All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Iyappan Subramanian <iyappan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Keyur Chudgar <keyur@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
	Stephane Le Provost <stephane.leprovost@mediatek.com>,
	Pedro Tsai <pedro.tsai@mediatek.com>,
	Andrew Perepech <andrew.perepech@mediatek.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] net: phy: delay PHY driver probe until PHY registration
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:49:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dca54c57-a3bd-1147-63b2-4631194963f0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622135106.GK4560@sirena.org.uk>

On 6/22/20 6:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:39:40PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
>> The PHY subsystem cannot be the first to run into this problem, that
>> you need a device structure to make use of the regulator API, but you
>> need the regulator API to probe the device. How do other subsystems
>> work around this?
> 
> If the bus includes power management for the devices on the bus the
> controller is generally responsible for that rather than the devices,
> the devices access this via facilities provided by the bus if needed.
> If the device is enumerated by firmware prior to being physically
> enumerable then the bus will generally instantiate the device model
> device and then arrange to wait for the physical device to appear and
> get joined up with the device model device, typically in such situations
> the physical device might appear and disappear dynamically at runtime
> based on what the driver is doing anyway.

In premise there is nothing that prevents the MDIO bus from taking care
of the regulators, resets, prior to probing the PHY driver, what is
complicated here is that we do need to issue a read of the actual PHY to
know its 32-bit unique identifier and match it with an appropriate
driver. The way that we have worked around this with if you do not wish
such a hardware access to be made, is to provide an Ethernet PHY node
compatible string that encodes that 32-bit OUI directly. In premise the
same challenges exist with PCI devices/endpoints as well as USB, would
they have reset or regulator typically attached to them.

> 
>> Maybe it is time to add a lower level API to the regulator framework?
> 
> I don't see any need for that here, this is far from the only thing
> that's keyed off a struct device and having the device appear and
> disappear at runtime can make things like runtime PM look really messy
> to userspace.
> 
> We could use a pre-probe stage in the device model for hotpluggable
> buses in embedded contexts where you might need to bring things out of
> reset or power them up before they'll appear on the bus for enumeration
> but buses have mostly handled that at their level.
> 

That sounds like a better solution, are there any subsystems currently
implementing that, or would this be a generic Linux device driver model
addition that needs to be done?
-- 
Florian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
	Iyappan Subramanian <iyappan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Andrew Perepech <andrew.perepech@mediatek.com>,
	Stephane Le Provost <stephane.leprovost@mediatek.com>,
	Keyur Chudgar <keyur@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Pedro Tsai <pedro.tsai@mediatek.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] net: phy: delay PHY driver probe until PHY registration
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:49:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dca54c57-a3bd-1147-63b2-4631194963f0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622135106.GK4560@sirena.org.uk>

On 6/22/20 6:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:39:40PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
>> The PHY subsystem cannot be the first to run into this problem, that
>> you need a device structure to make use of the regulator API, but you
>> need the regulator API to probe the device. How do other subsystems
>> work around this?
> 
> If the bus includes power management for the devices on the bus the
> controller is generally responsible for that rather than the devices,
> the devices access this via facilities provided by the bus if needed.
> If the device is enumerated by firmware prior to being physically
> enumerable then the bus will generally instantiate the device model
> device and then arrange to wait for the physical device to appear and
> get joined up with the device model device, typically in such situations
> the physical device might appear and disappear dynamically at runtime
> based on what the driver is doing anyway.

In premise there is nothing that prevents the MDIO bus from taking care
of the regulators, resets, prior to probing the PHY driver, what is
complicated here is that we do need to issue a read of the actual PHY to
know its 32-bit unique identifier and match it with an appropriate
driver. The way that we have worked around this with if you do not wish
such a hardware access to be made, is to provide an Ethernet PHY node
compatible string that encodes that 32-bit OUI directly. In premise the
same challenges exist with PCI devices/endpoints as well as USB, would
they have reset or regulator typically attached to them.

> 
>> Maybe it is time to add a lower level API to the regulator framework?
> 
> I don't see any need for that here, this is far from the only thing
> that's keyed off a struct device and having the device appear and
> disappear at runtime can make things like runtime PM look really messy
> to userspace.
> 
> We could use a pre-probe stage in the device model for hotpluggable
> buses in embedded contexts where you might need to bring things out of
> reset or power them up before they'll appear on the bus for enumeration
> but buses have mostly handled that at their level.
> 

That sounds like a better solution, are there any subsystems currently
implementing that, or would this be a generic Linux device driver model
addition that needs to be done?
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
	Iyappan Subramanian <iyappan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Andrew Perepech <andrew.perepech@mediatek.com>,
	Stephane Le Provost <stephane.leprovost@mediatek.com>,
	Keyur Chudgar <keyur@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Pedro Tsai <pedro.tsai@mediatek.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] net: phy: delay PHY driver probe until PHY registration
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:49:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dca54c57-a3bd-1147-63b2-4631194963f0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622135106.GK4560@sirena.org.uk>

On 6/22/20 6:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:39:40PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
>> The PHY subsystem cannot be the first to run into this problem, that
>> you need a device structure to make use of the regulator API, but you
>> need the regulator API to probe the device. How do other subsystems
>> work around this?
> 
> If the bus includes power management for the devices on the bus the
> controller is generally responsible for that rather than the devices,
> the devices access this via facilities provided by the bus if needed.
> If the device is enumerated by firmware prior to being physically
> enumerable then the bus will generally instantiate the device model
> device and then arrange to wait for the physical device to appear and
> get joined up with the device model device, typically in such situations
> the physical device might appear and disappear dynamically at runtime
> based on what the driver is doing anyway.

In premise there is nothing that prevents the MDIO bus from taking care
of the regulators, resets, prior to probing the PHY driver, what is
complicated here is that we do need to issue a read of the actual PHY to
know its 32-bit unique identifier and match it with an appropriate
driver. The way that we have worked around this with if you do not wish
such a hardware access to be made, is to provide an Ethernet PHY node
compatible string that encodes that 32-bit OUI directly. In premise the
same challenges exist with PCI devices/endpoints as well as USB, would
they have reset or regulator typically attached to them.

> 
>> Maybe it is time to add a lower level API to the regulator framework?
> 
> I don't see any need for that here, this is far from the only thing
> that's keyed off a struct device and having the device appear and
> disappear at runtime can make things like runtime PM look really messy
> to userspace.
> 
> We could use a pre-probe stage in the device model for hotpluggable
> buses in embedded contexts where you might need to bring things out of
> reset or power them up before they'll appear on the bus for enumeration
> but buses have mostly handled that at their level.
> 

That sounds like a better solution, are there any subsystems currently
implementing that, or would this be a generic Linux device driver model
addition that needs to be done?
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-22  9:37 [PATCH 00/15] net: phy: correctly model the PHY voltage supply in DT Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 01/15] net: phy: arrange headers in mdio_bus.c alphabetically Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:12   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-23 18:54   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 18:54     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 18:54     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 02/15] net: phy: arrange headers in mdio_device.c alphabetically Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:12   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-23 18:56   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 18:56     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 18:56     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 03/15] net: phy: arrange headers in phy_device.c alphabetically Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:12   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-23 18:57   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 18:57     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 18:57     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 04/15] net: mdio: add a forward declaration for reset_control to mdio.h Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:13   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-23 18:59   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 18:59     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 18:59     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 05/15] net: phy: reset the PHY even if probe() is not implemented Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:16   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-23 19:14   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 19:14     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 19:14     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-24 16:22     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 16:22       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 16:22       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 06/15] net: phy: mdio: reset MDIO devices " Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:18   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-23 19:16   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 19:16     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 19:16     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 07/15] net: phy: split out the PHY driver request out of phy_device_create() Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 08/15] net: phy: check the PHY presence in get_phy_id() Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 09/15] net: phy: delay PHY driver probe until PHY registration Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:39   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-22 13:51     ` Mark Brown
2020-06-23 19:49       ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2020-06-23 19:49         ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 19:49         ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-24  9:43         ` Mark Brown
2020-06-24  9:43           ` Mark Brown
2020-06-24  9:43           ` Mark Brown
2020-06-24 13:48           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 13:48             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 13:48             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 16:06             ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-24 16:06               ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-24 16:06               ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-24 16:35               ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 16:35                 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 16:35                 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 16:50               ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-24 16:50                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-24 16:50                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-24 18:59                 ` Robin Murphy
2020-06-24 18:59                   ` Robin Murphy
2020-06-24 18:59                   ` Robin Murphy
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 10/15] net: phy: simplify phy_device_create() Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 11/15] net: phy: drop get_phy_device() Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 19:29   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 12/15] dt-bindings: mdio: add phy-supply property to ethernet phy node Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-23 19:39   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 19:39     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-23 19:39     ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 13/15] net: phy: mdio: add support for PHY supply regulator Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-23  9:30     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 14/15] net: phy: add PHY regulator support Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-22 13:29   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-23  9:41     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-23  9:42       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-23  9:46         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-23  9:56           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-23 16:27             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-23 16:27               ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-23 16:27               ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-06-24 16:57               ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-24 16:57                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-24 16:57                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-24 18:12                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-24 18:12                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-24 18:12                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-22  9:37 ` [PATCH 15/15] ARM64: dts: mediatek: add a phy regulator to pumpkin-common.dtsi Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dca54c57-a3bd-1147-63b2-4631194963f0@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew.perepech@mediatek.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fparent@baylibre.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=iyappan@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=keyur@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pedro.tsai@mediatek.com \
    --cc=quan@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=stephane.leprovost@mediatek.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.