All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: chunkuang.hu@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
	airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com,
	nfraprado@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] MediaTek DisplayPort: support eDP and aux-bus
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:38:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da4847bb-d4b1-7810-3b5f-1200596b19fd@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXv+5HzQhoz0OUhifQC0vr44O5VwvuYnsHSA2jK0FjwJT3OBA@mail.gmail.com>

Il 07/07/23 10:23, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:30 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>>   - Set data lanes to idle to prevent stalls if bootloader didn't
>>     properly close the eDP port
>>   - Now using the .done_probing() callback for AUX bus to prevent
>>     probe deferral loops in case the panel-edp driver is a module
>>     as previously seen with another bridge driver (ANX7625) on
>>     some other SoCs (MT8192 and others)
>>   - Rebased over next-20230706
>>   - Dropped Chen-Yu's T-b tag on last patch as some logic changed
>>     (before, I wasn't using the .done_probing() callback).
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>>   - Added DPTX AUX block initialization before trying to communicate
>>     to stop relying on the bootloader keeping it initialized before
>>     booting Linux.
>>   - Fixed commit description for patch [09/09] and removed commented
>>     out code (that slipped from dev phase.. sorry!).
>>
>> This series adds "real" support for eDP in the mtk-dp DisplayPort driver.
>>
>> Explaining the "real":
>> Before this change, the DisplayPort driver did support eDP to some
>> extent, but it was treating it entirely like a regular DP interface
>> which is partially fine, after all, embedded DisplayPort *is* actually
>> DisplayPort, but there might be some differences to account for... and
>> this is for both small performance improvements and, more importantly,
>> for correct functionality in some systems.
>>
>> Functionality first:
>>
>> One of the common differences found in various boards implementing eDP
>> and machines using an eDP panel is that many times the HPD line is not
>> connected. This *must* be accounted for: at startup, this specific IP
>> will raise a HPD interrupt (which should maybe be ignored... as it does
>> not appear to be a "real" event...) that will make the eDP panel to be
>> detected and to actually work but, after a suspend-resume cycle, there
>> will be no HPD interrupt (as there's no HPD line in my case!) producing
>> a functionality issue - specifically, the DP Link Training fails because
>> the panel doesn't get powered up, then it stays black and won't work
>> until rebooting the machine (or removing and reinserting the module I
>> think, but I haven't tried that).
>>
>> Now for.. both:
>> eDP panels are *e*DP because they are *not* removable (in the sense that
>> you can't unplug the cable without disassembling the machine, in which
>> case, the machine shall be powered down..!): this (correct) assumption
>> makes us able to solve some issues and to also gain a little performance
>> during PM operations.
>>
>> What was done here is:
>>   - Caching the EDID if the panel is eDP: we're always going to read the
>>     same data everytime, so we can just cache that (as it's small enough)
>>     shortening PM resume times for the eDP driver instance;
>>   - Always return connector_status_connected if it's eDP: non-removable
>>     means connector_status_disconnected can't happen during runtime...
>>     this also saves us some time and even power, as we won't have to
>>     perform yet another power cycle of the HW;
>>   - Added aux-bus support!
>>     This makes us able to rely on panel autodetection from the EDID,
>>     avoiding to add more and more panel timings to panel-edp and, even
>>     better, allowing to use one panel node in devicetrees for multiple
>>     variants of the same machine since, at that point, it's not important
>>     to "preventively know" what panel we have (eh, it's autodetected...!).
>>
>> This was tested on a MT8195 Cherry Tomato Chromebook (panel-edp on aux-bus)
> 
> Do you have panel-edp built as a module? If I have it built in, the panel
> can correctly display stuff. If I have it built as a module, the panel is
> correctly detected, but the panel stays black even if DRM thinks it is
> displaying stuff.
> 

I tested both. I'll recheck on a clean tree just to be sure...

> And it looks like EDID reading and panel power sequencing is still not
> working correctly, i.e. needs regulator-always-on?

Yeah that's still needed with this version, I'm still trying to get *at least*
some support upstreamed before refining it.

Cheers,
Angelo

> 
> ChenYu
> 
>> P.S.: For your own testing commodity, here's a reference devicetree:
>> &edp_tx {
>>          status = "okay";
>>
>>          pinctrl-names = "default";
>>          pinctrl-0 = <&edptx_pins_default>;
>>
>>          ports {
>>                  #address-cells = <1>;
>>                  #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>>                  port@0 {
>>                          reg = <0>;
>>                          edp_in: endpoint {
>>                                  remote-endpoint = <&dp_intf0_out>;
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>
>>                  port@1 {
>>                          reg = <1>;
>>                          edp_out: endpoint {
>>                                  data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
>>                                  remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>          };
>>
>>          aux-bus {
>>                  panel: panel {
>>                          compatible = "edp-panel";
>>                          power-supply = <&pp3300_disp_x>;
>>                          backlight = <&backlight_lcd0>;
>>                          port {
>>                                  panel_in: endpoint {
>>                                          remote-endpoint = <&edp_out>;
>>                                  };
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>          };
>> };
>>
>>
>> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (9):
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Cache EDID for eDP panel
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Move AUX and panel poweron/off sequence to function
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Always return connected status for eDP in .detect()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Always set cable_plugged_in at resume for eDP panel
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Change logging to dev for mtk_dp_aux_transfer()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Enable event interrupt only when bridge attached
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Use devm variant of drm_bridge_add()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Move AUX_P0 setting to
>>      mtk_dp_initialize_aux_settings()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Add support for embedded DisplayPort aux-bus
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: chunkuang.hu@kernel.org, nfraprado@collabora.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	kernel@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] MediaTek DisplayPort: support eDP and aux-bus
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:38:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da4847bb-d4b1-7810-3b5f-1200596b19fd@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXv+5HzQhoz0OUhifQC0vr44O5VwvuYnsHSA2jK0FjwJT3OBA@mail.gmail.com>

Il 07/07/23 10:23, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:30 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>>   - Set data lanes to idle to prevent stalls if bootloader didn't
>>     properly close the eDP port
>>   - Now using the .done_probing() callback for AUX bus to prevent
>>     probe deferral loops in case the panel-edp driver is a module
>>     as previously seen with another bridge driver (ANX7625) on
>>     some other SoCs (MT8192 and others)
>>   - Rebased over next-20230706
>>   - Dropped Chen-Yu's T-b tag on last patch as some logic changed
>>     (before, I wasn't using the .done_probing() callback).
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>>   - Added DPTX AUX block initialization before trying to communicate
>>     to stop relying on the bootloader keeping it initialized before
>>     booting Linux.
>>   - Fixed commit description for patch [09/09] and removed commented
>>     out code (that slipped from dev phase.. sorry!).
>>
>> This series adds "real" support for eDP in the mtk-dp DisplayPort driver.
>>
>> Explaining the "real":
>> Before this change, the DisplayPort driver did support eDP to some
>> extent, but it was treating it entirely like a regular DP interface
>> which is partially fine, after all, embedded DisplayPort *is* actually
>> DisplayPort, but there might be some differences to account for... and
>> this is for both small performance improvements and, more importantly,
>> for correct functionality in some systems.
>>
>> Functionality first:
>>
>> One of the common differences found in various boards implementing eDP
>> and machines using an eDP panel is that many times the HPD line is not
>> connected. This *must* be accounted for: at startup, this specific IP
>> will raise a HPD interrupt (which should maybe be ignored... as it does
>> not appear to be a "real" event...) that will make the eDP panel to be
>> detected and to actually work but, after a suspend-resume cycle, there
>> will be no HPD interrupt (as there's no HPD line in my case!) producing
>> a functionality issue - specifically, the DP Link Training fails because
>> the panel doesn't get powered up, then it stays black and won't work
>> until rebooting the machine (or removing and reinserting the module I
>> think, but I haven't tried that).
>>
>> Now for.. both:
>> eDP panels are *e*DP because they are *not* removable (in the sense that
>> you can't unplug the cable without disassembling the machine, in which
>> case, the machine shall be powered down..!): this (correct) assumption
>> makes us able to solve some issues and to also gain a little performance
>> during PM operations.
>>
>> What was done here is:
>>   - Caching the EDID if the panel is eDP: we're always going to read the
>>     same data everytime, so we can just cache that (as it's small enough)
>>     shortening PM resume times for the eDP driver instance;
>>   - Always return connector_status_connected if it's eDP: non-removable
>>     means connector_status_disconnected can't happen during runtime...
>>     this also saves us some time and even power, as we won't have to
>>     perform yet another power cycle of the HW;
>>   - Added aux-bus support!
>>     This makes us able to rely on panel autodetection from the EDID,
>>     avoiding to add more and more panel timings to panel-edp and, even
>>     better, allowing to use one panel node in devicetrees for multiple
>>     variants of the same machine since, at that point, it's not important
>>     to "preventively know" what panel we have (eh, it's autodetected...!).
>>
>> This was tested on a MT8195 Cherry Tomato Chromebook (panel-edp on aux-bus)
> 
> Do you have panel-edp built as a module? If I have it built in, the panel
> can correctly display stuff. If I have it built as a module, the panel is
> correctly detected, but the panel stays black even if DRM thinks it is
> displaying stuff.
> 

I tested both. I'll recheck on a clean tree just to be sure...

> And it looks like EDID reading and panel power sequencing is still not
> working correctly, i.e. needs regulator-always-on?

Yeah that's still needed with this version, I'm still trying to get *at least*
some support upstreamed before refining it.

Cheers,
Angelo

> 
> ChenYu
> 
>> P.S.: For your own testing commodity, here's a reference devicetree:
>> &edp_tx {
>>          status = "okay";
>>
>>          pinctrl-names = "default";
>>          pinctrl-0 = <&edptx_pins_default>;
>>
>>          ports {
>>                  #address-cells = <1>;
>>                  #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>>                  port@0 {
>>                          reg = <0>;
>>                          edp_in: endpoint {
>>                                  remote-endpoint = <&dp_intf0_out>;
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>
>>                  port@1 {
>>                          reg = <1>;
>>                          edp_out: endpoint {
>>                                  data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
>>                                  remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>          };
>>
>>          aux-bus {
>>                  panel: panel {
>>                          compatible = "edp-panel";
>>                          power-supply = <&pp3300_disp_x>;
>>                          backlight = <&backlight_lcd0>;
>>                          port {
>>                                  panel_in: endpoint {
>>                                          remote-endpoint = <&edp_out>;
>>                                  };
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>          };
>> };
>>
>>
>> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (9):
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Cache EDID for eDP panel
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Move AUX and panel poweron/off sequence to function
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Always return connected status for eDP in .detect()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Always set cable_plugged_in at resume for eDP panel
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Change logging to dev for mtk_dp_aux_transfer()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Enable event interrupt only when bridge attached
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Use devm variant of drm_bridge_add()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Move AUX_P0 setting to
>>      mtk_dp_initialize_aux_settings()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Add support for embedded DisplayPort aux-bus
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: chunkuang.hu@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
	airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com,
	nfraprado@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] MediaTek DisplayPort: support eDP and aux-bus
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:38:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da4847bb-d4b1-7810-3b5f-1200596b19fd@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXv+5HzQhoz0OUhifQC0vr44O5VwvuYnsHSA2jK0FjwJT3OBA@mail.gmail.com>

Il 07/07/23 10:23, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:30 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>>   - Set data lanes to idle to prevent stalls if bootloader didn't
>>     properly close the eDP port
>>   - Now using the .done_probing() callback for AUX bus to prevent
>>     probe deferral loops in case the panel-edp driver is a module
>>     as previously seen with another bridge driver (ANX7625) on
>>     some other SoCs (MT8192 and others)
>>   - Rebased over next-20230706
>>   - Dropped Chen-Yu's T-b tag on last patch as some logic changed
>>     (before, I wasn't using the .done_probing() callback).
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>>   - Added DPTX AUX block initialization before trying to communicate
>>     to stop relying on the bootloader keeping it initialized before
>>     booting Linux.
>>   - Fixed commit description for patch [09/09] and removed commented
>>     out code (that slipped from dev phase.. sorry!).
>>
>> This series adds "real" support for eDP in the mtk-dp DisplayPort driver.
>>
>> Explaining the "real":
>> Before this change, the DisplayPort driver did support eDP to some
>> extent, but it was treating it entirely like a regular DP interface
>> which is partially fine, after all, embedded DisplayPort *is* actually
>> DisplayPort, but there might be some differences to account for... and
>> this is for both small performance improvements and, more importantly,
>> for correct functionality in some systems.
>>
>> Functionality first:
>>
>> One of the common differences found in various boards implementing eDP
>> and machines using an eDP panel is that many times the HPD line is not
>> connected. This *must* be accounted for: at startup, this specific IP
>> will raise a HPD interrupt (which should maybe be ignored... as it does
>> not appear to be a "real" event...) that will make the eDP panel to be
>> detected and to actually work but, after a suspend-resume cycle, there
>> will be no HPD interrupt (as there's no HPD line in my case!) producing
>> a functionality issue - specifically, the DP Link Training fails because
>> the panel doesn't get powered up, then it stays black and won't work
>> until rebooting the machine (or removing and reinserting the module I
>> think, but I haven't tried that).
>>
>> Now for.. both:
>> eDP panels are *e*DP because they are *not* removable (in the sense that
>> you can't unplug the cable without disassembling the machine, in which
>> case, the machine shall be powered down..!): this (correct) assumption
>> makes us able to solve some issues and to also gain a little performance
>> during PM operations.
>>
>> What was done here is:
>>   - Caching the EDID if the panel is eDP: we're always going to read the
>>     same data everytime, so we can just cache that (as it's small enough)
>>     shortening PM resume times for the eDP driver instance;
>>   - Always return connector_status_connected if it's eDP: non-removable
>>     means connector_status_disconnected can't happen during runtime...
>>     this also saves us some time and even power, as we won't have to
>>     perform yet another power cycle of the HW;
>>   - Added aux-bus support!
>>     This makes us able to rely on panel autodetection from the EDID,
>>     avoiding to add more and more panel timings to panel-edp and, even
>>     better, allowing to use one panel node in devicetrees for multiple
>>     variants of the same machine since, at that point, it's not important
>>     to "preventively know" what panel we have (eh, it's autodetected...!).
>>
>> This was tested on a MT8195 Cherry Tomato Chromebook (panel-edp on aux-bus)
> 
> Do you have panel-edp built as a module? If I have it built in, the panel
> can correctly display stuff. If I have it built as a module, the panel is
> correctly detected, but the panel stays black even if DRM thinks it is
> displaying stuff.
> 

I tested both. I'll recheck on a clean tree just to be sure...

> And it looks like EDID reading and panel power sequencing is still not
> working correctly, i.e. needs regulator-always-on?

Yeah that's still needed with this version, I'm still trying to get *at least*
some support upstreamed before refining it.

Cheers,
Angelo

> 
> ChenYu
> 
>> P.S.: For your own testing commodity, here's a reference devicetree:
>> &edp_tx {
>>          status = "okay";
>>
>>          pinctrl-names = "default";
>>          pinctrl-0 = <&edptx_pins_default>;
>>
>>          ports {
>>                  #address-cells = <1>;
>>                  #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>>                  port@0 {
>>                          reg = <0>;
>>                          edp_in: endpoint {
>>                                  remote-endpoint = <&dp_intf0_out>;
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>
>>                  port@1 {
>>                          reg = <1>;
>>                          edp_out: endpoint {
>>                                  data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
>>                                  remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>          };
>>
>>          aux-bus {
>>                  panel: panel {
>>                          compatible = "edp-panel";
>>                          power-supply = <&pp3300_disp_x>;
>>                          backlight = <&backlight_lcd0>;
>>                          port {
>>                                  panel_in: endpoint {
>>                                          remote-endpoint = <&edp_out>;
>>                                  };
>>                          };
>>                  };
>>          };
>> };
>>
>>
>> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (9):
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Cache EDID for eDP panel
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Move AUX and panel poweron/off sequence to function
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Always return connected status for eDP in .detect()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Always set cable_plugged_in at resume for eDP panel
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Change logging to dev for mtk_dp_aux_transfer()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Enable event interrupt only when bridge attached
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Use devm variant of drm_bridge_add()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Move AUX_P0 setting to
>>      mtk_dp_initialize_aux_settings()
>>    drm/mediatek: dp: Add support for embedded DisplayPort aux-bus
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>




_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-10  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-06 12:30 [PATCH v4 0/9] MediaTek DisplayPort: support eDP and aux-bus AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Cache EDID for eDP panel AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Move AUX and panel poweron/off sequence to function AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Always return connected status for eDP in .detect() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Always set cable_plugged_in at resume for eDP panel AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Change logging to dev for mtk_dp_aux_transfer() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Enable event interrupt only when bridge attached AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Use devm variant of drm_bridge_add() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Move AUX_P0 setting to mtk_dp_initialize_aux_settings() AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/mediatek: dp: Add support for embedded DisplayPort aux-bus AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-06 12:30   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-07  8:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] MediaTek DisplayPort: support eDP and aux-bus Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-07-07  8:23   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-07-07  8:23   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-07-10  7:38   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2023-07-10  7:38     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-07-10  7:38     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da4847bb-d4b1-7810-3b5f-1200596b19fd@collabora.com \
    --to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.