All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
	ying.huang@intel.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	tim.c.chen@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: respect cpuset policy during page demotion
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:36:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da533477-da08-88cb-1e76-46364f1a6151@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026074343.6517-1-feng.tang@intel.com>

On 10/26/22 03:43, Feng Tang wrote:
> In page reclaim path, memory could be demoted from faster memory tier
> to slower memory tier. Currently, there is no check about cpuset's
> memory policy, that even if the target demotion node is not allowd
> by cpuset, the demotion will still happen, which breaks the cpuset
> semantics.
>
> So add cpuset policy check in the demotion path and skip demotion
> if the demotion targets are not allowed by cpuset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> ---
> Hi reviewers,
>
> For easy bisectable, I combined the cpuset change and mm change
> in one patch, if you prefer to separate them, I can turn it into
> 2 patches.
>
> Thanks,
> Feng
>
>   include/linux/cpuset.h |  6 ++++++
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   mm/vmscan.c            | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> index d58e0476ee8e..6fcce2bd2631 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ static inline void set_mems_allowed(nodemask_t nodemask)
>   	task_unlock(current);
>   }
>   
> +extern void cpuset_get_allowed_mem_nodes(struct cgroup *cgroup,
> +						nodemask_t *nmask);
>   #else /* !CONFIG_CPUSETS */
>   
>   static inline bool cpusets_enabled(void) { return false; }
> @@ -299,6 +301,10 @@ static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq)
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
> +static inline void cpuset_get_allowed_mem_nodes(struct cgroup *cgroup,
> +						nodemask_t *nmask)
> +{
> +}
>   #endif /* !CONFIG_CPUSETS */
>   
>   #endif /* _LINUX_CPUSET_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 3ea2e836e93e..cbb118c0502f 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -3750,6 +3750,35 @@ nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk)
>   	return mask;
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * Retrieve the allowed memory nodemask for a cgroup.
> + *
> + * Set *nmask to cpuset's effective allowed nodemask for cgroup v2,
> + * and NODE_MASK_ALL (means no constraint) for cgroup v1 where there
> + * is no guaranteed association from a cgroup to a cpuset.
> + */
> +void cpuset_get_allowed_mem_nodes(struct cgroup *cgroup, nodemask_t *nmask)
> +{
> +	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> +	struct cpuset *cs;
> +
> +	if (!is_in_v2_mode()) {
> +		*nmask = NODE_MASK_ALL;
> +		return;
> +	}

You are allowing all nodes to be used for cgroup v1. Is there a reason 
why you ignore v1?

> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	css = cgroup_e_css(cgroup, &cpuset_cgrp_subsys);
> +	if (css) {
> +		css_get(css);
> +		cs = css_cs(css);
> +		*nmask = cs->effective_mems;
> +		css_put(css);
> +	}
Since you are holding an RCU read lock and copying out the whole 
nodemask, you probably don't need to do a css_get/css_put pair.
> +
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
Cheers,

Longman


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Waiman Long <longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	ying.huang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	aneesh.kumar-tEXmvtCZX7AybS5Ee8rs3A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	tim.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	fengwei.yin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: respect cpuset policy during page demotion
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:36:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da533477-da08-88cb-1e76-46364f1a6151@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026074343.6517-1-feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On 10/26/22 03:43, Feng Tang wrote:
> In page reclaim path, memory could be demoted from faster memory tier
> to slower memory tier. Currently, there is no check about cpuset's
> memory policy, that even if the target demotion node is not allowd
> by cpuset, the demotion will still happen, which breaks the cpuset
> semantics.
>
> So add cpuset policy check in the demotion path and skip demotion
> if the demotion targets are not allowed by cpuset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Hi reviewers,
>
> For easy bisectable, I combined the cpuset change and mm change
> in one patch, if you prefer to separate them, I can turn it into
> 2 patches.
>
> Thanks,
> Feng
>
>   include/linux/cpuset.h |  6 ++++++
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   mm/vmscan.c            | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> index d58e0476ee8e..6fcce2bd2631 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ static inline void set_mems_allowed(nodemask_t nodemask)
>   	task_unlock(current);
>   }
>   
> +extern void cpuset_get_allowed_mem_nodes(struct cgroup *cgroup,
> +						nodemask_t *nmask);
>   #else /* !CONFIG_CPUSETS */
>   
>   static inline bool cpusets_enabled(void) { return false; }
> @@ -299,6 +301,10 @@ static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq)
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
> +static inline void cpuset_get_allowed_mem_nodes(struct cgroup *cgroup,
> +						nodemask_t *nmask)
> +{
> +}
>   #endif /* !CONFIG_CPUSETS */
>   
>   #endif /* _LINUX_CPUSET_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 3ea2e836e93e..cbb118c0502f 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -3750,6 +3750,35 @@ nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk)
>   	return mask;
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * Retrieve the allowed memory nodemask for a cgroup.
> + *
> + * Set *nmask to cpuset's effective allowed nodemask for cgroup v2,
> + * and NODE_MASK_ALL (means no constraint) for cgroup v1 where there
> + * is no guaranteed association from a cgroup to a cpuset.
> + */
> +void cpuset_get_allowed_mem_nodes(struct cgroup *cgroup, nodemask_t *nmask)
> +{
> +	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> +	struct cpuset *cs;
> +
> +	if (!is_in_v2_mode()) {
> +		*nmask = NODE_MASK_ALL;
> +		return;
> +	}

You are allowing all nodes to be used for cgroup v1. Is there a reason 
why you ignore v1?

> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	css = cgroup_e_css(cgroup, &cpuset_cgrp_subsys);
> +	if (css) {
> +		css_get(css);
> +		cs = css_cs(css);
> +		*nmask = cs->effective_mems;
> +		css_put(css);
> +	}
Since you are holding an RCU read lock and copying out the whole 
nodemask, you probably don't need to do a css_get/css_put pair.
> +
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
Cheers,

Longman


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-26  7:43 [PATCH] mm/vmscan: respect cpuset policy during page demotion Feng Tang
2022-10-26  7:43 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26  7:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26  7:49   ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26  8:00   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26  8:00     ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26  9:19     ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26  9:19       ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 10:42       ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 10:42         ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 11:02         ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 11:02           ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:08           ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 12:08             ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 12:21             ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:21               ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:35               ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-26 12:35                 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-27  9:02                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27  9:02                   ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 10:16                   ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-27 10:16                     ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-27 13:05                     ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 13:05                       ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 12:20       ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26 12:20         ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26 15:59         ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 15:59           ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-26 17:57           ` Yang Shi
2022-10-26 17:57             ` Yang Shi
2022-10-27  7:11             ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  7:11               ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  7:45               ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  7:45                 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  7:51                 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  7:51                   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27 17:55               ` Yang Shi
2022-10-27 17:55                 ` Yang Shi
2022-10-28  3:37                 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-28  3:37                   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-28  5:54                   ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-28  5:54                     ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-28 17:23                     ` Yang Shi
2022-10-28 17:23                       ` Yang Shi
2022-10-31  1:56                       ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  1:56                         ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  2:19                       ` Feng Tang
2022-10-31  2:19                         ` Feng Tang
2022-10-28  5:09                 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-28  5:09                   ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-10-28 17:16                   ` Yang Shi
2022-10-28 17:16                     ` Yang Shi
2022-10-31  1:53                     ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  1:53                       ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  6:47           ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  6:47             ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  7:10             ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27  7:10               ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27  7:39               ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  7:39                 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  8:01                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27  8:01                   ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27  9:31                   ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  9:31                     ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 12:29                     ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 12:29                       ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-27 23:22                       ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27 23:22                         ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  8:40                         ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31  8:40                           ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31  8:51                           ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  8:51                             ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-31  9:18                             ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31  9:18                               ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31 14:09                           ` Feng Tang
2022-10-31 14:09                             ` Feng Tang
2022-10-31 14:32                             ` Michal Hocko
2022-10-31 14:32                               ` Michal Hocko
2022-11-07  8:05                               ` Feng Tang
2022-11-07  8:05                                 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-07  8:17                                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-11-07  8:17                                   ` Michal Hocko
2022-11-01  3:17                     ` Huang, Ying
2022-11-01  3:17                       ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-26  8:26 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-10-26  8:26   ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-10-26  8:37   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26  8:37     ` Feng Tang
2022-10-26 14:36 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2022-10-26 14:36   ` Waiman Long
2022-10-27  5:57   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  5:57     ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  5:13 ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  5:13   ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  5:49   ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  5:49     ` Feng Tang
2022-10-27  6:05     ` Huang, Ying
2022-10-27  6:05       ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da533477-da08-88cb-1e76-46364f1a6151@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.