All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lznuaa@gmail.com" <lznuaa@gmail.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] drivers/perf: imx_ddr: Add ddr performance counter support
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:08:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc519703-dcd8-7238-c50c-25f265f9a07b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555447156-28306-2-git-send-email-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

On 16/04/2019 21:39, Frank Li wrote:
[...]
> +static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	struct resource *iomem;
> +	char *name;
> +	char *hpname;
> +	int num;
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 irq;
> +	const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> +		of_match_device(imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
> +
> +	iomem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, iomem);
> +	if (IS_ERR(base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> +	np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> +	pmu = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pmu)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	num = ddr_perf_init(pmu, base, &pdev->dev);
> +
> +	name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "ddr%d", num);
> +	if (!name)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hpname = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> +				"perf/imx/ddr%d:online", num);
> +	if (!hpname)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pmu->flags = (uintptr_t) of_id->data;
> +
> +	cpumask_set_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), &pmu->cpu);
> +	ret = cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, hpname, NULL,
> +					 ddr_perf_offline_cpu);
> +
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cpuhp_setup_state_multi failed\n");
> +		goto ddr_perf_err;
> +	}

Since you don't seem to ever remove this state again, this looks like it 
would make subsequent loads of the module always fail after it's been 
loaded and unloaded once - have you tried that?

Robin.

> +
> +	pmu->cpuhp_state = ret;
> +
> +	/* Register the pmu instance for cpu hotplug */
> +	cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu->node);
> +
> +	ret = perf_pmu_register(&(pmu->pmu), name, -1);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto ddr_perf_err;
> +
> +	/* Request irq */
> +	irq = of_irq_get(np, 0);
> +	if (irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get irq: %d", irq);
> +		ret = irq;
> +		goto ddr_perf_irq_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> +					ddr_perf_irq_handler,
> +					IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +					DDR_PERF_DEV_NAME,
> +					pmu);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Request irq failed: %d", ret);
> +		goto ddr_perf_irq_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +ddr_perf_irq_err:
> +	perf_pmu_unregister(&(pmu->pmu));
> +
> +ddr_perf_err:
> +	if (pmu->cpuhp_state)
> +		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu->node);
> +
> +	dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "i.MX8 DDR Perf PMU failed (%d), disabled\n", ret);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ddr_perf_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu->node);
> +	perf_pmu_unregister(&pmu->pmu);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver imx_ddr_pmu_driver = {
> +	.driver         = {
> +		.name   = "imx-ddr-pmu",
> +		.of_match_table = imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids,
> +	},
> +	.probe          = ddr_perf_probe,
> +	.remove         = ddr_perf_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init imx_ddr_pmu_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&imx_ddr_pmu_driver);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(imx_ddr_pmu_init);
> +
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lznuaa@gmail.com" <lznuaa@gmail.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/4] drivers/perf: imx_ddr: Add ddr performance counter support
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:08:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc519703-dcd8-7238-c50c-25f265f9a07b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555447156-28306-2-git-send-email-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

On 16/04/2019 21:39, Frank Li wrote:
[...]
> +static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	struct resource *iomem;
> +	char *name;
> +	char *hpname;
> +	int num;
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 irq;
> +	const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> +		of_match_device(imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
> +
> +	iomem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, iomem);
> +	if (IS_ERR(base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> +	np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> +	pmu = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pmu)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	num = ddr_perf_init(pmu, base, &pdev->dev);
> +
> +	name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "ddr%d", num);
> +	if (!name)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hpname = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> +				"perf/imx/ddr%d:online", num);
> +	if (!hpname)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pmu->flags = (uintptr_t) of_id->data;
> +
> +	cpumask_set_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), &pmu->cpu);
> +	ret = cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, hpname, NULL,
> +					 ddr_perf_offline_cpu);
> +
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cpuhp_setup_state_multi failed\n");
> +		goto ddr_perf_err;
> +	}

Since you don't seem to ever remove this state again, this looks like it 
would make subsequent loads of the module always fail after it's been 
loaded and unloaded once - have you tried that?

Robin.

> +
> +	pmu->cpuhp_state = ret;
> +
> +	/* Register the pmu instance for cpu hotplug */
> +	cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu->node);
> +
> +	ret = perf_pmu_register(&(pmu->pmu), name, -1);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto ddr_perf_err;
> +
> +	/* Request irq */
> +	irq = of_irq_get(np, 0);
> +	if (irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get irq: %d", irq);
> +		ret = irq;
> +		goto ddr_perf_irq_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> +					ddr_perf_irq_handler,
> +					IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +					DDR_PERF_DEV_NAME,
> +					pmu);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Request irq failed: %d", ret);
> +		goto ddr_perf_irq_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +ddr_perf_irq_err:
> +	perf_pmu_unregister(&(pmu->pmu));
> +
> +ddr_perf_err:
> +	if (pmu->cpuhp_state)
> +		cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu->node);
> +
> +	dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "i.MX8 DDR Perf PMU failed (%d), disabled\n", ret);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ddr_perf_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu->node);
> +	perf_pmu_unregister(&pmu->pmu);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver imx_ddr_pmu_driver = {
> +	.driver         = {
> +		.name   = "imx-ddr-pmu",
> +		.of_match_table = imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids,
> +	},
> +	.probe          = ddr_perf_probe,
> +	.remove         = ddr_perf_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init imx_ddr_pmu_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&imx_ddr_pmu_driver);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(imx_ddr_pmu_init);
> +
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-24 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-16 20:39 [PATCH V5 1/4] dt-bindings: perf: imx8-ddr: add imx8qxp ddr performance monitor Frank Li
2019-04-16 20:39 ` Frank Li
2019-04-16 20:39 ` [PATCH V5 2/4] drivers/perf: imx_ddr: Add ddr performance counter support Frank Li
2019-04-16 20:39   ` Frank Li
2019-04-24 10:58   ` Will Deacon
2019-04-24 10:58     ` Will Deacon
2019-04-24 19:13     ` Zhi Li
2019-04-24 19:13       ` Zhi Li
2019-04-25 17:16     ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-25 17:16       ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-24 11:08   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-04-24 11:08     ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-16 20:39 ` [PATCH V5 3/4] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: added ddr performance monitor nodes Frank Li
2019-04-16 20:39   ` Frank Li
2019-04-16 20:39 ` [PATCH V5 4/4] MAINTAINERS: Added imx DDR performonitor driver maintainer information Frank Li
2019-04-16 20:39   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc519703-dcd8-7238-c50c-25f265f9a07b@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=lznuaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.