* [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390"
@ 2020-07-16 14:39 Seth Forshee
2020-07-16 17:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-16 19:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2020-07-16 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, KP Singh,
Ilya Leoshkevich
Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel
This reverts commit 3203c9010060806ff88c9989aeab4dc8d9a474dc.
The s390 bpf JIT previously had a restriction on the maximum
program size, which required some tests in test_bpf to be flagged
as expected failures. The program size limitation has been removed,
and the tests now pass, so these tests should no longer be flagged.
Fixes: d1242b10ff03 ("s390/bpf: Remove JITed image size limitations")
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 20 --------------------
1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index a5fddf9ebcb7..ca7d635bccd9 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -5275,31 +5275,21 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
"BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations",
{ },
-#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
- CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
-#else
CLASSIC,
-#endif
{ },
{
{ 1, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT },
{ 10, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT }
},
.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns6,
- .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
},
{ /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
"BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations",
{ },
-#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
- CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
-#else
CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
-#endif
{ },
{ { 1, 0 }, { 10, 0 } },
.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns7,
- .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
},
{ /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
"BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test",
@@ -5350,28 +5340,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{
"BPF_MAXINSNS: exec all MSH",
{ },
-#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
- CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
-#else
CLASSIC,
-#endif
{ 0xfa, 0xfb, 0xfc, 0xfd, },
{ { 4, 0xababab83 } },
.fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns13,
- .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
},
{
"BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id",
{ },
-#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
- CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
-#else
CLASSIC,
-#endif
{ },
{ { 1, 0xbee } },
.fill_helper = bpf_fill_ld_abs_get_processor_id,
- .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
},
/*
* LD_IND / LD_ABS on fragmented SKBs
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390"
2020-07-16 14:39 [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390" Seth Forshee
@ 2020-07-16 17:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-16 19:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Leoshkevich @ 2020-07-16 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Seth Forshee, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko,
John Fastabend, KP Singh
Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 09:39 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> This reverts commit 3203c9010060806ff88c9989aeab4dc8d9a474dc.
>
> The s390 bpf JIT previously had a restriction on the maximum
> program size, which required some tests in test_bpf to be flagged
> as expected failures. The program size limitation has been removed,
> and the tests now pass, so these tests should no longer be flagged.
>
> Fixes: d1242b10ff03 ("s390/bpf: Remove JITed image size limitations")
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> ---
> lib/test_bpf.c | 20 --------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> index a5fddf9ebcb7..ca7d635bccd9 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> @@ -5275,31 +5275,21 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
> { /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations",
> { },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> - CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
> CLASSIC,
> -#endif
> { },
> {
> { 1, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT },
> { 10, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT }
> },
> .fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns6,
> - .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
> },
> { /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations",
> { },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> - CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
> CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
> -#endif
> { },
> { { 1, 0 }, { 10, 0 } },
> .fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns7,
> - .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
> },
> { /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test",
> @@ -5350,28 +5340,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
> {
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: exec all MSH",
> { },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> - CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
> CLASSIC,
> -#endif
> { 0xfa, 0xfb, 0xfc, 0xfd, },
> { { 4, 0xababab83 } },
> .fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns13,
> - .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
> },
> {
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id",
> { },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> - CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
> CLASSIC,
> -#endif
> { },
> { { 1, 0xbee } },
> .fill_helper = bpf_fill_ld_abs_get_processor_id,
> - .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
> },
> /*
> * LD_IND / LD_ABS on fragmented SKBs
Thank you for the fix!
I tested it and it indeed fixes these 4 failures.
I will have a look at the remaining 8 tomorrow.
Reviewed-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390"
2020-07-16 14:39 [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390" Seth Forshee
2020-07-16 17:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
@ 2020-07-16 19:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2020-07-16 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Seth Forshee, Alexei Starovoitov, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko, John Fastabend, KP Singh,
Ilya Leoshkevich
Cc: netdev, bpf, linux-kernel
On 7/16/20 4:39 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> This reverts commit 3203c9010060806ff88c9989aeab4dc8d9a474dc.
>
> The s390 bpf JIT previously had a restriction on the maximum
> program size, which required some tests in test_bpf to be flagged
> as expected failures. The program size limitation has been removed,
> and the tests now pass, so these tests should no longer be flagged.
>
> Fixes: d1242b10ff03 ("s390/bpf: Remove JITed image size limitations")
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-16 19:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-16 14:39 [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390" Seth Forshee
2020-07-16 17:53 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-16 19:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.