* [RFC][PATCH V6][PATCH 0/4] btrfs: allocation_hint mode
@ 2021-02-22 21:19 Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-02-22 21:22 ` [RFC][PATCH V7][PATCH " Goffredo Baroncelli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Goffredo Baroncelli @ 2021-02-22 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Goffredo Baroncelli, Josef Bacik, Zygo Blaxell
Hi all,
This patches set was born after some discussion between me, Zygo and Josef.
Some details can be found in https://github.com/btrfs/btrfs-todo/issues/19.
Some further information about a real use case can be found in
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210116002533.GE31381@hungrycats.org/
The idea behind this patches set, is to dedicate some disks (the fastest one)
to the metadata chunk. My initial idea was a "soft" hint. However Zygo
asked an option for a "strong" hint (== mandatory). The result is that
each disk can be "tagged" by one of the following flags:
- BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_METADATA_ONLY
- BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_PREFERRED_METADATA
- BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_PREFERRED_DATA
- BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_DATA_ONLY
When the chunk allocator search a disks to allocate a chunk, scans the disks
in an order decided by these tags. For metadata, the order is:
*_METADATA_ONLY
*_PREFERRED_METADATA
*_PREFERRED_DATA
The *_DATA_ONLY are not eligible from metadata chunk allocation.
For the data chunk, the order is reversed, and the *_METADATA_ONLY are
excluded.
The exact sort logic is to sort first for the "tag", and then for the space
available. If there is no space available, the next "tag" disks set are
selected.
To set these tags, a new property called "allocation_hint" was created.
There is a dedicated btrfs-prog patches set [[PATCH V5] btrfs-progs:
allocation_hint disk property].
$ sudo mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/test-btrfs/
$ for i in /dev/loop[0-9]; do sudo ./btrfs prop get $i allocation_hint; done
devid=1, path=/dev/loop0: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_METADATA
devid=2, path=/dev/loop1: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_METADATA
devid=3, path=/dev/loop2: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
devid=4, path=/dev/loop3: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
devid=5, path=/dev/loop4: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
devid=6, path=/dev/loop5: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
devid=7, path=/dev/loop6: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
devid=8, path=/dev/loop7: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
$ sudo ./btrfs fi us /mnt/test-btrfs/
Overall:
Device size: 2.75GiB
Device allocated: 1.34GiB
Device unallocated: 1.41GiB
Device missing: 0.00B
Used: 400.89MiB
Free (estimated): 1.04GiB (min: 1.04GiB)
Data ratio: 2.00
Metadata ratio: 1.00
Global reserve: 3.25MiB (used: 0.00B)
Multiple profiles: no
Data,RAID1: Size:542.00MiB, Used:200.25MiB (36.95%)
/dev/loop0 288.00MiB
/dev/loop1 288.00MiB
/dev/loop2 127.00MiB
/dev/loop3 127.00MiB
/dev/loop4 127.00MiB
/dev/loop5 127.00MiB
Metadata,single: Size:256.00MiB, Used:384.00KiB (0.15%)
/dev/loop1 256.00MiB
System,single: Size:32.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB (0.05%)
/dev/loop0 32.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/loop0 704.00MiB
/dev/loop1 480.00MiB
/dev/loop2 1.00MiB
/dev/loop3 1.00MiB
/dev/loop4 1.00MiB
/dev/loop5 1.00MiB
/dev/loop6 128.00MiB
/dev/loop7 128.00MiB
# change the tag of some disks
$ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop0 allocation_hint DATA_ONLY
$ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop1 allocation_hint DATA_ONLY
$ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop5 allocation_hint METADATA_ONLY
$ for i in /dev/loop[0-9]; do sudo ./btrfs prop get $i allocation_hint; done
devid=1, path=/dev/loop0: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
devid=2, path=/dev/loop1: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
devid=3, path=/dev/loop2: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
devid=4, path=/dev/loop3: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
devid=5, path=/dev/loop4: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
devid=6, path=/dev/loop5: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
devid=7, path=/dev/loop6: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
devid=8, path=/dev/loop7: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
$ sudo btrfs bal start --full-balance /mnt/test-btrfs/
$ sudo ./btrfs fi us /mnt/test-btrfs/
Overall:
Device size: 2.75GiB
Device allocated: 735.00MiB
Device unallocated: 2.03GiB
Device missing: 0.00B
Used: 400.72MiB
Free (estimated): 1.10GiB (min: 1.10GiB)
Data ratio: 2.00
Metadata ratio: 1.00
Global reserve: 3.25MiB (used: 0.00B)
Multiple profiles: no
Data,RAID1: Size:288.00MiB, Used:200.19MiB (69.51%)
/dev/loop0 288.00MiB
/dev/loop1 288.00MiB
Metadata,single: Size:127.00MiB, Used:336.00KiB (0.26%)
/dev/loop5 127.00MiB
System,single: Size:32.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB (0.05%)
/dev/loop7 32.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/loop0 736.00MiB
/dev/loop1 736.00MiB
/dev/loop2 128.00MiB
/dev/loop3 128.00MiB
/dev/loop4 128.00MiB
/dev/loop5 1.00MiB
/dev/loop6 128.00MiB
/dev/loop7 96.00MiB
#As you can see all the metadata were placed on the disk loop5/loop7 even if
#the most empty one are loop0 and loop1.
TODO:
- more tests
- the tool which show the space available should consider the tagging (
the disks tagged by _METADATA_ONLY should be excluded from the data
availability)
Comments are welcome
BR
G.Baroncelli
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
Revision:
V7:
- make more room in the struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_properties up to 1K
- leave in btrfs_tree.h only the costants
- removed the mount option (sic)
- correct an 'use before check' in the while loop (signaled
by Zygo)
- add a 2nd sort to be sure that the device_info array is in the
expected order
V6:
- add further values to the hints: add the possibility to
exclude a disk for a chunk type
btrfs: add ioctl BTRFS_IOC_DEV_PROPERTIES.
btrfs: add flags to give an hint to the chunk allocator
btrfs: export dev_item.type in
/sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/devinfo/<devid>/type
btrfs: add allocator_hint mode
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 11 +++++
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 3 ++
include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 39 +++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 14 ++++++
6 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.30.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH V7][PATCH 0/4] btrfs: allocation_hint mode
2021-02-22 21:19 [RFC][PATCH V6][PATCH 0/4] btrfs: allocation_hint mode Goffredo Baroncelli
@ 2021-02-22 21:22 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-02-22 21:34 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Goffredo Baroncelli @ 2021-02-22 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Goffredo Baroncelli, linux-btrfs; +Cc: Josef Bacik, Zygo Blaxell
Sorry, the subject is wrong, it should be [RFC][PATCH V7][PATCH 0/4] btrfs: allocation_hint mode (seven instead six)
On 2/22/21 10:19 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patches set was born after some discussion between me, Zygo and Josef.
> Some details can be found in https://github.com/btrfs/btrfs-todo/issues/19.
>
> Some further information about a real use case can be found in
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210116002533.GE31381@hungrycats.org/
>
> The idea behind this patches set, is to dedicate some disks (the fastest one)
> to the metadata chunk. My initial idea was a "soft" hint. However Zygo
> asked an option for a "strong" hint (== mandatory). The result is that
> each disk can be "tagged" by one of the following flags:
> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_METADATA_ONLY
> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_PREFERRED_METADATA
> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_PREFERRED_DATA
> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_DATA_ONLY
>
> When the chunk allocator search a disks to allocate a chunk, scans the disks
> in an order decided by these tags. For metadata, the order is:
> *_METADATA_ONLY
> *_PREFERRED_METADATA
> *_PREFERRED_DATA
>
> The *_DATA_ONLY are not eligible from metadata chunk allocation.
>
> For the data chunk, the order is reversed, and the *_METADATA_ONLY are
> excluded.
>
> The exact sort logic is to sort first for the "tag", and then for the space
> available. If there is no space available, the next "tag" disks set are
> selected.
>
> To set these tags, a new property called "allocation_hint" was created.
> There is a dedicated btrfs-prog patches set [[PATCH V5] btrfs-progs:
> allocation_hint disk property].
>
> $ sudo mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/test-btrfs/
> $ for i in /dev/loop[0-9]; do sudo ./btrfs prop get $i allocation_hint; done
> devid=1, path=/dev/loop0: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_METADATA
> devid=2, path=/dev/loop1: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_METADATA
> devid=3, path=/dev/loop2: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
> devid=4, path=/dev/loop3: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
> devid=5, path=/dev/loop4: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
> devid=6, path=/dev/loop5: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
> devid=7, path=/dev/loop6: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
> devid=8, path=/dev/loop7: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
>
> $ sudo ./btrfs fi us /mnt/test-btrfs/
> Overall:
> Device size: 2.75GiB
> Device allocated: 1.34GiB
> Device unallocated: 1.41GiB
> Device missing: 0.00B
> Used: 400.89MiB
> Free (estimated): 1.04GiB (min: 1.04GiB)
> Data ratio: 2.00
> Metadata ratio: 1.00
> Global reserve: 3.25MiB (used: 0.00B)
> Multiple profiles: no
>
> Data,RAID1: Size:542.00MiB, Used:200.25MiB (36.95%)
> /dev/loop0 288.00MiB
> /dev/loop1 288.00MiB
> /dev/loop2 127.00MiB
> /dev/loop3 127.00MiB
> /dev/loop4 127.00MiB
> /dev/loop5 127.00MiB
>
> Metadata,single: Size:256.00MiB, Used:384.00KiB (0.15%)
> /dev/loop1 256.00MiB
>
> System,single: Size:32.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB (0.05%)
> /dev/loop0 32.00MiB
>
> Unallocated:
> /dev/loop0 704.00MiB
> /dev/loop1 480.00MiB
> /dev/loop2 1.00MiB
> /dev/loop3 1.00MiB
> /dev/loop4 1.00MiB
> /dev/loop5 1.00MiB
> /dev/loop6 128.00MiB
> /dev/loop7 128.00MiB
>
> # change the tag of some disks
>
> $ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop0 allocation_hint DATA_ONLY
> $ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop1 allocation_hint DATA_ONLY
> $ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop5 allocation_hint METADATA_ONLY
>
> $ for i in /dev/loop[0-9]; do sudo ./btrfs prop get $i allocation_hint; done
> devid=1, path=/dev/loop0: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
> devid=2, path=/dev/loop1: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
> devid=3, path=/dev/loop2: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
> devid=4, path=/dev/loop3: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
> devid=5, path=/dev/loop4: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
> devid=6, path=/dev/loop5: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
> devid=7, path=/dev/loop6: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
> devid=8, path=/dev/loop7: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
>
> $ sudo btrfs bal start --full-balance /mnt/test-btrfs/
> $ sudo ./btrfs fi us /mnt/test-btrfs/
> Overall:
> Device size: 2.75GiB
> Device allocated: 735.00MiB
> Device unallocated: 2.03GiB
> Device missing: 0.00B
> Used: 400.72MiB
> Free (estimated): 1.10GiB (min: 1.10GiB)
> Data ratio: 2.00
> Metadata ratio: 1.00
> Global reserve: 3.25MiB (used: 0.00B)
> Multiple profiles: no
>
> Data,RAID1: Size:288.00MiB, Used:200.19MiB (69.51%)
> /dev/loop0 288.00MiB
> /dev/loop1 288.00MiB
>
> Metadata,single: Size:127.00MiB, Used:336.00KiB (0.26%)
> /dev/loop5 127.00MiB
>
> System,single: Size:32.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB (0.05%)
> /dev/loop7 32.00MiB
>
> Unallocated:
> /dev/loop0 736.00MiB
> /dev/loop1 736.00MiB
> /dev/loop2 128.00MiB
> /dev/loop3 128.00MiB
> /dev/loop4 128.00MiB
> /dev/loop5 1.00MiB
> /dev/loop6 128.00MiB
> /dev/loop7 96.00MiB
>
>
> #As you can see all the metadata were placed on the disk loop5/loop7 even if
> #the most empty one are loop0 and loop1.
>
>
>
> TODO:
> - more tests
> - the tool which show the space available should consider the tagging (
> the disks tagged by _METADATA_ONLY should be excluded from the data
> availability)
>
>
> Comments are welcome
> BR
> G.Baroncelli
>
> --
> gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
>
> Revision:
> V7:
> - make more room in the struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_properties up to 1K
> - leave in btrfs_tree.h only the costants
> - removed the mount option (sic)
> - correct an 'use before check' in the while loop (signaled
> by Zygo)
> - add a 2nd sort to be sure that the device_info array is in the
> expected order
>
> V6:
> - add further values to the hints: add the possibility to
> exclude a disk for a chunk type
>
> btrfs: add ioctl BTRFS_IOC_DEV_PROPERTIES.
> btrfs: add flags to give an hint to the chunk allocator
> btrfs: export dev_item.type in
> /sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/devinfo/<devid>/type
> btrfs: add allocator_hint mode
>
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 11 +++++
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 3 ++
> include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 39 +++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 14 ++++++
> 6 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH V7][PATCH 0/4] btrfs: allocation_hint mode
2021-02-22 21:22 ` [RFC][PATCH V7][PATCH " Goffredo Baroncelli
@ 2021-02-22 21:34 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Goffredo Baroncelli @ 2021-02-22 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zygo Blaxell; +Cc: Josef Bacik, linux-btrfs
Hi Zygo,
if you are using the previous patches set, pay attention that there is a bug in the previous iteration (V5 and V6) which could cause the crash of btrfs.
BR
G.Baroncelli
On 2/22/21 10:22 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Sorry, the subject is wrong, it should be [RFC][PATCH V7][PATCH 0/4] btrfs: allocation_hint mode (seven instead six)
>
> On 2/22/21 10:19 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patches set was born after some discussion between me, Zygo and Josef.
>> Some details can be found in https://github.com/btrfs/btrfs-todo/issues/19.
>>
>> Some further information about a real use case can be found in
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210116002533.GE31381@hungrycats.org/
>>
>> The idea behind this patches set, is to dedicate some disks (the fastest one)
>> to the metadata chunk. My initial idea was a "soft" hint. However Zygo
>> asked an option for a "strong" hint (== mandatory). The result is that
>> each disk can be "tagged" by one of the following flags:
>> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_METADATA_ONLY
>> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_PREFERRED_METADATA
>> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_PREFERRED_DATA
>> - BTRFS_DEV_ALLOCATION_DATA_ONLY
>>
>> When the chunk allocator search a disks to allocate a chunk, scans the disks
>> in an order decided by these tags. For metadata, the order is:
>> *_METADATA_ONLY
>> *_PREFERRED_METADATA
>> *_PREFERRED_DATA
>>
>> The *_DATA_ONLY are not eligible from metadata chunk allocation.
>>
>> For the data chunk, the order is reversed, and the *_METADATA_ONLY are
>> excluded.
>>
>> The exact sort logic is to sort first for the "tag", and then for the space
>> available. If there is no space available, the next "tag" disks set are
>> selected.
>>
>> To set these tags, a new property called "allocation_hint" was created.
>> There is a dedicated btrfs-prog patches set [[PATCH V5] btrfs-progs:
>> allocation_hint disk property].
>>
>> $ sudo mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/test-btrfs/
>> $ for i in /dev/loop[0-9]; do sudo ./btrfs prop get $i allocation_hint; done
>> devid=1, path=/dev/loop0: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_METADATA
>> devid=2, path=/dev/loop1: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_METADATA
>> devid=3, path=/dev/loop2: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
>> devid=4, path=/dev/loop3: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
>> devid=5, path=/dev/loop4: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
>> devid=6, path=/dev/loop5: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
>> devid=7, path=/dev/loop6: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
>> devid=8, path=/dev/loop7: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
>>
>> $ sudo ./btrfs fi us /mnt/test-btrfs/
>> Overall:
>> Device size: 2.75GiB
>> Device allocated: 1.34GiB
>> Device unallocated: 1.41GiB
>> Device missing: 0.00B
>> Used: 400.89MiB
>> Free (estimated): 1.04GiB (min: 1.04GiB)
>> Data ratio: 2.00
>> Metadata ratio: 1.00
>> Global reserve: 3.25MiB (used: 0.00B)
>> Multiple profiles: no
>>
>> Data,RAID1: Size:542.00MiB, Used:200.25MiB (36.95%)
>> /dev/loop0 288.00MiB
>> /dev/loop1 288.00MiB
>> /dev/loop2 127.00MiB
>> /dev/loop3 127.00MiB
>> /dev/loop4 127.00MiB
>> /dev/loop5 127.00MiB
>>
>> Metadata,single: Size:256.00MiB, Used:384.00KiB (0.15%)
>> /dev/loop1 256.00MiB
>>
>> System,single: Size:32.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB (0.05%)
>> /dev/loop0 32.00MiB
>>
>> Unallocated:
>> /dev/loop0 704.00MiB
>> /dev/loop1 480.00MiB
>> /dev/loop2 1.00MiB
>> /dev/loop3 1.00MiB
>> /dev/loop4 1.00MiB
>> /dev/loop5 1.00MiB
>> /dev/loop6 128.00MiB
>> /dev/loop7 128.00MiB
>>
>> # change the tag of some disks
>>
>> $ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop0 allocation_hint DATA_ONLY
>> $ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop1 allocation_hint DATA_ONLY
>> $ sudo ./btrfs prop set /dev/loop5 allocation_hint METADATA_ONLY
>>
>> $ for i in /dev/loop[0-9]; do sudo ./btrfs prop get $i allocation_hint; done
>> devid=1, path=/dev/loop0: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
>> devid=2, path=/dev/loop1: allocation_hint=DATA_ONLY
>> devid=3, path=/dev/loop2: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
>> devid=4, path=/dev/loop3: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
>> devid=5, path=/dev/loop4: allocation_hint=PREFERRED_DATA
>> devid=6, path=/dev/loop5: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
>> devid=7, path=/dev/loop6: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
>> devid=8, path=/dev/loop7: allocation_hint=METADATA_ONLY
>>
>> $ sudo btrfs bal start --full-balance /mnt/test-btrfs/
>> $ sudo ./btrfs fi us /mnt/test-btrfs/
>> Overall:
>> Device size: 2.75GiB
>> Device allocated: 735.00MiB
>> Device unallocated: 2.03GiB
>> Device missing: 0.00B
>> Used: 400.72MiB
>> Free (estimated): 1.10GiB (min: 1.10GiB)
>> Data ratio: 2.00
>> Metadata ratio: 1.00
>> Global reserve: 3.25MiB (used: 0.00B)
>> Multiple profiles: no
>>
>> Data,RAID1: Size:288.00MiB, Used:200.19MiB (69.51%)
>> /dev/loop0 288.00MiB
>> /dev/loop1 288.00MiB
>>
>> Metadata,single: Size:127.00MiB, Used:336.00KiB (0.26%)
>> /dev/loop5 127.00MiB
>>
>> System,single: Size:32.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB (0.05%)
>> /dev/loop7 32.00MiB
>>
>> Unallocated:
>> /dev/loop0 736.00MiB
>> /dev/loop1 736.00MiB
>> /dev/loop2 128.00MiB
>> /dev/loop3 128.00MiB
>> /dev/loop4 128.00MiB
>> /dev/loop5 1.00MiB
>> /dev/loop6 128.00MiB
>> /dev/loop7 96.00MiB
>>
>>
>> #As you can see all the metadata were placed on the disk loop5/loop7 even if
>> #the most empty one are loop0 and loop1.
>>
>>
>>
>> TODO:
>> - more tests
>> - the tool which show the space available should consider the tagging (
>> the disks tagged by _METADATA_ONLY should be excluded from the data
>> availability)
>>
>>
>> Comments are welcome
>> BR
>> G.Baroncelli
>>
>> --
>> gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
>> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
>>
>> Revision:
>> V7:
>> - make more room in the struct btrfs_ioctl_dev_properties up to 1K
>> - leave in btrfs_tree.h only the costants
>> - removed the mount option (sic)
>> - correct an 'use before check' in the while loop (signaled
>> by Zygo)
>> - add a 2nd sort to be sure that the device_info array is in the
>> expected order
>>
>> V6:
>> - add further values to the hints: add the possibility to
>> exclude a disk for a chunk type
>>
>> btrfs: add ioctl BTRFS_IOC_DEV_PROPERTIES.
>> btrfs: add flags to give an hint to the chunk allocator
>> btrfs: export dev_item.type in
>> /sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/devinfo/<devid>/type
>> btrfs: add allocator_hint mode
>>
>> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 11 +++++
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 3 ++
>> include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 39 +++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 14 ++++++
>> 6 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-22 21:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-22 21:19 [RFC][PATCH V6][PATCH 0/4] btrfs: allocation_hint mode Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-02-22 21:22 ` [RFC][PATCH V7][PATCH " Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-02-22 21:34 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.