* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
[not found] <1476193521-29034-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
@ 2016-10-12 15:28 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-13 7:25 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2016-10-12 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Apfelbaum
Cc: qemu-devel, kraxel, laine, peter.maydell, drjones, abologna,
alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange, mst
Marcel,
On 10/11/16 15:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Proposes best practices on how to use PCI Express/PCI device
> in PCI Express based machines and explain the reasoning behind them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> RFC->v2:
> - Addressed a lot of comments from the reviewers (many thanks to all, especially to Laszlo)
>
> Since the RFC mail-thread was relatively long and already
> has passed a lot of time from the RFC, I post this version
> even if is very possible that I left some of the comments out,
> my apologies if so.
>
> I will go over the comments again, in the meantime please
> feel free to comment on this version, even if on something
> you've already pointed out.
>
> It may take a day or two until I'll be able to respond, but I
> will do my best to address all comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcel
>
>
> docs/pcie.txt | 273 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 273 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 docs/pcie.txt
Your patch doesn't seem to have reached qemu-devel. I got one copy from
you directly, and no copy reflected by the qemu-devel list server. I
also checked the mailing list archive:
- searched for the subject with google -- only the RFC version was found,
- checked mail-archive.com by message-id
- checked the primary archive for October
(http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/threads.html)
-- I found only messages in the RFC thread.
So, before I start reading this version and commenting on it, can you
please repost version 2, and verify that the list reflects it?
Thanks!
Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
2016-10-12 15:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines Laszlo Ersek
@ 2016-10-13 7:25 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-13 8:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Apfelbaum @ 2016-10-13 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo Ersek
Cc: qemu-devel, kraxel, laine, peter.maydell, drjones, abologna,
alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange, mst
On 10/12/2016 06:28 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Marcel,
>
> On 10/11/16 15:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> Proposes best practices on how to use PCI Express/PCI device
>> in PCI Express based machines and explain the reasoning behind them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> RFC->v2:
>> - Addressed a lot of comments from the reviewers (many thanks to all, especially to Laszlo)
>>
>> Since the RFC mail-thread was relatively long and already
>> has passed a lot of time from the RFC, I post this version
>> even if is very possible that I left some of the comments out,
>> my apologies if so.
>>
>> I will go over the comments again, in the meantime please
>> feel free to comment on this version, even if on something
>> you've already pointed out.
>>
>> It may take a day or two until I'll be able to respond, but I
>> will do my best to address all comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Marcel
>>
>>
>> docs/pcie.txt | 273 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 273 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 docs/pcie.txt
>
> Your patch doesn't seem to have reached qemu-devel. I got one copy from
> you directly, and no copy reflected by the qemu-devel list server. I
> also checked the mailing list archive:
> - searched for the subject with google -- only the RFC version was found,
> - checked mail-archive.com by message-id
> - checked the primary archive for October
> (http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/threads.html)
> -- I found only messages in the RFC thread.
>
> So, before I start reading this version and commenting on it, can you
> please repost version 2, and verify that the list reflects it?
>
Hi,
That is very strange, I tried sending it again but I received the same error:
Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
...
<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>: host eggs.gnu.org[208.118.235.92] said: 550 Invalid
address in message header (in reply to end of DATA command)
Reporting-MTA: dns; <>.redhat.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: <>
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; marcel@redhat.com
Arrival-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:49 +0000 (UTC)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; eggs.gnu.org
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid address in message header
I'll try sending the mail with another mail server.
Thanks,
Marcel
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
2016-10-13 7:25 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
@ 2016-10-13 8:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-13 9:11 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Laszlo Ersek @ 2016-10-13 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Apfelbaum, peter.maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: drjones, mst, abologna, qemu-devel, kraxel, laine,
alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange
On 10/13/16 09:25, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 10/12/2016 06:28 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Marcel,
>>
>> On 10/11/16 15:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>> Proposes best practices on how to use PCI Express/PCI device
>>> in PCI Express based machines and explain the reasoning behind them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> RFC->v2:
>>> - Addressed a lot of comments from the reviewers (many thanks to
>>> all, especially to Laszlo)
>>>
>>> Since the RFC mail-thread was relatively long and already
>>> has passed a lot of time from the RFC, I post this version
>>> even if is very possible that I left some of the comments out,
>>> my apologies if so.
>>>
>>> I will go over the comments again, in the meantime please
>>> feel free to comment on this version, even if on something
>>> you've already pointed out.
>>>
>>> It may take a day or two until I'll be able to respond, but I
>>> will do my best to address all comments.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Marcel
>>>
>>>
>>> docs/pcie.txt | 273
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 273 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 docs/pcie.txt
>>
>> Your patch doesn't seem to have reached qemu-devel. I got one copy from
>> you directly, and no copy reflected by the qemu-devel list server. I
>> also checked the mailing list archive:
>> - searched for the subject with google -- only the RFC version was found,
>> - checked mail-archive.com by message-id
>> - checked the primary archive for October
>> (http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/threads.html)
>> -- I found only messages in the RFC thread.
>>
>> So, before I start reading this version and commenting on it, can you
>> please repost version 2, and verify that the list reflects it?
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> That is very strange, I tried sending it again but I received the same
> error:
>
> Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
> ...
> <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>: host eggs.gnu.org[208.118.235.92] said: 550
> Invalid
> address in message header (in reply to end of DATA command)
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; <>.redhat.com
> X-Postfix-Queue-ID: <>
> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; marcel@redhat.com
> Arrival-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:49 +0000 (UTC)
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Original-Recipient: rfc822;qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.0.0
> Remote-MTA: dns; eggs.gnu.org
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid address in message header
>
>
> I'll try sending the mail with another mail server.
Something remains broken; and quite strangely at that. Now I've got two copies of the following message in my inbox:
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 RESEND] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
with the following message-id's:
<1476343236-13192-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
<1476345339-5355-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
and I have zero copies of this message in my qemu-devel folder.
Interestingly, the subject *does* have the [qemu-devel] prefix, in both copies. So I thought, maybe these were reflected by the list server after all, and only their headers changed unexpectedly / inexpicably, so that my filter rules wouldn't apply any longer (and the messages wouldn't be moved to my qemu-devel folder).
However, the mailing list archive at <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/threads.html> still does not list your message.
Here's the full list of headers from the first RESEND message:
> Return-Path: marcel@redhat.com
> Received: from zmta01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO zmta01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.8) by zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:20:49 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by zmta01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399BF186479; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:20:49 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from work.redhat.com (vpn-200-250.tlv.redhat.com [10.35.200.250]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9D7KbZ4017253; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:20:40 -0400
> From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: lersek@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, laine@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, abologna@redhat.com, "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, marcel@redhat.com
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 RESEND] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:20:36 +0300
> Message-Id: <1476343236-13192-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26
Same from the second RESEND message:
> Return-Path: marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com
> Received: from zmta05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO zmta05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.12) by zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:55:48 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by zmta05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2946AF3D17; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:55:48 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9D7tmY6005308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:55:48 -0400
> Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com (mail-lf0-f65.google.com [209.85.215.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18E556ACB; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:55:46 +0000 (UTC)
> Received: by mail-lf0-f65.google.com with SMTP id x79so11304638lff.2; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=+JGgRHitO0WAq3Rs3Wg56WhdeaZNglV9fLL15iELtbI=; b=Cy+4b1NqUiUkUsBKiRjFuJU3v49UagEhdlaPyl9+CA+NVMq+OPtiLV5yXuZpt8CLG1 bM3yFj9WiJKDvYfqC1RfP++b+GiZ54VfDVYJApJMfgVNUzQ9KTwym4PyRZdq4mDs+bpz RPahiIr0X4Te2NmGTigFFAiehF+Cbp/z+Iw3sd1Ohk8AGQi9SeArYOwpEMfftny1bpzL 0sy7rckFYDii4tR4NGFea6QwD1WdiZQMEcGO4ehMYkaNK1CF0HzZS8qPowhXps9jP3SI UJQVsgIA4XzmsU8uM9obwpYEDpsFm1sEm8QJQnH0eHIFIIsmhbYBGY01mOyaOOpreCuU /zhA==
> X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=+JGgRHitO0WAq3Rs3Wg56WhdeaZNglV9fLL15iELtbI=; b=I5eFxwfhwQRfip4oTgWmEVxmZIZASVTZXSx4wX3E/yXDHbvjlQ9JZ0r6QEewsKqC6l iiPmk22UIegrf8nERV9sZ36oCDwkVt7lDHXTyVYIR71EXfgCIA/EjNfqqoB7S6W7SvnZ Drk41JuMd0nTsosckYkgf7a/ihIW36rAvEK7Nk0w3ksOUu4T4mgvwecmQoEDM+azW8of z2U6bnBPMDw4FWMSjbjTkmkTOxQq8lDwOehFCN7CiriNgdJdxx5ZSRoxuQwPvzY2WzN0 sTSorSr9up5y8xqM0DbN5T0meRbAtEKiqD13pvik/VvTPQ1aohbaRCEe8lHce9quR3xj RAZQ==
> X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmSYj3noaP+kq0Jt5q2dU0xdBwlcYcms/Jj427Xur4KqGcVF/T3+KdHk7+aPe+NwA==
> X-Received: by 10.28.4.16 with SMTP id 16mr1160305wme.39.1476345344367; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from work.redhat.com ([46.120.229.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm20384747wjl.28.2016.10.13.00.55.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
> Sender: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
> From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
> X-Google-Original-From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: lersek@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, laine@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, abologna@redhat.com, "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, marcel@redhat.com
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 RESEND] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:55:39 +0300
> Message-Id: <1476345339-5355-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:55:46 +0000 (UTC)
> X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:55:46 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'209.85.215.65' DOMAIN:'mail-lf0-f65.google.com' HELO:'mail-lf0-f65.google.com' FROM:'marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com' RCPT:''
> X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 1.272 * (BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS) 209.85.215.65 mail-lf0-f65.google.com 209.85.215.65 mail-lf0-f65.google.com <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
> X-RedHat-Possible-Forgery: <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com> Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22
> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.38
None of these appear to contain the following headers (example taken from another message of yours that I do see on the list / in my qemu-devel folder):
> X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
> List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
> X-Mailman-Copy: yes
Something is seriously broken.
Peter and/or Stefan (really I'm just guessing here...), who can help us analyze this from the mailing list side? Especially the "550 Invalid address in message header" error message from eggs.gnu.org? Because, the exact same messages have been delivered directly to my inbox just fine.
Thanks,
Laszlo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
2016-10-13 8:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
@ 2016-10-13 9:11 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-13 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Apfelbaum @ 2016-10-13 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laszlo Ersek, peter.maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: drjones, mst, abologna, qemu-devel, kraxel, laine,
alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange
On 10/13/2016 11:53 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/13/16 09:25, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> On 10/12/2016 06:28 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Marcel,
>>>
>>> On 10/11/16 15:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>>> Proposes best practices on how to use PCI Express/PCI device
>>>> in PCI Express based machines and explain the reasoning behind them.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> RFC->v2:
>>>> - Addressed a lot of comments from the reviewers (many thanks to
>>>> all, especially to Laszlo)
>>>>
>>>> Since the RFC mail-thread was relatively long and already
>>>> has passed a lot of time from the RFC, I post this version
>>>> even if is very possible that I left some of the comments out,
>>>> my apologies if so.
>>>>
>>>> I will go over the comments again, in the meantime please
>>>> feel free to comment on this version, even if on something
>>>> you've already pointed out.
>>>>
>>>> It may take a day or two until I'll be able to respond, but I
>>>> will do my best to address all comments.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Marcel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> docs/pcie.txt | 273
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 273 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 docs/pcie.txt
>>>
>>> Your patch doesn't seem to have reached qemu-devel. I got one copy from
>>> you directly, and no copy reflected by the qemu-devel list server. I
>>> also checked the mailing list archive:
>>> - searched for the subject with google -- only the RFC version was found,
>>> - checked mail-archive.com by message-id
>>> - checked the primary archive for October
>>> (http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/threads.html)
>>> -- I found only messages in the RFC thread.
>>>
>>> So, before I start reading this version and commenting on it, can you
>>> please repost version 2, and verify that the list reflects it?
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> That is very strange, I tried sending it again but I received the same
>> error:
>>
>> Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
>> ...
>> <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>: host eggs.gnu.org[208.118.235.92] said: 550
>> Invalid
>> address in message header (in reply to end of DATA command)
>>
>> Reporting-MTA: dns; <>.redhat.com
>> X-Postfix-Queue-ID: <>
>> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; marcel@redhat.com
>> Arrival-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:49 +0000 (UTC)
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Original-Recipient: rfc822;qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 5.0.0
>> Remote-MTA: dns; eggs.gnu.org
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid address in message header
>>
>>
>> I'll try sending the mail with another mail server.
>
Hi Laszlo, thanks for the help
> Something remains broken; and quite strangely at that. Now I've got two copies of the following message in my inbox:
>
> [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 RESEND] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
>
> with the following message-id's:
>
> <1476343236-13192-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
> <1476345339-5355-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
>
> and I have zero copies of this message in my qemu-devel folder.
>
> Interestingly, the subject *does* have the [qemu-devel] prefix, in both copies.
This is because I have a script adding the [qemu-devel] prefix, maybe I should drop it.
So I thought, maybe these were reflected by the list server after all, and only their headers changed unexpectedly / inexpicably, so that my filter rules wouldn't apply any longer (and the messages
wouldn't be moved to my qemu-devel folder).
>
> However, the mailing list archive at <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/threads.html> still does not list your message.
>
> Here's the full list of headers from the first RESEND message:
>
>> Return-Path: marcel@redhat.com
>> Received: from zmta01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO zmta01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.8) by zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:20:49 -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by zmta01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399BF186479; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:20:49 -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: from work.redhat.com (vpn-200-250.tlv.redhat.com [10.35.200.250]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9D7KbZ4017253; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:20:40 -0400
>> From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
>> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Cc: lersek@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, laine@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, abologna@redhat.com, "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, marcel@redhat.com
>> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 RESEND] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
>> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:20:36 +0300
>> Message-Id: <1476343236-13192-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
>> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26
>
> Same from the second RESEND message:
>
>> Return-Path: marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com
>> Received: from zmta05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO zmta05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.12) by zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:55:48 -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by zmta05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2946AF3D17; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:55:48 -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9D7tmY6005308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:55:48 -0400
>> Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com (mail-lf0-f65.google.com [209.85.215.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18E556ACB; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:55:46 +0000 (UTC)
>> Received: by mail-lf0-f65.google.com with SMTP id x79so11304638lff.2; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=+JGgRHitO0WAq3Rs3Wg56WhdeaZNglV9fLL15iELtbI=; b=Cy+4b1NqUiUkUsBKiRjFuJU3v49UagEhdlaPyl9+CA+NVMq+OPtiLV5yXuZpt8CLG1 bM3yFj9WiJKDvYfqC1RfP++b+GiZ54VfDVYJApJMfgVNUzQ9KTwym4PyRZdq4mDs+bpz RPahiIr0X4Te2NmGTigFFAiehF+Cbp/z+Iw3sd1Ohk8AGQi9SeArYOwpEMfftny1bpzL 0sy7rckFYDii4tR4NGFea6QwD1WdiZQMEcGO4ehMYkaNK1CF0HzZS8qPowhXps9jP3SI UJQVsgIA4XzmsU8uM9obwpYEDpsFm1sEm8QJQnH0eHIFIIsmhbYBGY01mOyaOOpreCuU /zhA==
>> X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=+JGgRHitO0WAq3Rs3Wg56WhdeaZNglV9fLL15iELtbI=; b=I5eFxwfhwQRfip4oTgWmEVxmZIZASVTZXSx4wX3E/yXDHbvjlQ9JZ0r6QEewsKqC6l iiPmk22UIegrf8nERV9sZ36oCDwkVt7lDHXTyVYIR71EXfgCIA/EjNfqqoB7S6W7SvnZ Drk41JuMd0nTsosckYkgf7a/ihIW36rAvEK7Nk0w3ksOUu4T4mgvwecmQoEDM+azW8of z2U6bnBPMDw4FWMSjbjTkmkTOxQq8lDwOehFCN7CiriNgdJdxx5ZSRoxuQwPvzY2WzN0 sTSorSr9up5y8xqM0DbN5T0meRbAtEKiqD13pvik/VvTPQ1aohbaRCEe8lHce9quR3xj RAZQ==
>> X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmSYj3noaP+kq0Jt5q2dU0xdBwlcYcms/Jj427Xur4KqGcVF/T3+KdHk7+aPe+NwA==
>> X-Received: by 10.28.4.16 with SMTP id 16mr1160305wme.39.1476345344367; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
>> Received: from work.redhat.com ([46.120.229.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm20384747wjl.28.2016.10.13.00.55.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
>> Sender: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
>> From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
>> X-Google-Original-From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
>> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Cc: lersek@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, laine@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, abologna@redhat.com, "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, marcel@redhat.com
>> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 RESEND] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
>> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:55:39 +0300
>> Message-Id: <1476345339-5355-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
>> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:55:46 +0000 (UTC)
>> X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:55:46 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'209.85.215.65' DOMAIN:'mail-lf0-f65.google.com' HELO:'mail-lf0-f65.google.com' FROM:'marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com' RCPT:''
>> X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 1.272 * (BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS) 209.85.215.65 mail-lf0-f65.google.com 209.85.215.65 mail-lf0-f65.google.com <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
>> X-RedHat-Possible-Forgery: <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com> Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
>> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22
>> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.38
>
> None of these appear to contain the following headers (example taken from another message of yours that I do see on the list / in my qemu-devel folder):
>
>> X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
>> List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
>> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
>> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
>> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
>> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
>> X-Mailman-Copy: yes
>
> Something is seriously broken.
Agreed, I sent the patch with both Red Hat and Google SMTP and each time
was rejected by the server for the recipient domain nongnu.org by eggs.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::10].
The error that the other server returned was: 550 Invalid address in message header
Interesting fact, replying to the list (as I am doing now) in Thunderbird *does* work.
Is this a git send-email bug? Very strange.
I considered re-sending again but it will only spam the people addressed in CC.
>
> Peter and/or Stefan (really I'm just guessing here...), who can help us analyze this from the mailing list side? Especially the "550 Invalid address in message header" error message from eggs.gnu.org? Because, the exact same messages have been delivered directly to my inbox just fine.
>
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Marcel
> Thanks,
> Laszlo
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
2016-10-13 9:11 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
@ 2016-10-13 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-13 10:53 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-10-13 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Apfelbaum, Laszlo Ersek, peter.maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: drjones, mst, qemu-devel, abologna, kraxel, laine
On 13/10/2016 11:11, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Agreed, I sent the patch with both Red Hat and Google SMTP and each time
> was rejected by the server for the recipient domain nongnu.org by
> eggs.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::10].
>
> The error that the other server returned was: 550 Invalid address in
> message header
You have an "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com address that
looks seriously invalid. :)
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
2016-10-13 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2016-10-13 10:53 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-13 13:12 ` Eric Blake
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Apfelbaum @ 2016-10-13 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini, Laszlo Ersek, peter.maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: drjones, mst, qemu-devel, abologna, kraxel, laine
On 10/13/2016 12:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 13/10/2016 11:11, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> Agreed, I sent the patch with both Red Hat and Google SMTP and each time
>> was rejected by the server for the recipient domain nongnu.org by
>> eggs.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::10].
>>
>> The error that the other server returned was: 550 Invalid address in
>> message header
>
> You have an "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com address that
> looks seriously invalid. :)
>
Yes, I saw that - we have 2 lucky people not spammed (yet),
but sadly is uncorrelated with the issue in hand.
Thanks,
Marcel
> Paolo
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
2016-10-13 10:53 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
@ 2016-10-13 13:12 ` Eric Blake
2016-10-13 14:04 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Blake @ 2016-10-13 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcel Apfelbaum, Paolo Bonzini, Laszlo Ersek, peter.maydell,
Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: drjones, mst, qemu-devel, abologna, kraxel, laine
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1218 bytes --]
On 10/13/2016 05:53 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 12:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/10/2016 11:11, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>> Agreed, I sent the patch with both Red Hat and Google SMTP and each time
>>> was rejected by the server for the recipient domain nongnu.org by
>>> eggs.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::10].
>>>
>>> The error that the other server returned was: 550 Invalid address in
>>> message header
>>
>> You have an "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com address that
>> looks seriously invalid. :)
>>
>
> Yes, I saw that - we have 2 lucky people not spammed (yet),
> but sadly is uncorrelated with the issue in hand.
How so? It could very well be that the list engine is refusing to
deliver the mail because the mail has an invalid To: header (you left
out a comma, creating a single invalid address instead of two desired
addresses). Your outgoing SMTP is delivering to as many valid addresses
as possible, but the list engine is unable to rewrite the message for
distribution to the list as soon as it encounters something invalid.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines
2016-10-13 13:12 ` Eric Blake
@ 2016-10-13 14:04 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Apfelbaum @ 2016-10-13 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Blake, Marcel Apfelbaum, Paolo Bonzini, Laszlo Ersek,
peter.maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: drjones, mst, qemu-devel, abologna, kraxel, laine
On 10/13/2016 04:12 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 05:53 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> On 10/13/2016 12:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13/10/2016 11:11, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>>> Agreed, I sent the patch with both Red Hat and Google SMTP and each time
>>>> was rejected by the server for the recipient domain nongnu.org by
>>>> eggs.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::10].
>>>>
>>>> The error that the other server returned was: 550 Invalid address in
>>>> message header
>>>
>>> You have an "alex.williamson@redhat.comberrange"@redhat.com address that
>>> looks seriously invalid. :)
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I saw that - we have 2 lucky people not spammed (yet),
>> but sadly is uncorrelated with the issue in hand.
>
> How so? It could very well be that the list engine is refusing to
> deliver the mail because the mail has an invalid To: header (you left
> out a comma, creating a single invalid address instead of two desired
> addresses). Your outgoing SMTP is delivering to as many valid addresses
> as possible, but the list engine is unable to rewrite the message for
> distribution to the list as soon as it encounters something invalid.
>
Hi Eric,
Indeed, I sent the patch again, this time to QEMU list only and it was sent OK.
I didn't think this was the problem because:
(a) some addresses did receive the message
(b) I thought I didn't mess up the mails on my first mail, but I was wrong.
Anyway, thank you for the explanation, you and Paolo are right.
Marcel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-13 14:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1476193521-29034-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com>
2016-10-12 15:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] docs: add PCIe devices placement guidelines Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-13 7:25 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-13 8:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-13 9:11 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-13 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-13 10:53 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-10-13 13:12 ` Eric Blake
2016-10-13 14:04 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.