All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 1/8] pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware Joao Pinto
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch series adds the new interrupt api to pcie-designware
make it possible to use features like MSIX.

The work consisted of adapting the pcie-designware-host and each SoC
specific driver.

Joao Pinto (8):
  pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware
  pci: exynos SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  pci: imx6 SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  pci: artpec6 SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  pci: generic PCIe DW driver adapted to new irq API
  pci: qcom SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  pci: keystone SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  pci: removing old irq api from pcie-designware

 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c           |  18 --
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c             |  18 --
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c      |  97 +--------
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c         |   1 +
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h         |   4 +-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c       |   4 +-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c         |  18 --
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 372 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c |  15 --
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h      |  18 +-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c            |  15 --
 11 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 349 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC v2 1/8] pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware
  2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 ` Joao Pinto
  2017-05-21  8:44   ` Marc Zyngier
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 2/8] pci: exynos SoC driver adapted to new irq API Joao Pinto
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch adds the new interrupt api to pcie-designware, keeping the old
one. Although the old API is still available, pcie-designware initiates with
the new one.

Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
---
changes v1->v2:
- Now there's no config to toggle between the 2 APIs, so pcie-designware
initiaties wih the new one by default
- Using lower_32_bits / upper_32_bits
- Instead of mutex, now using spinlocks
- Instead of always reading PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE, now we use an internal
variable
- dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc() was updated to enable Multi-MSI
- using irq_domain_create_linear() instead of irq_domain_add_linear()

 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h      |  15 ++
 2 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index 28ed32b..78ce002 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
  * published by the Free Software Foundation.
  */
 
+#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_pci.h>
@@ -53,6 +54,28 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_msi_irq_chip = {
 	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
 };
 
+static void dw_msi_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) {
+	pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
+	irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
+}
+
+static void dw_msi_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) {
+	pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
+	irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip = {
+	.name = "PCI-MSI",
+	.irq_mask = dw_msi_mask_irq,
+	.irq_unmask = dw_msi_unmask_irq,
+};
+
+static struct msi_domain_info dw_pcie_msi_domain_info = {
+	.flags	= (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
+		     MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),
+	.chip	= &dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip,
+};
+
 /* MSI int handler */
 irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
@@ -81,6 +104,191 @@ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/* Chained MSI interrupt service routine */
+static void dw_chained_msi_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+	struct pcie_port *pp;
+	struct dw_pcie *pci;
+
+	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
+	pci = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+	pp = &pci->pp;
+
+	dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
+
+	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
+}
+
+static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
+	u64 msi_target;
+
+	if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr)
+		msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
+	else
+		msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
+
+	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_target);
+	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_target);
+
+	if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
+		msg->data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, data->hwirq);
+	else
+		msg->data = data->hwirq;
+
+	dev_dbg(pci->dev, "msi#%d address_hi %#x address_lo %#x\n",
+		(int)data->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo);
+}
+
+static int dw_pci_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
+				   const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static void dw_pci_bottom_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
+	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
+
+	if (pp->ops->msi_clear_irq)
+		pp->ops->msi_clear_irq(pp, data->hwirq);
+	else {
+		ctrl = data->hwirq / 32;
+		res = ctrl * 12;
+		bit = data->hwirq % 32;
+
+		pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
+		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
+				    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void dw_pci_bottom_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
+	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
+
+	if (pp->ops->msi_set_irq)
+		pp->ops->msi_set_irq(pp, data->hwirq);
+	else {
+		ctrl = data->hwirq / 32;
+		res = ctrl * 12;
+		bit = data->hwirq % 32;
+
+		pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
+		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
+				    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
+	.name			= "DWPCI-MSI",
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= dw_pci_setup_msi_msg,
+	.irq_set_affinity	= dw_pci_msi_set_affinity,
+	.irq_mask		= dw_pci_bottom_mask,
+	.irq_unmask		= dw_pci_bottom_unmask,
+};
+
+static int dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
+				    unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs,
+				    void *args)
+{
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = domain->host_data;
+	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long bit;
+	u32 i;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
+
+	bit = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(pp->msi_irq_in_use, pp->num_vectors, 0,
+					 nr_irqs, 0);
+
+	if (bit >= pp->num_vectors) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
+		return -ENOSPC;
+	}
+
+	bitmap_set(pp->msi_irq_in_use, bit, nr_irqs);
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
+		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, bit + i,
+				    &dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip,
+				    domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
+				    NULL, NULL);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void dw_pcie_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
+				    unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
+{
+	struct irq_data *data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
+	bitmap_clear(pp->msi_irq_in_use, data->hwirq, nr_irqs);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops = {
+	.alloc	= dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc,
+	.free	= dw_pcie_irq_domain_free,
+};
+
+int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct dw_pcie *pci)
+{
+	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(pci->dev->of_node);
+
+	pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, pp->num_vectors,
+					       &dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops, pci);
+	if (!pp->irq_domain) {
+		dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	pp->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode,
+						   &dw_pcie_msi_domain_info,
+						   pp->irq_domain);
+	if (!pp->msi_domain) {
+		dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
+		irq_domain_remove(pp->irq_domain);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void dw_pcie_free_msi(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	irq_set_chained_handler(pp->msi_irq, NULL);
+	irq_set_handler_data(pp->msi_irq, NULL);
+
+	irq_domain_remove(pp->msi_domain);
+	irq_domain_remove(pp->irq_domain);
+}
+
 void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
 	u64 msi_target;
@@ -97,13 +305,14 @@ void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 
 static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
 {
-	unsigned int res, bit, val;
+	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
 
-	res = (irq / 32) * 12;
+	ctrl = irq / 32;
+	res = ctrl * 12;
 	bit = irq % 32;
-	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
-	val &= ~(1 << bit);
-	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
+	pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
+	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
+			    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
 }
 
 static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
@@ -125,13 +334,14 @@ static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
 
 static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
 {
-	unsigned int res, bit, val;
+	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
 
-	res = (irq / 32) * 12;
+	ctrl = irq / 32;
+	res = ctrl * 12;
 	bit = irq % 32;
-	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
-	val |= 1 << bit;
-	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
+	pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
+	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
+			    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
 }
 
 static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
@@ -279,11 +489,14 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+	struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
 	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
 	struct resource *cfg_res;
 	int i, ret;
+
 	LIST_HEAD(res);
-	struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
+
+	spin_lock_init(&pci->pp.lock);
 
 	cfg_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "config");
 	if (cfg_res) {
@@ -378,17 +591,18 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
 		if (!pp->ops->msi_host_init) {
-			pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
-						MAX_MSI_IRQS, &msi_domain_ops,
-						&dw_pcie_msi_chip);
-			if (!pp->irq_domain) {
-				dev_err(dev, "irq domain init failed\n");
-				ret = -ENXIO;
+			ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-vectors",
+						   &pp->num_vectors);
+			if (ret)
+				pp->num_vectors = 1;
+
+			ret = dw_pcie_allocate_domains(pci);
+			if (ret)
 				goto error;
-			}
 
-			for (i = 0; i < MAX_MSI_IRQS; i++)
-				irq_create_mapping(pp->irq_domain, i);
+			irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pci->pp.msi_irq,
+							 dw_chained_msi_isr,
+							 pci);
 		} else {
 			ret = pp->ops->msi_host_init(pp, &dw_pcie_msi_chip);
 			if (ret < 0)
@@ -400,14 +614,9 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 		pp->ops->host_init(pp);
 
 	pp->root_bus_nr = pp->busn->start;
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
-		bus = pci_scan_root_bus_msi(dev, pp->root_bus_nr,
-					    &dw_pcie_ops, pp, &res,
-					    &dw_pcie_msi_chip);
-		dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = dev;
-	} else
-		bus = pci_scan_root_bus(dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
-					pp, &res);
+
+	bus = pci_scan_root_bus(dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
+				pp, &res);
 	if (!bus) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto error;
@@ -579,11 +788,16 @@ static u8 dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 
 void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
-	u32 val;
+	u32 val, ctrl;
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
 
 	dw_pcie_setup(pci);
 
+	/* Initialize IRQ Status array */
+	for (ctrl = 0; ctrl < MAX_MSI_CTRLS; ctrl++)
+		dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + (ctrl * 12), 4,
+				    &pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
+
 	/* setup RC BARs */
 	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 0x00000004);
 	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1, 0x00000000);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
index c6a8405..622ffcf 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
@@ -165,7 +165,11 @@ struct pcie_port {
 	struct dw_pcie_host_ops	*ops;
 	int			msi_irq;
 	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
+	struct irq_domain	*msi_domain;
 	unsigned long		msi_data;
+	u32			num_vectors;
+	u32			irq_status[MAX_MSI_CTRLS];
+	spinlock_t		lock;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
 };
 
@@ -282,8 +286,10 @@ static inline u32 dw_pcie_readl_dbi2(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 reg)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST
 irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp);
 void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp);
+void dw_pcie_free_msi(struct pcie_port *pp);
 void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp);
 int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp);
+int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct dw_pcie *pci);
 #else
 static inline irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
@@ -294,6 +300,10 @@ static inline void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
 }
 
+static inline void dw_pcie_free_msi(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+}
+
 static inline void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
 }
@@ -302,6 +312,11 @@ static inline int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static inline int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct dw_pcie *pci)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_DW_EP
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC v2 2/8] pci: exynos SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 1/8] pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 ` Joao Pinto
  2017-05-18 18:50   ` Jingoo Han
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 3/8] pci: imx6 " Joao Pinto
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch adapts Exynos SoC specific driver to use the new interrupt api
available in pcie-designware.

Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
---
changes v1->v2:
- just to keep up patch set version

 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c | 18 ------------------
 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c
index 546082a..e49c39a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c
@@ -490,15 +490,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
-{
-	struct exynos_pcie *ep = arg;
-	struct dw_pcie *pci = ep->pci;
-	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
-
-	return dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
-}
-
 static void exynos_pcie_msi_init(struct exynos_pcie *ep)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = ep->pci;
@@ -622,15 +613,6 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct exynos_pcie *ep,
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to get msi irq\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
-
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pp->msi_irq,
-					exynos_pcie_msi_irq_handler,
-					IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
-					"exynos-pcie", ep);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "failed to request msi irq\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
 	}
 
 	pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC v2 3/8] pci: imx6 SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 1/8] pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 2/8] pci: exynos SoC driver adapted to new irq API Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 ` Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 4/8] pci: artpec6 " Joao Pinto
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch adapts imx6 SoC specific driver to use the new interrupt api
available in pcie-designware.

Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
---
changes v1->v2:
- just to keep up patch set version

 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 18 ------------------
 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c
index a98cba5..f22ce1f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-imx6.c
@@ -490,15 +490,6 @@ static int imx6_pcie_wait_for_speed_change(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static irqreturn_t imx6_pcie_msi_handler(int irq, void *arg)
-{
-	struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie = arg;
-	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
-	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
-
-	return dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
-}
-
 static int imx6_pcie_establish_link(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;
@@ -620,15 +611,6 @@ static int imx6_add_pcie_port(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie,
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to get MSI irq\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
-
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pp->msi_irq,
-				       imx6_pcie_msi_handler,
-				       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
-				       "mx6-pcie-msi", imx6_pcie);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "failed to request MSI irq\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
 	}
 
 	pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC v2 4/8] pci: artpec6 SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 3/8] pci: imx6 " Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 ` Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 5/8] pci: generic PCIe DW " Joao Pinto
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch adapts artpec6 SoC specific driver to use the new interrupt api
available in pcie-designware.

Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
---
changes v1->v2:
- just to keep up patch set version

 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c | 18 ------------------
 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
index 82a04ac..d81789b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
@@ -188,15 +188,6 @@ static struct dw_pcie_host_ops artpec6_pcie_host_ops = {
 	.host_init = artpec6_pcie_host_init,
 };
 
-static irqreturn_t artpec6_pcie_msi_handler(int irq, void *arg)
-{
-	struct artpec6_pcie *artpec6_pcie = arg;
-	struct dw_pcie *pci = artpec6_pcie->pci;
-	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
-
-	return dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
-}
-
 static int artpec6_add_pcie_port(struct artpec6_pcie *artpec6_pcie,
 				 struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
@@ -211,15 +202,6 @@ static int artpec6_add_pcie_port(struct artpec6_pcie *artpec6_pcie,
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to get MSI irq\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
-
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pp->msi_irq,
-				       artpec6_pcie_msi_handler,
-				       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
-				       "artpec6-pcie-msi", artpec6_pcie);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "failed to request MSI irq\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
 	}
 
 	pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC v2 5/8] pci: generic PCIe DW driver adapted to new irq API
  2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 4/8] pci: artpec6 " Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 ` Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 6/8] pci: qcom SoC " Joao Pinto
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch adapts the generic PCIe DW driver to use the new interrupt api
available in pcie-designware.

Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
---
changes v1->v2:
- just to keep up patch set version

 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c
index 32091b3..3b9717b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c
@@ -28,13 +28,6 @@ struct dw_plat_pcie {
 	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
 };
 
-static irqreturn_t dw_plat_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
-{
-	struct pcie_port *pp = arg;
-
-	return dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
-}
-
 static void dw_plat_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
@@ -64,14 +57,6 @@ static int dw_plat_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
 		pp->msi_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
 		if (pp->msi_irq < 0)
 			return pp->msi_irq;
-
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pp->msi_irq,
-					dw_plat_pcie_msi_irq_handler,
-					IRQF_SHARED, "dw-plat-pcie-msi", pp);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "failed to request MSI IRQ\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
 	}
 
 	pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC v2 6/8] pci: qcom SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 5/8] pci: generic PCIe DW " Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 ` Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 7/8] pci: keystone " Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 8/8] pci: removing old irq api from pcie-designware Joao Pinto
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch adapts Qcom SoC specific driver to use the new interrupt api
available in pcie-designware.

Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
---
changes v1->v2:
- just to keep up patch set version

 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index 5bf23d4..4e1cc02 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -126,13 +126,6 @@ static void qcom_ep_reset_deassert(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
 	usleep_range(PERST_DELAY_US, PERST_DELAY_US + 500);
 }
 
-static irqreturn_t qcom_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
-{
-	struct pcie_port *pp = arg;
-
-	return dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
-}
-
 static void qcom_pcie_v0_v1_ltssm_enable(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
 {
 	u32 val;
@@ -724,14 +717,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		pp->msi_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "msi");
 		if (pp->msi_irq < 0)
 			return pp->msi_irq;
-
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pp->msi_irq,
-				       qcom_pcie_msi_irq_handler,
-				       IRQF_SHARED, "qcom-pcie-msi", pp);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "cannot request msi irq\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
 	}
 
 	ret = phy_init(pcie->phy);
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC v2 7/8] pci: keystone SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 6/8] pci: qcom SoC " Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 ` Joao Pinto
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 8/8] pci: removing old irq api from pcie-designware Joao Pinto
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch adapts Keystone SoC specific driver to use the new interrupt api
available in pcie-designware. A new callback was added to dw_pcie_host_ops
to handle a specific Keystone function and msi_host_init callback is changed
to simplify the access to pci data structure for keystone all SoC drivers
that use the structure.

Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
---
changes v1->v2:
- just to keep up patch set version

 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c      | 97 +++-------------------------------
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c         |  1 +
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h         |  4 +-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c       |  3 +-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 12 ++++-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h      |  3 +-
 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c
index 8bc626e..da1472e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c
@@ -124,19 +124,15 @@ void ks_dw_pcie_handle_msi_irq(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie, int offset)
 	}
 }
 
-static void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack(int irq, struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
 	u32 offset, reg_offset, bit_pos;
 	struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie;
-	struct msi_desc *msi;
-	struct pcie_port *pp;
 	struct dw_pcie *pci;
 
-	msi = irq_data_get_msi_desc(d);
-	pp = (struct pcie_port *) msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata(msi);
 	pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
 	ks_pcie = to_keystone_pcie(pci);
-	offset = d->irq - irq_linear_revmap(pp->irq_domain, 0);
+	offset = irq - irq_linear_revmap(pp->irq_domain, 0);
 	update_reg_offset_bit_pos(offset, &reg_offset, &bit_pos);
 
 	ks_dw_app_writel(ks_pcie, MSI0_IRQ_STATUS + (reg_offset << 4),
@@ -166,93 +162,12 @@ void ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
 			 BIT(bit_pos));
 }
 
-static void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci, struct msi_controller *chip)
 {
-	struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie;
-	struct msi_desc *msi;
-	struct pcie_port *pp;
-	struct dw_pcie *pci;
-	u32 offset;
-
-	msi = irq_data_get_msi_desc(d);
-	pp = (struct pcie_port *) msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata(msi);
-	pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
-	ks_pcie = to_keystone_pcie(pci);
-	offset = d->irq - irq_linear_revmap(pp->irq_domain, 0);
-
-	/* Mask the end point if PVM implemented */
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
-		if (msi->msi_attrib.maskbit)
-			pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
-	}
-
-	ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(pp, offset);
-}
-
-static void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
-{
-	struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie;
-	struct msi_desc *msi;
-	struct pcie_port *pp;
-	struct dw_pcie *pci;
-	u32 offset;
-
-	msi = irq_data_get_msi_desc(d);
-	pp = (struct pcie_port *) msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata(msi);
-	pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
-	ks_pcie = to_keystone_pcie(pci);
-	offset = d->irq - irq_linear_revmap(pp->irq_domain, 0);
-
-	/* Mask the end point if PVM implemented */
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
-		if (msi->msi_attrib.maskbit)
-			pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
-	}
-
-	ks_dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(pp, offset);
-}
+	/* overide number of vectors and sent them to Keystone Max MSI IRQs */
+	pci->pp.num_vectors = MAX_MSI_IRQS;
 
-static struct irq_chip ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip = {
-	.name = "Keystone-PCIe-MSI-IRQ",
-	.irq_ack = ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack,
-	.irq_mask = ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_mask,
-	.irq_unmask = ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_unmask,
-};
-
-static int ks_dw_pcie_msi_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
-			      irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
-{
-	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip,
-				 handle_level_irq);
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static const struct irq_domain_ops ks_dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops = {
-	.map = ks_dw_pcie_msi_map,
-};
-
-int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp, struct msi_controller *chip)
-{
-	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
-	struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie = to_keystone_pcie(pci);
-	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
-	int i;
-
-	pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(ks_pcie->msi_intc_np,
-					MAX_MSI_IRQS,
-					&ks_dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops,
-					chip);
-	if (!pp->irq_domain) {
-		dev_err(dev, "irq domain init failed\n");
-		return -ENXIO;
-	}
-
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_MSI_IRQS; i++)
-		irq_create_mapping(pp->irq_domain, i);
-
-	return 0;
+	return dw_pcie_allocate_domains(pci);
 }
 
 void ks_dw_pcie_enable_legacy_irqs(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c
index fcc9723..a59bd9b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.c
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static struct dw_pcie_host_ops keystone_pcie_host_ops = {
 	.msi_clear_irq = ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq,
 	.get_msi_addr = ks_dw_pcie_get_msi_addr,
 	.msi_host_init = ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init,
+	.msi_irq_ack = ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack,
 	.scan_bus = ks_dw_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus,
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h
index 74c5825..83179382 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ int ks_dw_pcie_rd_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
 		unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 *val);
 void ks_dw_pcie_setup_rc_app_regs(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie);
 void ks_dw_pcie_initiate_link_train(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie);
+void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack(int i, struct pcie_port *pp);
 void ks_dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
 void ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
 void ks_dw_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus(struct pcie_port *pp);
-int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp,
-		struct msi_controller *chip);
+int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci, struct msi_controller *chip);
 int ks_dw_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
index 27d638c..4fb491b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
@@ -162,10 +162,9 @@ static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 	iowrite32(0, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN);
 }
 
-static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp,
+static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci,
 				 struct msi_controller *chip)
 {
-	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
 	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	struct device_node *msi_node;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index 78ce002..f1743cb 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -197,8 +197,18 @@ static void dw_pci_bottom_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
 }
 
+static void dw_pci_bottom_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi_desc(d);
+	struct pcie_port *pp = (struct pcie_port *) msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata(msi);
+
+	if (pp->ops->msi_irq_ack)
+		pp->ops->msi_irq_ack(d->irq, pp);
+}
+
 static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
 	.name			= "DWPCI-MSI",
+	.irq_ack		= dw_pci_bottom_ack,
 	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= dw_pci_setup_msi_msg,
 	.irq_set_affinity	= dw_pci_msi_set_affinity,
 	.irq_mask		= dw_pci_bottom_mask,
@@ -604,7 +614,7 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 							 dw_chained_msi_isr,
 							 pci);
 		} else {
-			ret = pp->ops->msi_host_init(pp, &dw_pcie_msi_chip);
+			ret = pp->ops->msi_host_init(pci, &dw_pcie_msi_chip);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				goto error;
 		}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
index 622ffcf..2ac99fa 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
@@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ struct dw_pcie_host_ops {
 	phys_addr_t (*get_msi_addr)(struct pcie_port *pp);
 	u32 (*get_msi_data)(struct pcie_port *pp, int pos);
 	void (*scan_bus)(struct pcie_port *pp);
-	int (*msi_host_init)(struct pcie_port *pp, struct msi_controller *chip);
+	int (*msi_host_init)(struct dw_pcie *pci, struct msi_controller *chip);
+	void (*msi_irq_ack)(int irq, struct pcie_port *pp);
 };
 
 struct pcie_port {
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [RFC v2 8/8] pci: removing old irq api from pcie-designware
  2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 7/8] pci: keystone " Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-15 17:03 ` Joao Pinto
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian,
	mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci, Joao Pinto

This patch removes the old interrupt API.

Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
---
changes v1->v2:
- removes less because the patch set no longer has the configurable toggle
between APIs

 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c      |   2 +-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h         |   2 +-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c       |   3 +-
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 192 +--------------------------------
 drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h      |   2 +-
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 195 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c
index da1472e..30a5352 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone-dw.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
 			 BIT(bit_pos));
 }
 
-int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci, struct msi_controller *chip)
+int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 {
 	/* overide number of vectors and sent them to Keystone Max MSI IRQs */
 	pci->pp.num_vectors = MAX_MSI_IRQS;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h
index 83179382..89119271 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-keystone.h
@@ -59,5 +59,5 @@ void ks_dw_pcie_msi_irq_ack(int i, struct pcie_port *pp);
 void ks_dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
 void ks_dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
 void ks_dw_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus(struct pcie_port *pp);
-int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci, struct msi_controller *chip);
+int ks_dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci);
 int ks_dw_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
index 4fb491b..231ea75 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
@@ -162,8 +162,7 @@ static void ls_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 	iowrite32(0, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI_RO_WR_EN);
 }
 
-static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci,
-				 struct msi_controller *chip)
+static int ls_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 {
 	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
index f1743cb..bcd7af6 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
@@ -46,14 +46,6 @@ static int dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, int where, int size,
 	return dw_pcie_write(pci->dbi_base + where, size, val);
 }
 
-static struct irq_chip dw_msi_irq_chip = {
-	.name = "PCI-MSI",
-	.irq_enable = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
-	.irq_disable = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq,
-	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
-};
-
 static void dw_msi_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) {
 	pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
 	irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
@@ -313,186 +305,6 @@ void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 			    (u32)(msi_target >> 32 & 0xffffffff));
 }
 
-static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
-{
-	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
-
-	ctrl = irq / 32;
-	res = ctrl * 12;
-	bit = irq % 32;
-	pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
-	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
-			    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
-}
-
-static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
-			    unsigned int nvec, unsigned int pos)
-{
-	unsigned int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) {
-		irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq_base, i, NULL);
-		/* Disable corresponding interrupt on MSI controller */
-		if (pp->ops->msi_clear_irq)
-			pp->ops->msi_clear_irq(pp, pos + i);
-		else
-			dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(pp, pos + i);
-	}
-
-	bitmap_release_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, pos, order_base_2(nvec));
-}
-
-static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
-{
-	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
-
-	ctrl = irq / 32;
-	res = ctrl * 12;
-	bit = irq % 32;
-	pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
-	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
-			    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
-}
-
-static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
-{
-	int irq, pos0, i;
-	struct pcie_port *pp;
-
-	pp = (struct pcie_port *)msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata(desc);
-	pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
-				       order_base_2(no_irqs));
-	if (pos0 < 0)
-		goto no_valid_irq;
-
-	irq = irq_find_mapping(pp->irq_domain, pos0);
-	if (!irq)
-		goto no_valid_irq;
-
-	/*
-	 * irq_create_mapping (called from dw_pcie_host_init) pre-allocates
-	 * descs so there is no need to allocate descs here. We can therefore
-	 * assume that if irq_find_mapping above returns non-zero, then the
-	 * descs are also successfully allocated.
-	 */
-
-	for (i = 0; i < no_irqs; i++) {
-		if (irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq, i, desc) != 0) {
-			clear_irq_range(pp, irq, i, pos0);
-			goto no_valid_irq;
-		}
-		/*Enable corresponding interrupt in MSI interrupt controller */
-		if (pp->ops->msi_set_irq)
-			pp->ops->msi_set_irq(pp, pos0 + i);
-		else
-			dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(pp, pos0 + i);
-	}
-
-	*pos = pos0;
-	desc->nvec_used = no_irqs;
-	desc->msi_attrib.multiple = order_base_2(no_irqs);
-
-	return irq;
-
-no_valid_irq:
-	*pos = pos0;
-	return -ENOSPC;
-}
-
-static void dw_msi_setup_msg(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq, u32 pos)
-{
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-	u64 msi_target;
-
-	if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr)
-		msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
-	else
-		msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
-
-	msg.address_lo = (u32)(msi_target & 0xffffffff);
-	msg.address_hi = (u32)(msi_target >> 32 & 0xffffffff);
-
-	if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
-		msg.data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, pos);
-	else
-		msg.data = pos;
-
-	pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
-}
-
-static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
-			    struct msi_desc *desc)
-{
-	int irq, pos;
-	struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
-
-	if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	irq = assign_irq(1, desc, &pos);
-	if (irq < 0)
-		return irq;
-
-	dw_msi_setup_msg(pp, irq, pos);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int dw_msi_setup_irqs(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
-			     int nvec, int type)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
-	int irq, pos;
-	struct msi_desc *desc;
-	struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
-
-	/* MSI-X interrupts are not supported */
-	if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	WARN_ON(!list_is_singular(&pdev->dev.msi_list));
-	desc = list_entry(pdev->dev.msi_list.next, struct msi_desc, list);
-
-	irq = assign_irq(nvec, desc, &pos);
-	if (irq < 0)
-		return irq;
-
-	dw_msi_setup_msg(pp, irq, pos);
-
-	return 0;
-#else
-	return -EINVAL;
-#endif
-}
-
-static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
-{
-	struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
-	struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
-	struct pcie_port *pp = (struct pcie_port *)msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata(msi);
-
-	clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
-}
-
-static struct msi_controller dw_pcie_msi_chip = {
-	.setup_irq = dw_msi_setup_irq,
-	.setup_irqs = dw_msi_setup_irqs,
-	.teardown_irq = dw_msi_teardown_irq,
-};
-
-static int dw_pcie_msi_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
-			   irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
-{
-	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &dw_msi_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
-	.map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
-};
-
 int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
@@ -502,7 +314,7 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 	struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
 	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
 	struct resource *cfg_res;
-	int i, ret;
+	int ret;
 
 	LIST_HEAD(res);
 
@@ -614,7 +426,7 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
 							 dw_chained_msi_isr,
 							 pci);
 		} else {
-			ret = pp->ops->msi_host_init(pci, &dw_pcie_msi_chip);
+			ret = pp->ops->msi_host_init(pci);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				goto error;
 		}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
index 2ac99fa..f486587 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ struct dw_pcie_host_ops {
 	phys_addr_t (*get_msi_addr)(struct pcie_port *pp);
 	u32 (*get_msi_data)(struct pcie_port *pp, int pos);
 	void (*scan_bus)(struct pcie_port *pp);
-	int (*msi_host_init)(struct dw_pcie *pci, struct msi_controller *chip);
+	int (*msi_host_init)(struct dw_pcie *pci);
 	void (*msi_irq_ack)(int irq, struct pcie_port *pp);
 };
 
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC v2 2/8] pci: exynos SoC driver adapted to new irq API
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 2/8] pci: exynos SoC driver adapted to new irq API Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-18 18:50   ` Jingoo Han
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2017-05-18 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Joao Pinto', bhelgaas, marc.zyngier
  Cc: m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni, minghuan.Lian, mingkai.hu,
	tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach, niklas.cassel,
	jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni, svarbanov,
	linux-pci

On Monday, May 15, 2017 1:04 PM, Joao Pinto wrote:

> 
> This patch adapts Exynos SoC specific driver to use the new interrupt api
> available in pcie-designware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> ---
> changes v1->v2:
> - just to keep up patch set version
> 
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c | 18 ------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c
> index 546082a..e49c39a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-exynos.c
> @@ -490,15 +490,6 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_irq_handler(int irq,
> void *arg)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
> 
> -static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> -{
> -	struct exynos_pcie *ep = arg;
> -	struct dw_pcie *pci = ep->pci;
> -	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> -
> -	return dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
> -}
> -
>  static void exynos_pcie_msi_init(struct exynos_pcie *ep)
>  {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = ep->pci;
> @@ -622,15 +613,6 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct
> exynos_pcie *ep,
>  			dev_err(dev, "failed to get msi irq\n");
>  			return -ENODEV;
>  		}
> -
> -		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pp->msi_irq,
> -					exynos_pcie_msi_irq_handler,
> -					IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
> -					"exynos-pcie", ep);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			dev_err(dev, "failed to request msi irq\n");
> -			return ret;
> -		}
>  	}
> 
>  	pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> --
> 2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC v2 1/8] pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware
  2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 1/8] pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware Joao Pinto
@ 2017-05-21  8:44   ` Marc Zyngier
  2017-05-22  9:24     ` Joao Pinto
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2017-05-21  8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joao Pinto
  Cc: bhelgaas, jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni,
	minghuan.Lian, mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach,
	niklas.cassel, jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni,
	svarbanov, linux-pci

On Mon, May 15 2017 at 06:03:41 PM, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> wrote:
> This patch adds the new interrupt api to pcie-designware, keeping the old
> one. Although the old API is still available, pcie-designware initiates with
> the new one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
> ---
> changes v1->v2:
> - Now there's no config to toggle between the 2 APIs, so pcie-designware
> initiaties wih the new one by default
> - Using lower_32_bits / upper_32_bits
> - Instead of mutex, now using spinlocks
> - Instead of always reading PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE, now we use an internal
> variable
> - dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc() was updated to enable Multi-MSI
> - using irq_domain_create_linear() instead of irq_domain_add_linear()
>
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h      |  15 ++
>  2 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index 28ed32b..78ce002 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/of_pci.h>
> @@ -53,6 +54,28 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_msi_irq_chip = {
>  	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
>  };
>  
> +static void dw_msi_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) {
> +	pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
> +	irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_msi_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) {
> +	pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
> +	irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip = {
> +	.name = "PCI-MSI",
> +	.irq_mask = dw_msi_mask_irq,
> +	.irq_unmask = dw_msi_unmask_irq,
> +};
> +
> +static struct msi_domain_info dw_pcie_msi_domain_info = {
> +	.flags	= (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
> +		     MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),

How is Multi-MSI supported if you don't pass the MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI
flag?

> +	.chip	= &dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip,
> +};
> +
>  /* MSI int handler */
>  irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  {
> @@ -81,6 +104,191 @@ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/* Chained MSI interrupt service routine */
> +static void dw_chained_msi_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	struct pcie_port *pp;
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> +
> +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +	pci = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +	pp = &pci->pp;
> +
> +	dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
> +
> +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +	u64 msi_target;
> +
> +	if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr)
> +		msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
> +	else
> +		msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
> +
> +	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_target);
> +	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_target);
> +
> +	if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
> +		msg->data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, data->hwirq);

I've already asked about the reason for this indirection, and I'd
appreciate an answer.

> +	else
> +		msg->data = data->hwirq;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(pci->dev, "msi#%d address_hi %#x address_lo %#x\n",
> +		(int)data->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo);
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_pci_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
> +				   const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_pci_bottom_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (pp->ops->msi_clear_irq)
> +		pp->ops->msi_clear_irq(pp, data->hwirq);

Same thing. If you have to have that kind of indirection, then this is a
different irqchip altogether. Also, see below for the coding-style.

> +	else {
> +		ctrl = data->hwirq / 32;
> +		res = ctrl * 12;
> +		bit = data->hwirq % 32;
> +
> +		pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
> +		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
> +				    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_pci_bottom_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (pp->ops->msi_set_irq)
> +		pp->ops->msi_set_irq(pp, data->hwirq);
> +	else {

Coding-style:

        if (...) {
        	...
        } else {

> +		ctrl = data->hwirq / 32;
> +		res = ctrl * 12;
> +		bit = data->hwirq % 32;
> +
> +		pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
> +		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
> +				    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
> +	.name			= "DWPCI-MSI",
> +	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= dw_pci_setup_msi_msg,
> +	.irq_set_affinity	= dw_pci_msi_set_affinity,
> +	.irq_mask		= dw_pci_bottom_mask,
> +	.irq_unmask		= dw_pci_bottom_unmask,
> +};
> +
> +static int dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> +				    unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs,
> +				    void *args)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = domain->host_data;
> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	unsigned long bit;
> +	u32 i;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> +
> +	bit = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(pp->msi_irq_in_use, pp->num_vectors, 0,
> +					 nr_irqs, 0);
> +
> +	if (bit >= pp->num_vectors) {
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> +		return -ENOSPC;
> +	}
> +
> +	bitmap_set(pp->msi_irq_in_use, bit, nr_irqs);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
> +		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, bit + i,
> +				    &dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip,
> +				    domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
> +				    NULL, NULL);
> +
> +	return 0;

How does this work when you're using the indirection I've moaned about
earlier? How can you guarantee that there are similar number of
available vectors?

> +}
> +
> +static void dw_pcie_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
> +				    unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
> +{
> +	struct irq_data *data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> +	bitmap_clear(pp->msi_irq_in_use, data->hwirq, nr_irqs);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops = {
> +	.alloc	= dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc,
> +	.free	= dw_pcie_irq_domain_free,
> +};
> +
> +int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(pci->dev->of_node);
> +
> +	pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, pp->num_vectors,
> +					       &dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops, pci);
> +	if (!pp->irq_domain) {
> +		dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	pp->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode,
> +						   &dw_pcie_msi_domain_info,
> +						   pp->irq_domain);
> +	if (!pp->msi_domain) {
> +		dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
> +		irq_domain_remove(pp->irq_domain);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void dw_pcie_free_msi(struct pcie_port *pp)
> +{
> +	irq_set_chained_handler(pp->msi_irq, NULL);
> +	irq_set_handler_data(pp->msi_irq, NULL);
> +
> +	irq_domain_remove(pp->msi_domain);
> +	irq_domain_remove(pp->irq_domain);
> +}
> +
>  void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  {
>  	u64 msi_target;
> @@ -97,13 +305,14 @@ void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  
>  static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>  {
> -	unsigned int res, bit, val;
> +	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
>  
> -	res = (irq / 32) * 12;
> +	ctrl = irq / 32;
> +	res = ctrl * 12;
>  	bit = irq % 32;
> -	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
> -	val &= ~(1 << bit);
> -	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
> +	pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
> +	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
> +			    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
>  }
>  
>  static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
> @@ -125,13 +334,14 @@ static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
>  
>  static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>  {
> -	unsigned int res, bit, val;
> +	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
>  
> -	res = (irq / 32) * 12;
> +	ctrl = irq / 32;
> +	res = ctrl * 12;
>  	bit = irq % 32;
> -	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
> -	val |= 1 << bit;
> -	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
> +	pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
> +	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
> +			    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
>  }
>  
>  static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
> @@ -279,11 +489,14 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> +	struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
>  	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
>  	struct resource *cfg_res;
>  	int i, ret;
> +
>  	LIST_HEAD(res);
> -	struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
> +
> +	spin_lock_init(&pci->pp.lock);
>  
>  	cfg_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "config");
>  	if (cfg_res) {
> @@ -378,17 +591,18 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
>  		if (!pp->ops->msi_host_init) {
> -			pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
> -						MAX_MSI_IRQS, &msi_domain_ops,
> -						&dw_pcie_msi_chip);
> -			if (!pp->irq_domain) {
> -				dev_err(dev, "irq domain init failed\n");
> -				ret = -ENXIO;
> +			ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-vectors",
> +						   &pp->num_vectors);
> +			if (ret)
> +				pp->num_vectors = 1;

1? As in "one bit only"? Is that a valid configuration? Also, all of
this code seems to assume a maximum number of 32 MSIs. Is that a real
limitation? Because if that's the case, you can drop all the stuff about
ctrl and the '* 12' offset all over the code.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC v2 1/8] pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware
  2017-05-21  8:44   ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2017-05-22  9:24     ` Joao Pinto
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joao Pinto @ 2017-05-22  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier, Joao Pinto
  Cc: bhelgaas, jingoohan1, m-karicheri2, thomas.petazzoni,
	minghuan.Lian, mingkai.hu, tie-fei.zang, hongxing.zhu, l.stach,
	niklas.cassel, jesper.nilsson, wangzhou1, gabriele.paoloni,
	svarbanov, linux-pci


Hi Mark,

Às 9:44 AM de 5/21/2017, Marc Zyngier escreveu:
> On Mon, May 15 2017 at 06:03:41 PM, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds the new interrupt api to pcie-designware, keeping the old
>> one. Although the old API is still available, pcie-designware initiates with
>> the new one.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
>> ---
>> changes v1->v2:
>> - Now there's no config to toggle between the 2 APIs, so pcie-designware
>> initiaties wih the new one by default
>> - Using lower_32_bits / upper_32_bits
>> - Instead of mutex, now using spinlocks
>> - Instead of always reading PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE, now we use an internal
>> variable
>> - dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc() was updated to enable Multi-MSI
>> - using irq_domain_create_linear() instead of irq_domain_add_linear()
>>
>>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h      |  15 ++
>>  2 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> index 28ed32b..78ce002 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>   */
>>  
>> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_pci.h>
>> @@ -53,6 +54,28 @@ static struct irq_chip dw_msi_irq_chip = {
>>  	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
>>  };
>>  
>> +static void dw_msi_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) {
>> +	pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
>> +	irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_msi_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) {
>> +	pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
>> +	irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct irq_chip dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip = {
>> +	.name = "PCI-MSI",
>> +	.irq_mask = dw_msi_mask_irq,
>> +	.irq_unmask = dw_msi_unmask_irq,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct msi_domain_info dw_pcie_msi_domain_info = {
>> +	.flags	= (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
>> +		     MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),
> 
> How is Multi-MSI supported if you don't pass the MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI
> flag?

Well spoted, it was lost in the merge.

> 
>> +	.chip	= &dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip,
>> +};
>> +
>>  /* MSI int handler */
>>  irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>> @@ -81,6 +104,191 @@ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Chained MSI interrupt service routine */
>> +static void dw_chained_msi_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> +{
>> +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp;
>> +	struct dw_pcie *pci;
>> +
>> +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>> +	pci = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>> +	pp = &pci->pp;
>> +
>> +	dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
>> +
>> +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
>> +	u64 msi_target;
>> +
>> +	if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr)
>> +		msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
>> +	else
>> +		msi_target = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
>> +
>> +	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_target);
>> +	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_target);
>> +
>> +	if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
>> +		msg->data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, data->hwirq);
> 
> I've already asked about the reason for this indirection, and I'd
> appreciate an answer.

I answered in a previous e-mail. There are some SoCs using Synopsys PCIe Core
that have a custom way of managing some operations, like the msi_data,
msi_addrr, the mask/unmask of interrupts, etc. That is the reason why we have
these callbacks. An SoC specific driver fills their callbacks, call the
pcie-designware functions that they need and initialize their IP. There is a
group of drivers that are standard, like the pcie-designware-plat, exynos, qcom,
artpec6, imx6, etc.

> 
>> +	else
>> +		msg->data = data->hwirq;
>> +
>> +	dev_dbg(pci->dev, "msi#%d address_hi %#x address_lo %#x\n",
>> +		(int)data->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_pci_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
>> +				   const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
>> +{
>> +	return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_pci_bottom_mask(struct irq_data *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
>> +	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	if (pp->ops->msi_clear_irq)
>> +		pp->ops->msi_clear_irq(pp, data->hwirq);
> 
> Same thing. If you have to have that kind of indirection, then this is a
> different irqchip altogether. Also, see below for the coding-style.

We can have a different irqchip for each SoC specifc driver that needs it, but
the change would be bigger. I suggest that we keep the current method and get
every driver working properly using the new API and after that I can make a
second round of patches targetting these callbacks. What do you think?

> 
>> +	else {
>> +		ctrl = data->hwirq / 32;
>> +		res = ctrl * 12;
>> +		bit = data->hwirq % 32;
>> +
>> +		pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
>> +		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
>> +				    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_pci_bottom_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
>> +	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	if (pp->ops->msi_set_irq)
>> +		pp->ops->msi_set_irq(pp, data->hwirq);
>> +	else {
> 
> Coding-style:
> 
>         if (...) {
>         	...
>         } else {
> 
>> +		ctrl = data->hwirq / 32;
>> +		res = ctrl * 12;
>> +		bit = data->hwirq % 32;
>> +
>> +		pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
>> +		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
>> +				    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
>> +	}

Yes correct. I did not run the checkpatch, because I was more worried about the
functionality. I will run it next patch version.

>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct irq_chip dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
>> +	.name			= "DWPCI-MSI",
>> +	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= dw_pci_setup_msi_msg,
>> +	.irq_set_affinity	= dw_pci_msi_set_affinity,
>> +	.irq_mask		= dw_pci_bottom_mask,
>> +	.irq_unmask		= dw_pci_bottom_unmask,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
>> +				    unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs,
>> +				    void *args)
>> +{
>> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = domain->host_data;
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	unsigned long bit;
>> +	u32 i;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	bit = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(pp->msi_irq_in_use, pp->num_vectors, 0,
>> +					 nr_irqs, 0);
>> +
>> +	if (bit >= pp->num_vectors) {
>> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +		return -ENOSPC;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	bitmap_set(pp->msi_irq_in_use, bit, nr_irqs);
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
>> +		irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, bit + i,
>> +				    &dw_pci_msi_bottom_irq_chip,
>> +				    domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
>> +				    NULL, NULL);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
> 
> How does this work when you're using the indirection I've moaned about
> earlier? How can you guarantee that there are similar number of
> available vectors?

With MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI, this approach would work properly correct?

> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_pcie_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
>> +				    unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
>> +{
>> +	struct irq_data *data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
>> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +	bitmap_clear(pp->msi_irq_in_use, data->hwirq, nr_irqs);
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct irq_domain_ops dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops = {
>> +	.alloc	= dw_pcie_irq_domain_alloc,
>> +	.free	= dw_pcie_irq_domain_free,
>> +};
>> +
>> +int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>> +{
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
>> +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(pci->dev->of_node);
>> +
>> +	pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, pp->num_vectors,
>> +					       &dw_pcie_msi_domain_ops, pci);
>> +	if (!pp->irq_domain) {
>> +		dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	pp->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode,
>> +						   &dw_pcie_msi_domain_info,
>> +						   pp->irq_domain);
>> +	if (!pp->msi_domain) {
>> +		dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
>> +		irq_domain_remove(pp->irq_domain);
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void dw_pcie_free_msi(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +{
>> +	irq_set_chained_handler(pp->msi_irq, NULL);
>> +	irq_set_handler_data(pp->msi_irq, NULL);
>> +
>> +	irq_domain_remove(pp->msi_domain);
>> +	irq_domain_remove(pp->irq_domain);
>> +}
>> +
>>  void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	u64 msi_target;
>> @@ -97,13 +305,14 @@ void dw_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  
>>  static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>>  {
>> -	unsigned int res, bit, val;
>> +	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
>>  
>> -	res = (irq / 32) * 12;
>> +	ctrl = irq / 32;
>> +	res = ctrl * 12;
>>  	bit = irq % 32;
>> -	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
>> -	val &= ~(1 << bit);
>> -	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
>> +	pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
>> +	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
>> +			    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
>> @@ -125,13 +334,14 @@ static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
>>  
>>  static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>>  {
>> -	unsigned int res, bit, val;
>> +	unsigned int res, bit, ctrl;
>>  
>> -	res = (irq / 32) * 12;
>> +	ctrl = irq / 32;
>> +	res = ctrl * 12;
>>  	bit = irq % 32;
>> -	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val);
>> -	val |= 1 << bit;
>> -	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val);
>> +	pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
>> +	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,
>> +			    pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
>> @@ -279,11 +489,14 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>> +	struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
>>  	struct pci_bus *bus, *child;
>>  	struct resource *cfg_res;
>>  	int i, ret;
>> +
>>  	LIST_HEAD(res);
>> -	struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_init(&pci->pp.lock);
>>  
>>  	cfg_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "config");
>>  	if (cfg_res) {
>> @@ -378,17 +591,18 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  
>>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
>>  		if (!pp->ops->msi_host_init) {
>> -			pp->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
>> -						MAX_MSI_IRQS, &msi_domain_ops,
>> -						&dw_pcie_msi_chip);
>> -			if (!pp->irq_domain) {
>> -				dev_err(dev, "irq domain init failed\n");
>> -				ret = -ENXIO;
>> +			ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-vectors",
>> +						   &pp->num_vectors);
>> +			if (ret)
>> +				pp->num_vectors = 1;
> 
> 1? As in "one bit only"? Is that a valid configuration? Also, all of
> this code seems to assume a maximum number of 32 MSIs. Is that a real
> limitation? Because if that's the case, you can drop all the stuff about
> ctrl and the '* 12' offset all over the code.

The IP is capable of handling 256, distributed by 8 registers of 32-bit (shifted
by 12). For now the driver is hardcoded to handle 32 and so you have ctrl = 1 (1
register).

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 

Thanks,
Joao

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-22  9:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-15 17:03 [RFC v2 0/8] add new irq api to pcie-designware Joao Pinto
2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 1/8] pci: adding new irq api to pci-designware Joao Pinto
2017-05-21  8:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-05-22  9:24     ` Joao Pinto
2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 2/8] pci: exynos SoC driver adapted to new irq API Joao Pinto
2017-05-18 18:50   ` Jingoo Han
2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 3/8] pci: imx6 " Joao Pinto
2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 4/8] pci: artpec6 " Joao Pinto
2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 5/8] pci: generic PCIe DW " Joao Pinto
2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 6/8] pci: qcom SoC " Joao Pinto
2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 7/8] pci: keystone " Joao Pinto
2017-05-15 17:03 ` [RFC v2 8/8] pci: removing old irq api from pcie-designware Joao Pinto

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.