All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: chao.gao@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	anthony.perard@citrix.com, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	marcel@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net,
	sstabellini@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Qemu: Add Xen vIOMMU support
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:40:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf4a6b77-3265-c037-281b-941c4f55244f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e1d1637-1cf8-2ad4-36e2-342aa21b100d@redhat.com>

On 2017年03月17日 22:48, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17/03/2017 12:29, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> This patchset is to add Xen vIOMMU device model and handle
>> irq remapping stuffs. Xen vIOMMU emulation is in the Xen hypervisor
>> and the new device module in Qemu works as hypercall wrappers to
>> create and destroy vIOMMU in hypervisor.
>>
>> Xen only supports emulated I440 and so we enable vIOMMU with emulated
>> I440 chipset. This works on Linux and Windows guest.
> 
> Any plans to change this?  Why is Xen not able to use Q35 with Intel
> IOMMU, with only special hooks for interrupt remapping?
> 
> Paolo
> 

Hi Paolo:
Thanks for review. For Xen side, we won't reuse Intel IOMMU device model
in Qemu and create counterpart in Xen hypervisor. The reasons are
 1) Avoid round trips between Qemu and Xen hypervisor
 2) Ease of integration with the rest part of the hypervisor(vIOAPIC,
vMSI and so on).

We don't have plan to enable Q35 for Xen now. There is no dependency
between Q35 emulation and vIOMMU implementation from our test. As
Stefano mentioned, Anthony worked on the Q35 support before. These two
tasks can be done in parallel.

-- 
Best regards
Tianyu Lan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
	ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, marcel@redhat.com,
	anthony.perard@citrix.com, rth@twiddle.net, chao.gao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Qemu: Add Xen vIOMMU support
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:40:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf4a6b77-3265-c037-281b-941c4f55244f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e1d1637-1cf8-2ad4-36e2-342aa21b100d@redhat.com>

On 2017年03月17日 22:48, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17/03/2017 12:29, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> This patchset is to add Xen vIOMMU device model and handle
>> irq remapping stuffs. Xen vIOMMU emulation is in the Xen hypervisor
>> and the new device module in Qemu works as hypercall wrappers to
>> create and destroy vIOMMU in hypervisor.
>>
>> Xen only supports emulated I440 and so we enable vIOMMU with emulated
>> I440 chipset. This works on Linux and Windows guest.
> 
> Any plans to change this?  Why is Xen not able to use Q35 with Intel
> IOMMU, with only special hooks for interrupt remapping?
> 
> Paolo
> 

Hi Paolo:
Thanks for review. For Xen side, we won't reuse Intel IOMMU device model
in Qemu and create counterpart in Xen hypervisor. The reasons are
 1) Avoid round trips between Qemu and Xen hypervisor
 2) Ease of integration with the rest part of the hypervisor(vIOAPIC,
vMSI and so on).

We don't have plan to enable Q35 for Xen now. There is no dependency
between Q35 emulation and vIOMMU implementation from our test. As
Stefano mentioned, Anthony worked on the Q35 support before. These two
tasks can be done in parallel.

-- 
Best regards
Tianyu Lan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-20  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-17 11:29 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Qemu: Add Xen vIOMMU support Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:29 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/4] I440: Allow adding sysbus devices with -device on I440 Lan Tianyu
2017-03-20 19:49   ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-03-21  0:36     ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/4] Xen: add a dummy vIOMMU to create/destroy vIOMMU in Xen Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:29   ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-30 16:24   ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony PERARD
2017-03-30 16:24     ` Anthony PERARD
2017-03-30 20:19     ` [Qemu-devel] " Chao Gao
2017-03-30 20:19       ` Chao Gao
2017-03-17 11:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/4] xen-pt: bind/unbind interrupt remapping format MSI Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:29   ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-30 16:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony PERARD
2017-03-30 16:51     ` Anthony PERARD
2017-03-30 20:31     ` [Qemu-devel] " Chao Gao
2017-03-30 20:31       ` Chao Gao
2017-03-17 11:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/4] msi: taking interrupt format into consideration during judging a pirq is binded with a event channel Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:29   ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-30 17:29   ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony PERARD
2017-03-30 17:29     ` Anthony PERARD
2017-03-30 20:38     ` [Qemu-devel] " Chao Gao
2017-03-30 20:38       ` Chao Gao
2017-03-17 11:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Qemu: Add Xen vIOMMU support no-reply
2017-03-17 11:46   ` no-reply
2017-03-17 14:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 14:48   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 20:57   ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-17 20:57     ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-20  2:40   ` Lan Tianyu [this message]
2017-03-20  2:40     ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-20 11:38     ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-20 11:38       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-20 14:17       ` [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-20 14:17         ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-20 14:35         ` [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-20 14:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-21  1:13       ` [Qemu-devel] " Lan Tianyu
2017-03-21  1:13         ` Lan Tianyu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf4a6b77-3265-c037-281b-941c4f55244f@intel.com \
    --to=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=marcel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.