Re: [PATCH v1 03/10] clk: at91: pmc: Support backup for programmable clocks

[Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>]

On 14/09/2017 at 09:41, romain izard wrote:
> 2017-09-13 19:03 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>:
>> On 13/09/2017 at 14:29:35 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2017 at 17:35, Romain Izard wrote:
>>>> From: Romain Izard <romain.izard@mobile-devices.fr>
>>>>
>>>> Save and restore the System Clock and Programmable Clock register for
>>>> the backup use case.
>>>
>>> "System Clock" seems to be handled in another patch.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 5 +++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
>>>> index 07dc2861ad3f..5421b03553ec 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
>>>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static struct
>>>>     u32 pcr[PMC_MAX_IDS];
>>>>     u32 audio_pll0;
>>>>     u32 audio_pll1;
>>>> +   u32 pckr[3];
>>>
>>> Some products have different numbers of PCK (only 2 on at91sam9x5 for
>>> instance)...
>>>
>>
>> My opinion is that it will be time to change that when multiple SoCs will
>> need to save their registers.
>>
> For the next version, I'll add a #define. But as this code requires a
> device tree node with the compatible string "atmel,sama5d2-pmc", I believe
> that we can ignore other chips for now.

Fair enough, let's go for this.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre