All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/16] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 21:13:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d2ed8680-9b08-5adf-7310-64a57620394a@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMty3ZBdtC-PkT4UaqHF76iw4W4UogyAAJSYLcrHxQk4zz=47Q@mail.gmail.com>

>>> 2) For BAR support, lets place it as it is and support via spi-nor
>>
>> Problem is, it not desirable to use BAR as default because its not
>> stateless and does not work with all flash parts. OTOH, it seems like 4
>> byte addressing (stateless dedicated opcode or with enter/exit 4 byte
>> mode) seems to be standard.
>> Also, Linux doesn't support BAR and haven't seen any request for BAR
>> support. Why support additional feature and burden of maintaining when
>> it may not be needed.
>>
>> But if you insist, I just have to add BAR support back.
> 
> It's not about insistence, ie how we support since from long and
> u-boot bootloader project does in general. bootloader can be some
> certain boot difference functionalities unlike Linux, it's better not
> to compare u-boot with Linux in all cases.
> 
> Example we have SPI_TX_BYTE which usually not supported in Linux.
> Since it's ich controller specific and it require for bootloader to do
> byte tx on that specific controller, so we supported. Same for the
> case with the BAR, this specific controller(or supported boards) has
> been in U-Boot since from long and they do upstream well. So we need
> to support BAR in any case or we can find any alternative to work the
> same functionalities. (we tried before but ended-up adding BAR)
> 
How about this instead?

Lets use 4 byte addressing opcodes as default for >16MB flashes.
But if CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_BAR is enabled then, spi-nor layer will use BAR
registers for >16MB access instead of 4 byte addressing.
I will remove SPI_FLASH_BAR from defconfigs from all boards expect those
controllers that really cannot handle 4 byte addressing. From a quick
glance it looks following controllers support only 3 byte addresses:
stm32_qspi.c
ich.c
fsl_qspi.c
renesas_rpc_spi.c
mtk_qspi.c

So, except for boards with above controllers, I will remove
SPI_FLASH_BAR for all other boards. If there is a regression, then such
boards can go back to enabling CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_BAR.

AFAIU, above controller HWs(except ich) can support 4 byte addressing
but would need to move to spi-mem.



Regards
Vignesh
ex

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-15 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-12 17:32 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/16] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] spi: spi-mem: Allow use of spi_mem_exec_op for all SPI modes Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/16] spi-mem: Claim SPI bus before spi mem access Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/16] spi: Add non DM version of SPI_MEM Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:25   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 20:40     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 20:45       ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 21:02         ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 21:07           ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 21:25             ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 23:10               ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 23:20                 ` Tom Rini
2018-12-12 23:55                 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-14  9:59                   ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-04 21:28                     ` Simon Glass
2018-12-13  9:38               ` Vignesh R
2018-12-13  9:41                 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-12-13  8:50     ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 10:02       ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-14 10:57         ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 13:59           ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-28  6:57   ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-28  9:45     ` Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/16] sh: bitops: add hweight*() macros Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/16] mtd: spi: Port SPI NOR framework from Linux Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:31   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 22:56     ` Tom Rini
2018-12-12 23:21       ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-13  3:01         ` Tom Rini
2018-12-13  7:47           ` Stefan Roese
2018-12-13 11:44           ` Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/16] mtd: spi: Switch to new SPI NOR framework Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/16] mtd: spi: Remove unused files Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:38   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-13  9:07     ` Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/16] mtd: spi: Add lightweight SPI flash stack for SPL Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/16] sf_mtd: Simply mtd operations Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:31   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-13  2:11   ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2018-12-13  7:46   ` Stefan Roese
2018-12-13  8:24   ` Vignesh R
2018-12-13  9:40     ` Stefan Roese
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/16] configs: Get rid of SPI_FLASH_BAR Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:41   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 20:51     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 20:54     ` Simon Goldschmidt
2018-12-13 10:41     ` Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/16] configs: Remove SF_DUAL_FLASH Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:50   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/16] axm_defconfig: Enable simple malloc in SPL Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/16] taurus_defconfig: " Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/16] da850_am18xxevm: Enable tiny printf Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/16] turris_omnia_defconfig: " Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/16] MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for SPI NOR Vignesh R
2018-12-12 21:01   ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-14  8:03     ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 10:13 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/16] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework Jagan Teki
2018-12-14 15:54   ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 16:14     ` Simon Goldschmidt
2018-12-14 16:27       ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 16:38         ` Simon Goldschmidt
2018-12-14 16:42           ` Vignesh R
2018-12-15 13:59             ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-15 14:42               ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-15  6:31         ` Stefan Roese
2018-12-15 13:54     ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-15 15:43       ` Vignesh R
2018-12-18 12:32         ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-18 17:19           ` Vignesh R
2018-12-21  8:55             ` Ashish Kumar
2018-12-15 15:43       ` Vignesh R [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d2ed8680-9b08-5adf-7310-64a57620394a@ti.com \
    --to=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.