All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390"
@ 2020-07-16 14:39 Seth Forshee
  2020-07-16 17:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
  2020-07-16 19:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2020-07-16 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, KP Singh,
	Ilya Leoshkevich
  Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel

This reverts commit 3203c9010060806ff88c9989aeab4dc8d9a474dc.

The s390 bpf JIT previously had a restriction on the maximum
program size, which required some tests in test_bpf to be flagged
as expected failures. The program size limitation has been removed,
and the tests now pass, so these tests should no longer be flagged.

Fixes: d1242b10ff03 ("s390/bpf: Remove JITed image size limitations")
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 20 --------------------
 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index a5fddf9ebcb7..ca7d635bccd9 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -5275,31 +5275,21 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 	{	/* Mainly checking JIT here. */
 		"BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations",
 		{ },
-#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
-		CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
-#else
 		CLASSIC,
-#endif
 		{ },
 		{
 			{  1, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT },
 			{ 10, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT }
 		},
 		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns6,
-		.expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
 	},
 	{	/* Mainly checking JIT here. */
 		"BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations",
 		{ },
-#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
-		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
-#else
 		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
-#endif
 		{ },
 		{ { 1, 0 }, { 10, 0 } },
 		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns7,
-		.expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
 	},
 	{	/* Mainly checking JIT here. */
 		"BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test",
@@ -5350,28 +5340,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 	{
 		"BPF_MAXINSNS: exec all MSH",
 		{ },
-#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
-		CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
-#else
 		CLASSIC,
-#endif
 		{ 0xfa, 0xfb, 0xfc, 0xfd, },
 		{ { 4, 0xababab83 } },
 		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns13,
-		.expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
 	},
 	{
 		"BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id",
 		{ },
-#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
-		CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
-#else
 		CLASSIC,
-#endif
 		{ },
 		{ { 1, 0xbee } },
 		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_ld_abs_get_processor_id,
-		.expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
 	},
 	/*
 	 * LD_IND / LD_ABS on fragmented SKBs
-- 
2.27.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390"
  2020-07-16 14:39 [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390" Seth Forshee
@ 2020-07-16 17:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
  2020-07-16 19:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Leoshkevich @ 2020-07-16 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Seth Forshee, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
	Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko,
	John Fastabend, KP Singh
  Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel

On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 09:39 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> This reverts commit 3203c9010060806ff88c9989aeab4dc8d9a474dc.
> 
> The s390 bpf JIT previously had a restriction on the maximum
> program size, which required some tests in test_bpf to be flagged
> as expected failures. The program size limitation has been removed,
> and the tests now pass, so these tests should no longer be flagged.
> 
> Fixes: d1242b10ff03 ("s390/bpf: Remove JITed image size limitations")
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> ---
>  lib/test_bpf.c | 20 --------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> index a5fddf9ebcb7..ca7d635bccd9 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> @@ -5275,31 +5275,21 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
>  	{	/* Mainly checking JIT here. */
>  		"BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations",
>  		{ },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> -		CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
>  		CLASSIC,
> -#endif
>  		{ },
>  		{
>  			{  1, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT },
>  			{ 10, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT }
>  		},
>  		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns6,
> -		.expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
>  	},
>  	{	/* Mainly checking JIT here. */
>  		"BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations",
>  		{ },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> -		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
>  		CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
> -#endif
>  		{ },
>  		{ { 1, 0 }, { 10, 0 } },
>  		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns7,
> -		.expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
>  	},
>  	{	/* Mainly checking JIT here. */
>  		"BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test",
> @@ -5350,28 +5340,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
>  	{
>  		"BPF_MAXINSNS: exec all MSH",
>  		{ },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> -		CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
>  		CLASSIC,
> -#endif
>  		{ 0xfa, 0xfb, 0xfc, 0xfd, },
>  		{ { 4, 0xababab83 } },
>  		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns13,
> -		.expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
>  	},
>  	{
>  		"BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id",
>  		{ },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> -		CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
>  		CLASSIC,
> -#endif
>  		{ },
>  		{ { 1, 0xbee } },
>  		.fill_helper = bpf_fill_ld_abs_get_processor_id,
> -		.expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
>  	},
>  	/*
>  	 * LD_IND / LD_ABS on fragmented SKBs

Thank you for the fix!
I tested it and it indeed fixes these 4 failures.

I will have a look at the remaining 8 tomorrow.

Reviewed-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390"
  2020-07-16 14:39 [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390" Seth Forshee
  2020-07-16 17:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
@ 2020-07-16 19:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2020-07-16 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Seth Forshee, Alexei Starovoitov, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, KP Singh,
	Ilya Leoshkevich
  Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel

On 7/16/20 4:39 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> This reverts commit 3203c9010060806ff88c9989aeab4dc8d9a474dc.
> 
> The s390 bpf JIT previously had a restriction on the maximum
> program size, which required some tests in test_bpf to be flagged
> as expected failures. The program size limitation has been removed,
> and the tests now pass, so these tests should no longer be flagged.
> 
> Fixes: d1242b10ff03 ("s390/bpf: Remove JITed image size limitations")
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>

Applied, thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-16 19:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-16 14:39 [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390" Seth Forshee
2020-07-16 17:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-16 19:02 ` Daniel Borkmann

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.