All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
@ 2020-10-11 16:13 David Rubio
  2020-10-12 18:12 ` Brian Norris
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: David Rubio @ 2020-10-11 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-wireless

On the kernel 5.9 there's support for the RTL8821CE chipset, but my
variant seems to not be supported:

Oct 11 12:20:39 youmu kernel: rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: rfe 2 isn't supported
Oct 11 12:20:39 youmu kernel: rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: failed to setup
chip efuse info
Oct 11 12:20:39 youmu kernel: rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: failed to setup
chip information


If you need any further information please reply with what steps I should take.
There's no wifi working at all here, and those are all of the messages I get.

Thanks you!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-11 16:13 rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported David Rubio
@ 2020-10-12 18:12 ` Brian Norris
  2020-10-13  2:11   ` Andy Huang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2020-10-12 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Rubio; +Cc: linux-wireless, Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 9:13 AM David Rubio
<david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oct 11 12:20:39 youmu kernel: rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: rfe 2 isn't supported

I'm not sure anything changed since the last time this came up:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/

I think this needs somebody from Realtek to look, or else ignore the
objections and merge the sub-optimal (trivial) patch. I'm not sure of
the ramifications of doing the latter.

Brian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* RE: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-12 18:12 ` Brian Norris
@ 2020-10-13  2:11   ` Andy Huang
  2020-10-13  2:37     ` Larry Finger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Andy Huang @ 2020-10-13  2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Brian Norris', David Rubio
  Cc: linux-wireless, Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

The support for RFE type 2 of 8821ce, the patches are ready, but we need to do some verifications. After the verification it will be upload.

Tzu-En

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:13 AM
To: David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@gmail.com>; Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 9:13 AM David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oct 11 12:20:39 youmu kernel: rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: rfe 2 isn't 
> supported

I'm not sure anything changed since the last time this came up:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/

I think this needs somebody from Realtek to look, or else ignore the objections and merge the sub-optimal (trivial) patch. I'm not sure of the ramifications of doing the latter.

Brian

------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-13  2:11   ` Andy Huang
@ 2020-10-13  2:37     ` Larry Finger
  2020-10-16 18:42       ` David Rubio
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2020-10-13  2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Huang, 'Brian Norris', David Rubio
  Cc: linux-wireless, Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

On 10/12/20 9:11 PM, Andy Huang wrote:
> The support for RFE type 2 of 8821ce, the patches are ready, but we need to do some verifications. After the verification it will be upload.
> 
> Tzu-En
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:13 AM
> To: David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@gmail.com>; Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> Subject: Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
> 
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 9:13 AM David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oct 11 12:20:39 youmu kernel: rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: rfe 2 isn't
>> supported
> 
> I'm not sure anything changed since the last time this came up:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/
> 
> I think this needs somebody from Realtek to look, or else ignore the objections and merge the sub-optimal (trivial) patch. I'm not sure of the ramifications of doing the latter.
> 

Once the patches are uploaded, I will merge them with rtw88 at GitHub.

Larry


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-13  2:37     ` Larry Finger
@ 2020-10-16 18:42       ` David Rubio
  2020-10-18  9:11         ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: David Rubio @ 2020-10-16 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger
  Cc: Andy Huang, Brian Norris, linux-wireless, Yan-Hsuan Chuang,
	Kai-Heng Feng

> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/

I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
BT device paired breaks?)

Thanks for making me aware of it!
- Kodehawa

El lun., 12 oct. 2020 a las 23:37, Larry Finger
(<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>) escribió:
>
> On 10/12/20 9:11 PM, Andy Huang wrote:
> > The support for RFE type 2 of 8821ce, the patches are ready, but we need to do some verifications. After the verification it will be upload.
> >
> > Tzu-En
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:13 AM
> > To: David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com>
> > Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@gmail.com>; Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > Subject: Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 9:13 AM David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Oct 11 12:20:39 youmu kernel: rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: rfe 2 isn't
> >> supported
> >
> > I'm not sure anything changed since the last time this came up:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/
> >
> > I think this needs somebody from Realtek to look, or else ignore the objections and merge the sub-optimal (trivial) patch. I'm not sure of the ramifications of doing the latter.
> >
>
> Once the patches are uploaded, I will merge them with rtw88 at GitHub.
>
> Larry
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-16 18:42       ` David Rubio
@ 2020-10-18  9:11         ` Kalle Valo
  2020-10-18 22:51           ` David Rubio
  2020-10-19 17:10           ` Larry Finger
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-10-18  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Rubio
  Cc: Larry Finger, Andy Huang, Brian Norris, linux-wireless,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:

>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/
>
> I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
> to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
> though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
> understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
> BT device paired breaks?)

If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex
issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple
reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11.

I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to
wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.30092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-18  9:11         ` Kalle Valo
@ 2020-10-18 22:51           ` David Rubio
  2020-10-19  7:37             ` Kalle Valo
  2020-10-19 17:10           ` Larry Finger
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: David Rubio @ 2020-10-18 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kalle Valo
  Cc: Larry Finger, Andy Huang, Brian Norris, linux-wireless,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

There's no possibility of including it on 5.10 changes? Seems like a
trivial patch
Or did the merge window pass already? I'm not aware of it by now.

Thanks though. Very much appreciated.

El dom., 18 oct. 2020 a las 6:11, Kalle Valo (<kvalo@codeaurora.org>) escribió:
>
> David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/
> >
> > I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
> > to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
> > though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
> > understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
> > BT device paired breaks?)
>
> If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex
> issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple
> reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11.
>
> I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to
> wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.30092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/
>
> --
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-18 22:51           ` David Rubio
@ 2020-10-19  7:37             ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-10-19  7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Rubio
  Cc: Larry Finger, Andy Huang, Brian Norris, linux-wireless,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:

> There's no possibility of including it on 5.10 changes? Seems like a
> trivial patch Or did the merge window pass already? I'm not aware of
> it by now.

wireless-drivers-next goes via net-next and the deadline for net-next is
before the merge window opens, so it's too late for v5.10.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-18  9:11         ` Kalle Valo
  2020-10-18 22:51           ` David Rubio
@ 2020-10-19 17:10           ` Larry Finger
  2020-10-19 17:42             ` David Rubio
  2020-10-22  5:53             ` Kalle Valo
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2020-10-19 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kalle Valo, David Rubio
  Cc: Andy Huang, Brian Norris, linux-wireless, Yan-Hsuan Chuang,
	Kai-Heng Feng

On 10/18/20 4:11 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/
>>
>> I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
>> to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
>> though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
>> understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
>> BT device paired breaks?)
> 
> If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex
> issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple
> reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11.
> 
> I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to
> wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.30092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/

Kalle,

I had generated and applied that trivial patch to my GitHub repo with the rtw88 
drivers a couple of months ago. Yes, it does get the user past the 
initialization check; however, wifi performance is abysmal according the the 
users of the repo. It seems that the antenna selection of rfe 2 models affects 
wifi as well as BT. Applying this patch will get wifi running; however, the 
users will need to be within 1 m of the AP for it to work! I do not have an 
RTL8821CE chip, thus I have not tested myself.

Larry


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-19 17:10           ` Larry Finger
@ 2020-10-19 17:42             ` David Rubio
  2020-10-21  3:41               ` Andy Huang
  2020-10-22  5:53             ` Kalle Valo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: David Rubio @ 2020-10-19 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger
  Cc: Kalle Valo, Andy Huang, Brian Norris, linux-wireless,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

Makes sense I guess. My room is 7m^2 so can't test beyond that.
Small room issues, or well, not issues, I guess.

- Kodehawa

El lun., 19 oct. 2020 a las 14:10, Larry Finger
(<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>) escribió:
>
> On 10/18/20 4:11 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/
> >>
> >> I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
> >> to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
> >> though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
> >> understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
> >> BT device paired breaks?)
> >
> > If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex
> > issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple
> > reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11.
> >
> > I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to
> > wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens:
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.30092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/
>
> Kalle,
>
> I had generated and applied that trivial patch to my GitHub repo with the rtw88
> drivers a couple of months ago. Yes, it does get the user past the
> initialization check; however, wifi performance is abysmal according the the
> users of the repo. It seems that the antenna selection of rfe 2 models affects
> wifi as well as BT. Applying this patch will get wifi running; however, the
> users will need to be within 1 m of the AP for it to work! I do not have an
> RTL8821CE chip, thus I have not tested myself.
>
> Larry
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* RE: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-19 17:42             ` David Rubio
@ 2020-10-21  3:41               ` Andy Huang
  2020-10-21 14:12                 ` David Rubio
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Andy Huang @ 2020-10-21  3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'David Rubio', Larry Finger
  Cc: Kalle Valo, Brian Norris, linux-wireless, Yan-Hsuan Chuang,
	Kai-Heng Feng


David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes,
> 
> Makes sense I guess. My room is 7m^2 so can't test beyond that.
> Small room issues, or well, not issues, I guess.
> 
> - Kodehawa
> 
> El lun., 19 oct. 2020 a las 14:10, Larry Finger
> (<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>) escribió:
> >
> > On 10/18/20 4:11 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > >>>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@r
> ealtek.com/
> > >>
> > >> I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
> > >> to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
> > >> though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
> > >> understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
> > >> BT device paired breaks?)
> > >
> > > If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex
> > > issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple
> > > reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11.
> > >
> > > I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to
> > > wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens:
> > >
> > >
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.30
> 092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/
> >
> > Kalle,
> >
> > I had generated and applied that trivial patch to my GitHub repo with the
> rtw88
> > drivers a couple of months ago. Yes, it does get the user past the
> > initialization check; however, wifi performance is abysmal according the the
> > users of the repo. It seems that the antenna selection of rfe 2 models affects
> > wifi as well as BT. Applying this patch will get wifi running; however, the
> > users will need to be within 1 m of the AP for it to work! I do not have an
> > RTL8821CE chip, thus I have not tested myself.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> 
David,

What is the band for the test, 2.4GHz or 5GHz?
Without setting to a correct rf module for RFE type 2, you might encounter some
problems on 2.4GHz band.
In my test, on 2.4GHz band, with the wrong setting, it could not connect to an AP.

Tzu-En

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-21  3:41               ` Andy Huang
@ 2020-10-21 14:12                 ` David Rubio
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: David Rubio @ 2020-10-21 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Huang
  Cc: Larry Finger, Kalle Valo, Brian Norris, linux-wireless,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

5GHz. Haven't really tried 2.4GHz.

So basically with that patch, 5GHz works ok-ish, and 2.4GHz is broken?

- Kodehawa

El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 0:41, Andy Huang (<tehuang@realtek.com>) escribió:
>
>
> David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes,
> >
> > Makes sense I guess. My room is 7m^2 so can't test beyond that.
> > Small room issues, or well, not issues, I guess.
> >
> > - Kodehawa
> >
> > El lun., 19 oct. 2020 a las 14:10, Larry Finger
> > (<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>) escribió:
> > >
> > > On 10/18/20 4:11 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > > David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:
> > > >
> > > >>>
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@r
> > ealtek.com/
> > > >>
> > > >> I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
> > > >> to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
> > > >> though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
> > > >> understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
> > > >> BT device paired breaks?)
> > > >
> > > > If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex
> > > > issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple
> > > > reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11.
> > > >
> > > > I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to
> > > > wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens:
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.30
> > 092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/
> > >
> > > Kalle,
> > >
> > > I had generated and applied that trivial patch to my GitHub repo with the
> > rtw88
> > > drivers a couple of months ago. Yes, it does get the user past the
> > > initialization check; however, wifi performance is abysmal according the the
> > > users of the repo. It seems that the antenna selection of rfe 2 models affects
> > > wifi as well as BT. Applying this patch will get wifi running; however, the
> > > users will need to be within 1 m of the AP for it to work! I do not have an
> > > RTL8821CE chip, thus I have not tested myself.
> > >
> > > Larry
> > >
> >
> David,
>
> What is the band for the test, 2.4GHz or 5GHz?
> Without setting to a correct rf module for RFE type 2, you might encounter some
> problems on 2.4GHz band.
> In my test, on 2.4GHz band, with the wrong setting, it could not connect to an AP.
>
> Tzu-En

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-19 17:10           ` Larry Finger
  2020-10-19 17:42             ` David Rubio
@ 2020-10-22  5:53             ` Kalle Valo
  2020-10-22 15:53               ` Larry Finger
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-10-22  5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger
  Cc: David Rubio, Andy Huang, Brian Norris, linux-wireless,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> writes:

> On 10/18/20 4:11 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82@realtek.com/
>>>
>>> I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
>>> to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
>>> though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
>>> understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
>>> BT device paired breaks?)
>>
>> If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex
>> issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple
>> reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11.
>>
>> I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to
>> wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens:
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.30092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/
>
> Kalle,
>
> I had generated and applied that trivial patch to my GitHub repo with
> the rtw88 drivers a couple of months ago. Yes, it does get the user
> past the initialization check; however, wifi performance is abysmal
> according the the users of the repo. It seems that the antenna
> selection of rfe 2 models affects wifi as well as BT. Applying this
> patch will get wifi running; however, the users will need to be within
> 1 m of the AP for it to work! I do not have an RTL8821CE chip, thus I
> have not tested myself.

Ok, I will drop the patch then. But it would be really nice to enable
even some level of support for rfe 2, can't we find some solution? Like
disabling 2.4 GHz band for that rfe or something?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-22  5:53             ` Kalle Valo
@ 2020-10-22 15:53               ` Larry Finger
  2020-10-23  3:13                 ` Andy Huang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2020-10-22 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kalle Valo
  Cc: David Rubio, Andy Huang, Brian Norris, linux-wireless,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang, Kai-Heng Feng

On 10/22/20 12:53 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Ok, I will drop the patch then. But it would be really nice to enable
> even some level of support for rfe 2, can't we find some solution? Like
> disabling 2.4 GHz band for that rfe or something?

The E-mail from Realtek 
(https://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=160255510004938&w=2) says that the 
patches are ready; however, they need to do some "verification". To me (without 
proof), that implies a regulatory problem, and it is better that we not enable 
rfe 2 without the official patches.

I hope those patches will be forthcoming very soon.

Larry

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* RE: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
  2020-10-22 15:53               ` Larry Finger
@ 2020-10-23  3:13                 ` Andy Huang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Andy Huang @ 2020-10-23  3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Larry Finger', Kalle Valo
  Cc: David Rubio, Brian Norris, linux-wireless, Yan-Hsuan Chuang,
	Kai-Heng Feng


From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Larry Finger
> 
> On 10/22/20 12:53 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Ok, I will drop the patch then. But it would be really nice to enable
> > even some level of support for rfe 2, can't we find some solution? Like
> > disabling 2.4 GHz band for that rfe or something?
> 
> The E-mail from Realtek
> (https://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=160255510004938&w=2) says that the
> patches are ready; however, they need to do some "verification". To me
> (without
> proof), that implies a regulatory problem, and it is better that we not enable
> rfe 2 without the official patches.
> 
> I hope those patches will be forthcoming very soon.
> 
> Larry
> 
The verification is not related to regulatory. It is that our QA team tests the some
functionalities (performance, BT coex etc.) of RFE type 2. If the test run successfully,
the patch will be sent in the next 2 weeks.

Tzu-En

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-23  3:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-11 16:13 rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported David Rubio
2020-10-12 18:12 ` Brian Norris
2020-10-13  2:11   ` Andy Huang
2020-10-13  2:37     ` Larry Finger
2020-10-16 18:42       ` David Rubio
2020-10-18  9:11         ` Kalle Valo
2020-10-18 22:51           ` David Rubio
2020-10-19  7:37             ` Kalle Valo
2020-10-19 17:10           ` Larry Finger
2020-10-19 17:42             ` David Rubio
2020-10-21  3:41               ` Andy Huang
2020-10-21 14:12                 ` David Rubio
2020-10-22  5:53             ` Kalle Valo
2020-10-22 15:53               ` Larry Finger
2020-10-23  3:13                 ` Andy Huang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.