparam.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> index 31644bcd..6cf1acec 100644
>> --- a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
>> @@ -526,11 +526,20 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>>   
>>   	igt_fixture {
>>   		struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
>> +		char *tmp;
>>   
>> -		i915 = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>> +		igt_i915_driver_unload();
>> +		igt_assert_eq(igt_i915_driver_load("lmem_size=4096"), 0);
>> +
>> +		i915 = __drm_open_driver(DRIVER_INTEL);
>>   		igt_require_gem(i915);
>>   		igt_require(gem_has_lmem(i915));
>>   
>> +		tmp = __igt_params_get(i915, "lmem_size");
>> +		if (!tmp)
>> +			igt_info("lmem_size modparam not supported on this kernel. Continuing with full lmem size. This may result in CI timeouts.");
>> +		free(tmp);
> 
> Newline at the end missing. With that added,
> Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> 
>> +
>>   		regions = gem_get_query_memory_regions(i915);
>>   		igt_require(regions);
>>   
>> @@ -556,6 +565,7 @@ igt_main_args("", long_options, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
>>   		intel_ctx_destroy(i915, ctx);
>>   		free(regions);
>>   		close(i915);
>> +		igt_i915_driver_unload();

If this causes an extra module unload on legacy platforms just after 
tests skips due not having local memory, is it a good idea? Would it 
make sense to move the skip to before unload and reload with lmem_size 
param and only unload if that condition was passed?

Regards,

Tvrtko

>>   	}
>>   
>>   	igt_exit();
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-08  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-28 10:08 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/gem_lmem_swapping: limit lmem to 4G Matthew Auld
2022-03-28 10:08 ` [igt-dev] " Matthew Auld
2022-03-28 11:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Petri Latvala
2022-03-28 11:18   ` [igt-dev] " Petri Latvala
2022-04-08  8:56   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2022-04-08  8:56     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-28 11:48 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/gem_lmem_swapping: limit lmem to 4G (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-28 13:27 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbef4460-580a-ab84-296c-6aa1715e8381@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cq.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.