Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Pavel Roskin]

Hello!

It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss.  The last valid
backup is for April.  Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details.

My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
mirrored by a cron job twice an hour.

Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to
switch to a git repository.  The git service is down now, but the status
report says it will be restarted soon:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-05/msg00023.html

Alternatively, we could convert the git repository at repo.or.cz to
Subversion.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[James Jarvis]

Hi Pavel,

If needed (unlikely) I have a checkout of Rev 2238 (2009-05-27).

Cheers,

James

Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss.  The last valid
> backup is for April.  Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details.
>
> My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
> mirrored by a cron job twice an hour.
>
> Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to
> switch to a git repository.  The git service is down now, but the status
> report says it will be restarted soon:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-05/msg00023.html
>
> Alternatively, we could convert the git repository at repo.or.cz to
> Subversion.
>
>   


-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Michael Gorven]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 391 bytes --]

On Monday 01 June 2009 15:37:23 Pavel Roskin wrote:
> My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
> mirrored by a cron job twice an hour.

I have a Bazaar repo up to r2240 (2009-05-28 22:08:33) and a Mercurial repo up 
to r2238 (Tue May 26 23:19:42) if it helps.

Michael

-- 
http://michael.gorven.za.net
PGP Key ID 6612FE85
S/MIME Key ID AAF09E0E

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko]

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss.  The last valid
> backup is for April.  Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details.
>
> My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
> mirrored by a cron job twice an hour.
>
> Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to
> switch to a git repository.  The git service is down now, but the status
> report says it will be restarted soon:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-05/msg00023.html
I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future
problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git
mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that
it doesn't give much benefit considering the effort. Now when it's
more effort to have a complete svn rather than git I think git is
better solution
>
> Alternatively, we could convert the git repository at repo.or.cz to
> Subversion.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Pavel Roskin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>



-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Pavel Roskin]

Quoting James Jarvis <James.Jarvis@ed.ac.uk>:

> Hi Pavel,
>
> If needed (unlikely) I have a checkout of Rev 2238 (2009-05-27).

The git repository ends at the revision 2240, which is newer.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Michael Gorven]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 739 bytes --]

On Monday 01 June 2009 16:22:12 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future
> problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git
> mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that
> it doesn't give much benefit considering the effort. Now when it's
> more effort to have a complete svn rather than git I think git is
> better solution

I've found Bazaar the nicest to work with out of the major DVCSs. I also think 
that it has the lowest learning curve from Subversion (e.g. bound branches 
basically behave like SVN checkouts).

Michael

-- 
http://michael.gorven.za.net
PGP Key ID 6612FE85
S/MIME Key ID AAF09E0E

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Otavio Salvador]

"Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" <phcoder@gmail.com> writes:

> I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future
> problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git
> mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that
> it doesn't give much benefit considering the effort. Now when it's
> more effort to have a complete svn rather than git I think git is
> better solution

+1 :-)

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko]

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Michael Gorven <michael@gorven.za.net> wrote:
> On Monday 01 June 2009 16:22:12 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future
>> problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git
>> mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that
>> it doesn't give much benefit considering the effort. Now when it's
>> more effort to have a complete svn rather than git I think git is
>> better solution
>
> I've found Bazaar the nicest to work with out of the major DVCSs. I also think
> that it has the lowest learning curve from Subversion (e.g. bound branches
> basically behave like SVN checkouts).
git has advantage of being supported on savannah
>
> Michael
>
> --
> http://michael.gorven.za.net
> PGP Key ID 6612FE85
> S/MIME Key ID AAF09E0E
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
>



-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Bruce O. Benson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 413 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <
phcoder@gmail.com> wrote:

> git has advantage of being supported on savannah
> >
>

Git is nice.
Also, any SCCS that has a secondary http method of access helps when
checkouts come from behind corporate firewalls.


-- 
Bruce O. Benson, mailto:bbenson@gmail.com | http://www.tux.org
Donating spare CPU to science: Folding@home Team Debian (#2019)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 808 bytes --]

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Felix Zielcke]

Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 09:37 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:

> 
> My git mirror git://repo.or.cz/grub2.git should be up-to-date, as it was
> mirrored by a cron job twice an hour.
> 

It is. The last commit made was by you with rev 2240
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/commit-grub/2009-05/index.html

By the way I linked now the git mirror in the wiki.
-- 
Felix Zielcke

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Colin Watson]

On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:59:05PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Michael Gorven <michael@gorven.za.net> wrote:
> > I've found Bazaar the nicest to work with out of the major DVCSs. I also think
> > that it has the lowest learning curve from Subversion (e.g. bound branches
> > basically behave like SVN checkouts).
> 
> git has advantage of being supported on savannah

Not that it's really any of my business, but just as a point of
information since you raised this as a point in git's favour over
Bazaar: Bazaar works fine on Savannah too. From another project:

  $ bzr push
  Using saved push location: bzr+ssh://bzr.sv.gnu.org/man-db/trunk

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@ubuntu.com]

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[David Miller]

From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:37:23 -0400

> Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to
> switch to a git repository.

Yes, please, let's do this :-)

RE: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Gregg C Levine]

Hello!
A suggestion. If we do indeed switch from subversion to git for a repository
then we'll need to post easy to use and understand instructions.

These instructions should include all of the steps necessary to create a
local one for the user, and how to manage it.

For myself I prefer subversion, but I am willing to work with this incoming
git one. Just anything except bitkeeper I had a heck of a lot of problems
with it.
--
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net
"The Force will be with you always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
  


> -----Original Message-----
> From: grub-devel-bounces+hansolofalcon=worldnet.att.net@gnu.org
[mailto:grub-devel-
> bounces+hansolofalcon=worldnet.att.net@gnu.org] On Behalf Of David Miller
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:12 PM
> To: grub-devel@gnu.org; proski@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org
> 
> From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:37:23 -0400
> 
> > Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to
> > switch to a git repository.
> 
> Yes, please, let's do this :-)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

RE: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Felix Zielcke]

Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 17:23 -0400 schrieb Gregg C Levine:
> Hello!
> A suggestion. If we do indeed switch from subversion to git for a repository
> then we'll need to post easy to use and understand instructions.
> 
> These instructions should include all of the steps necessary to create a
> local one for the user, and how to manage it.
> 
> For myself I prefer subversion, but I am willing to work with this incoming
> git one. Just anything except bitkeeper I had a heck of a lot of problems
> with it.


We could just link to http://git-scm.com/course/svn.html
There some other tutorials/guides too http://git-scm.com/documentation
-- 
Felix Zielcke

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Felix Zielcke]

Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 09:37 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> It looks like savannah.gnu.org has suffered a data loss.  The last
> valid
> backup is for April.  Please see http://savannah.gnu.org/ for details.
> 
> Since now having a repository affects out effectiveness, we may opt to
> switch to a git repository.  The git service is down now, but the
> status
> report says it will be restarted soon:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-05/msg00023.html

Savannah has recovered now:
https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=5828

I checked out both their SVN backups with rsync.
The April one seems to be really working but the incomplete May not:
$ svnadmin verify grub-new
svnadmin: No such revision 0
The April one is up to rev 2148.

So now we have to decide what to do.

Unfortunately Okuji already objected against git [0]
Though I don't understand why the 3-way merge could be a problem. With
SVN you even can't do local commits and with git you don't need to use
them if you have fear. Or even merging from other people like the Kernel
team does. We could still use it more like SVN.

[0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2007-12/msg00094.html
-- 
Felix Zielcke

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[David Miller]

From: Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:13:02 +0200

> Unfortunately Okuji already objected against git [0]

That was a year and a half ago, and how much has Okuji even made
postings to this mailing list lately?

Remind me what the definition of "maintainer" is?

I think the people actually doing the work of implementing things and
fixing bugs should make this decision, rather than someone who hasn't
the time to contribute in any way at all.

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Marco Gerards]

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:

> From: Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de>
> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:13:02 +0200
>
>> Unfortunately Okuji already objected against git [0]
>
> That was a year and a half ago, and how much has Okuji even made
> postings to this mailing list lately?
>
> Remind me what the definition of "maintainer" is?
>
> I think the people actually doing the work of implementing things and
> fixing bugs should make this decision, rather than someone who hasn't
> the time to contribute in any way at all.

No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did?  He
actually wrote all the intial code of GRUB 2 from scratch.

Besides that, a maintainer has to take care that the project remains a
true GNU project.

--
Marco

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[David Miller]

From: Marco Gerards <mgerards@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200

> No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did?  He
> actually wrote all the intial code of GRUB 2 from scratch.

RMS did the same for GCC, but now he concentrates his efforts
on other activities and doesn't pretend to be the GCC maintainer.

> Besides that, a maintainer has to take care that the project remains a
> true GNU project.

I think I know this, as I'm on the GCC steering committee since it's
inception.

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Felix Zielcke]

Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 13:54 -0700 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Marco Gerards <mgerards@xs4all.nl>
> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200
> 
> > No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did?  He
> > actually wrote all the intial code of GRUB 2 from scratch.
> 
> RMS did the same for GCC, but now he concentrates his efforts
> on other activities and doesn't pretend to be the GCC maintainer.


Okuji already said once [0] that he could add a new co-maintainer.
The only reply was from Robert [1] that he doestn't have time.
I wonder why I didn't reply. Well anyway I would have time but I don't
think I would be a good GNU maintainer, especially for reviewing other
patches. Ugh.

[0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-10/msg00114.html
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-11/msg00006.html
-- 
Felix Zielcke

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[David Miller]

From: Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:12:15 +0200

> Okuji already said once [0] that he could add a new co-maintainer.
> The only reply was from Robert [1] that he doestn't have time.
> I wonder why I didn't reply. Well anyway I would have time but I don't
> think I would be a good GNU maintainer, especially for reviewing other
> patches. Ugh.

Personally, I would be more than happy to see you in this role.

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko]

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 13:54 -0700 schrieb David Miller:
>> From: Marco Gerards <mgerards@xs4all.nl>
>> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:17:46 +0200
>>
>> > No offense, but didn't Okuji implement more than most of us did?  He
>> > actually wrote all the intial code of GRUB 2 from scratch.
>>
>> RMS did the same for GCC, but now he concentrates his efforts
>> on other activities and doesn't pretend to be the GCC maintainer.
>
>
> Okuji already said once [0] that he could add a new co-maintainer.
> The only reply was from Robert [1] that he doestn't have time.
> I wonder why I didn't reply. Well anyway I would have time but I don't
> think I would be a good GNU maintainer, especially for reviewing other
> patches. Ugh.
If I choose not to accelerate my studies I would have time to be a
co-maintainer. I like gnu and grub2 and hate to see the current state
of things. However I don't think I would be a good candidate: I have
only some knowledge of licensing and have only recently signed the
copyright assignment. If the community disagrees with the last
statement I would be happy to assume this role
>
> [0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-10/msg00114.html
> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-11/msg00006.html
> --
> Felix Zielcke
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>



-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Felix Zielcke]

Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Savannah has recovered now:
> https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=5828
> 
> I checked out both their SVN backups with rsync.
> The April one seems to be really working but the incomplete May not:
> $ svnadmin verify grub-new
> svnadmin: No such revision 0
> The April one is up to rev 2148.
> 
> So now we have to decide what to do.

Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0]

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html
I checked it out with rsync and verified it with `svnadmin verify'
It's up to rev 2238 so we only have to do 2 commits again.

-- 
Felix Zielcke

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Felix Zielcke]

Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> 
> Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0]
> 
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html
> I checked it out with rsync and verified it with `svnadmin verify'
> It's up to rev 2238 so we only have to do 2 commits again.

Just noticed that they actually even restored it to that backup.
I commited the 2 missing revs now, so we're back in business again.
-- 
Felix Zielcke

Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org

[Pavel Roskin]

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:51 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > 
> > Luckly they now found a working backup from May 27 [0]
> > 
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-users/2009-06/msg00027.html
> > I checked it out with rsync and verified it with `svnadmin verify'
> > It's up to rev 2238 so we only have to do 2 commits again.
> 
> Just noticed that they actually even restored it to that backup.
> I commited the 2 missing revs now, so we're back in business again.

Thank you!  The git mirroring is continuing.  Now back to coding.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin