[U-Boot] MT76XX-driver

[U-Boot] MT76XX-driver

[Frank Wunderlich]

Hi,
 
can you please rename the driver (and the commit-message) to mt7622 because this is a MIPS-driver and not compatible with e.g. mt7623 (arm).
 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/988140/
 
regards Frank

[U-Boot] MT76XX-driver

[Stefan Roese]

Hi Frank,

On 23.10.18 16:38, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> can you please rename the driver (and the commit-message) to
> mt7622 because this is a MIPS-driver and not compatible with
> e.g. mt7623 (arm).
>   
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/988140/

Okay, will do.

Thanks,
Stefan

[U-Boot] MT76XX-driver

[Weijie Gao]

Hi Stefan,

mt7622 is an ARMv8 soc and its ethernet is different from mt7622 anyway.
It's better to name it mt7628-eth or rt5350-eth because mt7628/mt7688
actually reuse the ethernet from rt5350.

In fact arch/mips/mach-mt7620 should be named mach-mt7628 as mt7628
and mt7628 have so many differences in low level codes and drivers.

BTW, the offical mt7622 u-boot support will be submitted later by MTK.
mt7621 may also be submitted.

Best Regards,

Weijie
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> 于2018年10月23日周二 下午11:02写道：
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 23.10.18 16:38, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > can you please rename the driver (and the commit-message) to
> > mt7622 because this is a MIPS-driver and not compatible with
> > e.g. mt7623 (arm).
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/988140/
>
> Okay, will do.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot



-- 
_______________________________________________
lede-devel mailing list
lede-devel at lists.infradead.org

[U-Boot] MT76XX-driver

[Stefan Roese]

Hi Weijie,

On 23.10.18 17:43, Weijie Gao wrote:
> mt7622 is an ARMv8 soc and its ethernet is different from mt7622 anyway.
> It's better to name it mt7628-eth or rt5350-eth because mt7628/mt7688
> actually reuse the ethernet from rt5350.

Okay, I'll send another version shortly - probably using 7628, as
I don't want to introduce rt5350 now.
  
> In fact arch/mips/mach-mt7620 should be named mach-mt7628 as mt7628
> and mt7628 have so many differences in low level codes and drivers.

Yes, thanks. I'll probably follow-up with renaming the base MIPS
port to mt7628 soon.

This MediaTek SoC naming is very inconsistent and "foggy". At least
for me.
  
> BTW, the offical mt7622 u-boot support will be submitted later by MTK.
> mt7621 may also be submitted.

That's good to hear. Do you know if there is any interest from MTK
to work on the new mainline MT7628 / 7688 MIPS in mainline? I would
very much welcome this.

Thanks,
Stefan